Alternative Reservoir and Balloon Placement in Complex Patients Undergoing Urologic Prostheses
- 75 Downloads
Purpose of Review
To evaluate contemporary rationale and techniques for ectopic reservoir/balloon placement in complex urologic prosthetics patients.
Recent studies have demonstrated that ectopic reservoir placement is safe and durable when compared to traditional space of Retzius placement. Complex patients exist on a spectrum from those with a previously violated retropubic space, to those with bilaterally obscured external inguinal rings and/or multiple prior prosthetic reservoirs. Ectopic placement has become more commonplace and accepted as a viable alternative strategy over the past 7 years. Concerns relating to reservoir palpability and long-term outcomes have been allayed. The risk of deep pelvic complications appears to be negligible after both placement or removal of ectopic reservoirs when performed by experienced implanters even in the most complex patient.
Ectopic placement of prosthetic balloons and reservoirs offers unique advantages and has become commonplace in contemporary prosthetic urology practice.
KeywordsInflatable penile prosthesis Reservoir Pressure regulating balloon Ectopic
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Travis J. Pagliara reports consultancies for Coloplast and Boston Scientific.
Daniel W. Smith declares no potential conflicts of interest.
Boyd R. Viers reports honoraria from Coloplast and consultancy for Boston Scientific.
Allen F. Morey reports honoraria from Coloplast and Boston Scientific.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
- 5.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. FDA PMA supplemental apprival. Approval for changes in the labeling of the Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis surgical protocol to incorporate ectopic placement. Silver Spring: US Food and Drug Administration; 2015.Google Scholar
- 15.Karpman E, Brant WO, Kansas B, Bella AJ, Jones LA, Eisenhart E, et al. Reservoir alternate surgical implantation technique: preliminary outcomes of initial PROPPER study of low profile or spherical reservoir implantation in submuscular location or traditional prevesical space. J Urol. 2015;193(1):239–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Pagliara TJ, Viers BR, Scott J, Morey AF. Extended experience with high submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs: refined technique for optimal outcomes. Urol Practice. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urpr.2017.06.006.
- 23.Rozanski AT, Viers BR, Shakir NA, Pagliara TJ, Scott JM, Morey AF. Is removal of the pressure-regulating balloon necessary after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion? Urology. 2017;113:225–29.Google Scholar