Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complications Following Radical Nephroureterectomy

  • Urothelial Cancer (A Sagalowsky, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the gold standard treatment strategy for bulky, high-grade, or muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Many patients with UTUC who require RNU are elderly, comorbid, and at risk for perioperative complications. Recognition of likelihood and extent of such complications guides preoperative counseling, decision-making process for major surgery, and perioperative care. A critical review of such data is essential, given the inevitable impact of complications on hospital duration, need for readmission, resource utilization, and costs associated with management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Raman JD, Scherr DS. Management of patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007;4(8):432–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raman JD, Messer J, Sielatycki JA, Hollenbeak CS. Incidence and survival of patients with carcinoma of the ureter and renal pelvis in the USA, 1973-2005. BJU Int. 2011;107(7):1059–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Campbell MF. Campbell-Walsh urology/editor-in-chief, Alan J. Wein; [editors, Louis R. Kavoussi et al.]. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.

  4. Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF, Kamat AM, Zigeuner R, Kikuchi E, et al. Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer. 2009;115(6):1224–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roupret M, Babjuk M, Comperat E, Zigeuner R, Sylvester R, Burger M, et al. European guidelines on upper tract urothelial carcinomas: 2013 update. Eur Urol. 2013;63(6):1059–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin YK, Deliere A, Lehman K, Harpster LE, Kaag MG, Raman JD. Critical analysis of 30 day complications following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Can J Urol. 2014;21(4):7369–73. A critical review of almost 100 consecutive RNU operations to define that the risk of complications following surgery is approximately 40 %. The principal risk factor for complication was poor performance status.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rassweiler JJ, Schulze M, Marrero R, Frede T, Palou Redorta J, Bassi P. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: is it better than open surgery? Eur Urol. 2004;46(6):690–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanna N, Sun M, Trinh QD, Hansen J, Bianchi M, Montorsi F, et al. Propensity-score-matched comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a national series. Eur Urol. 2012;61(4):715–21. Nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) study with propensity-score matched analysis suggesting a lower complication rate for laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ni S, Tao W, Chen Q, Liu L, Jiang H, Hu H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2012;61(6):1142–53. Systematic review of 21 studies comparing open and laparoscopic nephrouretectomy that indicates no significant difference in intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative complications between approaches.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Yu C, Horiguchi H, Nishimatsu H, Fushimi K, et al. Perioperative outcome comparisons between open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy among a population-based cohort from 2010 to 2012. J Endourol Endourol Soc. 2015;29(7):770–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanske J, Sanchez A, Schmid M, Meyer CP, Abdollah F, Feldman AS, et al. A comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in open versus minimally invasive nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: analysis of 896 patients from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. J Endourol Endourol Soc. 2015;29(9):1052–8. A manuscript highlighting that MIRNU has similar overall complication rates compared to ORNU. MINU, however, was associated with a decreased risk of blood transfusions, thromboembolic events, re-intervention, and overall LOS compared to ONU.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tinay I, Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F, Leow JJ, Allard CB, Rodriguez D, Wang Y, et al. Trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes and costs for nephroureterectomies in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): a 10-year population-based analysis. BJU Int. 2015.

  13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajput MZ, Kamat AM, Clavell-Hernandez J, Siefker-Radtke AO, Grossman HB, Dinney CP, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy and regional lymphadenectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Urology. 2011;78(1):61–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Raman JD, Lin YK, Kaag M, Atkinson T, Crispen P, Wille M, et al. High rates of advanced disease, complications, and decline of renal function after radical nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol. 2014;32(1):47. e9-14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Connolly SS, Rochester MA, Baus. Nephroureterectomy surgery in the UK in 2012: British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) registry data. BJU Int. 2015;116(5):780–90. Population-based registry of perioperative outcomes following nephroureterectomy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin YK, Klatte T, Shariat SF, Krabbe LM, Margulis V, Arnouk A, et al. Preoperative nomogram to predict perioperative complications after radical nephroureterectomy. http://www.aua2015.org/abstracts/files/presenter_LinYuKuan.cfm.

  18. Park R, Rjepaj C, Raman JD. The comprehensive complications index (CCI) is more accurate than the Clavien Dindo grading system in predicting length of stay following radical nephroureterectomy. http://www.aua2015.org/abstracts/files/presenter_ParkRosa.cfm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay D. Raman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Jay D. Raman and Syed M. Jafri each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Urothelial Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raman, J.D., Jafri, S.M. Complications Following Radical Nephroureterectomy. Curr Urol Rep 17, 36 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-016-0595-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-016-0595-1

Keywords

Navigation