Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contemporary Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Renal Angiomyolipomas

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery (V Bird, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Renal angiomyolipomas (AMLs) are benign renal masses that are often asymptomatic and detected incidentally. However, treatment might be necessary in symptomatic presentations or when the mass exceeds 4 cm in size. While the goal of management for renal AMLs is to relieve symptoms and prevent hemorrhage, a priority is renal function preservation, especially given the propensity of these lesions to recur. The traditional treatment for renal AMLs is renal angioembolization or surgical excision of the lesion. With advancements in minimally invasive surgery, several other modalities have now emerged for nephron sparing approaches. These include angioembolization, laparoscopic and percutaneous ablative therapies such as radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and microwave ablation, and pure or robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Given the relatively low frequency of renal AMLs requiring treatment, much of the available literature on these minimally invasive approaches is largely extrapolative, based on series on small renal masses, i.e. renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This report is based on a thorough review of the published literature to date on the minimally invasive treatment and outcomes of renal AMLs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance

  1. Stillwell TJ, Gomez MR, Kelalis PP. Renal lesions in tuberous sclerosis. J Urol. 1987;138(3):477–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson CP, Sanda MG. Contemporary diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol. 2002;168(4 Pt 1):1315–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bissler JJ, Kingswood JC. Renal angiomyolipomata. Kidney Int. 2004;66(3):924–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lemaitre L, Claudon M, Dubrulle F, Mazeman E. Imaging of angiomyolipomas. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1997;18(2):100–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seyam RM, Bissada NK, Kattan SA, et al. Changing trends in presentation, diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma: comparison of sporadic and tuberous sclerosis complex-associated forms. Urology. 2008;72(5):1077–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dickinson M, Ruckle H, Beaghler M, Hadley HR. Renal angiomyolipoma: optimal treatment based on size and symptoms. Clin Nephrol. 1998;49(5):281–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oesterling JE, Fishman EK, Goldman SM, Marshall FF. The management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol. 1986;135(6):1121–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fazeli-Matin S, Novick AC. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal angiomyolipoma. Urology. 1998;52(4):577–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Han YM, Kim JK, Roh BS, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: selective arterial embolization—effectiveness and changes in angiomyogenic components in long-term follow-up. Radiology. 1997;204(1):65–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. • Kothary N, Soulen MC, Clark TW, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: long-term results after arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16(1):45–50. One of the longest term follow-up data post-RAE for AMLs. The authors underscore the significance of life-long surveillance for recurrences of AMLs in patients with tuberous sclerosis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lenton J, Kessel D, Watkinson AF. Embolization of renal angiomyolipoma: immediate complications and long-term outcomes. Clin Radiol. 2008;63(8):864–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Villalta JD, Sorensen MD, Durack JC, Kerlan RK, Stoller ML. Selective arterial embolization of angiomyolipomas: a comparison of smaller and larger embolic agents. J Urol. 2011;186(3):921–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamlin JA, Smith DC, Taylor FC, McKinney JM, Ruckle HC, Hadley HR. Renal angiomyolipomas: long-term follow-up of embolization for acute hemorrhage. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1997;48(3):191–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. • Bishay VL, Crino PB, Wein AJ, et al. Embolization of giant renal angiomyolipomas: technique and results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(1):67–72. This paper reviews the prophylactic treatment of 23 large AMLs (> 10 cm) with renal angioembolization alone, while preserving renal function. This highlights the unique applicability of RAE in the management of very large AMLs, while achieving the goal of renal function preservation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prevoo W, van den Bosch MA, Horenblas S. Radiofrequency ablation for treatment of sporadic angiomyolipoma. Urology. 2008;72(1):188–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacomides L, Ogan K, Watumull L, Cadeddu JA. Laparoscopic application of radio frequency energy enables in situ renal tumor ablation and partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2003;169(1):49–53. discussion 53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sooriakumaran P, Gibbs P, Coughlin G, et al. Angiomyolipomata: challenges, solutions, and future prospects based on over 100 cases treated. BJU Int. 2010;105(1):101–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. • Castle SM, Gorbatiy V, Ekwenna O, Young E, Leveillee RJ. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy for renal angiomyolipoma (AML): an alternative to angio-embolization and nephron-sparing surgery. BJU Int. 2012;109(3):384–7. The authors review the largest series on radiofrequency ablation of renal AMLs.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Delworth MG, Pisters LL, Fornage BD, von Eschenbach AC. Cryotherapy for renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma. J Urol. 1996;155(1):252–4. discussion 254–255.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Remer EM, Weinberg EJ, Oto A, O’Malley CM, Gill IS. MR imaging of the kidneys after laparoscopic cryoablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(3):635–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Byrd GF, Lawatsch EJ, Mesrobian HG, Begun F, Langenstroer P. Laparoscopic cryoablation of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol. 2006;176(4 Pt 1):1512–6. discussion 1516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson SC, Graham S, D’Agostino H, Elmajian DA, Shingleton WB. Percutaneous renal cryoablation of angiomyolipomas in patients with solitary kidneys. Urology. 2009;74(6):1246–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wen CC, Nakada SY. Energy ablative techniques for treatment of small renal tumors. Curr Opin Urol. 2006;16(5):321–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Laeseke PF, Lee FT, Sampson LA, van der Weide DW, Brace CL. Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the kidney: high-power triaxial antennas create larger ablation zones than similarly sized internally cooled electrodes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(9):1224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guan W, Bai J, Liu J, et al. Microwave ablation versus partial nephrectomy for small renal tumors: intermediate-term results. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106(3):316–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. • Msezane L, Chang A, Shikanov S, et al. Laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery in the management of angiomyolipoma: a single center experience. J Endourol. 2010;24(4):583–7. The authors contend that pre-operative imaging has poor postive predictive value and low sensitivity in diagnosing AMLs.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Simmons MN, Chung BI, Gill IS. Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur Urol. 2009;55(1):199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lane BR, Aydin H, Danforth TL, et al. Clinical correlates of renal angiomyolipoma subtypes in 209 patients: classic, fat poor, tuberous sclerosis associated and epithelioid. J Urol. 2008;180(3):836–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schips L, Berardinelli F, Neri F, Tamburro FR, Cindolo L. Laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy without ischemia for very small, exophytic renal masses: surgical details and functional outcomes. Eur Urol. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.008

  30. Bolufer E, López-Fontana G, Castillo OA. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy (Da Vinci) in an angiomyolipoma associated to Wünderlich Syndrome. Arch Esp Urol. 2012;65(9):831–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Sri Sivalingam & Stephen Y. Nakada

Authors
  1. Sri Sivalingam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen Y. Nakada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Y. Nakada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sivalingam, S., Nakada, S.Y. Contemporary Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Renal Angiomyolipomas. Curr Urol Rep 14, 147–153 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-013-0311-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-013-0311-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation