Skip to main content

Current use of penile implants in erectile dysfunction

Abstract

Penile implants became popular with the introduction of effective models more than 30 years ago. Today they play a secondary but definitive role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction at times when more conservative therapies have failed. Improvements in reducing the incidence of infection, treating infection with antiseptic washes, enhancing device longevity, and instituting new techniques to manage complicated implantation procedures have made them more acceptable to patients. Although penile implants are the least often chosen and most invasive treatment for erectile dysfunction, they have the highest satisfaction rate—in the range of 80% to 90%—among both patients and partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.

    Small MP, Carrion HM, Gordon JA: Small carrion penile Prosthesis: New management of impotence. Urology 1974, 2:80 -82.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW: Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable prosthesis. Urology 1975, 5:479–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Stanley GE, Bivalacqua TJ, Hellstrom WJ: Penile prosthetic trends in the era of effective oral erectogenic agents. South Med J 2000, 76:1153–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM: Penile prosthesis infections. Int J Impot Res 2001, 13:326–328.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wilson SK, Delk JR II: Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol 1994, 153:659–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bishop JR, Moul JW, Sehelnik SA, et al.: Use of glycoslylated hemoglobin to identify diabetics at high risk for penile prosthesis infections. J Urol 1992, 147:386–388.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wilson SK, Carson CC, Cleves MA, Delk JR: Quantifying risk of penile prosthesis infection with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. J Urol 1998, 159:1539–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nickel JC, Heaton J, Morales A, Costerton JW: Bacterial biofilm in persistent penile prosthesis-associated infection. J Urol 1988, 135:586–588.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Moncada I, Hernandez C, Jara J, et al.: Buckling of cylinders may cause prolonged penile pain after prosthesis implantation: a case control study using magnetic resonance imaging of the penis. J Urol 1999, 161:193–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Brant MD, Ludlow JK, Mulcahy JJ: Prosthesis salvage operation: Immediate replacement of infected penile prosthesis. J Urol 1996, 155:155–157.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mulcahy JJ: Long-term experience with salvage of infected penile implants. J Urol 2000, 163:481–482.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jarow JP: Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. J Urol 1996, 156:402–406.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Henry GD, Wilson SK, Delk JR, et al.: Penile prosthesis culture during revision surgery: multicenter study. J Urol 2004, 172:153–156. This study demonstrates the high positive culture rate of implant cavities during revision surgery. Attention to being aggressive in eradicating these subclinical infections is prudent.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fitch WP, Borges FD: Infection prophylaxis for revision of penile prosthetic devices. J Urol 2000, 163(Suppl 998):225.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wilson SK, Henry GD, Delk JR, Cleves MA: Prevention of infection in revision of penile prosthesis using antibiotic coated prosthesis and Mulcahy salvage protocol. J Urol 2003, 69(Suppl 1264):325.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Darouiche RO, Smith JA Jr, Hanna H, et al.: Efficacy of antimicrobial-impregnated bladder catheters in reducing catheter association bacteriuria: a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Urology 1999, 54:976–981.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Raad I, Darouiche R, Hachem R, et al.: Antibiotics and prevention of microbial colonization of catheters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995, 39:2397–2400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wilson SK, Delk JR, Henry GD: Short-term follow-up for enhanced American Medical Systems CX prosthesis. J Urol 2002, 169(Suppl 1333A).

  19. 19.

    Carson CC: Efficacy of antibiotic impregnation of inflatable prostheses in decreasing infection in original implants. J Urol 2004, 171:1611–1614. This reference points to the success in reducing infection associated with penile implant placement when antibacterial medication adherent to the prosthesis parts is brought into the wound.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wolter CE, Hellstrom WJG: The hydrophilic-coated inflatable penile prosthesis: 1-year experience. J Sex Med 2004, 1:221–224.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mulcahy JJ: Distal corporoplasty for lateral extrusion of penile prosthesis cylinders. J Urol 1999, 161:193–195.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ball TP: Surgical repair of penile “SST” deformity. Urology 1980, 15:603–604.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Smith CP, Kraus SR, Boone TB: Management of impending penile prosthesis erosion with polytetrafluoroethlene distal windsock graft. J Urol 1998, 160:2037–2040.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Carson CC, Noh CH: Distal penile prosthesis extrusion: treatment with distal corporoplasty or gortex windsock reinforcement. Int J Impot Res 2002, 14:81–84.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wilson SK, Delk JR: A new treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1994, 152:1121–1123.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR: Long-term follow-up of treatment of Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 2001, 165:825–829.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mulcahy JJ, Rowland RG: Tunica wedge excision to correct penile curvature associated with inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1987, 138:63–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Palese MA, Burnett AL: Corporoplasty using pericardium allograft (Tutoplast) with complex penile prosthesis surgery. Urology 2001, 58:1049–1052.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Leungwattanakij S, Bivalacqua TJ, Reddy S, Hellstrom WJG: Long-term follow-up on the use of pericardial graft in the surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res 2001, 13:183–186.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Colombo F, Guarneri J, Kartalas-Goumas E, Austoni E:Prosthesis implant and penile enlargement. Int J Impot Res 2002, 14(Suppl 4):125.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A: Mechanical reliability, safety and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: Results of a two center study. J Urol 2001, 166:932–937.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Carmiganani G, et al.: AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: A long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2000, 37:50–55.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chaing HS, Wu CC, Wen TC: Ten years of experience with penile prosthesis implantation in Taiwanese patients. J Urol 2000, 163:476–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Montorsi F, Guazzoni B, Barbieri L, et al.: AMS 700 CX inflatable penile implants for Peyronie’s disease: Functional results, morbidity and patient-partner satisfaction. Int J Impot Res 1996, 8:81–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John J. Mulcahy MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulcahy, J.J., Wilson, S.K. Current use of penile implants in erectile dysfunction. Curr Urol Rep 7, 485–489 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-006-0059-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Erectile Dysfunction
  • Tunica Albuginea
  • Penile Prosthesis
  • Corporal Body
  • High Satisfaction Rate