Abstract
Historically, the choice of sling material for the treatment of urinary incontinence has been based on the surgeon’s preference and experience. In general, pelvic surgeons have not differentiated artificial graft materials by their inherent qualities or for biocompatibility in the female pelvis and vaginal wall. The introduction of new artificial graft materials and new methods of implantation for the correction of genuine stress incontinence has generated renewed interest in the “pros and cons” associated with nonabsorbable material use. In this review, we discuss and differentiate sling materials and techniques. We consider some of the physical and biologic qualities of artificial graft materials, present theories and practices associated with the successful use of permanent grafts, and discuss the natural evolution of artificial graft slings to the current use of the tension-free vaginal tape and Suprapubic Arc Sling System (American Medical Systems, Minneapolis, MN).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Clemens JQ, DeLancey JO, Faerber GJ, et al.: Urinary tract erosions after synthetic pubovaginal slings: diagnosis and management strategy. Urology 2000, 56:589–595.
Meschia M, Pifarotti P, Bernasconi F, et al.: Tension-free vaginal tape: analysis of outcomes and complications in 404 stress incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001, 12(Suppl 2):S24-S27.
Morehead JM, Holt RG: Soft-tissue response to synthetic biomaterials. Otolargyngol Clin North Am 1994, 27:195–201.
Avtan L, Avci C, Bulut T, Fourtanier G: Mesh infections after laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997, 7:192–195.
Miller K, Junger W: Ileocutaneous fistula formation following laparoscopic polypropylene mesh hernia repair. Surg Endosc 1997, 11:772–773.
Pourdeyhimi B: Porosity of surgical mesh fabrics: new technology. J Biomed Mater Res 1989, 23(A1 Suppl):145–152.
Iglesia CB, Fenner DE, Brubaker L: The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1997, 8:105–115. This is an excellent review of the published results of mesh use in gynecologic surgery. However, it should be noted that the review omits reports from the urologic stress incontinence literature. There are multiple tables that analyze cure rates and complications by the type of material and procedure.
Debodinance P, Cosson M, Burlet GL: Tolerance of synthetic tissues in touch with vaginal scars: review to the point of 287 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999, 87:23–30.
Falconer C, Soderberg M, Blomgren B, Ulmsten U: Influence of different sling materials on connective tissue metabolism is stress urinary incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001, 12(Suppl 2):S19–23.
Klutke JJ, Carlin BI, Klutke CG: The tension-free vaginal tape procedure: correction of stress incontinence with minimal alteration in proximal urethral mobility. Urology 2000, 55:512–514. This article presents information on the anatomic findings following midurethral suspension. The persistence of bladder neck motion is documented in patients who are continent, and the absence of obstructive symptoms is also noted.
Nilsson JC, Kuuva N, Falconer M, et al.: Long-term results of the tension free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001, 12(Suppl 2):S5–8.
Rezapour M, Falconer C, Ulmsten U: Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in stress incontinent women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD):a long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001, 12(Suppl 2):S12–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Staskin, D.R., Plzak, L. Synthetic slings: Pros and cons. Curr Urol Rep 3, 414–417 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-002-0087-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-002-0087-3