Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The valve bladder: Etiology and outcome

  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The infravesical obstruction created by posterior urethral valves produces a series of structural, biochemical, and functional changes in these boys’ bladders that begins during fetal life. Any change can be irreversible and result in the alterations in bladder function that can be found in some of these patients. Bladder instability, poor compliance, and myogenic failure are the three most common urodynamic patterns and are also responsible for some of these patients’ poor long-term prognosis. Treatment of bladder dysfunction in these patients is basically directed toward improving their kidney function prognosis and also to avoid the urinary incontinence presented secondarily by some valve bladders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Dinneen MD, Duffy PG: Posterior urethral valves. Br J Urol 1996, 78:275–281.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Glassberg KI, Schneider M, Haller JO, et al.: Observations on persistently dilated ureter after posterior urethral valve ablation. Urology 1982, 20:20–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell ME: Persistent ureteral dilatation following valve resection. Dial Pediatr Urol 1982, 5:8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peters CA, Vasavada S, Dator D, et al.: The effect of obstruction on the developing bladder. J Urol 1992, 148:491–496.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Peters C: Congenital bladder obstruction: research strategies and directions. (Muscle, matrix and bladder function). Adv Exp Med Biol 1995, 385:117–130.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim KM, Kogan BA, Massad CA, et al.: Collagen and elastin in the obstructed fetal bladder. J Urol 1991, 146:528–531.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peters CA, Bolkier M, Bauer SB, et al.: The urodynamic consequences of posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1990, 144:122–126.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith GH, Duckett JW: Urethral lesions in infants and children. In Adult and Pediatric Urology, edn 3. Edited by Gillenwater JY, Grayhack JT, Howards SS, Duckett JW. St. Louis: Mosby Year-Book; 1996:2411–2431.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duckett JW: Are “valve bladders” congenital or iatrogenic? Br J Urol 1997, 79:271–275. This paper discusses bladder dysfunction in patients with PUV. The authors suggest that valve bladder is an iatrogenic phenomenon that results from the overuse of high urinary diversion.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanagho E: Congenital obstructed bladders: fate after prolonged defunctionalization. J Urol 1974, 111:102–109.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Close CE, Carr MC, Burns MW, et al.: Lower urinary tract changes after early valve ablation in neonates and infants: is early diversion warranted? J Urol 1997, 157:984–988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith GH, Canning DA, Schulman SL, et al.: The long term outcome of posterior urethral valves treated with primary valve ablation and observation. J Urol 1996, 155:1730–1734.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jayanthi VR, McLorie GA, Khoury AE, et al.: The effect of temporary cutaneous diversion on ultimate bladder function. J Urol 1995, 15:889–892.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khoury AE, Houle AM, McLorie GA, et al.: Cutaneous vesicostomy effect on bladder’s eventual function. Dial Ped Urol 1990, 13:4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim YH, Horowitz M, Combs A, et al.: Comparative urodynamic findings after primary valve ablation, vesicostomy or proximal diversion. J Urol 1996, 156:673–676.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaureguizar E, López-Pereira P, Martinez-Urrutia MJ, et al.: Does neonatal pyeloureterostomy worsen bladder function in children with posterior urethral valves? J Urol 2000, 164:1031–1034. This study demonstrates that temporary high diversion does not affect bladder function adversely over the long term.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dinneen M: The relationship between renal and vesical function in boys with posterior urethral valves [Thesis]. In Cork, Ireland: University College of Cork; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Gennaro M, Mosiello G, Capitanucci ML, et al.: Early detection of bladder dysfunction following posterior urethral valves ablation. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1996, 6:163–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Holmdahl G, Sillen U, Hanson E, et al.: Bladder dysfunction in boys with posterior urethral valves before and after puberty. J Urol 1996, 155:694–698.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. De Gennaro M, Capitanucci ML, Capoza N, et al.: Detrusor hypocontractility in children with posterior urethral valves arises before puberty. Br J Urol 1998, 81:81–85. This paper suggests that different types of bladder dysfunction in PUV patients are no more than variations on the same basic pattern that would, with time, develop into detrusor failure.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Koff SA: Relationship between dysfunctional voiding and reflux. J Urol 1992, 148:1703–1705.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Churchill BM, Khoury AE, McLorie GA: Neurogenic bladder: a clinical approach based on fundamental biohydraulics. Acta Urol Belg 1989, 57:475–495.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Weiss R, Biancani D: Rationale for ureteral tapering. Urology 1982, 20:482–487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Bordon TA, et al.: Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol 1981, 126:205–209.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Connor JP, Burbige KA: Long-term urinary continence and renal function in neonates with posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1990, 144:1209–1211.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Parkhouse HF, Barrat TM, Dillon MJ, et al.: Long-term outcome of boys with posterior urethral valves. Br J Urol 1988, 62:59–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Warshaw BL, Hymes LC, Trulock TS, et al.: Prognostic features in infants with obstructive uropathy due to posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1985, 133:240–243.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nguyen HT, Peters CA: Long-term complications of posterior urethral valves. Br J Urol 1999, 83:23–28. This is an excellent review of long-term considerations in patients with PUV.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nijman RJM, Scholtmeijer RJ, Groenewegen AAM: Urodynamic studies in boys with posterior urethral valves [abstract]. AAP annual meeting 1991. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1991:42.

    Google Scholar 

  30. López-Pereira P, Martinez-Urrutia MJ, Espinosa L: Bladder dysfunction as a prognostic factor in patients with posterior urethral valves. Br J Urol 2001, in press. This study investigates the extent to which different types of bladder dysfunction can affect long-term renal function. Poor bladder compliance and myogenic failure had the worst prognosis.

  31. Reinberg Y, Gonzalez R, Fryd D, et al.: The outcome of renal transplantation in children with posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1988, 140:1491–1495.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Salomon L, Fontaine E, Gagnadoux M-F, et al.: Posterior urethral valves: long-term renal function consequences after transplantation. J Urol 1997, 157:992–995. This paper retrospectively compares the outcomes of renal transplantation among patients with PUVs and with malformation uropathies (controls). A statistically significant increase in serum creatinine was noted at 10 years in children with PUVs but not in control patients.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Churchill BM, Sheldon CA, McLorie GA, et al.: Factors influencing patient and graft survival in 300 cadaveric pediatric renal transplants. J Urol 1988, 140:1129–1131.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bryant JE, Joseph DB, Kohaut CE, et al.: Renal transplantation in children with posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1991, 146:1585–1587.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. López-Pereira P, Jaureguizar E, Martinez-Urrutia MJ, et al.: Does treatment of bladder dysfunction prior to renal transplant improve outcome in patients with posterior urethral valves? Pediatr Transplant 2000, 4:118–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cass A, Stephens F: Posterior urethral valves: diagnosis and management. J Urol 1974, 112:519–525.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kurth K, Allman E, Schroder E: Major and minor complications of posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1981, 126:517–519.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Whitaker RH, Keeton JE, Williams DI: Posterior urethral valves: a study of urinary control after operation. J Urol 1972, 108:167–171.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Egami K, Durham SE: A study of the sequelae of posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1982, 127:84–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bauer SB, Dieppa RA, Labib KK, et al.: The bladder in boys with posterior urethral valves: A urodynamic assessment. J Urol 1979, 121:769–773.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mitrofanoff P: Cystostomie continente trans-appendiculaire dans le traitement des vessies neurologiques. Chir Ped 1980, 21:297–305.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kajbafzadeh AM, Quinn FM, Duffy PG, et al.: Augmentationcystoplasty in boys with posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1995, 154:874–877.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. De Badiola F, Ruiz E, Puigdevall J, et al.: Sigmoideocistoplastia seromuscular. Rev Iberoamericana Urol Ped 1999, 1:12–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaureguizar, E., López-Pereira, P. & Martinez-Urrutia, M.J. The valve bladder: Etiology and outcome. Curr Urol Rep 3, 115–120 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-002-0021-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-002-0021-8

Keywords

Navigation