Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physical examination of the knee

  • Published:
Current Sports Medicine Reports

Abstract

Even with the rapid advancement in technology and medical imaging, there is still no substitute for the history and physical examination that can be obtained from a patient. With a well-performed history and physical, the majority of pathology can be determined prior to any expensive imaging or surgical procedures. The knee is one of the most commonly injured joints, and its function is critical to basic ambulation and participation in sports, work, and activities of daily living. This article reviews the key concepts to a complete evaluation of the knee and highlights aspects of the physical examination and radiographie imaging that best aid in diagnosing knee pathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J: Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:592–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith BW, Green GA: Acute knee injuries: part I. History and physical examination. Am Fam Physician 1995, 51:615–621.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson JL, O’Malley PG, Kroenke K: Evaluation of acute knee pain in primary care. Ann Intern Med 2003, 139:575–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ross G, Deconciliis GP, Choi K, Scheller AD: Evaluation and treatment of acute posterolateral corner/anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:2–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ritchie JR, Miller MD, Harner CD: History and physical examination of the knee. In Knee Surgery. Edited by Fu FH, Harner CD, Vince KG. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hosea TM, Tria AJ: Physical examination of the knee: clinical. In Ligament and Extensor Mechanism Injuries of the Knee: Diagnosis and Treatment. Edited by Scott WN. St. Louis: Mosby; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoppenfeld S: Physical Examination of the Spine and Extremities. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calmbach WL, Hutchens M: Evaluation of patients presenting with knee pain: part I. History, physical examination, radiographs, and laboratory tests. Am Fam Physician 2003, 68:907–912.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fanelli GC, Orcutt DR, Edson CJ: The multiple-ligament injured knee: Evaluation, treatment, and results. Arthroscopy 2005, 21:471–486. Excellent comprehensive systematic article describing the multiligament-injured knee on proper evaluation, treatment, and results of repair.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boden BP, Pearsall AW, Garrett WE Jr, Feagin IA In Patellofemoral instability: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1997, 5:47–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arendt EA, Fithian DC, Cohen E: Current concepts of lateral patella dislocation. Clin Sports Med 2002, 21:499–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fulkerson JP, Kalenak A, Rosenberg TD: Patellofemoral pain. Instr. Course Lect 1992, 41:57–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Montgomery TJ, Savoie FH, White JL, et al.: Orthopedic management of knee dislocations. Comparison of surgical reconstruction and immobilization. Am J Knee Surg 1995, 8:97–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chhabra A, Cha PS, Rihn JA, et al.: Surgical management of knee dislocations. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(Suppl 1):1–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miranda FE, Dennis JW, Beldenz HC, et al: Confirmation of the safety and accuracy of physical examination in the evaluation of knee dislocation for the injury of the popliteal artery: a prospective study. J Trauma 2002, 52:247–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katz JW, Fingeroth RJ: The diagnostic accuracy of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament comparing the Lachman test, the anterior drawer sign, and the pivot shift test in acute and chronic knee injuries. Am J Sports Med 1986, 14:88–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J: Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopaedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:592–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jonsson T, Althoff B, Peterson L, Renstrom P: Clinical diagnosis of ruptures of the anterior drawer ligament: a comparative study of the Lachman test and the anterior drawer sign. Am J Sports Med 1982, 10:100–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Donaldson WF III, Warren RF, Wickiewicz T: A comparison of acute anterior cruciate ligament examinations. Initial versus examination under anesthesia. Am J Sports Med 1985, 13:5–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitsou A, Vallianatos P: Clinical diagnosis of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament a comparison between the Lachman test and the anterior drawer sign. Injury 1988, 19:427–428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim SI, Kim HK: Reliability of the anterior drawer test, the pivot shift test, and the Lachman test. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 317:237–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Galway RD, Beaupre A, Macintosh DL: Pivot shift. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972, 54:763.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lucie RS, Wiedel JD, Messner DG: The acute pivot shift: clinical correlation. Am J Sports Med 1984, 12:189–191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bach BR Jr, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL: The pivot shift phenomenon: results and description of a modified clinical test for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 1988, 16:571–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fetto JF, Marshall JL: Injuy to the anterior cruciate ligament producing the pivot shift sign. J Bone Joint Surg 1979, 61:710–714.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hochstein P, Schmickal T, Grutzner PA, Wentzensen A: [Diagnostic and incidence of the rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament]. Unfallchirurg 1999, 102:753–762.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller MD, Bergfeld IA: The posterior cruciate ligament injured knee: principles of evaluation and treatment. AAOS Instr Course Lect 1999, 48:199–207.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Harner CD, Hoher J: Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligaments injuries: Current concepts. Am J Sports Med 1998, 26:471–482. Comprehensive overview of PCL injuries that describes proper examination, grading, and treatments.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rubinstein RA Jr, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, et al: The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 1994, 22:550–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Barnett P, Sachs R: Use of the quadriceps active test to diagnose posterior cruciate-ligament disruption and measure posterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988, 70:386–391.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Eren OT: The accuracy of joint line tenderness by physical examination in the diagnosis of meniscal tears. Arthroscopy 2003, 19:850–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Solomon DH, Simel DL, Bates DW, et al: The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of the physical examination. JAMA 2001, 286:1610–1620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jerosch I, Riemer S: How good are clinical investigative procedures for diagnosing meniscus lesions? Sportverletz Sportschaden 2004, 18:59–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu SH, Osti L, Henry M, Bocchi L: The diagnosis of acute complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Comparison of MRI, arthrometry and clinical examination. J Bone Joint SurgBr 1995, 77:586–588.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Evans PJ, Bell GD, Frank C: Prospective evaluation of the McMurray test. Am J Sports Med 1993, 21:604–608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stratford PW, Binkley J: A review of the McMurray test: definition, interpretation, and clinical usefulness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995, 22:116–120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Harner CD, Miller MD, Irrgang JJ: Management of the stiff knee after trauma and ligament reconstruction. In Traumatic Disorders of the Knee. Edited by Siliski JM. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1994:364.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Margheritini F, Mancini L, Mauro CS, Mariani PP: Stress radiography for quantifying posterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Arthroscopy 2003, 19:706–711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fairbank TJ: Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1948, 30:664–670.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sanders TG, Miller MD: A systematic approach to magnetic resonance imaging interpretation of sports medicine injuries of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2005, 33:131–148. Comprehensive review of MRI of the knee that reviews common findings in sports-related injuries involving the ligaments, tendons, menisci, osseous structures, and articular surfaces. Gives an excellent systematic approach to reviewing MRI images of the knee and other pathology.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orndorff, D.G., Hart, J.A. & Miller, M.D. Physical examination of the knee. Curr Sports Med Rep 4, 243–248 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11932-005-0003-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11932-005-0003-y

Keywords

Navigation