Gelbard MK, Dorey F, James K: The natural history of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 1990, 144:1376–1379.
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Montorsi F, Salonia A, Maga T, et al.: Evidence-based assessment of long-term results of plaque incision and vein grafting for Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 2000, 163:1704–1708. This study highlights the need to wait 1 year after disease stabilization to perform surgery. In 6% of cases, relapses occurred 6 months after surgery, suggesting a new Peyronie’s disease episode rather than nonstabilized disease episode.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Usta MF, Bivalacqua TJ, Tokatli Z et al.: Stratification of penile vascular pathologies in patients with Peyronie’s disease and in men with erectile dysfunction according to age: a comparative study. J Urol 2004, 172:259–262. This study highlighted the strong association between Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Schaeffer EM, Jarow JP Jr, Vrablic J, Jarow JP: Duplex ultrasonography detects clinically significant anomalies of penile arterial vasculature affecting surgical approach to penile straightening. Urology 2006, 67:166–169. The strong association of vascular anomaly supports the indication of this noninvasive method that is associated with drug-induced erection testing to analyze penile deformity and rigidity. The study provides important clues to prevent postoperative ED.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Kendirci M, Nowfar S, Gur S, et al.: The relationship between the type of penile abnor-mality and penile vascular status in patients with Peyronie’s Disease. J Urol 2005, 174:632–635.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Usta MF, Bivalacqua TJ, Sanabria J, et al.: Patient and partner satisfaction and long-term results after surgical treatment for Peyronie’s disease. Urology 2003, 62:105–109. A relevant study highlighting no increase in complication rates when using reconstruction with pericardial grafting concomitantly with penile prosthesis implantation.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Levine LA, Lenting EL: A surgical algorithm for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 1997, 158:2149–2152. Highlighted the importance of subjective rigidity evaluation as reported by the patient and its correlation to objective rigidity as assessed by the physician.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Tornehl CK, Carson CC: Surgical alternatives for treating Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int 2004, 94:774–783. An extensive review of surgical procedures for Peyronie’s disease.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Tornehl CK, Carson CC: Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Urol Clin N Am 2005, 32:479–485. Another extensive review of surgical procedures for Peyronie’s disease.
Article
Google Scholar
Mulhall J, Anderson M, Parker M: A surgical algorithm for men with combined Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction: functional and satisfaction outcomes. J Sex Med 2005, 2:132–138. A contribution toward an improved definition of preoperative parameters for the best choice of surgical procedure.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Mulhall J, Ahmed A, Anderson M: Penile prosthesis surgery for Peyronie’s disease: Defining the need for intra-operative adjuvant maneuvers. J Sex Med 2004, 1:318–321. A contribution toward assessing the need for adjuvant procedures in cases of PD and penile prosthesis implantation. Surgeons should be familiar with all these associated procedures.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Wessells H, Lue TF, McAninch JW: Penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guide-lines for penile augmentation. J Urol 1996, 156:995–997.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lue TF, El-Sakka Al: Lengthening shortened penis caused by Peyronie’s disease using circular venous grafting and daily stretching with a vacuum erection device. J Urol 1999, 161:1141–1144.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Wilson SK, Delk JR: A new treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable prosthesis. J Urol 1994, 152:1121–1123.
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Greenfield JM, Lucas S, Levine LA: Factors affecting the loss of length associated with tunica albuginea plication for correction of penile curvature. J Urol 2006, 175:238–241. This study showed that the length change correlated significantly with preoperative stretched penis length and the severity of curvature as measured in degrees in the operating room at time of surgery.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Gholami SS, Lue TF: Correction of penile curvature using the 16-dot plication tech-nique: a review of 132 patients. J Urol 2002, 167:2066–2069. Suture threads used for this technique must be nonabsorbable, preferably not producing palpable stitches that may cause pain and impact the patient’s quality of life.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Van der Horst C, Martinez-Portillo FJ, Melchior D, et al.: Polytetrafluoroethylene versus polypropylene sutures for Essed-Schroeder tunical plication. J Urol 2003, 170:472–475. This study highlights the greatly improved quality of life for patients with minimized stitch palpability and local pain.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Giammusso B, Burrello M, Branchina A, et al.: Modified corporoplasty for ventral penile curvature: Description of the technique and initial results. J Urol 2004, 171:1209–1211. This study highlights the simplified technique for ventral curvature correction without vasculonervous bundle mobilization. The authors recommend not using incisions greater than 1.5 cm, even if multiple incisions are necessary, to prevent excessive penile indentation and palpable dog ears.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Bokarica P, Parazajder J, Mazuran B, Gilja I: Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease based on penile length and degree of curvature. Int J Impot Res 2005, 17:170–174. This study points to the importance of preoperative penile length and curvature degree assessment for selecting surgical treatment. It must be emphasized that even patients with a penis longer than 13 cm may not accept the size reduction imposed by the disease and the surgical procedure. Such patients are candidates for grafting procedures.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Pryor J, Akkus E, Alter G, et al.: Peyronie’s Disease. J Sex Med 2004, 1:110–115. This article contains recommendations from the International Consultation, Paris, 2004.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Kalsi J, Minhas S, Christopher N, Ralph D: The results of plaque incision and venous grafting (Lue procedure) to correct the penile deformity of Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int 2005, 95:1029–1033.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Gelbard MK: Relaxing incisions in the correction of penile deformity due to Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 1995, 154:1457–1460.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lue TF, El-Sakka Al: Venous patch graft for Peyronie’s disease. Part I. Technique. J Urol 1998, 160:2047–2049. This is an important contribution for tunica incision and grafting.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Egydio PH, Lucon AM, Arap S: A single relaxing incision to correct different types of penile curvature: surgical technique based on geometrical principles. BJU Int 2004, 94:1147–1157. A contribution toward determining the best location of a relaxation incision by means of geometric principles.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Perovic SV, Djordjevic ML: The penile disassembly technique in the surgical treat-ment of Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int 2001, 88:731–738. An important contribution on when improved distal exposure is necessary for reconstruction.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Kendirci M, Hellstrom WJG: Critical analysis of surgery for Peyronie’s disease. Curr Opin Urol 2004, 14:381–388. This is an excellent review with critical analysis of PD surgery.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Hellstrom WJ, Reddy S: Application of pericardium graft in the surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 2000, 163:1445–1447.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Chun JL, McGregor A, Krishnan R, Carson CC: A comparison of dermal and ca-daveric pericardial grafts in the Modified Horton-Devine procedure for Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 2001, 166:185–188.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Levine LA, Estrada CR: Human cadaveric pericardial graft for the surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 2003, 170:2359–2362. This is an excellent discussion of "off-the-shelf"grafting materials.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Leungwattanakij S, Bivalacqua TJ, Yang SY, et al.: Comparison of cadaveric pericardial, dermal, vein, and synthetic grafts for tunica albuginea substitution using a rat model. BJU Int 2003, 92:119–124. This study further supports the safety of pericardial graft use.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Knoll LD: Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa graft in the surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. Urology 2001, 57:753–757.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Schultheiss D, Lorenz RR, Meister R, et al.: Functional tissue engineering of autologous tunica albuginea: a possible graft for Peyronie’s disease surgery. Eur Urol 2004, 45:781–786.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Eberli D, Susaeta RA, Yoo JJ, Atala A: Novel acellular collagen matrix for Peyronie’s repair. J Urol 2005, 173(Suppl):254.
Google Scholar
Egydio PH, Lucon AM, Arap S: Treatment of Peyronie’s disease by incomplete circumferential incision of the tunica albuginea and plaque with bovine pericardium graft. Urology 2002, 59:570–574.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Mulcahy JJ, Wilson SK: Management of Peyronie’s disease with penile prostheses. Int J Impot Res 2002, 14:384–388. The procedure most associated with PD surgery and penile prosthesis implantation is reviewed.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Rahman NU, Carrion RE, Bochinski D, Lue TF: Combined penile plication surgery and insertion of penile prosthesis for severe penile curvature and erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2004, 171:2346–2349.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar