Addressing FGM with Multidisciplinary Care. The Experience of the Belgian Reference Center CeMAViE
Purpose of Review
To describe the multidisciplinary approach of the Brussels-based referral center, one of the two centers for women living with female genital mutilation (FGM) in Belgium. This approach is contextualized and compared to the latest literature on the subject.
According to the World Health Organization, women who have undergone FGM should be able to benefit from multidisciplinary care. Clitoral reconstructive surgery appears to be a crucial but controversial element of this holistic treatment; its long-term benefits and role in sexual satisfaction are still the focus of many questions.
Clitoral reconstructive surgery has been reimbursed by Belgian social security since 2014 only in conjunction with multidisciplinary care. In our referral center, the care is provided by a gynecologist, a midwife, a psychotherapist, and a sexologist. Five preoperative consultations are mandatory to obtain the refund. CeMaVie’s first line of treatments is non-surgical therapies.
KeywordsFemale genital mutilation Gender-based violence Multidisciplinary care Clitoris reconstructive surgery Sexology Psychotherapy
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:• Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.WHO. Eliminating female genital mutilation [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2017 Dec 1]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/fgm/9789241596442/en/
- 2.Unicef. UNICEF’S DATA WORK ON FGM/C [Internet]. Unicef; 2016 [cited 2018 Jan 14]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/FGMC-2016-brochure_250.pdf
- 3.Russia orders inquiry into claims of FGM in Dagestan | Society | The Guardian [Internet]. [cited 2018 Jan 14]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/nov/05/russia-orders-inquiry-into-claims-of-fgm-in-dagestan
- 4.Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund I. Female “circumcision” in Africa dimensions of the practice and debates. Vol. In Female ‘circumcision’ in Africa: culture, controversy, and change. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2000.Google Scholar
- 5.Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund I. Transcultural Bodies: female genital cutting in global context. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
- 6.Hosken F. Genital mutilation of women in Africa. Munger Afr Libr Notes. 1976;36:3–21.Google Scholar
- 7.O’Neill S. Defying the Law Negotiation Change: the Futanke’s opposition to the national ban on FGM in Senegal. Vol. Unpublished PhD Thesis. London: Goldsmiths, University of London; 2013.Google Scholar
- 8.Boddy J. Wombs and alien spirits: women, men, and the Zar cult in Northern Sudan [Internet]. University of Wisconsin Press; 1989 [cited 2018 Jan 12]. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/8761
- 9.Ahmadu F. Rites and wrongs: an insider/outsider reflects on power and excision. Vol. Female ‘circumcision’ in Africa: culture, controversy, and change. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2000.Google Scholar
- 10.Ahmadu F, Ain’t I. A woman too? Challenging myths of sexual dysfunction in circumcised women. Vol. Transcultural bodies: female genital cutting in global context. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
- 13.•• Berg RC, Underland V, Odgaard-Jensen J, Fretheim A, Vist GE. Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4(11):e006316. The meta-analysis we expected on the consequences of FGM. A work that confirms or invalidates some widely held beliefs, to be considered according to the limited data available. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.•• Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Say L. Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: an analysis. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122(3):294–303. An in-depth summary of the issues that practitioners and researchers need to consider for the present and the future. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Legros C. Pierre Foldes et Frédérique Martz, après des mutilations sexuelles réparer les corps et les âmes. Le Monde.fr [Internet]. 2017 Jul 8 [cited 2018 Jan 12]; Available from: http://www.lemonde.fr/festival/visuel/2017/07/08/apres-des-mutilations-sexuelles-reparer-les-corps-et-les-ames_5157723_4415198.html
- 16.WHO. Health complications of female genital mutilation including sequelae in childbirth [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2017 Dec 1]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/fgm/who_fch_wmh_00.2/en/
- 17.Dubourg D, Richard F. Etude de prévalence des femmes excisées et des filles à risque d’excision en Belgique. Brussels: SPF Santé Publique, Sécurité de la Chaîne alimentaire et Environnement; 2014.Google Scholar
- 20.• CMR O, Madzou S, Simporé A, Combaud V, Ouattara A, Millogo F, et al. Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation at CHU Yalgado of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. About 68 patients operated. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016;45(9):1099–106. The author proposes a new interesting technique CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.•• Berg RC, Taraldsen S, Said MA, Sørbye IK, Vangen S. The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017; The most recent and comprehensive meta-analysis of FGM surgery.Google Scholar