Advertisement

Current Sexual Health Reports

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 90–97 | Cite as

The Dual Control Model of Sexual Response: Relevance of Sexual Excitation and Sexual Inhibition for Sexual Function

  • Julia VeltenEmail author
Integrating the Psychosocial (B McCarthy, RT Segraves and AH Clayton, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Integrating the Psychosocial

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The dual control model of sexual response aims to explain sexual behavior and response through two factors, labeled sexual excitation and sexual inhibition. Sexual dysfunctions are common among women and men and pose a threat to the sexual health of both genders. The main objective of this paper was to review the latest findings concerning the predictive value of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition for sexual function and dysfunction in men and women.

Recent Findings

Most relevant studies have been conducted in North America and Europe using non-clinical samples. Women and men with high sexual inhibition related to performance concerns and distractibility during sex report lower sexual function. In addition, high sexual excitation is associated with higher sexual function in both genders.

Summary

Sexual excitation and sexual inhibition are predictors of sexual function in women and men. More prospective and clinical studies are needed to evaluate the usefulness of both propensities as predictors or moderators of treatment success.

Keywords

Dual control model of sexual response Sexual excitation Sexual inhibition Sexual dysfunction Sexual function 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Julia Velten declares no potential conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.

References

Papers of Particular Interest, Published Recently, Have Been Highlighted as: • Of Importance •• Of Major Importance

  1. 1.
    Davison SL, Bell RJ, LaChina M, Holden SL, Davis SR. The relationship between self-reported sexual satisfaction and general well-being in women. J Sex Med. 2009;6(10):2690–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States. 1999;281(6):537–45.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laumann EO, Nicolosi A, Glasser DB, Paik A, Gingell C, Moreira E, et al. Sexual problems among women and men aged 40–80 y: prevalence and correlates identified in the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17(1):39–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laumann EO, Paik A, Glasser DB, Kang J-H, Wang T, Levinson B, et al. A cross-national study of subjective sexual well-being among older women and men: findings from the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(2):143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Basson R, Wierman ME, van Lankveld JJ, Brotto L. Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in women. J Sex Med. 2010;7(1pt2):314–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamilton LD, Julian AM. The relationship between daily hassles and sexual function in men and women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(5):379–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oliveira C, Nobre PJ. The role of trait-affect, depression, and anxiety in women with sexual dysfunction: a pilot study. J Sex Marital Ther. 2013;39(5):436–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    del Mar Sanchez-Fuentes M, Santos-Iglesias P, Sierra JC. A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. Int J Clin Heal Psychol. 2014;14(1):67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lewis RW, Fugl-Meyer KS, Corona G, Hayes RD, Laumann EO, Moreira Jr ED, et al. Definitions/epidemiology/risk factors for sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7(4pt2):1598–607.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bancroft J, Janssen E. The dual control model of male sexual response: a theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000;24(24):571–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carpenter D, Janssen E, Graham CA, Vorst H, Wicherts J. Women’s scores on the sexual inhibition/sexual excitation scales (SIS/SES): gender similarities and differences. J Sex Res. 2008;45(1):36–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janssen E, Vorst H, Finn P, Bancroft J. The sexual inhibition (SIS) and sexual excitation (SES) scales: II. Predicting psychophysiological response patterns. J Sex Res. 2002;39(2):127–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pinxten W, Lievens J. An exploratory study of factors associated with sexual inhibition and excitation: findings from a representative survey in Flanders. J Sex Res. 2015;52(6):679–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    •• Jozkowski KN, Sanders SA, Milhausen RR, Graham CA. Examining the psychometric properties of the sexual excitation/sexual inhibition inventory for women (SESII-W) in a sample of lesbian and bisexual women. J Sex Res. 2016;53(7):836–48. This study assesses the relevance of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition in homosexual and bisexual women CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Velten J, Scholten S, Graham CA, Margraf J. Psychometric properties of the sexual excitation sexual inhibition inventory for women in a German sample. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(2):303–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bloemendaal LBA, Laan ETM. The psychometric properties of the sexual excitation/sexual inhibition inventory for women (SESII-W) within a Dutch population. J Sex Res. 2015;52(1):69–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    • Bancroft J, Graham CA, Janssen E, Sanders SA. The dual control model: current status and future directions. J Sex Res. 2009;46(2–3):121–42. This includes a comprehensive review of the dual control model and various outcomes CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rettenberger M, Briken P. Das Duale Kontrollmodell. [The dual control model]. Z Sex-Forsch. 2013;26(3):211–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brotto LA, Basson R. Group mindfulness-based therapy significantly improves sexual desire in women. Behav Res Ther. 2014;57:43–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malavige LS, Wijesekara PN, Jayaratne SD, Kathriarachchi ST, Ranasinghe P, Sivayogan S, et al. Linguistic validation of the sexual inhibition and sexual excitation scales (SIS/SES) translated into five South Asian languages: Oxford sexual dysfunction study (OSDS). BMC Res Notes. 2013;6:550.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moyano N, Sierra JC. Validación de las Escalas de Inhibición sexual/Excitación sexual—forma breve (EIS/EES-FB) [validation of the sexual inhibition/excitation scales-short form (SIS/SES-SF)]. Ter Psicológica. 2014;32:41–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Granados MR, Salinas JM, Sierra JC. Spanish version of the sexual excitation/sexual inhibition inventory for women: factorial structure, reliability and validity evidences. Int J Clin Heal Psychol. 2017;17(1):65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neves CF, Milhausen RR, Carvalheira A. Sexual excitation/sexual inhibition inventory (SESII-W/M): adaptation and validation within a Portuguese sample of men and women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2016;42(6):552–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carpenter D, Janssen E, Graham C, Vorst H, Wicherts J. Sexual inhibition/sexual excitation scales-short form. Handb Sex Relat Meas. 2011;3:236–8.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Graham CA, Sanders SA, Milhausen RR, McBride KR. Turning on and turning off: a focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav. 2004;33(6):527–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Graham CA, Sanders SA, Milhausen RR. The sexual excitation/sexual inhibition inventory for women: psychometric properties. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(4):397–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006;119(2):e7–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Milhausen RR, Graham CA, Sanders SA, Yarber WL, Maitland SB, Graham CA, et al. Validation of the sexual excitation/sexual inhibition inventory for women and men. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39(5):1091–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sanders SA, Graham CA, Milhausen RR, Graham ÆCA, Milhausen RR. Predicting sexual problems in women: the relevance of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition. Arch Sex Behav. 2008;37(2):241–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington: APA Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sarin S, Amsel R, Binik YM. A streetcar named “derousal”? A psychophysiological examination of the desire–arousal distinction in sexually functional and dysfunctional women. J Sex Res. 2016;53(6):711–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lippa RA. The relation between sex drive and sexual attraction to men and women: a cross-national study of heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual men and women. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36(2):209–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schmitt DP. Sexual strategies across sexual orientations: how personality traits and culture relate to sociosexuality among gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and heterosexuals. J Psychol Human Sex. 2007;18(2–3):183–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dennerstein L, Alexander JL, Kotz K. The menopause and sexual functioning: a review of the population-based studies. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2003;14(1):64–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heiman JR, Long JS, Smith SN, Fisher WA, Sand MS, Rosen RC. Sexual satisfaction and relationship happiness in midlife and older couples in five countries. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(4):741–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bell S, Reissing ED. Sexual well-being in older women: the relevance of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition. J Sex Res. 2016; doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1250147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    •• Velten J, Scholten S, Graham CA, Margraf J. Sexual excitation and sexual inhibition as predictors of sexual function in women: a cross sectional and longitudinal study. J Sex Marital Ther. 2017;43(2):95–109. This study is the first to assess the predictive value of sexual excitation and inhibition for future sexual function CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kilimnik CD, Meston CM. Role of body esteem in the sexual excitation and inhibition responses of women with and without a history of childhood sexual abuse. J Sex Med. 2016;13(11):1718–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gregory R, Cheng H, Rupp HA, Sengelaub DR, Heiman JR. Oxytocin increases VTA activation to infant and sexual stimuli in nulliparous and postpartum women. Horm Behav. 2015;69:82–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dèttore D, Pucciarelli M, Santarnecchi E. Anxiety and female sexual functioning: an empirical study. J Sex Marital Ther. 2013;39(3):216–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lykins AD, Janssen E, Newhouse S, Heiman JR, Rafaeli E. The effects of similarity in sexual excitation, inhibition, and mood on sexual arousal problems and sexual satisfaction in newlywed couples. J Sex Med. 2012;9(5):1360–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    • Bancroft J. Central inhibition of sexual response in the male: a theoretical perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999;23(6):763–84. This study provides background information about the dual control model’s theoretical assumptions CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Janssen E, Vorst H, Finn P, Bancroft J. The sexual inhibition (SIS) and sexual excitation (SES) scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. J Sex Res. 2002;39(2):114–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Janssen E, Bancroft J. The dual-control model: the role of sexual inhibition and excitation in sexual arousal and behavior. Psychophysiol sex. 2007;15:197–222.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bancroft J, Carnes L, Janssen E, Goodrich D, Long JS. Erectile and ejaculatory problems in gay and heterosexual men. Arch Sex Behav. 2005;34(3):285–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bancroft J, Janssen E, Carnes L, Goodrich D, Strong D, Long JS. Sexual activity and risk taking in young heterosexual men: the relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking. J Sex Res. 2004;41(2):181–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bancroft J, Janssen E, Strong D, Carnes L, Vukadinovic Z, Long JS. Sexual risk-taking in gay men: the relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking. Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32(6):555–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rettenberger M, Klein V, Briken P. The relationship between hypersexual behavior, sexual excitation, sexual inhibition, and personality traits. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(1):219–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Muise A, Milhausen RR, Cole SL, Graham C. Sexual compulsivity in heterosexual married adults: the role of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition in individuals not considered “high-risk.”. Sex Addict Compulsivity. 2013;20(3):192–209.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nguyen HV, Koo KH, Davis KC, Otto JM, Hendershot CS, Schacht RL, et al. Risky sex: interactions among ethnicity, sexual sensation seeking, sexual inhibition, and sexual excitation. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(5):1231–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sarin S, Amsel R, Binik YM. How hot is he? A psychophysiological and psychosocial examination of the arousal patterns of sexually functional and dysfunctional men. J Sex Med. 2014;11(7):1725–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Duits A, van Oirschot N, van Oostenbrugge RJ, van Lankveld J. The relevance of sexual responsiveness to sexual function in male stroke patients. J Sex Med. 2009;6(12):3320–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Louizos CCJ, McCann B, Knight PK. Changes in sexual inhibition and excitation during PDE5I therapy. Int J Impot Res. 2014;26(4):146–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington: APA Press; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bancroft J, Graham CA. The varied nature of women’s sexuality: unresolved issues and a theoretical approach. Horm Behav. 2011;59(5):717–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Clifton J, Seehuus M, Rellini AH. Testing cognitive predictors of individual differences in the sexual psychophysiological responses of sexually functional women. Psychophysiology. 2015;52(7):957–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    •• Velten J, Scholten S, Graham CA, Adolph D, Margraf J. Investigating female sexual concordance: do sexual excitation and sexual inhibition moderate the agreement of genital and subjective sexual arousal in women? Arch Bexual Behav. 2016;45(8):1957–71. This study describes how SE and SI affect women’s sexual response in an in-laboratory setting CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Toates F. An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual motivation, arousal, and behavior. J Sex Res. 2009;46(2–3):168–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kenny DA. Cross-lagged panel design. New York: Wiley; 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mitchell KR, Jones KG, Wellings K, Johnson AM, Graham CA, Datta J, et al. Estimating the prevalence of sexual function problems: the impact of morbidity criteria. J Sex Res. 2016;53(8):955–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    van Lankveld J. Internet-based interventions for women’s sexual dysfunction. Current Sexual Health Reports. 2016;8(3):136–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Frühauf S, Gerger H, Schmidt HM, Munder T, Barth J. Efficacy of psychological interventions for sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(6):915–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Brown KW, Ryan RM, Creswell JD. Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychol Inq. 2007;18(4):211–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Brotto LA, Basson R, Smith KB, Driscoll M, Sadownik L. Mindfulness-based group therapy for women with provoked vestibulodynia. Mindfulness. 2014;6(3):417–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Brotto LA, Seal BN, Rellini A. Pilot study of a brief cognitive behavioral versus mindfulness-based intervention for women with sexual distress and a history of childhood sexual abuse. J Sex Marital Ther. 2012;38:1–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Brotto LA, Yong P, Smith KB, Sadownik LA. Impact of a multidisciplinary vulvodynia program on sexual functioning and dyspareunia. J Sex Med. 2015;12(1):238–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology and PsychotherapyRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations