Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interventions to Address Sexual Function in Women Affected by Female Genital Cutting: a Scoping Review

Current Sexual Health Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Global migration trends necessitate that health care providers, regardless of location, address sequelae from female genital cutting (FGC). Surgical interventions to treat sexual dysfunction in this population are proliferating despite limited evidence of their impact. We conducted a scoping review to describe interventions to address sexual dysfunction in FGC-affected women.

Recent Findings

Thirty-four citations in four categories of peer-reviewed literature emerged: surgical technique descriptions, case reports, literature reviews, and original research including qualitative analyses, anatomically focused studies and surgical interventions.

Summary

Surgical strategies to address sexual function in FGC-affected women, although promising, are limited by low-quality evidence. FGC-affected women require, but are rarely receiving, multidisciplinary care to address myriad influences on sexual function. Research is needed to clarify the impact of surgical interventions and promising non-surgical strategies including education and counseling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance•• Of major importance

  1. Foldes P, Cuzin B, Andro A. Reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):134–41. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60400-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foldes P, Louis-Sylvestre C. Results of surgical clitoral repair after ritual excision: 453 cases. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006;34(12):1137–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan S. Trying to rebuild women’s bodies after female ‘circumcision’. The Atlantic; 2014.

  4. •• Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Say L. A systematic review of the evidence on clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015a;129(2):93–7. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.008. This study elucidates the limited evidence on safety and efficacy and long-term outcomes of clitoral reconstruction procedures.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. National Health Service Clinical Reference Group Complex Gynaecology. Clinical commissioning policy statement: genital surgery to improve clitoral sensation. 2015; NHS England E10/PS/a.

  6. No author. Clitoraid. 2012; Available at: http://www.clitoraid.org/. Accessed 13 Oct 2016.

  7. Gupta GR. Female genital mutilation/cutting: a statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. Reprod Health Matters. 2013;21(42):184–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. UNICEF. Female genital mutilation/cutting: a global concern. New York: UNICEF; 2016. p. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. Female genital mutilation: fact sheet. 2016. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/. Accessed 13 Oct 2016.

  10. • Goldberg H, Stupp P, Okoroh E, Besera G, Goodman D, Danel I. Female genital mutilation/cutting in the United States: updated estimates of women and girls at risk, 2012. Public Health Rep. 2016;131(2):340–7. This study presents the most recent estimates of women and girls living with FGC in the U.S.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ortensi LE, Farina P, Menonna A. Improving estimates of the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among migrants in Western countries. Demogr Res. 2015;32:543–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reig-Alcaraz M, Siles-González J, Solano-Ruiz C. A mixed-method synthesis of knowledge, experiences and attitudes of health professionals to female genital mutilation. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(2):245–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Female sexual dysfunction. ACOG practice bulletin no. 119. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):996–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shifren JL, Monz BU, Russo PA, Segreti A, Johannes CB. Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(5):970–8. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181898cdb.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berg RC, Denison EM, Fretheim A. Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review of quantitative studies. 2010.

  16. Berg RC, Denison E. Does female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) affect women’s sexual functioning? A systematic review of the sexual consequences of FGM/C. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2012;9(1):41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Catania L, Abdulcadir O, Puppo V, Verde JB, Abdulcadir J, Abdulcadir D. Pleasure and orgasm in women with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). J Sex Med. 2007;4(6):1666–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okonofua FE, Larsen U, Oronsaye F, Snow R, Slanger T. The association between female genital cutting and correlates of sexual and gynaecological morbidity in Edo State, Nigeria. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2002;109(10):1089–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. •• Johnsdotter S, Essén B. Cultural change after migration: circumcision of girls in Western migrant communities. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2016;32:15–25. This study highlights the dynamics of cultural change that is occurring across migrant FGC-affected communities now residing in the West.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdulcadir J, Margairaz C, Boulvain M, Irion O. Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;140:w13137. doi:10.4414/smw.2010.13137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dearholt S, Dang D. Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: models and guidelines. Sigma Theta Tau; 2012.

  25. Johnson C, Nour NM. Surgical techniques: defibulation of type III female genital cutting. J Sex Med. 2007;4(6):1544–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chevrot A, Lousquy R, Arfi A, Haddad B, Paniel BJ, Touboul C. Operative technique: the clitoral transposition. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015;44(8):787–91. doi:10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.02.013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Madzou S, Ouedraogo CM, Gillard P, Lefebvre-Lacoeuille C, Catala L, Sentilhes L, et al. Reconstructive surgery of the clitoris after sexual mutilation. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2011;56(1):59–64. doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2009.08.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Quilichini J, Burin Des Roziers B, Daoud G, Cartier S. Clitoridal reconstruction after female circumcision. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2011;56(1):74–9. doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2010.04.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thabet SM, Thabet AS. Defective sexuality and female circumcision: the cause and the possible management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2003;29(1):12–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Foldes P. Reconstructive plastic surgery of the clitoris after sexual mutilation. Prog Urol. 2004;14(1):47–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Petignat P, Say L. Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting: case studies. J Sex Med. 2015b;12(1):274–81. doi:10.1111/jsm.12737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen G, Dharia SP, Steinkampf MP, Callison S. Infertility from female circumcision. Fertil Steril. 2004a;81(6):1692–4. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Abdulcadir J, Dallenbach P. Overactive bladder after female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) type III. BMJ Case Rep. 2013; doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-008155 10.1136/bcr-2012-008155.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen G, Dharia SP, Steinkampf MP, Callison S. Infertility from female circumcision. Fertil Steril. 2004b;81(6):1692–4. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Anand M, Stanhope TJ, Occhino JA. Female genital mutilation reversal: a general approach. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(7):985–6. doi:10.1007/s00192-013-2299-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Craven S, Kavanagh A, Khavari R. Female genital mutilation management in the ambulatory clinic setting: a case study and review of the literature. J Surg Case Rep. 2016;2016(6) doi:10.1093/jscr/rjw104 10.1093/jscr/rjw104.

  37. Millogo-Traore F, Akotionga M, Lankoande J. Infibulation complications: three vaginal plastic surgeries at Kossodo (Burkina Faso). Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2002;95(4):250–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Morris SN, Nour NM. Benign vaginal villi noted at time of defibulation of female genital cutting. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(5):1206–9. 4p

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Penna C, Fallani MG, Fambrini M, Zipoli E, Marchionni M. Type III female genital mutilation: clinical implications and treatment by carbon dioxide laser surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1550–4.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gultekin IB, Altinboga O, Dur R, Kara OF, Kucukozkan T. Surgical reconstruction in female genital mutilation. Turk J Urol. 2016;42(2):111–4. doi:10.5152/tud.2015.89982.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Petignat P, Say L. Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting: case studies. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2015c;12(1):274–81. doi:10.1111/jsm.12737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fazari AB, Berg RC, Mohammed WA, Gailii EB, Elmusharaf K. Reconstructive surgery for female genital mutilation starts sexual functioning in Sudanese woman: a case report. J Sex Med. 2013;10(11):2861–5. doi:10.1111/jsm.12286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gudu W. Acute vulvar pain in a lady with post circumcision inclusion cyst of the vulva containing stones: a case report. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14 doi:10.1186/1472-6874-14-2.2-6874-14-2

  44. Paterson LQP, Davis SN, Binik YM. Female genital mutilation/cutting and orgasm before and after surgical repair. Sexologies: European Journal of Sexology and Sexual Health/Revue européenne de sexologie et de santé sexuelle. 2012;21(1):3–8. doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2011.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Villani M. From the “maturity” of a woman to surgery: conditions for clitoris repair. Sexologies. 2009;18(4):259–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Safari F. A qualitative study of women’s lived experience after deinfibulation in the UK. Midwifery. 2013;29(2):154–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ndiaye EA, Fall S, Beltran L. Intérêt de la prise en charge pluridisciplinaire des femmes excisées. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. 2015;44(9):862–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. •• Abdulcadir J, Botsikas D, Bolmont M, Bilancioni A, Djema DA, Bianchi Demicheli F, et al. Sexual anatomy and function in women with and without genital mutilation: a cross-sectional study. J Sex Med. 2016a;13(2):226–37. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.023. This is a landmark study that provides radiographic evidence of the preservation of sexual erectile tissues for sexual arousal, orgasm and pleasure in FGC-affected women.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Thabet SM. Reality of the G-spot and its relation to female circumcision and vaginal surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35(5):967–73. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01020.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Akotionga M, Traore O, Lakoande J, Kone B. External genital excision sequelae at the Yalgado Ouedraogo national central hospital: epidemiology and surgical treatment. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2001;29(4):295–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Nour NM, Michels KB, Bryant AE. Defibulation to treat female genital cutting: effect on symptoms and sexual function. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):55–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Krause E, Brandner S, Mueller MD, Kuhn A. Out of eastern Africa: defibulation and sexual function in woman with female genital mutilation. J Sex Med. 2011;8(5):1420–5. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02225.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Abramowicz S, Oden S, Dietrich G, Marpeau L, Resch B. Anatomic, functional and identity results after clitoris transposition. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016; 23.

  54. Nour NM, Michels KB, Bryant AE. Defibulation to treat female genital cutting: effect on symptoms and sexual function. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):55–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ouedraogo CM, Madzou S, Toure B, Ouedraogo A, Ouedraogo S, Lankoande J. Practice of reconstructive plastic surgery of the clitoris after genital mutilation in Burkina Faso. Report of 94 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2013;58(3):208–15. doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2012.04.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Creighton S, Bewley S, Liao LM. Reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):134–41. Lancet 2012 10/27;380 North American Edition(9852):1469–1469 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61836-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Abdulcadir J, McLaren S, Boulvain M, Irion O. Health education and clinical care of immigrant women with female genital mutilation/cutting who request postpartum reinfibulation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016b; 16.

  58. Vital M, de Visme S, Hanf M, Philippe HJ, Winer N, Wylomanski S. Using the female sexual function index (FSFI) to evaluate sexual function in women with genital mutilation undergoing surgical reconstruction: a pilot prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;202:71–4. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0348-2_ch2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Elnashar A, El-Dien Ibrahim M, El-Desoky M, Ali O, El-Sayd Mohamed Hassan M. Female sexual dysfunction in lower Egypt. BJOG. 2007;114(2):201–6. 6p

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Coker AL. Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health? A systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007;8(2):149–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Merckelbagh H, Nicolas M, Piketty M, Benifla J. Évaluation d’une prise en charge multidisciplinaire chez 169 patientes excisées demandeuses d’une chirurgie réparatrice. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 2015;43(10):633–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Committee on Gynecologic Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 378: vaginal “rejuvenation” and cosmetic vaginal procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(3):737–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Foldes P, Droupy S, Cuzin B. Cosmetic surgery of the female genitalia. Prog Urol. 2013;23(9):601–11. doi:10.1016/j.purol.2013.01.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. • Atallah S, Johnson-Agbakwu C, Rosenbaum T, Abdo C, Byers ES, Graham C, et al. Ethical and sociocultural aspects of sexual function and dysfunction in both sexes. J Sex Med. 2016;13(4):591–606. This study examines the ethical principles surrounding female genital cutting and female genital cosmetic surgery and the critical need for providers to provide culturally appropriate and ethically grounded patient counseling and education.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Einstein G. From body to brain: considering the neurobiological effects of female genital cutting. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51(1):84–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Bass JK, Ryder RW, Lammers M, Mukaba TN, Bolton PA. Post-partum depression in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: validation of a concept using a mixed-methods cross-cultural approach. Tropical Med Int Health. 2008;13(12):1534–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lazar JN, Johnson-Agbakwu CE, Davis OI, Shipp MP. Providers’ perceptions of challenges in obstetrical care for Somali women. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:149640. doi:10.1155/2013/149640.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Johnson CE, Ali SA, Shipp MP. Building community-based participatory research partnerships with a Somali refugee community. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(6):S230–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Johnson-Agbakwu CE, Helm T, Killawi A, Padela AI. Perceptions of obstetrical interventions and female genital cutting: insights of men in a Somali refugee community. Ethn Health. 2014;19(4):440–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Arora S, Kalishman S, Thornton K, Dion D, Murata G, Deming P, et al. Expanding access to hepatitis C virus treatment—extension for community healthcare outcomes (ECHO) project: disruptive innovation in specialty care. Hepatology. 2010;52(3):1124–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Abdulcadir J, Catania L, Hindin MJ, Say L, Petignat P, Abdulcadir O. Female genital mutilation. A visual reference and learning tool for health care professionals. Obstet Gynecol. 2016c;128:958–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Abdulcadir J, Pusztaszeri M, Vilarino R, Dubuisson J-B, Vlastos A-T. Clitoral neuroma after female genital mutilation/cutting: a rare but possible event. J Sex Med. 2012;9:1220–5. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02558.x.

  73. Nkwo PO. Reverse marsupialization technique of defibulation to restore vulvo-perineal elasticity: a case report and description of technique. Trop Doct. 2012;42:147–9. doi:10.1258/td.2012.120082.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Janice Hermer, Health Sciences Librarian, Arizona State University Libraries, for helping to facilitate the systematic literature search for this scoping review. We would also like to thank Craig Tower for his assistance with the French translations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Crista Johnson-Agbakwu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Female Sexual Dysfunction and Disorders

Crista Johnson-Agbakwu and Nicole Warren share joint first authorship

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson-Agbakwu, C., Warren, N. Interventions to Address Sexual Function in Women Affected by Female Genital Cutting: a Scoping Review. Curr Sex Health Rep 9, 20–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-017-0099-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-017-0099-0

Keywords

Navigation