Criteria for hypersexual disorder were proposed for consideration for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), but ultimately rejected by the American Psychiatric Association despite a field trial suggesting the criteria were valid and reliable. This article highlights the vast array of controversial issues surrounding the proposal for hypersexual disorder. While some criticisms covered a broader scope of general concerns about the field of psychiatric mental illness, many of these often extended to the proposal for hypersexual disorder. It is important to discuss both general concerns about psychiatric disorders and those specifically focused on hypersexuality in order to understand the challenges encountered in advancing the criteria for hypersexual disorder. This article attempts to place the controversies, criticisms, and issues about hypersexuality in context from leading experts in the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Kafka MP. Hypersexual disorder: a proposed diagnosis for DSM-V. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:377–400. This is the first publication to highlight the proposed criteria for HD for the DSM-5 and contains an excellent literature review.
Phillips J, Frances A, Cerullo MA, et al. The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: a pluralogue part 1: conceptual and definitional issues in psychiatric diagnosis. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2012;7:3. This is one of a three part series of well written articles that discusses some of the major concerns around defining mental illness in the psychiatric community.
Wakefield JC. The DSM-5’s proposed new categories of sexual disorder: the problem of false positives in sexual diagnosis. Clin Soc Work J. 2012;40:213–23.
Winters J. Hypersexual disorder: a more cautious approach. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:594–6.
Steele VR, Staley C, Fong T, Prause N. Sexual desire, not hypersexuality, is related to neurophysiological responses elicited by sexual images. Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol. 2013;3:20770.
Halpern AL. The proposed diagnosis of hypersexual disorder for inclusion in DSM-5: unnecessary and harmful. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40:487–8.
Kafka, MP. What happened to hypersexual disorder? Arch Sex Behav. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0326-y.
Moser C. Hypersexual disorder: just more muddled thinking. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(2):227–9. Dr. Moser has been a major opponent of the HD proposal. While some of his viewpoints have been somewhat strident, he does raise important questions to be addressed for HD researchers.
Kafka MP, Krueger RB. Response to Moser’s (2010) critique of hypersexual disorder for DSM-5. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40:231–2.
Scadding J. Diagnosis: the clinician and the computer. Lancet. 1967;2:877–82.
Wakefield JC. The concept of mental disorder: diagnostic implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry. 2007;6:149–56.
Varga S. Defining mental disorder. Exploring the ‘natural function’ approach. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2011;6:1.
First MB, Wakefield JC. Defining ‘mental disorder’ in DSM-V. Psychol Med. 2010;40:1779–82.
Giles J. No such thing as excessive levels of sexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(6):641–2.
Levine MP, Troiden RR. The myth of sexual compulsivity. J Sex Res. 1988;25(3):347–63.
Van Lankveld J. The road ahead: theoretical models to guide new sex research. J Sex Res. 2012;49(2–3):103–4.
Bancroft J, Graham CA, Janssen E, Sanders SA. The dual control model: current status and future directions. J Sex Res. 2009;46(2–3):121–42.
Reid RC, Karim R, McCrory E, Carpenter BN. Self-reported differences on measures of executive function and hypersexual behavior in a patient and community sample of men. Int J Neurosci. 2010;120(2):120–7.
Reid RC, Garos S, Carpenter BN, Coleman E. A surprising finding related to executive control in a patient sample of hypersexual men. J Sex Med. 2011;8(8):2227–36.
Kingston DA, Firestone P. Problematic hypersexuality: a review of conceptualization and diagnosis. Sex Addict Compul. 2008;15:284–310.
Reid RC, Cyders MA, Moghaddam JF, Fong TW. Psychometric properties of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale in patients with gambling disorders, hypersexuality, and methamphetamine dependence. Addict Behav. 2014;39(11):1640–5.
Reid RC, Garos S, Fong T. Psychometric development of the hypersexual behavior consequences scale. J Behav Addict. 2012;1(3):115–22.
Coleman E, Horvath KJ, Miner M, Ross MW, Oakes M, Rosser BRS. Compulsive sexual behavior and risk for unsafe sex among internet using men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:1045–53.
Fry PS, Debats DL. Perfectionism and other related trait measures as predictors of mortality in diabetic older adults: a six-and-a-half-year longitudinal study. J Health Psychol. 2011;16(7):1058–70.
Bardone-Cone AM, Wonderlich SA, Frost RO, Bulik CM, Mitchell JE, Uppala S, et al. Perfectionism and eating disorders: current status and future directions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27:384–405.
McGrath DS, Sherry SB, Stewart SH, Mushquash AR, Allen SL, Nealis LJ, et al. Reciprocal relations between self-critical perfectionism and depressive symptoms: evidence from a short-term, four-wave longitudinal study. Can J Behav Sci. 2012;44(3):169–81.
Flett GL, Hewitt PL. Treatment interventions for perfectionism—a cognitive perspective: introduction to the special issue. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther. 2008;26:127–33.
Block AD, Adriaens PR. Pathologizing sexual deviance: a history. J Sex Res. 2013;50(3–4):276–98.
Skegg K, Nada-Raja S, Dickson N, Paul C. Perceived “out of control” sexual behavior in a cohort of young adults from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Heath and Development Study. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:968–78.
Winters J, Christoff K, Gorzalka BB. Dysregulated sexuality and high sexual desire: distinct constructs? Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:1029–43. This is one of the prominent articles to question whether hypersexuality is just a problem with high sexual desire rather than a pathology.
Voon V, Mole TB, Banca P, et al. Neural correlates of sexual cue reactivity in individuals with and without compulsive sexual behaviours. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e102419. This is one of the more tightly controlled neuroimaging studies that also used the HD criteria in the assessment of subjects. This study showed significant differences in various brain regions among sexually compulsive subjects paralleling those also found in subjects with substance abuse.
Miner MH, Raymond N, Mueller BA, et al. Preliminary investigation of the impulsive and neuroanatomical characteristics of compulsive sexual behavior. Psychiatry Res. 2009;174:146–51.
Kuhn S, Gallinat J. Brain structure and functional connectivity associated with pornography consumption: the brain on porn. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(7):827–34.
Ley D, Prause N, Finn P. The emperor has no clothes: a review of the ‘pornography addiction’ model. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2014;6:94–105. While this paper has been very controversial, it highlights the need for theory in guiding the scientific study of HD and offers plausible alternative viewpoints in conceptualizing hypersexual behavior.
Reid RC, Carpenter BN, Hook JN, Garos S, Manning JC, Gilliland R, et al. Report of findings in a DSM-5 field trial for hypersexual disorder. J Sex Med. 2012;9(11):2868–77. This was the UCLA field trial for the DSM-5 proposed criteria for HD wherein the researchers found evidence for the validity and reliability of the HD criteria.
Twohig MP, Crosby JM, Cox JM. Viewing internet pornography: for whom is it problematic, how, and why? Sex Addict Compul. 2009;16(4):253–66.
Hook JN, Reid RC, Penberthy JK, Davis DE, Jennings DJ. Methodological review of treatments for nonparaphilic hypersexual behavior. J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(4):294–308.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Reid has no formal declarations of conflicts. He was the principal investigator for the DSM-5 field trial on hypersexual disorder conducted by UCLA. Dr. Kafka was a member of the DSM-5 Workgroup on Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Variations in Orientation, Identity, Addiction, and Compulsion
About this article
Cite this article
Reid, R.C., Kafka, M.P. Controversies About Hypersexual Disorder and the DSM-5. Curr Sex Health Rep 6, 259–264 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-014-0031-9