Abstract
This paper summarizes the measurement problems inherent to the assessment of rapid ejaculation, focusing on the inadequacy and lack of universally accepted specific criterion sets defining the dysfunction. Six methodologies are examined, including self-report, clinician judgment, omnibus sexuality inventories, self-administered rapid ejaculation questionnaires, and stopwatch assessment. The clinical and scientific methods used to assess this dysfunction are critically reviewed and discussed. This paper also provides suggestions for broadening the focus of future research in rapid ejaculation from primarily ejaculatory latency, control, and distress to relevant quality-of-life parameters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
McMahon CG, Meston C, Abdo C, et al.: Disorders of orgasm in men and women, ejaculatory disorders in men. In Sexual Medicine: Sexual Dysfunctions in Men and Women. Edited by Lue TF, Basson R, Rosen R, et al. UK: Health Publications; 2004 In press. The most comprehensive and current review of rapid ejaculation including physiology, assessment, and treatment.
Murphy KR, Davidshofer CO: Psychological Testing, edn 4. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1998.
Althof S: Evidence based assessment of rapid ejaculation. Invited address to a FDA and Harvard Medical School sponsored closed conference on Assessment of Sexual Function in Clinical Trials, Cape Cod, May 1997.
Metz M, McCarthy B: Coping with Premature Ejaculation: How to Overcome PE, Please Your Partner & Have Great Sex. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger; 2003.
Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N: The DSFI—a multidimensional measure of sexual functioning. J Sex Marital Ther 1979, 5:244–281.
Rust J, Golombok S: The GRISS: a psychometric instrument for the assessment of sexual dysfunction. Arch Sex Behav 1986, 13(2):157–165.
Clayton AH, McGarvey EL, Clavet GJ, Piazza L: Comparison of sexual functioning in clinical and non-clinical populations using the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ). Psychopharmacol Bull 1997, 33(4):747–753.
McGahuey CA, Gelenberg AJ, Laukes CA, et al.: The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX): reliability and validity. J Sex Marital Ther 2000, 26:26–40.
Hartmann U: The "PEQUEST": a multidimensional instrument for the assessment of premature ejaculation. Presented to the International Society for Impotence Research. San Francisco, CA, November 1986.
Xin Z, Yiming Y, Jiang H, et al.: Sexual function of patients with premature ejaculation assayed by Chinese Index of Premature Ejaculation (CIPE). Asian J Androl 2004, In press.
Symonds T, Althof S, Rosen RC, et al.: Questionnaire assessment of ejaculatory control: development and validation of a new instrument. Presented to the European Society for the Study of Impotence Research. Hamburg, Germany, December 2002. The IPE is arguably the best self-administered questionnaire available for treatment outcome studies. It should soon be in press and available to the public.
Althof S, Cappelleri J, Shpilsky A, et al.: Treatment responsiveness of the self-esteem and relationship (SEAR) questionnaire in erectile dysfunction. Urology 2003, 61(5):888–892.
Swindle RW, Cameron AE, Lockhart DC, Rosen R: The psychological and interpersonal relationship scales: assessing psychological and relationship outcomes associated with erectile dysfunction and its treatment. Arch Sex Behav 2004, 33(1):19–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Althof, S.E. Assessment of rapid ejaculation: Review of new and existing measures. Curr sex health rep 1, 61–64 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-004-0007-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-004-0007-2