Introduction

Kawasaki disease (KD) was first described in a 1967 report by Japanese pediatrician Tomisaku Kawasaki. The cardiac sequelae were later documented in 1970, following investigation of 10 autopsy cases of sudden cardiac death following diagnosis of KD. The first reported cases outside Japan were in Hawaii in the early 1970s; KD cases have since been reported in more than 60 countries worldwide.

Epidemiology

The epidemiology of KD varies greatly by geographic location and seasonality. The highest incidence rates (per 100,000) are in children of Japanese ancestry. Recently published data from the Japanese KD nationwide survey reported an increased rate over time from 218.6 per 100,000 in 2008 to 243.1 and 330.2 in 2011 and 2015 respectively [1•, 2]. In the United States, the incidence appears to have remained relatively stable. In 2012, the KD-associated hospitalization rate for children < 5 years of age was 18.1 per 100,000. In 2003, the rate was 19.7 per 100,000 children, [3] which amounts to roughly 4000 to 5500 new cases in the United States each year. The highest rates are seen among children < 5 years of age, with a male predominance (21.0 per 100,000 versus 15 per 100,000 in females). There is considerable ethnic variation, the highest rates seen among Asian/Pacific Islanders at 29.8 per 100,000 children < 5 years, and the lowest recorded rate among white children 13.7 per 100,000 [3, 4]. It should be pointed out that analysis of Black and Hispanic race/ethnic groups could not be carried out in the Holman study as there were too few reported cases [4].

Pathogenesis

Genetics

Although poorly understood, the predilection for children of East Asian and Pacific Islander descent, even with transmigration, supports the likely role genetics plays in pathogenesis of KD [5, 6]. Several additional findings support a genetic component to KD susceptibility, including: concordance risk in identical twins at ~ 13%, increased incidence of KD in children whose parents have a history of KD, and higher occurrence of KD in siblings of affected patients [7,8,9,10,11,12].

KD does not appear to follow Mendelian pattern of inheritance. However, familial aggregation is well recognized, as are prediction models for severity based on genetic differences. Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in different genes and gene regions have been implicated in family linkage and genome association studies: caspase 3 (CASP3), inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate kinase-C (ITPKC), CD40, FCGR2a, and B- cell lymphoid kinase (BLK) [13,14,15]. Interestingly, many of the SNPs associated with KD have been identified in other inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis. These findings may indicate a common pathway in the inflammatory immune response [16].

Vaccine Exposure Theory

Several studies have evaluated the role vaccination may play in triggering KD via robust stimulation of the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system. However, there is currently no evidence to suggest that vaccine administration is associated with development of KD [17,18,19,20].

Infectious Theory/Seasonality

The leading theory for the pathogenesis of KD is that an unknown infectious agent leads to activation of the immune system in a genetically susceptible child. Several epidemiologic phenomena support this theory. The first is the apparent seasonality of KD. There is a consistent peak in the number of cases reported in the month of January, with another gradual increase in spring to summer (March–June) [1•, 21]. We often see this kind of consistent seasonal fluctuation in relation to infectious agents, especially viral infections. Several temporal clusters of epidemics have been reported in Japan, Canada, the United States, and Finland further supporting an infectious trigger [22].

The next supporting feature is related to tropospheric wind patterns whose presence in different locations may coincide with the incidence of KD. Studies suggest that winds arising from certain regions may carry either environmental toxins or an infectious agent to another region, thus triggering development of KD [23,24,25]. Another supporting feature is the significant overlap of clinical features between KD and other infectious agents, most notably scarlet fever, the newly described multisystem inflammatory syndrome (described in detail below), and adenovirus. In one study, it was found that 10% of patients diagnosed with KD also had positive low titer adenovirus infection [26].

There is a mono-modal age distribution in the occurrence of KD with peak incidence in late infancy (9–11 months), and then a gradual decrease in incidence with advancing age [1•]. This suggests the possible existence of protective trans-placental antibodies to infection, which wanes after the first few months of life [27]. Finally, there are case reports/series showing higher occurrence of KD cases among siblings. The risk of KD in a child is increased roughly 10 times if a sibling has also been affected. This temporally occurs either on the same day or within 10 days of the initial presentation [7].

Immune Factors/Dysregulation

To date, no infectious causes have been identified as potential underlying etiologies, despite many investigations into bacterial toxins, super-antigens, fungal organisms, and viral pathogens. The theory remains, however, that an unknown stimulus triggers an inflammatory cascade with activation of both the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system. The innate immune system may be activated via detection of either pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The NLRP3 inflammasome recognizes these abnormal molecular patterns in the body and activates a signaling cascade, which ultimately results in downstream release of several pro-inflammatory cytokines. Some of the most well studied of these cytokines in KD include IL-1, IL-18, IL-6, TNF-a, IFN-gamma, and IL-8. Several studies have either implicated this pathway of innate activation, or have successfully induced coronary arteritis (resembling KD) in murine models via these innate mechanisms [28,29,30]. Interleukin-1 has direct inflammatory effects on coronary artery endothelial cells.

In addition to the innate immune response in activating inflammatory mechanisms in KD, there is also significant activation of the adaptive (antigen-specific) immune response. There appears to be increased numbers of circulating pro-inflammatory and regulatory T cells in the acute phase of KD [31]. Studies have noted an increased number of IgA-producing plasma cells in tissues and coronary artery vascular walls in affected patients with KD [32, 33]. Several auto-antibodies directed against myocardial, endothelial, and extracellular matrix proteins have also been described in the literature, although their clinical significance is poorly understood [34]. Following administration of IVIG, we see an expansion of regulatory T cell populations and normalization of B cell-activating factor. This is associated with subsequent clinical improvement during the acute phase of KD [35, 36]. All of the aforementioned findings support the significant role adaptive immune system plays in KD. B and T cell memory cell development is likely involved as well given the low recurrence rate of KD and typically self-limited course of the disease.

Diagnosis

There is no diagnostic test for KD, instead, the diagnosis of classic (or complete) Kawasaki disease is made utilizing clinical criteria (Table 1) and excluding other similar clinical entities. Individual clinical manifestations may not all present simultaneously. Careful review may reveal that one or more clinical features were present and resolved prior to presentation. Several other clinical manifestations may also be present which are not included in the diagnostic criteria (Table 2).

Table 1 Diagnostic criteria for Kawasaki disease
Table 2 Other (less common) clinical manifestations of KD

Patients who do not fulfill the complete diagnostic criteria for KD are referred to as incomplete or atypical KD. These patients may still be at risk for coronary artery abnormalities [37]. Therefore, any child with prolonged unexplained fever with any of the principal clinical features should be further evaluated for KD with consideration of echocardiography. The American Heart Associated (AHA) created an algorithm to aid in evaluation of suspected KD patients who do not meet the diagnostic criteria [38•].

Kawasaki disease tends to be triphasic with an acute, subacute, and convalescent phase. The acute phase is characterized by high-spiking fevers (typically > 39.0 °C), with the other principal features listed in table 1. The acute febrile phase lasts anywhere from 7 to 14 days. The subacute phase is often an asymptomatic period after the febrile episode subsides and extends approximately 4 weeks. During this phase, patients may still have desquamation of the digits, arthralgias, and abnormal lab findings. This is the period of time notable for the greatest risk (highest incidence) of developing cardiac sequelae, namely coronary artery aneurysms (CAA). The third, convalescent phase is typically an asymptomatic period, roughly 4–8 weeks after onset of initial illness. There is still a risk (but significantly decreased) of aneurysm development despite absence of clinical symptoms during this period.

The rate of KD recurrence is less than 3% of patients in Japan, [39] and roughly 1.7% of patients in the United States (3.5% in US KD patients of Asian and Pacific Islander descent) [40]. There is reportedly a higher risk of coronary artery sequelae with recurrent episodes [22].

Laboratory Analysis and Workup

Kawasaki disease is a clinical diagnosis based on set diagnostic criteria. Laboratory findings, although nonspecific, are useful in supporting a diagnosis of KD, particularly when the clinical manifestations are non-classic. Table 3 outlines several common laboratory findings seen in KD during different phases of disease [41, 42].

Table 3 Common laboratory findings in KD

Most children with KD will typically present in the acute phase with leukocytosis (elevated immature and mature granulocytes). Anemia is another common finding and tends to be normocytic and normochromic. Thrombocytosis is common after the first week of symptoms; counts peak in the third week, and may reach as high as 1,000,000 per mm3 (average ~ 700,000 per mm3) before normalizing in the subacute to convalescent phase. Acute phase reactants are elevated to varying degrees in nearly every patient with KD. Serum transaminases or gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase elevations occur in 40–60% of patients [2, 43]. Urinalysis may show a sterile pyuria in up to 80% of children [44].

Some studies suggest use of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide as an adjunctive diagnostic marker of acute phase KD. Its suggested use is in the pediatric emergency room in patients with unexplained prolonged fever with suspected KD. However, it is a nonspecific test with no clear cut-point values for a positive result [45,45,47]. A recent study investigated the use of platelet-activating factor (PAF) and its acetyl-hydrolase (PAF-AH) in predicting KD. In this particular report, the authors found a statistically significant elevation in PAF and PAF-AH levels in the acute phase in children with KD as compared to controls [48•].

Diagnostics/Imaging

The most feared sequelae of KD is development of coronary artery abnormalities, which occurs in 20–25% of untreated children [49]. Echocardiography remains the standard imaging modality to evaluate for both coronary artery dimension as well as other cardiac abnormalities. It is a non-invasive study without risk of radiation and high sensitivity and specificity for identifying coronary artery lesions (CALs). The Japanese Ministry of Health criteria is widely used to classify coronary artery sizes according to age [50]. In children younger than 5 years, coronary artery lumen diameter is abnormal if exceeding 3 mm. In children 5 years of age and older, a lumen diameter greater than 4 mm is considered abnormal. In addition to absolute luminal dimensions, both the Japanese ministry of Health and the American Heart Association also utilize Z scores when classifying CALs. Z scores are coronary dimensions that are adjusted for body surface area, as coronary artery dimensions will change with the size of the child. Overall, aneurysms < 5 mm luminal diameter are considered small, 5–8 mm luminal diameter are considered medium-sized, and aneurysms > 8 mm in luminal diameter are considered large.

Echocardiography surveillance is typically performed at diagnosis, 1–2 weeks after diagnosis, and then again 6–8 weeks later (assuming no complications). There are several factors associated with increased risk of developing CALs including male sex, age < 12 months or > 8 years, fever duration > 10 days, leukocytosis > 15,000 per mm3, low hemoglobin (< 10 g/dL), thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, and persistent fever or recurrence of fever > 36 h after IVIG administration [51, 52]. Children at higher risk, and those with previously noted CALs, will be screened more often. Other imaging modalities utilized include magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomographic angiography, and cardiac catheterization if warranted.

Differential

Several other illnesses share similar clinical features to KD (Table 4) and must be considered prior to diagnosis. Clinical manifestations that do not align with the diagnostic criteria for KD should prompt investigation of other causes. It must also be noted, that children affected by KD may have a concurrent infection with another pathogen, i.e., viral respiratory pathogen as previously described.

Table 4 Differential diagnosis of Kawasaki disease

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a newly reported inflammatory condition with Kawasaki-like features and an association with the 2019 Coronavirus (COVID-19). First described April 2020 in the UK, MIS-C cases are now reported in Italy, France, Spain, and the United States. Affected children tend to present with persistent fever, conjunctivitis, mucositis, lymphadenopathy, rash, evidence of multisystem organ involvement, and elevated inflammatory markers. Respiratory symptoms and abdominal pain are also common features [53•, 54•, 55•, 56•, 57•]. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) case definition for MIS-C includes individuals less than 21 years of age presenting with fever (> 38.0 °C), laboratory evidence of inflammation, and clinically severe illness requiring hospitalization with multisystem organ involvement. Patients must have evidence of exposure to COVID-19 within 4 weeks prior to onset of symptoms, and practitioners must exclude plausible alternative diagnoses [58•].

MIS-C appears to present as a late manifestation of disease (weeks after the COVID-19 exposure) and may be more related to immune activation during the convalescent period. It remains unknown if COVID-19 triggers KD features, if it is a completely separate entity, a spectrum of disease, related to macrophage activation, or an overlap syndrome. One of the most interesting aspects of this disease is that countries with the highest incidence of KD, i.e., Japan and China, have no reported cases despite excellent surveillance systems. Other notable differences compared to KD: MIS-C typically presents after the age of 5, and there appears to be a higher incidence in children of Afro-Caribbean descent [54•, 57•]. Little information is currently known about the pathogenesis and optimal treatment regimen for MIS-C. Most practitioners are utilizing standard Kawasaki protocols if clinically similar to KD in addition to supportive therapy [54•, 55•, 56•, 57•]. Several international registries are collecting surveillance data to learn more about this new entity. The hope is that discoveries in MIS-C may provide insight into our understanding of the trigger, genetics, and pathophysiology of KD.

Primary Treatment

Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG)

Early identification of KD is paramount as timely administration of treatment has greatly reduced the incidence of coronary artery lesions (CALs). IVIG is most effective when administered within 10 days of onset of fever, and its use decreases the risk of coronary artery aneurysm formation from 20–25% to 3–5% in those who are appropriately treated [59, 60]. Effective initial treatment consists of a single infusion of high-dose IVIG at 2 g/kg together with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) [60,60,62].

Even with prompt IVIG therapy, up to 20% of children will develop recurrent or persistent fevers. These children are termed IVIG-resistant [61,61,63]. There are several risk factors for IVIG-resistant KD including delayed initial IVIG administration, increased ESR, decreased hemoglobin and platelet levels, oral mucosal alterations, cervical lymphadenopathy, extremity swelling, and polymorphous rash [64•]. It is recommended that these children are administered a second dose of IVIG to help prevent sequelae [61]. Additional considerations regarding IVIG therapy: active vaccinations, i.e., measles and varicella vaccinations are contraindicated for 11 months after administration of IVIG and known physiologic ESR elevations after IVIG preclude its use to assess response to therapy.

ASA

Moderate-dose (30–50 mg/kg/day) or high-dose (80 to 100 mg/kg/day) ASA is generally utilized until the patient is afebrile in the United States, Japan, and Western Europe. There does not appear to be a significant difference between low-dose (3-5 mg/kg/day) ASA versus high-dose ASA in regard to incidence of CALs, duration of fever, or duration of hospitalization [65•]. There is also no clear evidence that any dose of ASA will decrease development of CALs [66].

Therefore, it may be reasonable to give the moderate-dose ASA to avoid potential toxicities seen in high-dose ASA. Regardless of dose, ASA and IVIG remain the standard initial management. ASA is typically scheduled every 6 h during the acute phase of illness. Some clinicians will continue high-dose ASA until the 14th day of illness, even after fever defervescence. After the acute phase, children are transitioned to low-dose (3–5 mg/kg) ASA for anti-platelet effect. Patients remain on low-dose ASA into the convalescent phase. The decision to continue or discontinue therapy is usually made around 6–8 weeks pending any CALs on echocardiogram. Patients who are at high risk of treatment resistance and/or patients with coronary sequelae may benefit from adjunctive treatments (which are discussed below).

Adjuvant Therapy and Treatment Options for Cases Refractory to IVIG and ASA

Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids are well-utilized in most vasculitides given their relatively fast onset, strong anti-inflammatory properties, and overall improved outcomes. Their use in KD is more controversial, but emerging data suggests that patients at particularly high risk for development of CALs may benefit from early use of corticosteroids as primary adjunctive therapy with IVIG and ASA. A 2016 meta-analysis of 16 studies by Chen et al. looked at early intervention with corticosteroids plus IVIG versus corticosteroid use in IVIG-resistant cases. They found that the incidence of CALs was lower in patients who received corticosteroids as adjunctive primary therapy compared to the IVIG only group [67]. A 2017 Cochrane review also demonstrated reduced incidence of CALs in KD patients treated with corticosteroids during the acute phase. Additionally, they found that corticosteroid use was associated with decreased duration of fever, length of hospitalization, and time to normalization of CRP [68•].

There is significant heterogeneity in studies assessing corticosteroids use in KD with regard to dose, duration, and timing of use. Despite this fact, there are several notable consistencies when comparing results. Studies that utilized a single dose of intravenous methylprednisolone [69, 70] did not demonstrate the same benefit of reduced incidence of CALs seen in studies which utilized moderate to high dose (i.e., 1–6 mg/kg/day prednisolone equivalent doses) over an extended course (i.e., greater than 3 days) [71, 72]. Early use of corticosteroids during the acute phase appears to be more beneficial than in refractory (IVIG-resistant) cases [67, 73]. Patients at higher risk of poor coronary outcomes have the greatest magnitude of benefit from early adjunctive corticosteroid therapy [68, 69, 72, 74]. Overall results demonstrate good tolerability and safety with corticosteroid use and no evidence of increased incidence of adverse outcomes. There is currently no consensus on corticosteroid dosing for treatment of KD. The most recent AHA guidelines note that a longer course of corticosteroids may be considered in high risk patients as primary adjunctive therapy or in IVIG-resistant cases [38•].

Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibition

TNF and IL-1 beta have both been implicated in the vascular endothelial cell damage and CALs seen in acute KD [75]. Several small studies reported potential beneficial effects of TNF blockade during the acute phase of KD, either as primary therapy or in cases refractory to IVIG. The most well-studied agent is infliximab, whose use may decrease the duration of fever and the length of hospitalization as well as aid in normalization of acute phase reactants. No studies to date, however, have reported decreased CALs with the use of infliximab [76, 77].

A recent trial with etanercept for acute phase KD showed no significant benefit in cases refractory to IVIG. However, there did appear to be an improvement in coronary artery dilation and disease progression in patients 1 year out from onset. This effect seemed especially true in patients with baseline abnormalities on coronary imaging [78•]. Use of TNF inhibitors is not mainstream for reasons besides lack of effect on CALs, namely association with malignancy and infection risk.

Interleukin 1 Inhibition

Several small case studies have reported successful use of anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, in the treatment of refractory KD [79,79,81]. Prospective trials are underway to further investigate.

Calcineurin Inhibition

Calcineurin inhibitors like cyclosporine may be beneficial as adjunctive primary treatment or in cases refractory to IVIG [82•, 83, 84]. The 2019 Hamada et al. study was a randomized control trial that showed reduced incidence of CALs in higher risk patients treated with IVIG plus cyclosporine versus standard therapy with IVIG alone. Additionally, the authors found no increased incidence of adverse events between the two groups [82•]. Calcineurin inhibition therapy has promise given the important role the adaptive immune system, specifically T cells, plays in the pathogenesis of KD. More studies need to be conducted to assess effectiveness and safety.

Other Therapies

Several other immunosuppressive agents are reported to be effective in patients with refractory KD including: plasma exchange, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and even rituximab. Use of these agents is not widespread given toxicity risks and lack of staunch prospective clinical trials [85,85,87]. IL-6 inhibitors are not currently used in refractory cases of KD. A 2017 prospective case series by Nozawa et al. reported progressive development of giant coronary artery aneurysms in 2 out of 4 children treated with tocilizumab with refractory KD. While this was a single small series, there is a suggestion than tocilizumab may accelerate formation of CALs [88].

Primary Prevention of Thrombosis

Patients with no evidence of CALs are maintained on low-dose ASA therapy throughout the acute phase of illness. At the 6–8 week follow-up appointment, ASA may be discontinued so long as no adverse changes are seen on the final cardiac imaging (echocardiogram). Patients with small CALs are typically continued on low-dose ASA monotherapy past this period. Those with moderate-sized aneurysms are managed with ASA and an ADP receptor antagonist, i.e., clopidogrel. Children with persistent large or giant aneurysms (internal luminal diameter ≥ 8 mm) may be treated with an antiplatelet agent plus anticoagulant therapy (i.e., warfarin or LMWH). The latter regimens are implemented in collaboration with pediatric hematology specialists. It is important to note that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which utilize the cyclooxygenase pathway, may interfere with the antiplatelet effect of ASA and should be avoided.

Studies are underway assessing the role of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) in children with KD and CALs. Statins may have potential beneficial effects on inflammation, platelet aggregation, coagulation, and endothelial function in addition to their known cholesterol lowering effects. Studies have shown both safety and tolerability, but long-term prospective trials are needed prior to recommending their routine use in KD [89, 90].

Prognosis and Long-Term Management

The prognosis for children diagnosed with Kawasaki disease is primarily based upon extent and severity of coronary artery involvement at diagnosis and at follow-up. The case-fatality rate in the United States and Japan is less than 0.2%, and the principal cause of death is myocardial infarction resulting from coronary artery occlusion [91]. The AHA 2017 guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and management of KD provide a detailed risk classification scheme that can be utilized for follow-up guidance [38•]. The classification system is divided into five risk categories utilizing both Z scores and absolute luminal dimensions.

The lowest risk level is 1, indicating no involvement of the coronary arteries (Z score < 2). These patients are screened with echocardiogram during the acute illness, and then again at 6–8 weeks after onset. These patients appear to have a similar risk profile to patients without a diagnosis of KD [49]. ASA can be discontinued in this group so long as there are no adverse changes in the risk classification. The highest risk group is risk level 5 with large or giant aneurysms (Z score ≥ 10 or absolute dimension ≥ 8 mm). These patients naturally require much closer cardiac monitoring, and even addition of anticoagulants if persistence of aneurysms as outlined above [38•].