Advertisement

Prolotherapy for Osteoarthritis and Tendinopathy: a Descriptive Review

  • David RabagoEmail author
  • Bobby Nourani
Complementary and Alternative Medicine (S Kolasinski, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Osteoarthritis and overuse tendinopathy are common chronic conditions of high societal and patient burden. The precise etiology of pain and disability in both conditions is multifactorial and not well understood. Patients are often refractory to conservative therapy. The development of new therapeutic options in both conditions is a public health priority. Prolotherapy is an injection-based outpatient regenerative therapy for chronic musculoskeletal conditions, including osteoarthritis and tendinopathy. The authors reviewed the basic science and clinical literature associated with prolotherapy for these conditions.

Recent Findings

Systematic review, including meta-analysis, and randomized controlled trials suggest that prolotherapy may be associated with symptom improvement in mild to moderate symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and overuse tendinopathy.

Summary

Although the mechanism of action is not well understood and is likely multifactorial, a growing body of literature suggests that prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis may be appropriate for the treatment of symptoms associated with knee osteoarthritis in carefully selected patients who are refractory to conservative therapy and deserves further basic and clinical science investigation for the treatment of osteoarthritis and tendinopathy.

Keywords

Osteoarthritis Tendinopathy Prolotherapy Outpatient therapy Musculoskeletal pain Musculoskeletal rehabilitation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Rabago is president of the Hackett Hemwall Patterson Foundation, a non-profit (501c3) organization that provides prolotherapy teaching and service. Dr. Nourani has nothing to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Recently published papers of particular interest have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Reginster JY. The prevalence and burden of arthritis. Rheumatology. 2002;41(suppl 1):3–6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/1041.suppl_1091.1093.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    CDC. Prevalence and impact of chronic joint symptoms-seven states, 1996. MMWR. 1998;47(17):345–51.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CDC. Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions—United States, 1991-1992. MMWR. 1994;43(40):730–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Felson DT, Zhang Y. An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 1998;41(8):1343–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilson MG, Michet CJ, Ilstrup DM, Melton LJ. Ideopathic symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: a population-based incidence study. Mayo Clic Proc. 1990;65(9):1214–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oliveria SA, Felson DT, Klein RA, Reed JI, Walker AM. Estrogen replacement therapy and the development of osteoarthritis. Epidemiology. 1996;7(4):415–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levy E, Ferme A, Perocheau D, et al. Socioeconomic costs of osteoarthritis in France. Rev Rhum. 1993;60(6 Pt 2):63S–7S.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Samson DJ, Grant MD, Ratko TA, Bonnell CJ, Ziegler KM, Aronson N. (2007) Treatment of primary and secondary osteoarthritis of the knee. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Publication No. 07-E012): Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Prepared by Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290–02-0026). Rockville, MD. 157:1–157.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McClindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22(3):363–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khan KM, Cook JL, Kannus P, Maffuli N, Bonar SF. Time to abandon the ‘tendinitis’ myth. BMJ. 2002;324:626–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bongers PM. The cost of shoulder pain at work. Variation in work tasks and good job opportunities are essential for prevention. BMJ. 2001;322(7278):64–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wilson JJ, Best TM. Common overuse tendon problems: a review and recommendations for treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(5):811–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rabago D, Best T, Beamsly M, Patterson J. A systematic review of prolotherapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Sports Med. 2005;15(5):376–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schultz L. A treatment for subluxation of the temporomandibular joint. JAMA. 1937;109(13):1032–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hackett GS, Hemwall GA, Montgomery GA. (1993) Ligament and tendon relaxation treated by prolotherapy. 5th ed. Oak Park: Gustav A. Hemwall.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    DeChellis DM, Cortazzo MH. Regenerative medicine in the field of pain medicine: Prolotherapy, platelet-rich plasma, and stem cell therapy—theory and evidence. Techniques in regional anesthesia and pain management. 2011;15(2):74–80. doi: 10.1053/j.trap.2011.1005.1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu YK, Tipton CM, Matthes RD, Bedford TG, Maynard JA, Walmer HC. An in-situ study of the influence of a sclerosing solution in rabbit medial collateral ligaments and its junction strength. Connect Tissue Res. 1983;11(2–3):95–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maynard JA, Pedrini VA, Pedrini-Mille A, Romanus B, Ohlerking F. Morphological and biochemical effects of sodium morrhuate on tendons. J Orthop Res. 1985;3(2):236–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Linetsky FS, FRafael M, Saberski L. (2002) Pain management with regenerative injection therapy (RIT). In: Weiner RS, ed. Pain Management. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 381–402.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jensen KT, Rabago D, Best TM, Patterson JJ, Vanderby R. Early inflammatory response of knee ligaments to prolotherapy in a rat model. J Orthop Res. 2008;26(6):816–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jensen KT, Rabago D, Best TM, Patterson JJ, Vanderby R. Longer term response of knee ligaments to prolotherapy in a rat injury model. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1347–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yoshi T, Zhao C, Schmelzer JD, Low PA, An K, Amadio A. The effects of hypertonic dextrose injection on connective tissue and nerve conduction through the rabbit carpal tunnel. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(2):333–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yelland MJ, Sweeting KR, Lyftogt JA, Ng SK, Scuffham PA. Prolotherapy injections and eccentric loading exercises for painful Achilles tendinosis: a randomised trial. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:421–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled double-blind study of dextrose prolotherapy for osteoarthritic thumb and finger (DIP, PIP, and Trapeziometacarpal) joints: evidence of clinical efficacy. J Altern Complem Med. 2000;6(4):311–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study of dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis with or without ACL laxity. Altern Ther Health M. 2000;6(2):68.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ehrich E, Davies G, Watson D, Bolognese J, Seidenberg B, Bellamy N. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(11):2635–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tubach F, Wells G, Ravaud P, Dougados M. Minimal clinically important difference, low disease activity state, and patient acceptable symptom state: methodological issues. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(10):2025–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rabago D, Zgierska A, Fortney L, et al. Hypertonic dextrose injections (prolotherapy) for knee osteoarthritis: results of a single-arm uncontrolled study with 1-year follow-up. J Altern Complement Med. 2012;18:408–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Altman RD. Criteria for classification of clinical osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1991;27(Suppl 65):10–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dumais R, Benoit C, Dumais A, et al. Effect of regenerative injection thereapy on fuction and pain in patients with knee osteoarthitis: a randomized crossover study. Pain Med. 2012;13:990–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(12):1833–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    •• Rabago D, Patterson JJ, Mundt M, et al. Dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(3):229–37. This study is the first rigorous RCT to report clinically important and statistically significant results for prolotherapy compared with masked “inert” control injections for any condition. The study suggests that hypertonic dextrose has independent efficacy compared with sham injection Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Filardo G, Di Matteo B, Di Martino A, et al. Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular knee injections show no superiority versus viscosupplementation. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1575–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    •• Sit RWS, Chung VCH, Reeves KD, et al.2016. Hypertonic dextrose injections (prolotherapy) in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 6. This systematic review with meta-analysis reported positive outcomes for prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis compared with at-home exercise on composite WOMAC scores, as well as pain and function WOMAC subscale scores. It provides the highest level (meta-analysis) of data supporting prolotherapy Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rabago D, Patterson JJ, Mundt M, et al. Dextrose and Morrhuate sodium injections (prolotherapy) for knee osteoarthritis: the results of a prospective open label trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20(5):383–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    • Rabago D, Kijowski R, Woods M, et al. Association between disease-specific quality-of-life and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes in a clinical trial of prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2075–82. This controlled study assessed mechanism of action of prolotherapy and reported that prolotherapy does not produce intra-articular cartilaginous growth on MRI at 1 year among participants with knee osteoarthritis who received prolotherapy, compared with those who did not. However, results suggest that prolotherapy may have a pain-specific mechanism of action Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guermazi A, Hayashi D, Roemer FW, Felson DT. Osteoarthritis: a review of strengths and weaknesses of different imaging options. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2013;39:567–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    • Topol GA, Podesta L, Reeves KD, et al. The chondrogenic effect of intra-articular hypertonic-dextrose (prolotherapy) in severe knee osteoarthritis. PM&R. 2016;8:1072–82. This open label pilot study provides intriguing data based on pre-post arthroscopically derived data among participants with severe knee osteoarthritis. Participants receiving prolotherapy reported clinical improvement consistent with prior studies. Visual examination of post-treatment arthroscopy and biopsy specimens suggested growth of hyaline cartilage Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    • Rabago D, Mundt M, Zgierska A, Grettie J. Hypertonic dextrose injection (prolotherapy) for knee osteoarthritis: long term outcomes. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2015;23(3):388–95. This open label study followed 65 participants who received prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis recipients to a mean 2.5 years and reported an average of 20.9 ± 2.8 points improvement on the 0–100 point composite WOMAC outcome measure. However, the group was made up of responders (82%), who improved by a total of 28.3 ± 17.5 points, and non-responders (18%) who lost 12.1 ± 7.9 points.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    • Rabago D, van Leuven L, Benes L, et al. Qualitative assessment of patients receiving prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis in a multi-method study. J Alt and Comp Med. 2016;22(12):983–9. This open-label study reported the qualitative outcomes of participants in studies assessing prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis. Themes included good safety profile, effectiveness, the importance of pre-procedure counseling, and a willingness to recommend prolotherapy to others. A minority of participants noted improved function but minimal improvement in pain, and 18% ( n = 4) noted no improvement in pain CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Verhar J. Tennis elbow: anatomical, epidemiological and therapeutic aspects. Int Orthop. 1994;18:263–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hamilton P. The prevalence of humeral epicondylitis: a survey in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986;36(291):464–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kivi P. The etiology and conservative treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1983;15(1):37–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ono Y, Nakamura R, Shimaoka M, Hattori Y, Ichihara G. Epicondylitis among cooks in nursery schools. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55(3):172–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ritz BR. Humeral epicondylitis among gas and waterworks employees. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995;21(6):478–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Scarpone M, Rabago D, Zgierska A, Arbogest J, Snell ED. The efficacy of prolotherapy for lateral epicondylosis: a pilot study. Clin J Sport Med. 2008;18(3):248–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rabago D, Lee KS, Ryan M, et al. Hypertonic dextrose and morrhuate sodium injections (prolotherapy) for lateral epicondylosis (tennis elbow): results of a single-blind, pilot-level randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehab. 2013;92(7):587–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yelland M, Rabago D, Bisset L, Ryan M. (2014) Randomised clinical trial of prolotherapy injections and an exercise program used singly and in combination for refractory tennis elbow. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12612000993897. Griffith University, Queensland Australia.
  49. 49.
    Topol GA, Podesta LA, Reeves KD, Raya MF, Fullerton BD, Yeh H. Hyperosmolar dextrose injection for recalcitrant Osgood-Schlatter disease. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):e1121–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bertrand H, Reeves KD, Bennett CJ, Bicknell S, Cheng AL. Dextrose prolotherapy versus control injections in painful rotator cuff tendinopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.1008.1412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Holmich P, Uhrskou P, Ulnits L. Effectiveness of active physical training as treatment of long-standing adductor-related groin pain in athletes: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9151):439–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Topol GA, Reeves KD, Hassanein KM. Efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy in elite male kicking-sport athletes with groin pain. Arch Phys Rehabil. 2005;86(4):697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kvist M. Achilles tendon injuries in athletes. Sports Med. 1994;18(3):173–2001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Maxwell NJ, Ryan MB, Taunton JE, Gillies JH, Wong AD. Sonographically guided intratendinous injection of hyperosmolar dextrose to treat chronic tendinosis of the Achilles tendon: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:W215–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Buchbinder R. Plantar fasciitis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(21):2159–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Taunton J, Ryan M, Clement D, McKenzie D, Lloyd-Smith D, Zumbo B. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(2):95–101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Crawford F, Thomson C. Interventions for treating plantar heel pain. Cochrane Database. 2003;3:CD000416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD14000416.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ryan MB, Wong AD, Gillies JH, Wong J, Taunton JE. Sonographically guided intratendinous injections of hyperosmolar dextrose/lidocaine: a pilot study for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(4):303–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rabago D, Nourani B, Weber M. (2017) Prolotherapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain. In: Rakel D, ed. Integrative Medicine. Vol In Press. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Baumgartner JJ. 2016 Regenerative injections: the art of healing complete injection manual, Sixth Ed. http://regenerative-md.com/: Rejuvmedical.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Family Medicine and Community HealthUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations