Advertisement

Management of Raynaud’s Phenomenon and Digital Ischemia

  • Ariane L. Herrick
SCLERODERMA (J VARGA, SECTION EDITOR)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Scleroderma

Abstract

This review focuses on new findings and developments relevant to the clinician caring for patients with primary and secondary [especially systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related] Raynaud phenomenon (RP). In the last 18 months, several clinical trials and observational studies of RP and of SSc-related digital ulceration have been published, reflecting increased awareness of disease burden and increased interest by pharmaceutical companies: new insights into pathophysiology are driving new approaches to treatment. Key developments are the increased use of phosphodiesterase type V inhibitors in severe RP, and of bosentan (an endothelin-1 receptor antagonist) for prevention of recurrent SSc-related digital ulcers. Other treatments being researched include topical glyceryl trinitrate (applied locally to the digits), botulinum toxin (for severe digital ischemia/ulceration), and several other drugs including oral prostanoids. Increased availability and interest in nailfold capillaroscopy, by facilitating early diagnosis of SSc, should pave the way for studies of early intervention and vascular protection.

Keywords

Raynaud’s phenomenon Systemic sclerosis Digital ulcers Digital ischemia Critical ischemia Clinical trials Phosphodiesterase inhibitors Endothelin-1 receptor antagonists Glyceryl trinitrate Prostanoids Botulinum toxin Nailfold capillaroscopy Management 

Notes

Disclosure

Dr. Herrick has served as a consultant for Actelion Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer; has received royalties from UpToDate; has received payment for development of educational presentations (including service on speakers’ bureaus) from Actelion Pharmaceuticals; has had travel/accommodations expenses covered/reimbursed by Actelion Pharmaceuticals; and has been an investigator in studies sponsored by Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, MediQuest, United Therapeutics Corp., and Orion Pharma.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major Importance

  1. 1.
    Silman A, Holligan S, Brennan P, Maddison P. Prevalence of symptoms of Raynaud’s phenomenon in general practice. BMJ. 1990;301:590–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tiev KP, Diot E, Clerson P, et al. Clinical features of scleroderma patients with or without prior or current ischemic digital ulcers: post-hoc analysis of a nationwide multicenter cohort (ItinerAIR-Sclerodermie). J Rheum. 2009;36:1470–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khimdas S, Harding S, Bonner A, et al. Associations with digital ulcers in a large cohort of systemic sclerosis: results from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group Registry. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:142–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    • Mouthon L, Mestre-Stanislas C, Berezne A, et al. Impact of digital ulcers on disability and health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:214–7. This study of 213 patients with SSc highlighted the functional impact and disease burden of digital ulceration. The 67 (31.4 %) patients with digital ulcers, compared to those without, had higher global disability (as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire), increased hand disability (measured by the Cochin Hand Function Scale), and reduced hand and wrist mobility.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    LeRoy EC, Medsger TA. Raynaud’s phenomenon: a proposal for classification. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1992;10:485–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suter LG, Murabito JM, Felson DT, Fraenkel L. The incidence and natural history of Raynaud’s phenomenon in the community. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1259–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kowal-Bielecka O, Landewe R, Avouac J, et al. EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR). Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:620–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    • Stewart M, Morling JR. Oral vasodilators for primary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012; Issue 7. Art. No.: CD006687. doi:  10.1002/14651858.CD006687.pub3. This Cochrane review of oral vasodilators (excluding calcium channel blockers) concluded that at present there is no evidence base to support the effectiveness of any of these drugs in PRP. The review therefore highlights the urgent need for well-designed clinical trials.
  9. 9.
    Huissstede BM, Hoogvliet P, Paulis WD, et al. Effectiveness of interventions for secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1166–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    • Shenoy PD, Kumar S, Jha LK, et al. Efficacy of tadalafil in secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon resistant to vasodilator therapy: a double-blind randomized cross-over trial. Rheumatol. 2010;49:2420–8. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial of 6 weeks of alternate day tadalafil 20 mg in 24 patients (23 with SSc) reported benefit in a number of clinical parameters including RP symptoms (frequency and duration of attacks, and Raynaud’s Condition Score), digital ulceration, and quality of life measures.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    • Herrick AL, Van den Hoogen F, Gabrielli A, et al. Modified-Release sildenafil reduces Raynaud’s phenomenon attack frequency in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:775–82. This multicentre double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with limited cutaneous SSc provided further evidence in favour of phosphodiesterase inhibiton for secondary RP. Four weeks’ modified release sildenafil (100 mg for 3 days then 200 mg daily) led to a greater reduction in mean percentage change in the number of RP attacks per week than placebo (−44.0 vs. −18.1 %, P = 0.034). Other endpoints were not significantly different between groups.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    • Caglayan E, Axmann S, Hellmich M, et al. Vardenafil for the treatment of Raynaud phenomenon: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1182–4. This single-centre double-blind, placebo controlled cross-over trial in 53 patients (6 primary, 47 secondary) reported a significant reduction (by −0.45) in Raynaud’s Condition Score on vardenafil compared to placebo (P = 0.03). The number and duration of attacks also fell significantly more on vardenafil.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pope J, Harding S, Khimdas S, et al. Agreement with guidelines from a large database for management for management of systemic sclerosis: results from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group. J Rheumatol. 2012;39:524–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walker KM, Pope J. Treatment of systemic sclerosis complications: what to use when first-line treatment fails – a consensus of systemic sclerosis experts. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;42:42–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chung L, Shapiro L, Fiorentino D, et al. MQX-503, a novel formulation of nitroglycerin, improves the severity of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:870–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fava A, Wung PK, Wigley FM, et al. Efficacy of Rho Kinase inhibitor fasudil in secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:925–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bredie SJ, Jong MC. No significant effect of Ginkgo biloba special extract EGb 761 in the treatment of primary Raynaud phenomenon: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2012;59:215–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Malenfant D, Summers K, Seney S, et al. Result of a pilot randomized placebo-controlled trial in primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon with St. John’s Wort: detecting changes in angiogenic cytokines when RP improves. ISRN Rheumatol 2011; Article ID 580704, 6 pages. doi: 10.5402/2011/580704.
  19. 19.
    Wigley FM, Wise RA, Seibold JR, et al. Intravenous iloprost infusion in patients with Raynaud phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis. A multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:199–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pope J, Fenlon D, Thompson A, et al. Iloprost and cisaprost for Raynaud’s phenomenon in progressive systemic sclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998; Issue 2: CD000953. doi:  10.1002/14651858
  21. 21.
    Walker KM, Pope J. Expert agreement on EULAR/EUSTAR recommendations for the management of systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1326–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hartzell TL, Makhni EC, Sampson C. Long-term results of periarterial sympathectomy. J Hand Surg (American). 2009;34:1454–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Korn JH, Mayes M, Matucci Cerinic M, for the RAPIDS-1 Study Group, et al. Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis. Prevention by treatment with bosentan, an oral endothelin receptor antagonist. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:3985–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    •• Matucci-Cerinic M, Denton CP, Furst DE, et al. Bosentan treatment of digital ulcers related to systemic sclerosis: results from the RAPIDS-2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:32–8. This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial confirmed the results of the previous RAPIDS-1 trial: bosentan was associated with a reduction in the number of new digital ulcers compared to placebo, but not with ulcer healing. All 188 patients with SSc, recruited from 41 centres, had at least one digital ulcer at the time of randomisation.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Arefiev K, Fiorentino DF, Chung L. Endothelin receptor antagonists for the treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis. Int J Rheumatol 2011; Article ID 201787, 7 pages, doi:  10.1155/2011/201787.
  26. 26.
    Ivorra JA, Simeon CP, Sancho JJ, et al. Bosentan in clinical practice for treating digital and other ischemic ulcers in Spanish patients with systemic sclerosis: IBER-DU cohort study. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1631–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nagai Y, Hasegawa M, Hattori T, et al. Bosentan for digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis. J Dermatol. 2012;39:48–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ichimura Y, Asano Y, Hatano M, et al. Significant attenuation of macrovascular involvement by bosentan in a patient with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis with multiple digital ulcers and gangrene. Mod Rheumatol. 2011;21:548–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taniguchi T, Asano Y, Hatano M, et al. Effects of bosentan on nondigital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:417–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nguyen VA, Eisendle K, Gruber I, et al. Effect of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan on Raynaud’s phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis: a double-blind prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. Rheumatol. 2010;49:583–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brueckner CS, Becker MO, Kroencke T, et al. Effect of sildenafil on digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: analysis from a single centre pilot study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1475–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Della Rossa A, Doveri M, D’Ascanio A, et al. Oral sildenafil in skin ulcers secondary to systemic sclerosis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2011;40:323–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moinzadeh P, Hunzelmann N, Kreig T. Combination therapy with an endothelin-1 receptor antagonist (bosentan) and a phosphodiesterase V inhibitor (sildenafil) for the management of severe digital ulcerations in systemic sclerosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:e102–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Seibold JR, Wigley FM, Schiopu E, et al. Digital ischemic ulcers in scleroderma treated with oral treprostinil diethanolamine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study (abstract). Arthritis Rheum. 2010;63(Suppl):S968–9.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Iorio ML, Masden DL, Higgins JP. Botulinum toxin A treatment of Raynaud’s phenomenon: a review. Sem Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41:599–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stone AV, Koman LA, Callahan MF, et al. The effect of botulinum neurotoxin-A on blood flow in rats: a potential mechanism for treatment of Raynaud phenomenon. J Hand Surg (American Volume). 2012;37:795–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yoshimasu T, Ikeda T, Uede K, et al. Effects of sarpogrelate hydrochloride on skin ulcers and quality of life in patients with systemic sclerosis. J Dermatol. 2012;39:536–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Herrick AL, Oogarah PK, Freemont AJ, Marcuson R, et al. Vasculitis in patients with systemic sclerosis and severe digital ischaemia requiring amputation. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994;53:323–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hasegawa M, Nagai Y, Tamura A, Ishikawa O. Arteriographic evaluation of vascular changes of the extremities in patients with systemic sclerosis. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155:1159–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang W, Xu JR, Lu Q, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of digital arteries in SSc patients on a 3 Tesla: preliminary study. Rheumatol. 2011;50:1712–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Koenig M, Joyal F, Fritzler MJ, et al. Autoantibodies and microvascular damage are independent predictive factors for the progression of Raynaud's phenomenon to systemic sclerosis: a twenty-year prospective study of 586 patients, with validation of proposed criteria for early systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:3902–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Avouac J, Fransen J, Walker UA, et al. Preliminary criteria for the very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis: results of a Delphi Consensus Study from EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:476–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Herrick AL, Cutolo M. Clinical implications from capillaroscopic analysis in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon and systemic sclerosis-spectrum disorders. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2595–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sebastiani M, Manfredi A, Colaci M, et al. Capillaroscopic skin ulcer risk index: a new prognostic tool for digital skin ulcer development in systemic sclerosis patients. Arthritis Rheum (Arthritis Care Res). 2009;61:688–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    • Smith V, De Keyser F, Pizzorni C, et al. Nailfold capillaroscopy for day-to-day clinical use: construction of a simple scoring modality as a clinical prognostic index for digital trophic lesions. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:180–3. The authors proposed a capillaroscopic index derived from capillary density as a predictor of digital trophic lesions. The importance of this study is that it emphasises how capillaroscopy may be a tool not only for predicting SSc in patients presenting with RP but also for predicting severity of vasculopathy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Abou-Raya A, Abou-Raya S, Helmii M. Statins: potentially useful in therapy of systemic sclerosis-related Raynaud’s phenomenon and digital ulcers. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:1801–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gabrielli A, Svegliati S, Moroncini G, et al. Oxidative stress and the pathogenesis of scleroderma: the Murrell’s hypothesis revisited. Semin Immunopathol. 2008;30:329–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fries R, Shariat K, von Wilmowsky H, Bohm M. Sildenafil in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon resistant to vasodilatory therapy. Circulation. 2005;112:2980–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Caglayan E, Huntgeburth M, Karasch T, et al. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition is a novel therapeutic option in Raynaud disease. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:231–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schiopu E, Hsu VM, Impens AJ, et al. Randomised placebo-controlled crossover trial of tadalafil in Raynaud’s phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:2264–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of ManchesterSalfordUK

Personalised recommendations