Current Rheumatology Reports

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 92–96 | Cite as

Osteoporosis epidemiology update

Article

Abstract

Osteoporosis remains a major public health problem through its association with fragility fractures. Despite the availability of preventative therapeutic agents, the incidence and its associated costs continue to rise globally. Understanding osteoporosis epidemiology is essential to developing strategies to reduce the burden of osteoporotic fracture in the population. This article reviews the epidemiology of osteoporosis globally, highlighting recent advances. It describes the burden of common osteoporotic fractures, the associated morbidity and mortality, the clustering of fractures in individuals, and the identification of at-risk groups. It also highlights the development of new algorithms to identify individuals at high risk of fracture, enabling the implementation of appropriate treatment strategies.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Consensus development conference: prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1991, 1:114–117.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1994, 843:1–129.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, et al.: Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporos Int 2001, 12:989–995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA: An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006, 17:1726–1733.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, et al.: Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 2001, 29:517–522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cummings SR, Melton LJ: Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 2002, 359:1761–1767.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gallagher JC, Melton LJ, Riggs BL, Bergstrath E: Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur in Rochester, Minnesota. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980, (150):163–171.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd: Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 1992, 2:285–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gehlbach SH, Avrunin JS, Puleo E: Trends in hospital care for hip fractures. Osteoporos Int 2007, 18:585–591.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SJ, et al.: Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol 1993, 137:1001–1005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tosteson AN, Gottlieb DJ, Radley DC, et al.: Excess mortality following hip fracture: the role of underlying health status. Osteoporos Int 2007, 18:1463–1472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bass E, French DD, Bradham DD, et al.: Risk-adjusted mortality rates of elderly veterans with hip fractures. Ann Epidemiol 2007, 17:514–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chrischilles EA, Butler CD, Davis CS, et al.: A model of lifetime osteoporosis impact. Arch Intern Med 1991, 151:2026–2032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, et al.: The prevalence of vertebral deformity in european men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 1996, 11:1010–1018.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, et al.: Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res 1992, 7:221–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, et al.: Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2000, 15:1384–1392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, et al.: Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 1991, 114:919–923.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cuddihy MT, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, et al.: Forearm fractures as predictors of subsequent osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 1999, 9:469–475.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gallacher SJ, Gallagher AP, McQuillian C, et al.: The prevalence of vertebral fracture amongst patients presenting with non-vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 2007, 18:185–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al.: Fracture risk following an osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004, 15:175–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, et al.: Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. JAMA 2007, 297:387–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, et al.: Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22:465–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hagino H, Katagiri H, Okano T, et al.: Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Tottori Prefecture, Japan: trend from 1986 to 2001. Osteoporos Int 2005, 16:1963–1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zingmond DS, Melton LJ 3rd, Silverman SL: Increasing hip fracture incidence in California Hispanics, 1983 to 2000. Osteoporos Int 2004, 15:603–610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, et al.: Nationwide decline in incidence of hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 2006, 21:1836–1838.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jaglal SB, Weller I, Mamdani M, et al.: Population trends in BMD testing, treatment, and hip and wrist fracture rates: are the hip fracture projections wrong? J Bone Miner Res 2005, 20:898–905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johnell O, Gullberg B, Allander E, et al.: The apparent incidence of hip fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources. MEDOS Study Group. Osteoporos Int 1992, 2:298–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yan L, Zhou B, Prentice A, et al.: Epidemiological study of hip fracture in Shenyang, People’s Republic of China. Bone 1999, 24:151–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morales-Torres J, Gutierrez-Urena S: The burden of osteoporosis in Latin America. Osteoporos Int 2004, 15:625–632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kaastad TS, Meyer HE, Falch JA: Incidence of hip fracture in Oslo, Norway: differences within the city. Bone 1998, 22:175–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Ugoni AM, et al.: Fracture rates lower in rural than urban communities: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002, 56:466–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Richards JB, Leslie WD, Joseph L, et al.: Changes to osteoporosis prevalence according to method of risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22:228–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cauley JA, Wu L, Wampler NS, et al.: Clinical risk factors for fractures in multi-ethnic women: the Women’s Health Initiative. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22:1816–1826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sennerby U, Farahmand B, Ahlbom A, et al.: Cardiovascular diseases and future risk of hip fracture in women. Osteoporos Int 2007, 18:1355–1362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C, et al.: Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 2005, 16:581–589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, et al.: The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 2007, 18:1033–1046.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical Research Council Epidemiology Resource CentreSouthampton General HospitalSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations