Current Psychiatry Reports

, 19:110 | Cite as

Reflections on Recent Research Into Animal-Assisted Interventions in the Military and Beyond

  • Christina B. Rumayor
  • Amy M. Thrasher
Military Mental Health (CH Warner, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Military Mental Health


Purpose of Review

The purpose of the present review was threefold: to address the current state of Animal-Assisted Interactions (AAI) within the military; to summarize recent literature (within the past three years) in the field of AAI; and to discuss trends in AAI research since 2014.

Recent Findings

With regard to AAI within the military, several canine interaction programs have been utilized to assist service members in coping with various issues. Therapy dogs have been deployed with Combat-Operational Stress Control units; they have been integrated into medical clinics and behavioral health treatment programs in garrison; and policy has been developed to address the use of therapy animals in military treatment facilities. General research in AAI has demonstrated efficacy for certain presenting issues (stress management, trauma, autism spectrum disorder) and specific populations (children, the elderly, acute care patients). Overall trends in research include calls for increased consideration for animal welfare in AAI and increased rigor in research methodology.


Current research supports the structured use of therapy dogs in the treatment of various disorders and with specific populations, including military service members and veterans; however, the need for additional research with rigorous methodology remains.


Animal-assisted interactions Animal-assisted therapy Therapy dogs Military CAM treatment CAM therapy 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Christina B. Rumayor and Amy M. Thrasher each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    O’Haire ME, Guerin NA, Kirkham AC. Animal-assisted intervention for trauma; a systematic literature review. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1–13. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fine AH, Beck A. Understanding our kinship with animals: input for health care professionals interested in the human/animal bond. In: Fine AH, editor. Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: theoretical foundations and guidelines for practice. 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2010. p. 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ernst L. Animal-assisted therapy: an exploration of its history, healing benefits, and how skilled nursing facilities can set up programs. Annal Long-Term Care, 2014:22. Retrieved from:
  4. 4.
    Shubert J. Dogs and human/mental health: from the pleasure of their company to the benefits of their assistance. U.S. Army Medical Department Journal, 2012:April–June:21–29. Retrieved from
  5. 5.
    Turner DC. The role of ethology in the field of human/animal relations and animal-assisted therapy. In: Fine AH, editor. Handbook of animal-assisted therapy: theoretical foundations and practical guidelines. San Diego: Academic Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson CC. Human/animal interactions and health: the evidence and issues—past, present, and future. In: Fine AH, editor. Handbook of animal-assisted therapy: theoretical foundations and practical guidelines. San Diego: Academic Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amiot CE, Bastian B. Toward a psychology of human-animal relations. Psych Bul. 2014;140:2–42. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ritchie EC, Chumley PR, Olmert MD, Yount RA, St. Laurent M, Rumayor C. Canines as assistive therapy for treatment of PTSD. In: Benedek DM, Wynn GH, editors. Complementary and alternative medicine for PTSD. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ritchie EC, Amaker R. The early years in canine assisted therapy in military medicine. AMEDD J 2012: April–June.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baldor, L.C. Therapy dog helps Ft. Bragg troops deal with stress. Associated Press. 8 MAY 2014.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Furst G. Prisoners, pups, and PTSD; the grass roots response to veterans with PTSD. Contemp Justice Rev. 2015;18:449–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klopp ML, Hunter RH, Kerts SJ. Examining the effects of a novel training program and use of psychiatric service dogs for military-related PTSD and associated symptoms. Am J Orthopsychiatry. MAR 2017. Advance online publication
  13. 13.
    Yount, RA, Lee, MR., & Olmert, MD (2012). Service dog training program for treatment of posttraumatic stress in service members. Army Med J, April–June, 63–69.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    •• Department of Veterans’ Affairs (2015). VA restarting study on service dogs and PTSD. Retrieved from: Though still pending, the VA study into the impact of service dogs for PTSD is one of the largest, most comprehensive reports on the utilization of service dogs. It is methodologically sound and represents the gold standard of research.
  15. 15.
    Army Directive 2013-01 Guidance on the acquisition and use of service dogs by soldiers, 28 Jan 13.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mims D, Waddell R. Animal assisted therapy and trauma survivors. J Evid Informed Soc Work. 2016;13:452–7. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsai CC, Friedmann E, Thomas SA. The effect of animal-assisted therapy on stress responses in hospitalized children. Anthrozoös. 2010;23:245–58. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nepps P, Stewart CN, Bruckno SR. Animal-assisted activity: effects of a complementary intervention program on psychological and physiological variables. J Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2014;19:211–5. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krause-Parello CA, Friedmann E. The effects of an animal-assisted intervention on salivary alpha-amylase, salivary immunoglobulin a, and heart rate during forensic interview in child sexual abuse cases. Anthrozoös. 2014;27:581–90. Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barker SB, Knisely JS, McCain NL, Schubert CM, Pandurangi AK. Exploratory study of stress-buffering response patterns from interaction with a therapy dog. Anthrozoös. 2010;23:79–91. Scholar
  21. 21.
    Friedmann E, Katcher AH, Thomas SA, Lynch JJ, Messent PR. Social interaction and blood pressure: influence of animal companions. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1983;171:461–5. Scholar
  22. 22.
    Polheber JP, Matchock RL. The presence of a dog attenuates cortisol and heart rate in the Trier Social Stress Test compared to human friends. J Behav Med. 2014;37:860–7. Scholar
  23. 23.
    Henry CL, Crowley SL. The psychological and physiological effects of using a therapy dog in mindfulness training. Antrhozoos. 2015;28:358–402.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wright H, Hall S, Hames A, Hardiman J, Mills R, Mills D. Acquiring a pet dog significantly reduces stress of primary carers for children with autism spectrum disorder: a prospective case control study. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45:2531–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Funashi A, Gruebler A, Aoki T, Kadone H, Suzuki K. Brief report: the smiles of a child with autism spectrum disorder during an animal-assisted activity may facilitate social positive behaviors—quantitative analysis with smile-detecting interface. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44:685–93. Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Haire ME, McKenzie SJ, McCune S, Slaughter V. Effects of classroom animal-assisted activities on social functioning in children with autism spectrum disorder. J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20:162–8. Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mueller MK, Callina KS. Human-animal interaction as a context for thriving and coping in military-connected youth: the role of pets during deployment. Appl Dev Sci. 2014;18:214–23. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tielsch Goddard A, Gilmer MJ. The role and impact of animals with pediatric patients. Pediatr Nurs. 2015;41:65–71.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Calcaterra V, Veggiotti P, Palestrini C, De Giorgis V, Raschetti R, Tumminelli M, Mencherini S, Papotti F, Kiersy C, Albertini R, Ostuni S, Pelizzo G. Post-operative benefits of animal-assisted therapy in pediatric surgery: a randomized study. PLOS One 2015:June:1–13. Doi:
  30. 30.
    Olsen C, Pedersen I, Bergland A, Enders-Slegers MJ, Patil G, Ihlebaek C. Effect of animal-assisted interventions on depression, agitation and quality of life in nursing home residents suffering from cognitive impairment or dementia: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Ger Psych. 2016;31:1312–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Menna LF, Santaniello A, Gerardi F, Di Maggio A, Milan G. Evaluation of the efficacy of animal-assisted therapy based on the reality orientation therapy protocol in Alzheimer’s disease patients: a pilot study. Psychogeriatrics. 2016;16:240–6. Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nordgren L, Engstrom G. Effects of dog-assisted intervention on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Nurs Older People. 2014;26:31–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thordberg K, Sorensen LU, Christensen JW, Poulsen PH, Houbak B, Damgaard V, et al. Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly. Psychogeriatrics. 2016;16:289–97. Scholar
  34. 34.
    Strickland OJ, Davidson S. Predictors of interest in participation in an animal-assisted activity program in elderly citizens. Soc Anim. 2016;3:213–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Phung A, Joyce C, Ambutas S, Browning M, Fogg L, Christopher BA, Flood S. Animal-assisted therapy for inpatient adults. Nursing 2017:63–66. Doi:
  36. 36.
    Creagan T, Bauer BA, Thomley BS, Borg JM. Animal-assisted therapy at Mayo Clinic: the time is now. Compl Ther in Clin Pract. 2015;21:101–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    •• Hosey G, Melfi V. Human-animal interactions, relationships and bonds: a review and analysis of the literature. Int Jour Comp Psych. 2014;27:117–42. Retrieved from Hosey and Melfi’s review is comprehensive in its assessment of the state of the AAI literature. It references all major works in the field up to 2014 and provides important to future direction that were followed up by Lundqvist et al. (2017). It also provides a synthesis of major trends in AAI research over the past decade.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Glenk LM. Current perspectives on therapy dog welfare in animal-assisted interventions. Animals. 2017;7:7–21. Scholar
  39. 39.
    Haubenhofer DK, Kirchengast S. Physiological arousal for companion dogs working with their owners in animal-assisted activities and animal-assisted therapy. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2006;9:165–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Haubenhofer DK, Kirchengast S. Dog handlers’ and dogs’ emotional and cortisol secretion response associated with animal-assisted therapy sessions. Soc Anim. 2007;15:127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Marinelli L, Normando S, Siliprandi C, Salvadorett M, Mongillo P. Dog assisted interventions in a specialized centre and potential concerns for animal welfare. Vet Res Commun. 2009;33:93–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    King C, Watters J, Mungre S. Effect of a time-out session with working animal-assisted therapy dogs. J Vet Behav. 2011;6:232–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ng ZY, Pierce BJ, Otto CM, Buechner-Maxwell VA, Siracusa C, Were SR. The effect of dog-human interaction on cortisol and behavior in registered animal-assisted activity dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2014;159:69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Byrd E, Widmar NO, Fulton J. Of fur, feather, and fin: human’s use and concern for non-human species. Animals. 2017;7:22–40. Scholar
  45. 45.
    •• Maujean A, Pepping CA, Kendall EA. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of animal-assisted therapy on psychosocial outcomes. Anthrozoös. 2015;28:23–36. This particular article is a comprehensive review of the psychosocial outcomes assessed in the most comprehensive studies (RCTs). The call for RCTs has long been made and Maujean et al. (2015) answer with this systematic review of all RCTs in AAI to date.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    •• McCune S, Kruger KA, Griffin JA, Esposito L, Freund LS, Hurley KJ, et al. Evolution of research into the mutual benefits of human-animal interaction. Anm. Frontiers. 2014;4:49–57. Like Hosey and Melfi (2014), McCune et al. (2014) examines the changes in AAI literature over time and provides important future directions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Stern C, Chur-Hansen A. Methodological considerations in designing and evaluating animal-assisted interventions. Animals. 2013;3:127–41. Scholar
  48. 48.
    •• Lundqvist M, Carlsson P, Sjodahl R, Theodorsson E, Levin LA. Patient benefit of dog-assisted interventions in health care: a systematic review. BMC Comp Alt Med. 2017;17:358–70. This article further evaluates the literature, carrying on the previous work of Hosey and Melfi (2014). It updates the literature with emphasis placed on methodologically sound research, leaving out anecdotal and methodologically inferior research, while emphasizing the benefits to patient care.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lopez-Cepero Borrego J, Rodriguez Franco L, Parea Mediavilla M, Blanco Pinero N, Tejada Roldan A, Blanco Picabia A. Animal-assisted interventions: review of current status and future challenges. Int Jour of Psych and Psych Theory. 2014;14:85–101.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Esposito L, McCune S, Griffin JA, Maholmes V. Directions in human-animal interaction research: child development, health and therapeutic interventions. Child Dev Pers. 2011;95:205–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral HealthBrian Allgood Army Community HospitalSeoulKorea
  2. 2. Department of Behavioral HealthWomack Army Medical CenterFort BraggUSA

Personalised recommendations