Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bipolar Disorder in Pregnancy and Postpartum: Principles of Management

  • Women's Mental Health (CN Epperson, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pregnancy and postpartum represent times of increased vulnerability for women with bipolar disorder, yet this condition remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. As 50 % of pregnancies are unplanned, the risks associated with the illness and the potential risks associated with treatment should be considered when a woman of reproductive age first presents for evaluation. This article reviews the epidemiology of perinatal bipolar disorder, screening recommendations, and treatment with pharmacotherapy and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). An overview of the data in pregnancy and lactation is presented for lithium, lamotrigine, valproic acid, newer antipsychotics, and ECT. General principles of management include close monitoring in pregnancy and postpartum, careful adjustment of the treatment regimen to attenuate the risk of relapse, and avoidance of valproic acid when possible. Thoughtful consideration of these issues will minimize the risks to the mother and baby.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Jones I, Chandra PS, Dazzan P, Howard LM. Bipolar disorder, affective psychosis, and schizophrenia in pregnancy and the post-partum period. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1789–99. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61278-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman MP, Smith KW, Freeman SA, McElroy SL, Kmetz GE, Wright R, et al. The impact of reproductive events on the course of bipolar disorder in women. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63(4):284–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Viguera AC, Whitfield T, Baldessarini RJ, Newport DJ, Stowe Z, Reminick A, et al. Risk of recurrence in women with bipolar disorder during pregnancy: prospective study of mood stabilizer discontinuation. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(12):1817–24. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06101639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma V, Burt VK, Ritchie HL. Bipolar II postpartum depression: detection, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166(11):1217–21. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08121902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frey BN, Simpson W, Wright L, Steiner M. Sensitivity and specificity of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire as a screening tool for bipolar disorder during pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(11):1456–61. doi:10.4088/JCP.12m07856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D, et al. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG. 2011;118 Suppl 1:1–203. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Viguera AC, Nonacs R, Cohen LS, Tondo L, Murray A, Baldessarini RJ. Risk of recurrence of bipolar disorder in pregnant and nonpregnant women after discontinuing lithium maintenance. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(2):179–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergink V, Armangue T, Titulaer MJ, Markx S, Dalmau J, Kushner SA. Autoimmune encephalitis in postpartum psychosis. Am J Psychiatry. 2015:appiajp201514101332. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14101332.

  9. Merrill L, Mittal L, Nicoloro J, Caiozzo C, Maciejewski PK, Miller LJ. Screening for bipolar disorder during pregnancy. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015;18(4):579–83. doi:10.1007/s00737-015-0527-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chessick CA, Dimidjian S. Screening for bipolar disorder during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2010;13(3):233–48. doi:10.1007/s00737-010-0151-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma V, Xie B. Screening for postpartum bipolar disorder: validation of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. J Affect Disord. 2011;131(1–3):408–11. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.11.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma V, Pope CJ. Pregnancy and bipolar disorder: a systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(11):1447–55. doi:10.4088/JCP.11r07499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. March of Dimes Foundation. Quick facts: birth defects. 2013 [8/5/15]; Available from: http://www.marchofdimes.com/peristats/ViewTopic.aspx?reg=99&top=16&lev=0&slev=1&dv=mt.

  14. Boden R, Lundgren M, Brandt L, Reutfors J, Andersen M, Kieler H. Risks of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes in women treated or not treated with mood stabilisers for bipolar disorder: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345, e7085. doi:10.1136/bmj.e7085.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yonkers KA, Wisner KL, Stowe Z, Leibenluft E, Cohen L, Miller L, et al. Management of bipolar disorder during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(4):608–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Newport DJ, Viguera AC, Beach AJ, Ritchie JC, Cohen LS, Stowe ZN. Lithium placental passage and obstetrical outcome: implications for clinical management during late pregnancy. Am J Psychiatr. 2005;162(11):2162–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nora JJ, Nora AH, Toews WH. Letter: Lithium, Ebstein’s anomaly, and other congenital heart defects. Lancet. 1974;2(7880):594–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen LS, Friedman JM, Jefferson JW, Johnson EM, Weiner ML. A reevaluation of risk of in utero exposure to lithium.[see comment][erratum appears in JAMA 1994 May 18;271(19):1485]. JAMA. 1994;271(2):146–50.

  19. Diav-Citrin O, Shechtman S, Tahover E, Finkel-Pekarsky V, Arnon J, Kennedy D, et al. Pregnancy outcome following in utero exposure to lithium: a prospective, comparative, observational study. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(7):785–94. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.12111402. This is a prospective, comparative observational study evaluating the risk of major malformations associated with lithium exposure during pregnancy. Lithium exposure was associated with an increased rate of cardiovascular anomalies (5/123 [4.1%] compared with 4/711 [0.6%] in the non-teratogenic exposure group), however this risk was no longer statistically significant after excluding malformations which resolved spontaneously.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kozma C. Neonatal toxicity and transient neurodevelopmental deficits following prenatal exposure to lithium: another clinical report and a review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;132A(4):441–4. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.30501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van der Lugt NM, van de Maat JS, van Kamp IL, Knoppert-van der Klein EA, Hovens JG, Walther FJ. Fetal, neonatal and developmental outcomes of lithium-exposed pregnancies. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88(6):375–8. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.09.013. This observational retrospective cohort study evaluated the growth and neurodevelopment of 15 children exposed to lithium in pregnancy at 3–15 years and found that lithium exposure was not associated with adverse effects on growth and cognitive development.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Deligiannidis KM, Byatt N, Freeman MP. Pharmacotherapy for mood disorders in pregnancy: a review of pharmacokinetic changes and clinical recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014;34(2):244–55. doi:10.1097/jcp.0000000000000087. This paper reviews the pharmacokinetic changes of antidepressants and mood stabilizers during pregnancy, discusses the implications for clinical and therapeutic drug monitoring, and offers clinical recommendations.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bergink V, Kushner SA. Lithium during pregnancy. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(7):712–5. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14030409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Viguera AC, Newport D, Ritchie J, Stowe Z, Whitfield T, Mogielnicki J, et al. Lithium in breast milk and nursing infants: clinical implications. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(2):342–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marin Gabriel MA, Olza Fernandez I, Donoso E, Gutierrez Cruz N. Lithium and artificial breastmilk; or is maternal breastfeeding better? An Pediatr (Barc). 2011;75(1):67–8. doi:10.1016/j.anpedi.2010.12.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bogen DL, Sit D, Genovese A, Wisner KL. Three cases of lithium exposure and exclusive breastfeeding. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2012;15(1):69–72. doi:10.1007/s00737-012-0257-3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tomson T, Battino D. Antiepileptic treatment in pregnant women: morphological and behavioural effects. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2011;205:295–315. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20195-0_15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Werler MM, Ahrens KA, Bosco JL, Mitchell AA, Anderka MT, Gilboa SM, et al. Use of antiepileptic medications in pregnancy in relation to risks of birth defects. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21(11):842–50. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mawhinney E, Campbell J, Craig J, Russell A, Smithson W, Parsons L, et al. Valproate and the risk for congenital malformations: is formulation and dosage regime important? Seizure. 2012;21(3):215–8. doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2012.01.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Meador KJ, Baker GA, Finnell RH, Kalayjian LA, Liporace JD, Loring DW, Mawer G, Pennell PB, Smith JC, Wolff MC, Group NS. In utero antiepileptic drug exposure: fetal death and malformations.[see comment]. Neurology. 2006;67(3):407–12.

  31. Hernandez-Diaz S, Smith CR, Shen A, Mittendorf R, Hauser WA, Yerby M, et al. Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. Neurology. 2012;78(21):1692–9. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182574f39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Diav-Citrin O, Shechtman S, Bar-Oz B, Cantrell D, Arnon J, Ornoy A. Pregnancy outcome after in utero exposure to valproate: evidence of dose relationship in teratogenic effect. CNS Drugs. 2008;22(4):325–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Sabers A, et al. Dose-dependent risk of malformations with antiepileptic drugs: an analysis of data from the EURAP epilepsy and pregnancy registry. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(7):609–17. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70107-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vajda FJ, O'Brien TJ, Graham JE, Lander CM, Eadie MJ. Dose dependence of fetal malformations associated with valproate. Neurology. 2013;81(11):999–1003. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a43e81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ozkan H, Cetinkaya M, Koksal N, Yapici S. Severe fetal valproate syndrome: combination of complex cardiac defect, multicystic dysplastic kidney, and trigonocephaly. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(3):521–4. doi:10.3109/14767058.2010.501120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Christensen J, Gronborg TK, Sorensen MJ, Schendel D, Parner ET, Pedersen LH, et al. Prenatal valproate exposure and risk of autism spectrum disorders and childhood autism. JAMA. 2013;309(16):1696–703. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.2270. This Danish population based study found that prenatal exposure to valproate was associated with an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder and childhood autism; the 508 children exposed to valproate had an absolute risk of 4.42 % (95 % CI, 2.59–7.46 %) for autism spectrum disorder (adjusted HR, 2.9 [95 % CI, 1.7–4.9]) and an absolute risk of 2.50 % (95 % CI, 1.30–4.81 %) for childhood autism (adjusted HR, 5.2 [95 % CI, 2.7–10.0]).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. FDA. Valproate sodium and related products (valproic acid and divalproex sodium): risk of birth defects: http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm192788.htm [released 12/3/09]. 2009 [8/14/15].

  38. Dolk H, Jentink J, Loane M, Morris J, de Jong-van den Berg LT. Does lamotrigine use in pregnancy increase orofacial cleft risk relative to other malformations? Neurology. 2008;71(10):714–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Molgaard-Nielsen D, Hviid A. Newer-generation antiepileptic drugs and the risk of major birth defects. JAMA. 2011;305(19):1996–2002. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Campbell E, Kennedy F, Russell A, Smithson WH, Parsons L, Morrison PJ, et al. Malformation risks of antiepileptic drug monotherapies in pregnancy: updated results from the UK and Ireland Epilepsy and Pregnancy Registers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(9):1029–34. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-306318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Veiby G, Daltveit AK, Engelsen BA, Gilhus NE. Fetal growth restriction and birth defects with newer and older antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. J Neurol. 2014;261(3):579–88. doi:10.1007/s00415-013-7239-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Meador KJ, Baker GA, Browning N, Cohen MJ, Bromley RL, Clayton-Smith J, et al. Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure and cognitive outcomes at age 6 years (NEAD study): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(3):244–52. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70323-x.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Baker GA, Bromley RL, Briggs M, Cheyne CP, Cohen MJ, Garcia-Finana M, et al. IQ at 6 years after in utero exposure to antiepileptic drugs: a controlled cohort study. Neurology. 2015;84(4):382–90. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001182.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bromley R, Weston J, Adab N, Greenhalgh J, Sanniti A, McKay AJ, et al. Treatment for epilepsy in pregnancy: neurodevelopmental outcomes in the child. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10, Cd010236. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010236.pub2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Veiby G, Daltveit AK, Schjolberg S, Stoltenberg C, Oyen AS, Vollset SE, et al. Exposure to antiepileptic drugs in utero and child development: a prospective population-based study. Epilepsia. 2013;54(8):1462–72. doi:10.1111/epi.12226.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Paulzen M, Lammertz SE, Veselinovic T, Goecke TW, Hiemke C, Grunder G. Lamotrigine in pregnancy—therapeutic drug monitoring in maternal blood, amniotic fluid, and cord blood. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;30(5):249–54. doi:10.1097/yic.0000000000000088. This study measured lamotrigine concentrations in maternal blood, amniotic fluid, and umbilical cord blood in six mother-infant pairs at delivery. Lamotrigine levels in serum were strongly correlated with the lamotrigine levels in the amniotic fluid and cord blood.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kacirova I, Grundmann M, Brozmanova H. Serum levels of lamotrigine during delivery in mothers and their infants. Epilepsy Res. 2010;91(2–3):161–5. doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.07.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Fotopoulou C, Kretz R, Bauer S, Schefold JC, Schmitz B, Dudenhausen J, et al. Prospectively assessed changes in lamotrigine-concentration in women with epilepsy during pregnancy, lactation and the neonatal period. Epilepsy Res. 2009;85(1):60–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Harden CL, Pennell PB, Koppel BS, Hovinga CA, Gidal B, Meador KJ, et al. Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy—focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breastfeeding: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society. Neurology. 2009;73(2):142–9. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a6b325.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Newport DJ, Stowe ZN, Viguera AC, Calamaras MR, Juric S, Knight B, et al. Lamotrigine in bipolar disorder: efficacy during pregnancy. Bipolar Disord. 2008;10(3):432–6. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00565.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Clark CT, Klein AM, Perel JM, Helsel J, Wisner KL. Lamotrigine dosing for pregnant patients with bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(11):1240–7. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13010006.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ohman I, Vitols S, Tomson T. Lamotrigine in pregnancy: pharmacokinetics during delivery, in the neonate, and during lactation. Epilepsia. 2000;41(6):709–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Page-Sharp M, Kristensen JH, Hackett LP, Beran RG, Rampono J, Hale TW, et al. Transfer of lamotrigine into breast milk. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(7–8):1470–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wakil L, Epperson CN, Gonzalez J, O'Reardon JP, Kim DR. Neonatal outcomes with the use of lamotrigine for bipolar disorder in pregnancy and breastfeeding: a case series and review of the literature. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2009;42(3):91–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Veiby G, Engelsen BA, Gilhus NE. Early child development and exposure to antiepileptic drugs prenatally and through breastfeeding: a prospective cohort study on children of women with epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(11):1367–74. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Meador KJ, Baker GA, Browning N, Clayton-Smith J, Combs-Cantrell DT, Cohen M, et al. Effects of breastfeeding in children of women taking antiepileptic drugs. Neurology. 2010;75(22):1954–60. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ffe4a9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Meador KJ, Baker GA, Browning N, Cohen MJ, Bromley RL, Clayton-Smith J, et al. Breastfeeding in children of women taking antiepileptic drugs: cognitive outcomes at age 6 years. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(8):729–36. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.118.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Veiby G, Bjork M, Engelsen BA, Gilhus NE. Epilepsy and recommendations for breastfeeding. Seizure. 2015;28:57–65. doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2015.02.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sabers A, Buchholt JM, Uldall P, Hansen EL. Lamotrigine plasma levels reduced by oral contraceptives. Epilepsy Res. 2001;47(1–2):151–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sabers A, Ohman I, Christensen J, Tomson T. Oral contraceptives reduce lamotrigine plasma levels. Neurology. 2003;61(4):570–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Christensen J, Petrenaite V, Atterman J, Sidenius P, Ohman I, Tomson T, et al. Oral contraceptives induce lamotrigine metabolism: evidence from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Epilepsia. 2007;48(3):484–9. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.00997.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Vigod SN, Gomes T, Wilton AS, Taylor VH, Ray JG. Antipsychotic drug use in pregnancy: high dimensional, propensity matched, population based cohort study. BMJ. 2015;350:h2298. doi:10.1136/bmj.h2298.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. McKenna K, Koren G, Tetelbaum M, Wilton L, Shakir S, Diav-Citrin O, Levinson A, Zipursky RB, Einarson A. Pregnancy outcome of women using atypical antipsychotic drugs: a prospective comparative study.[see comment]. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2005;66(4):444–9; quiz 546.

  64. Reis M, Kallen B. Maternal use of antipsychotics in early pregnancy and delivery outcome. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;28(3):279–88. doi:10.1097/JCP.0b013e318172b8d5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Habermann F, Fritzsche J, Fuhlbruck F, Wacker E, Allignol A, Weber-Schoendorfer C, et al. Atypical antipsychotic drugs and pregnancy outcome: a prospective, cohort study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013;33(4):453–62. doi:10.1097/JCP.0b013e318295fe12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kulkarni J, Worsley R, Gilbert H, Gavrilidis E, Van Rheenen TE, Wang W, et al. A prospective cohort study of antipsychotic medications in pregnancy: the first 147 pregnancies and 100 one year old babies. PLoS One. 2014;9(5), e94788. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094788.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ennis ZN, Damkier P. Pregnancy exposure to olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, aripiprazole and risk of congenital malformations. A systematic review. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014. doi:10.1111/bcpt.12372. A literature review of the available data on the risk of malformations with first-trimester exposure to the newer antipsychotics: olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and aripiprazole. The rate of malformation was 3.5 % for olanzapine, 3.6 % with quetiapine, and 5.1 % with risperidone; data for aripiprazole was limited.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Coughlin CG, Blackwell KA, Bartley C, Hay M, Yonkers KA, Bloch MH. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after antipsychotic medication exposure in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(5):1224–35. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Boden R, Lundgren M, Brandt L, Reutfors J, Kieler H. Antipsychotics during pregnancy: relation to fetal and maternal metabolic effects. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(7):715–21. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Terrana N, Koren G, Pivovarov J, Etwel F, Nulman I. Pregnancy outcomes following in utero exposure to second-generation antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;35(5):559–65. doi:10.1097/JCP.0000000000000391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. FDA. FDA Drug Safety Communication: antipsychotic drug labels updated on use during pregnancy and risk of abnormal muscle movements and withdrawal symptoms in newborns: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm243903.htm [released 2/22/2011]. 2011 [8/14/15].

  72. Johnson KC, LaPrairie JL, Brennan PA, Stowe ZN, Newport DJ. Prenatal antipsychotic exposure and neuromotor performance during infancy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(8):787–94. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.160.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Peng M, Gao K, Ding Y, Ou J, Calabrese JR, Wu R, et al. Effects of prenatal exposure to atypical antipsychotics on postnatal development and growth of infants: a case-controlled, prospective study. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 2013. doi:10.1007/s00213-013-3060-6.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Newport DJ, Calamaras MR, DeVane CL, Donovan J, Beach AJ, Winn S, et al. Atypical antipsychotic administration during late pregnancy: placental passage and obstetrical outcomes. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(8):1214–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Yonkers KA, Wisner KL, Stewart DE, Oberlander TF, Dell DL, Stotland N, et al. The management of depression during pregnancy: a report from the American Psychiatric Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(3):703–13. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ba0632.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Miller LJ. Use of electroconvulsive therapy during pregnancy. Hosp Commun Psychiatry. 1994;45(May):444–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Anderson EL, Reti IM. ECT in pregnancy: a review of the literature from 1941 to 2007. Psychosom Med. 2009;71(2):235–42. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e318190d7ca.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Leiknes KA, Cooke MJ, Jarosch-von Schweder L, Harboe I, Hoie B. Electroconvulsive therapy during pregnancy: a systematic review of case studies. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015;18(1):1–39. doi:10.1007/s00737-013-0389-0.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina J. Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Sabrina J. Khan, Madeleine E. Fersh, Carrie Ernst, Kim Klipstein, and Elizabeth Streicker Albertini declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Shari I. Lusskin has received expert testimony fees from Pfizer (sertraline litigation; consultant involving venlafaxine litigation). Dr. Lusskin has also received royalties from UpToDate.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Women's Mental Health

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, S.J., Fersh, M.E., Ernst, C. et al. Bipolar Disorder in Pregnancy and Postpartum: Principles of Management. Curr Psychiatry Rep 18, 13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-015-0658-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-015-0658-x

Keywords

Navigation