Recent advances in massively parallel sequencing (MPS) have had an extensive impact on research in medical genomics. In particular, the analysis of rare variants using MPS promises to lead to a better understanding of complex disorders. Nevertheless, for meaningful studies that address the genetic basis for neuropsychiatric disorders, at least hundreds of patient samples have to be analyzed. This undertaking is still not feasible for single research groups on a whole-genome scale and in individual samples. Thus, researchers increasingly employ strategies for reducing the amount of sequencing efforts, such as target enrichment and non-barcoded sample pooling. This review provides an overview of current technologies, discusses options for reduced experimental designs, and illustrates the successful application of the presented methodologies in a recent study of panic disorder patients. Thereby, it aims to introduce the emerging field of MPS into neuropsychiatric research and might serve as a guide for further studies.
Next-generation sequencing NGS Massively parallel sequencing MPS Targeted re-sequencing Target enrichment Exome enrichment Sample pooling DNA pooling Rare genetic variants Bioinformatics Complex disease Psychiatric disorder Anxiety disorder Panic disorder Human genetics Genetic disorders Genome-wide association studies GWAS Example study Review Psychiatry
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Hettema JM, Neale MC, Kendler KS. A review and meta-analysis of the genetic epidemiology of anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(10):1568–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell SM, Wray NR, Stone JL, Visscher PM, O'Donovan MC, Sullivan PF, et al. Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature. 2009;460(7256):748–52. doi:10.1038/nature08185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Maher B. Personal genomes: the case of the missing heritability. Nature. 2008;456(7218):18–21. doi:10.1038/456018a. Review that points out limitations of published GWAS in common diseases. It introduces to the phenomenon of missing heritability and presents explanation models.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen CT, Wang J, Lanktree MB, Cao H, McIntyre AD, Ban MR, et al. Excess of rare variants in genes identified by genome-wide association study of hypertriglyceridemia. Nat Genet. 2010;42(8):684–7. doi:10.1038/ng.628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trynka G, Hunt KA, Bockett NA, Romanos J, Mistry V, Szperl A, et al. Dense genotyping identifies and localizes multiple common and rare variant association signals in celiac disease. Nat Genet. 2011;43(12):1193–201. doi:10.1038/ng.998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies—the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(1):31–46. doi:10.1038/nrg2626. A detailed overview over the most used massively parallel sequencing platforms, working principles, and their applications.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li H, Homer N. A survey of sequence alignment algorithms for next-generation sequencing. Brief Bioinform. 2010;11(5):473–83. doi:10.1093/bib/bbq015. The authors review currently available mapping methods for MPS data.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamanova L, Coffey AJ, Scott CE, Kozarewa I, Turner EH, Kumar A, et al. Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing. Nat Methods. 2010;7(2):111–8. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1419. This review provides a quick and profound overview over target enrichment strategies and some ideas about choosing the most suitable technology.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen X, Listman JB, Slack FJ, Gelernter J, Zhao H. Biases and errors on allele frequency estimation and disease association tests of next-generation sequencing of pooled samples. Genet Epidemiol. 2012. doi:10.1002/gepi.21648.
Altmann A, Weber P, Bader D, Preuß M, Binder EB, Müller-Myhsok B. A beginners guide To SNP calling from high-throughput DNA-sequencing data. Hum Gen. 2012;131(10):1541–54. doi:10.1007/s00439-012-1213-z.
Nielsen R, Paul JS, Albrechtsen A, Song YS. Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(6):443–51. doi:10.1038/nrg2986. A review on currently available SNP calling methods in non-pooled DNA.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan HY, Chiou JJ, Tseng WH, Liu CH, Liu CK, Lin YJ et al. FASTSNP: an always up-to-date and extendable service for SNP function analysis and prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Web Server issue):W635–41. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl236.Google Scholar
Quast C, Altmann A, Weber P, Arloth J, Bader D, Heck A et al. Rare variants in TMEM132D in a case-control sample for panic disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2012;(in press).Google Scholar
Erhardt A, Czibere L, Roeske D, Lucae S, Unschuld PG, Ripke S, et al. TMEM132D, a new candidate for anxiety phenotypes: evidence from human and mouse studies. Mol Psychiatr. 2010;16(6):647–63. doi:10.1038/mp.2010.41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal V, Libiger O, Torkamani A, Schork NJ. Statistical analysis strategies for association studies involving rare variants. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(11):773–85. doi:10.1038/nrg2867. An excellent overview about the statistical challenges when working with rare genetic variants.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthaler S, Thilly WG. A strategy to discover genes that carry multi-allelic or mono-allelic risk for common diseases: a cohort allelic sums test (CAST). Mutat Res. 2007;615(1–2):28–56. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.09.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar