Skip to main content
Log in

Folie à Deux and shared psychotic disorder

  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Folie à deux (FAD) was first described in 19th century France. Since then, the concept has been elaborated, and several subtypes of FAD have been successively reported in France. In contrast, studies in German-speaking psychiatry mainly focused on the conceptual boundary between reactive/endogenous psychosis and etiological hypothesis (ie, psychogenesis vs genetic predisposition). In North America, Gralnick wrote a seminal review and redefined four subtypes of FAD by adopting the European classical concepts. More recently, “shared psychotic disorder” in DSM or “induced delusional disorder” in ICD-10 was branched off from FAD. However, several classical subcategories of FAD were not included in these recent definitions, the nosological significance of which should not be underestimated. We examined demographic data of FAD case reports published from the 19th to the 21st century and found that some of the earlier hypotheses, such as females being more susceptible, older and more intelligent individuals being more likely to be inducers, and sister-sister pairs being the most common relationship, were not supported. The controversial issue of the etiology of FAD—association of subjects or genetically driven psychosis—was re-examined in light of recent studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Lasègue C, Falret J: La folie à deux ou folie communiqué [in French]. Ann Med Psychol 1877, 18:321–355.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fenning S, Fochtmann LJ, Bromet EJ: Delusional disorder and shared psychotic disorder. In Kaplan & Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, vol 1. Edited by Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:1525–1533.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Legrand du Saulle H: Idées de Persécution Communiquées ou Délire à Deux et à Trois Personnes. Le Délire des Persécutions, Paris: Henri Plon; 1871.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Régis E: La Folie à Deux ou Folie Simultannée Avec Observations Recueillies à la Clinique de Pathologie Mentale (Thèse). Paris: Baillière; 1880.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marandon de Montyel E: Des conditions de la contagion mentale morbide. Ann Med Psych 1894, 7:266–293, 467–487.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Defendorf AR: Folie à deux. In Reference Handbook of the Medical Sciences. 1902:5–135.

  7. Clérambeaut G: Œuvre Psychiatrique. Paris: PUF; 1988:1–89.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lehman G: Zur casuistik des induzirten irreseins (Folie à deux). Arch Psychiatr 1883, 14:145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scharfetter C: On the hereditary aspects of symbiotic psychoses. A contribution towards the understanding of the schizophrenia-like psychoses. Psychiatr Clin (Basel) 1970, 3:145–152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ast F: Allg.Zschr.f.Psychiatr 1906, 63:41.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shinohara D: On induced psychosis [in Japanese]. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi 1959, 61:2035–2055.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bonhoeffer K: Allg.Zschr.f.Psychiatr 1911, 68:371.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jaspers K: Allgemeine Psychopathologie. Berlin: Springer; 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider K: Psychiatrie Heute. Translated into Japanese by Hirase S, Kanokogi T. Tokyo: Bunkodo; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gralnick A: Folie à deux—the psychosis of association. Psychiatr Q 1942, 16:230–236, 491–520.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dewhurst K, Todd J: The psychosis of association — folie à deux. J Nerv Ment Dis 1956, 124:451–459.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Munro A: Folie à deux revisited. Can J Psychiatry 1986, 31:233–234.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, edn 3. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mentjox R, van Houten CA, Kooiman CG: Induced psychotic disorder: clinical aspects, theoretical considerations, and some guidelines for treatment. Compr Psychiatry 1993, 34:120–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, edn 4. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization: The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders, edn 10. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Silveira JM, Seeman MV: Shared psychotic disorder: a critical review of the literature. Can J Psychiatry 1995, 40:389–395.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Arnone D, Patel A, Tan GM: The nosological significance of Folie à Deux: a review of the literature. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2006, 5:11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharon R, Eliyahu Y, Shteynman S. Shared psychotic disorder. [WebMD website]. Available at: http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic3352.htm Accessed February 2007.

  25. Kashiwase H, Kato M: Folie à deux in Japan — analysis of 97 cases in the Japanese literature. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1997, 96:231–234.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. White TG: Folie simultanée in monozygotic twins. Can J Psychiatry 1995, 40:418–420.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shiwach RS, Sobin PB: Monozygotic twins, folie à deux and heritability: a case report and critical review. Med Hypotheses 1998, 50:369–374.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lazarus A: Folie à deux in identical twin: interaction of nature and nurture. Br J Psychiatry 1986, 148:324–326.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kendler KS, Robinson G, McGuire M, Spellman MP: Late onset folie simultanée in a pair of monozygotic twins. Br J Psychiatry 1986, 148:463–465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shimizu M, Kubota Y, Calabrese JR, et al.: Analysis of delusional statements from 15 Japanese cases of ‘Folie à Deux.’ Psychopathology 2006, 39:92–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shimizu M: Folie à deux in schizophrenia—“psychogenesis” revisited. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi 2004, 106:546–563.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Patel AS, Arnone D, Ryan W: Folie à deux in bipolar affective disorder: a case report. Bipolar Disord 2004, 6:162–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dantendorfer K, Maierhofer D, Musalek M: Induced hallucinatory psychosis (folie à deux hallucinatoire): pathogenesis and nosological position. Psychopathology 1997, 30:309–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Joshi KG, Frierson RL, Gunter TD: Shared psychotic disorder and criminal responsibility: a review and case report of folie à trois. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2006, 34:511–517.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsue Shimizu MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shimizu, M., Kubota, Y., Toichi, M. et al. Folie à Deux and shared psychotic disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep 9, 200–205 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-007-0019-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-007-0019-5

Keywords

Navigation