Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of life events and social relationships on the course of major depression

  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concern about the accuracy of risk factor and mental status assessments argues for the need for more experimental research design studies on social factors in the course of depression. Gender and the history of disorder may need to be taken into account in examining the effects of adversity, interpersonal relationships, and social support on the future course of depression. This insight may be particularly critical in relation to intervention studies in which the group targeted may determine the potential for effectiveness so that negative results are not wrongly generalized to wider populations that could potentially benefit if studied. Interventions to improve mental health by providing social support have generally failed to show the enduring benefits suggested by observational studies. However, interventions that modify interpersonal functioning, which may improve the way persons perceive and value support from others, appear more promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Brugha TS: The end of the beginning: a requiem for the categorization of mental disorder? Psychol Med 2002, 32:1149–1154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melzer D, Tom BD, Brugha TS, et al.: Common mental disorder symptom counts in populations: are there distinct case groups above epidemiological cutoffs? Psychol Med 2002, 32:1195–1201. These researchers conducted analyses comparing subgroups known to be at high (vs low) risk in order to test the idea that there are no natural cut-points in symptom data on depression and anxiety. A single exponential model fitted a depression severity score (composed of depressive disorder criteria) remarkably well in householders throughout the UK.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al.: The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 2003, 289:3095–3105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Jr.: Boundaries of major depression: an evaluation of DSM-IV criteria. Am J Psychiatry 1998, 155:172–177.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schraedley PK, Turner RJ, Gotlib IH: Stability of retrospective reports in depression: traumatic events, past depressive episodes, and parental psychopathology. J Health Soc Behav 2002, 43:307–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koh KB, Kim CH, Park JK: Predominance of anger in depressive disorders compared with anxiety disorders and somatoform disorders. J Clin Psychiatry 2002, 63:486–492.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown GW: Social roles, context and evolution in the origins of depression. J Health Soc Behav 2002, 43:255–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brugha T, Bebbington P, Tennant C, Hurry J: The list of threatening experiences: a subset of 12 life event categories with considerable long-term contextual threat. Psychol Med 1985, 15:189–194.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Singleton N, Lewis G: Better or Worse: A Longitudinal Study of the Mental Health of Adults Living in Private Households in Great Britain. Edited by Singleton N, Lewis G. London: The Stationery Office; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Prescott CA: Toward a comprehensive developmental model for major depression in women. Am J Psychiatry 2002, 159:1133–1145. A striking example of the use of pathway models of complex life course influences on the inception of depression in adult life.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Segal ZV, Williams JM, Teasdale JD, Gemar M: A cognitive science perspective on kindling and episode sensitization in recurrent affective disorder. Psychol Med 1996, 26:371–380.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Post R: Transduction of psychosocial stress into the neurobiology of recurrent affective disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1992, 149:999–1010.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brugha TS, Bebbington PE, Stretch DD, et al.: Predicting the short-term outcome of first episodes and recurrences of clinical depression: a prospective study of life events, difficulties, and social support networks. J Clin Psychiatry 1997, 58:298–306.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goodyer IM: Social adversity and mental functions in adolescents at high risk of psychopathology: position paper and suggested framework for future research. Br J Psychiatry 2002, 181:383–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Friis RH, Wittchen HU, Pfister H, Lieb R: Life events and changes in the course of depression in young adults. Eur Psychiatry 2002, 17:241–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spijker J, Bijl RV, de Graaf R, Nolen WA: Determinants of poor 1-year outcome of DSM-III-R major depression in the general population: results of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001, 103:122–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D: Social relationship and health. Science 1988, 241:540–545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tolsdorf CC: Social networks, support and coping: an exploratory study. Fam Process 1976, 15:407–417.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bolger N, Zuckerman A, Kessler RC: Invisible support and adjustment to stress. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000, 79:953–961. A paradox of research on support and depression is the typical finding that support received tends to be associated with higher levels of severity of symptoms. This ingenious study design examined provision and receipt of support prospectively. In the case of depression, reports of support provision were associated with increased Bar examinee adjustment, whereas reports of support receipt were associated with decreased psychologic adjustment.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bebbington P, Brugha T, Meltzer H, et al.: Neurotic disorders and the receipt of psychiatric treatment. Psychol Med 2000, 30:1369–1376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown G, Rutter M: The measurement of family activities and relationships. Hum Relat 1966, 19:241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leff J, Kuipers L, Berkowitz R, et al.: A controlled trial of social intervention in the families of schizophrenic patients. Br J Psychiatry 1982, 141:121–134.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hooley JM: Control and controllability: beliefs and behavior in high and low expressed emotion relatives. Psychol Med 2002, 32:1091–1099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hooley JH, Teasdale JD: Predictors of relapse in unipolar depressives: expressed emotion, marital distress and perceived criticism. J Abnorm Psychol 1989, 98:229–235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McCleary L, Sanford M: Parental expressed emotion in depressed adolescents: prediction of clinical course and relationship to comorbid disorders and social functioning. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2002, 43:587–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Henderson S, Duncan Jones P, McAuley H, Ritchie K: The patient’s primary group. Br J Psychiatry 1978, 132:1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brugha T, Conroy R, Walsh N, et al.: Social networks, attachments and support in minor affective disorders: a replication. Br J Psychiatry 1982, 141:249–255.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brugha TS, Sturt E, MacCarthy B, et al.: The Interview Measure of Social Relationships: the description and evaluation of a survey instrument for assessing personal social resources. Soc Psychiatry 1987, 22:123–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Meltzer H, Gill B, Petticrew M, Hinds K: OPCS Surveys of Psychiatric Morbidity in Great Britain. Report 1: the prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households. Appendix B: algorithms for production of ICD-10 diagnoses of neurosis from the CIS-R. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Social Survey Division 168; 1995. OPCS Surveys of Psychiatric Morbidity in Great Britain.

  30. Brugha TS, Morgan Z, Bebbington P, et al.: Social support networks and type of neurotic symptom among adults in British households. Psychol Med 2003, 33:307–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brugha TS, Bebbington PE, MacCarthy B, et al.: Gender, social support and recovery from depressive disorders: a prospective clinical study. Psychol Med 1990, 20:147–156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brugha TS, Sharp HM, Cooper SA, et al.: The Leicester 500 Project: social support and the development of postnatal depressive symptoms, a prospective cohort survey. Psychol Med 1998, 28:63–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kawachi I, Berkman LF: Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health 2001, 78:458–467.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hintikka J, Koskela T, Kontula O, et al.: Men, women and friends: are there differences in relation to mental wellbeing? Qual Life Res 2000, 9:841–845.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wildes JE, Harkness KL, Simons AD: Life events, number of social relationships, and twelve-month naturalistic course of major depression in a community sample of women. Depress Anxiety 2002, 16:104–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stokes J, Levin I: Gender differences in predicting loneliness from social network characteristics. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986, 51:1069–1074.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Meltzer H, Gill B, Petticrew M, Hinds K: OPCS Surveys of Psychiatric Morbidity in Great Britain. Report 3: economic activity and social functioning of adults with psychiatric disorders. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Social Survey Division 168; 1995. OPCS Surveys of Psychiatric Morbidity in Great Britain.

  38. Rutter M: The interplay of nature, nurture, and developmental influences: the challenge ahead for mental health. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002, 59:996–1000. A clear exposition of present knowledge of social, genetic, and developmental research on neuropsychiatric disorders by a distinguished master of the field.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bowers CA, Geston EL: Social support as a buffer of anxiety: an experimental analogue. Am J Community Psychol 1986, 14:447–451.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sarason IG, Sarason BR: Experimentally provided social support. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986, 50:1222–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lakey B, Heller K: Social support from a friend, perceived support, and social problem solving. Am J Community Psychol 1988, 16:811–824.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Parker G, Barnett B: A test of the social support hypothesis. Br J Psychiatry 1987, 150:72–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Benum K, Anstorp T, Dalgard OS, Sorenson T: Social network stimulation: health promotion in a high risk group of middle-aged women. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1987, 76:1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sandler IN, Wolchik SA, MacKinnion D, et al.: Developing linkages between theory and intervention in stress and coping processes. In Handbook of Children’s Coping: Linking Theory and Intervention. Edited by Wolchik SA, Sandler IN. New York: Plenum; 1997:3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sandler IN, Barrera MJ: Toward a multi-method approach to assessing the effects of social support. Am J Community Psychol 1984, 12:37–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wolchik SA, West SG, Sandler IN, et al.: An experimental evaluation of theory-based mother and mother-child programs for children of divorce. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000, 68:843–856.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Heller K, Thompson M, Trueba PE, et al.: Peer support telephone dyads for elderly women: was this the wrong intervention? Am J Community Psychol 1991, 19:1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Brugha TS, Wheatley S, Taub NA, et al.: Pragmatic randomized trial of antenatal intervention to prevent postnatal depression by reducing psychosocial risk factors. Psychol Med 2000, 30:1273–1281.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Barlow J, Coren E, Stewart-Brown S: Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of parenting programs in improving maternal psychosocial health. Br J Gen Pract 2002, 52:223–233.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Price RH, van Ryn M, Vinokur AD: Impact of a preventive job search intervention on the likelihood of depression among the unemployed. J Health Soc Behav 1992, 33:158–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Beckham EE: Psychotherapy of depression research at a crossroads: directions for the 1990s. Clin Psychol Rev 1990, 10:207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Brugha TS: Social Support and Psychiatric Disorder: Research Findings and Guidelines for Clinical Practice. Edited by Brugha TS. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Frank JD, Frank JB: Persuasion and Healing: A Comparative Study of Psychotherapy. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lindeman S, Kaprio J, Isometsa E, et al.: Spousal resemblance for history of major depressive episode in the previous year. Psychol Med 2002, 32:363–367.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Meyers BS, Sirey JA, Bruce M, et al.: Predictors of early recovery from major depression among persons to community-based clinics: an observational study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002, 59:729–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. O’Leary KD, Smith DA: Marital interactions. Annu Rev Psychol 1991, 42:191–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. O’Leary KD, Beach SRH: Marital therapy: a viable treatment for depression and marital discord. Am J Psychiatry 1990, 147:183–186.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Leff J, Vearnals S, Brewin CR, et al.: The London depression intervention trial. Randomized controlled trial of antidepressant versus couple therapy in the treatment and maintenance of people with depression living with a partner: clinical outcome and costs. Br J Psychiatry 2000, 177:95–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Klerman G, Weissman M, Rounsaville BJ, Chevron ES: Interpersonal Psychotherapy of Depression. New York: Basic Books; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Elkin I, Shea T, Watkins JT, et al.: National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: general effectiveness of treatments. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989, 46:971–982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Frank E, Kupfer DJ, Wagner EF, et al.: Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy as a maintenance treatment of recurrent depression: contributing factors. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991, 48:1053–1059.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Meyer B, Pilkonis PA, Krupnick JL, et al.: Treatment expectancies, patient alliance, and outcome: further analyses from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression collaborative Research Program. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002, 70:1051–1055. Some of the best knowledge of the effects of interpersonal functioning on depression has come from secondary analyses of psychologic treatment trials. The link between treatment expectancies and outcome was mediated by patients’ contribution to the therapeutic alliance.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Koh KB, Kim CH, Park JK: Predominance of anger in depressive disorders compared with anxiety disorders and somatoform disorders. J Clin Psychiatry 2002, 63:486–492.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Spinelli MG, Endicott J: Controlled clinical trial of interpersonal psychotherapy versus education program for depressed pregnant women. Am J Psychiatry 2003, 160:555–562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Harkness KL, Frank E, Anderson B, et al.: Does interpersonal psychotherapy protect women from depression in the face of stressful life events? J Consult Clin Psychol 2002, 70:908–915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Persons J, Burns D: Mechanisms of action of cognitive therapy: the relative contributions of technical and interpersonal interventions. Cognit Ther Res 1985, 9:539–5518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Burns D, Nolen-Hoeksema S: Therapeutic empathy and recovery from depression in cognitive behavioral therapy: a structural equation model. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992, 60:441–449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Parry G: Social support processes and cognitive therapy. In Social Support and Psychiatric Disorder: Research Findings and Guidelines for Clinical Practice, edn 1. Edited by Brugha TS. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995:279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Unutzer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, et al.: Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002, 288:2836–2845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Social and Epidemiological Psychiatry, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Brandon Mental Health Unit, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, LE5 4PW, Leicester, UK

    Traolach S. Brugha MB, MD (NUI), FRCPsych

Authors
  1. Traolach S. Brugha MB, MD (NUI), FRCPsych
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brugha, T.S. The effects of life events and social relationships on the course of major depression. Curr Psychiatry Rep 5, 431–438 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-003-0081-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-003-0081-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation