Abstract
Purpose of Review
This review synthesizes the utility of measuring migraine triggers for the purpose of forecasting future headache attacks. The nature of forecasting models, headache triggers as inputs to such models, and how these trigger exposures can be measured for forecasting are reviewed. A critical evaluation of the existing forecasting models in the context of their potential application for preemptive treatment is considered.
Recent Findings
A substantial pool of candidate trigger factors could be considered in the creation of forecasting models. However, because mechanistic information about causal factors that precede a migraine attack is not well understood, and such factors are difficult to measure, empirical models that are based on trigger factors that are merely associated with the onset of headache activity are likely to be the focus of forecasting efforts in the near future. Of such factors, stress has considerable empirical support and has been used to successfully forecast future headache attacks within individuals over time. However, at present, existing models possess only modest levels of discrimination and lack strong resolution in generated predictions.
Summary
Current headache forecasting models represent an important first step in accurately predicting future headache activity. However, to utilize these models in a preemptive treatment paradigm where the risk of headache is treated prior to the actual experience of pain, these models must achieve greater precision with good calibration and generate predictions that are clinically actionable by individuals in their real-time home environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Walters Pellegrino AB, Davis-Martin RE, Houle TT, Turner DP, Smitherman TA. Perceived triggers of primary headache disorders: a meta-analysis. Cephalalgia Epub ahead of print 20 August 2017. DOI:1:0333102417727535.
Martin PR, MacLeod C. Behavioral management of headache triggers: avoidance of triggers is an inadequate strategy. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:483–95.
Martin PR. Behavioral management of migraine headache triggers: learning to cope with triggers. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2010;14:221–7.
Houle TT, Butschek RA, Turner DP, Smitherman TA, Rains JC, Penzien DB. Stress and sleep duration predict headache severity in chronic headache sufferers. Pain. 2012;153:2432–40.
Houle TT, Turner DP, Golding AN, Porter JA, Martin VT, Penzien DB, et al. Forecasting individual headache attacks using perceived stress: development of a multivariable prediction model for persons with episodic migraine. Headache. 2017;57:1041–50.
Köhler T, Haimerl C. Daily stress as a trigger of migraine attacks: results of thirteen single-subject studies. J Consul Clin Psychol. 1990;58:870–2.
Lipton RB, Buse DC, Hall CB, Tennen H, DeFreitas TA, Borkowski TM, et al. Reduction in perceived stress as a migraine trigger: testing the “let-down headache” hypothesis. Neurology. 2014;82:1395–401.
Turner DP, Smitherman TA, Penzien DB, Porter JA, Martin VT, Houle TT. Nighttime snacking, stress, and migraine activity. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21:638–43.
Giffin NJ, Ruggiero L, Lipton RB, Silberstein SD, Tvedskov JF, Olesen J, et al. Premonitory symptoms in migraine an electronic diary study. Neurology. 2003;60:935–40.
Armstrong JS. Principles of forecasting: a handbook for researchers and practitioners: Springer Science & Business Media; 2001.
Pawitan Y. In all likelihood: statistical modeling and inference using likelihood: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Turner DP, Smitherman TA, Martin VT, Penzien DB, Houle TT. Causality and headache triggers. Headache. 2013;53:628–35.
Pavlovic JM, Buse DC, Sollars CM, Haut S, Lipton RB. Trigger factors and premonitory features of migraine attacks: summary of studies. Headache. 2014;54:1670–9.
Schulte LH, Jurgens TP, May A. Photo-, osmo- and phonophobia in the premonitory phase of migraine: mistaking symptoms for triggers? J Headache Pain. 2015;16(14):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-015-0495-7.
Turner DP, Houle TT. Influences on headache trigger beliefs and perceptions. Cephalalgia Epub ahead of print 30 October 2017. DOI:1:0333102417739310.
Houle TT, Turner DP. Natural experimentation is a challenging method for identifying headache triggers. Headache. 2013;53:636–43.
Ramadan NM. Prophylactic migraine therapy: mechanisms and evidence. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2004;8:91–5.
Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, Gillard P, Hansen RN, Devine EB. Adherence to oral migraine-preventive medications among patients with chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2015;35:478–88.
Turner DP, Golding AN, Houle TT. Using a graphical risk tool to examine willingness-to-take migraine prophylactic medications. Pain. 2016;157:2226–34.
Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF, AMPP Advisory Group. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007; 68(5):343–349.
Schuster NM, Rapoport AM. New strategies for the treatment and prevention of primary headache disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12:635–50.
Nicholson RA, Buse DC, Andrasik F, Lipton RB. Nonpharmacologic treatments for migraine and tension-type headache: how to choose and when to use. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2011;13:28–40.
Cady RK, Sheftell F, Lipton RB, O'Quinn S, Jones M, Putnam DG, et al. Effect of early intervention with sumatriptan on migraine pain: retrospective analyses of data from three clinical trials. Clin Ther. 2000;22:1035–48.
Burstein R, Collins B, Jakubowski M. Defeating migraine pain with triptans: a race against the development of cutaneous allodynia. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:19–26.
Burstein R, Jakubowski M. Analgesic triptan action in an animal model of intracranial pain: a race against the development of central sensitization. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:27–36.
Lipton RB, Buse DC, Serrano D, Holland S, Reed ML. Examination of unmet treatment needs among persons with episodic migraine: results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) study. Headache. 2013;53:1300–11.
Brantley PJ, Waggoner CD, Jones GN, Rappaport NB. A daily stress inventory: development, reliability, and validity. J Behav Med. 1987;10:61–73.
Lipton RB, Pavlovic JM, Buse DC. Why migraine forecasting matters. Headache. 2017;57:1023–5.
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01NS065257.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Dana P. Turner, Adriana D. Lebowitz, Ivana Chtay, and Timothy T. Houle declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Headache and Pain
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, D.P., Lebowitz, A.D., Chtay, I. et al. Forecasting Migraine Attacks and the Utility of Identifying Triggers. Curr Pain Headache Rep 22, 62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0715-3
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0715-3