Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intradiscal electrothermal therapy, percutaneous discectomy, and nucleoplasty: What is the current evidence?

  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been a surge of minimally invasive techniques aimed at treating both discogenic low back pain (LBP) and radicular pain. This article assesses the current evidence for three such treatments: intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET), percutaneous discectomy, and nucleoplasty. An electronic search of the literature carried out using the Cochrane Library database (2007) and Medline (1966–2007) identified 77 references relating to IDET, 363 to percutaneous discectomy, and 36 to nucleoplasty. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the effectiveness of IDET; one demonstrated a positive effect on pain severity only, whereas the other demonstrated no substantial benefit. Other RCTs show that percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation is ineffective for the treatment of discogenic LBP. Trials of automated percutaneous discectomy suggest that clinical outcomes after treatment are at best fair and often worse when compared with microdiscectomy. There are no published RCTs assessing Coblation (ArthroCare Spine, Stockholm, Sweden) technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Yang B, et al.: False-positive findings on lumbar discography: reliability of subjective concordance assessment during provocative disc injection. Spine 1999, 24:2542–2547.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber H: The natural course of disc herniation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1993, 251:19–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Philips B, Ball C, Sackett D, et al.: The Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine: levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. http://www.pdptoolkit.co.uk/Files/ebm/cebm/Doing%20ebm/levels_of_evidence.htm. Accessed November 15, 2007.

  4. Saal JS, Saal JA: Management of chronic discogenic low back pain with a thermal intradiscal catheter: a preliminary report. Spine 2000, 25:382–388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Saal JA, Saal JS: Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain. A prospective outcome study with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Spine 2000, 25:2622–2627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saal JA, Saal JS: Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain. A prospective outcome study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine 2002, 27:966–973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Derby R, Eek B, Chen Y, et al.: Intradiscal electrothermal annuloplasty (IDET): a novel approach for treating chronic discogenic back pain. Neuromodulation 2000, 3:82–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerszten PC, Welch WC, McGrath PM, et al.: A prospective outcomes study of patients undergoing intradiscal electrothermy (IDET) for chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 2002, 5:360–364.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lutz C, Lutz GE, Cooke PM: Treatment of chronic lumbar diskogenic pain with intradiskal electrothermal therapy: a prospective outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:23–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spruit M, Jacobs WC: Pain and function after intradiscal electrothermal treatment (IDET) for symptomatic lumbar disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 2002, 11:589–593.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Park SY, Mood SH, Park MS, et al.: Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic lower back pain patients with internal disc disruption. Yonsei Med J 2005, 46:539–545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee MS, Cooper G, Lutz GE, et al.: Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) for treatment of chronic lumbar discogenic pain: a minimum 2-year clinical outcome study. Pain Physician 2003, 6:443–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Freedman BA, Cohen SP, Kuklo TR, et al.: Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) for chronic low back pain in active-duty soldiers: 2-year follow-up. Spine J 2003, 3:502–509.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen SP, Larkin T, Abdi S: Risk factors for failure and complications of intradiscal electrothermal therapy: a pilot study. Spine 2003, 28:1142–1147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis TT, Delamarter RB, Sra P, et al.: The IDET procedure for chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 2004, 29:752–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Webster BS, Verma S, Pransky GS: Outcomes of workers’ compensation claimants with low back pain undergoing intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Spine 2004, 29:435–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Karasek M, Bogduk N: Twelve-month follow-up of a controlled trial of intradiscal thermal anuloplasty for back pain due to internal disruption. Spine 2000, 25:2601–2607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bogduk N, Karasek M: Two-year follow-up of a controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal anuloplasty for chronic low back pain resulting from internal disc disruption. Spine J 2002, 2:343–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pauza KJ, Howell S, Dreyfuss P, et al.: A randomised, placebo-controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. Spine J 2004, 4:27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Freeman BJ, Fraser RD, Cain CM, et al.: A randomised double blind controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 2005, 30:2369–2377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Urrutia G, Kovacs F, Nishishinya MB, et al.: Percutaneous thermocoagulation intradiscal techniques for discogenic low back pain. Spine 2007, 32:1146–1154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Orr RD, Thomas S: Intradural migration of broken IDET catheter causing a radiculopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005, 18:185–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eckel TS, Ortiz AO: Intradiscal electrothermal therapy in the treatment of discogenic low back pain. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2002, 5:217–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cohen SP, Larkin T, Polly DW Jr: A giant herniated disc following intradiscal electrothermal therapy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002, 15:537–541.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ackerman WE III: Cauda equina syndrome after intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Reg Anaesth Pain Med 2002, 27:622.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hsia AW, Isaac K, Katz JS: Cauda equina syndrome from intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Neurology 2000, 55:320.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wetzel FT: Cauda equina syndrome from intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Neurology 2001, 56:1607.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Djurasovic M, Glassman SD, Dimar JR, et al.: Vertebral osteonecrosis associated with the use of intradiscal electrothermal therapy. A case report. Spine 2002, 27:E325–E328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Scholl BM, Theiss SM, Lopez-Ben R, et al.: Vertebral osteonecrosis related to intradiscal electrothermal therapy: a case report. Spine 2003, 28:E161–E164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barendse GA, van Den Berg SG, Kessels AH, et al.: Randomised controlled trial of percutaneous intradiscal radio-frequency thermo-coagulation for chronic discogenic back pain: lack of effect from a 90-second 70 °C lesion. Spine 2001, 26:287–292.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ercelen O, Bulutcu E, Oktenoglu T, et al.: Radiofrequency lesioning using two different time modalities for the treatment of lumbar discogenic low back pain: a randomized trial. Spine 2003, 278:1922–1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Finch PM, Price LM, Drummond PD: Radiofrequency heating of painful annular disruptions; one year outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005, 18:6–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kapural L, Hayek S, Malak O, et al.: Intradiscal thermal annuloplasty versus intradiscal radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of discogenic pain: a prospective matched control trial. Pain Med 2005, 6:425–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Onik G, Mooney V, Maroon JC, et al.: Automated percutaneous discectomy; a prospective multi-institutional study. Neurosurgery 1990, 26:228–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Revel M, Payan C, Vallee C, et al.: Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy versus chemonucleolysis in the treatment of sciatica; a randomised multicenter trial. Spine 1993, 18:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Krugluger J, Knahr K: Chemonucleolysis and automated percutaneous discectomy: a randomized comparison. Int Orthop 2000, 24:167–169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chatterjee S, Foy PM, Findlay GF: Report of a controlled clinical trial comparing automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy in the treatment of contained lumbar disc herniation. Spine 1995, 20:734–738.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Haines SJ, Jordan N, Boen JR, et al.: Discectomy strategies for lumbar disc herniation: results of the LAPDOG trial. J Clin Neurosci 2002, 9:411–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mayer HM, Brock M: Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy. J Neurosurg 1993, 78:216–225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sharps LS, Isaac Z: Percutaneous disc decompression using nucleoplasty. Pain Physician 2002, 5:121–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Singh V, Piryani C, Liao K, et al.: Percutaneous disc decompression using coblation (nucleoplasty) in the treatment of chronic discogenic pain. Pain Physician 2002, 5:250–259.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Singh V, Piryani C, Liao K: Evaluation of percutaneous disc decompression using coblation in chronic back pain with or without leg pain. Pain Physician 2003, 6:273–280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Singh V, Piryani C, Liao K: Role of percutaneous disc decompression using coblation in managing chronic discogenic low back pain: a prospective observational study. Pain Physician 2004, 7:419–425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gerszten PC, Welch WC, King JT: Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing nucleoplasty-based percutaneous discectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2006, 4:36–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mirzai H, Tekin I, Yaman O, et al.: The results of nucleoplasty in patients with lumbar herniated disc: a prospective clinical study of 52 consecutive patients. Spine J 2007, 7:88–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Masala S, Massari F, Fabiano S, et al.: Nucleoplasty in the treatment of lumbar diskogenic back pain: one year follow-up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007, 30:426–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bonaldi G, Baruzzi F, Facchinetti A, et al.: Plasma radiofrequency based discectomy for treatment of cervical herniated nucleus pulposus: feasibility, safety and preliminary clinical results. Am J Neuroradiol 2006, 27:2104–2111.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Nardi PV, Cabezas D, Cesaroni A: Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty using coblation technology. Clinical results in fifty consecutive cases. Acta Neurochirurgica 2005, 92(Suppl):73–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Smith & Nephew: IDET-For Physician: About the Procedure. http://www.idetprocedure.com/2000_professional/2100_about.html. Accessed November 15, 2007.

  50. Gibson JN, Waddell G: Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse: updated Cochrane review. Spine 2007, 32:1735–1747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. ArthroCare Corporation: Nucleoplasty-Patients. http://www.nucleoplasty.com/patients.aspx. Accessed November 15, 2007.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen’s Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    Brian J. C. Freeman

Authors
  1. Brian J. C. Freeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roshana Mehdian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. C. Freeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freeman, B.J.C., Mehdian, R. Intradiscal electrothermal therapy, percutaneous discectomy, and nucleoplasty: What is the current evidence?. Current Science Inc 12, 14–21 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-008-0004-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-008-0004-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation