Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neurolytic blocks revisited

  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of neurolytic blockade is a staple in the management of cancer pain. However, the data on neurolysis for chronic pain are plagued by inconsistencies in patient selection, diagnostic criteria, technical standards, and outcome measures. No one neurolytic agent or technique has been proven superior to another. Current evidence suggests that patients with pain of malignant origin may benefit from a variety of neurolytic techniques, as the benefit of documented short-term pain relief may outweigh risk at the end of life. In the absence of compelling data suggesting low-risk long-term efficacy, neurolysis for chronic benign pain should be cautiously considered, in most cases, only after failure of aggressive multidisciplinary management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Loeser JD: Other surgical interventions. Pain Pract 2006, 6:58–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler SHC, Edmond J: Neurolytic blockade and hypophysectomy. In Bonica’s Management of Pain. Edited by Loeser JD. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1990:1969–2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Molloy RE: Intrathecal and epidural neurolysis: agents used for neurolytic block. In Essentials of Pain Medicine and Regional Anesthesia, edn 2. Edited by Benzon R et al. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005:550–557.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Trescot AM: Cryoanalgesia in interventional pain management. Pain Physician 2003, 6:345–360.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang MK, Cho CH, Kim YC: The effects of cryoanalgesia combined with thoracic epidural analgesia in patients undergoing thoracotomy. Anaesthesia 2004, 59:1073–1077.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yao YH, Ning X, Zhang P, et al.: Comparison of the efficacy of cryoanalgesia and patient-controlled analgesia after thoracotomy [in Chinese]. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao 2005, 25:469–470, 473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Taha JM, Tew JM: Comparison of surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia: reevaluation of radiofrequency rhizotomy. Neurosurgery 1996, 38:865–871.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen JF, Lee ST: Comparison of percutaneous trigeminal ganglion compression and microvascular decompression for the management of trigeminal neuralgia. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2003, 105:203–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wróbel-Wisniewska G, Kasprzak P, Zawirski M: Sixteenyear experience in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia by percutaneous retrogasserian thermorhizotomy [in Polish]. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2002, 36:471–479.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanpolat Y, Savas A, Bekar A, et al.: Percutaneous controlled radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: 25-year experience with 1,600 patients. Neurosurgery 2001, 48:524–532; discussion 532.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu CY, Meng FG, Xu SJ, et al.: Selective percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: report on 1860 cases. Chin Med J 2004, 117:467–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Henson CF, Goldman HW, Rosenwasser RH, et al.: Glycerol rhizotomy versus gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: an analysis of patients treated at one institution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 63:82–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sheehan J, Pan HC, Stroila M, et al.: Gamma knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: outcomes and prognostic factors. J Neurosurg 2005, 102:434–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jawahar A, Wadhwa R, Berk C, et al.: Assessment of pain control, quality of life, and predictors of success after gamma knife surgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Focus 2005, 18:E8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Teixeira MJ, Siqueira SRDT, Almeida GM: Percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy and neurovascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve for the treatment of facial pain. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2006, 64:983–989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zakrzewska JM, Jassim S, Bulman JS: A prospective, longitudinal study on patients with trigeminal neuralgia who underwent radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the Gasserian ganglion. Pain 1999, 79:51–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Slappendel R, Crul BJ, Braak GJ, et al.: The efficacy of radiofrequency lesioning of the cervical spinal dorsal root ganglion in a double blinded randomized study: no difference between 40 degrees C and 67 degrees C treatments. Pain 1997, 73:159–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Geurts JWM, van Wijk RMAW, Wynne HJ, et al.: Radiofrequency lesioning of dorsal root ganglia for chronic lumbosacral radicular pain: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet 2003, 361:21–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mailis A, Furlan A: Sympathectomy for neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003, CD002918-CD002918.

  20. Bozkurt AK, Köksal C, Demirbas MY, et al.: A randomized trial of intravenous iloprost (a stable prostacyclin analogue) versus lumbar sympathectomy in the management of Buerger’s disease. Int Angiol 2006, 25:162–168.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wong GY, Schroeder DR, Carns PE, et al.: Effect of neurolytic celiac plexus block on pain relief, quality of life, and survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004, 291:1092–1099.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Kaufman HS, et al.: Chemical splanchnicectomy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 1993, 217:447–455; discussion 456.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Carroll I: Celiac plexus block for visceral pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2006, 10:20–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leung JW, Bowen-Wright M, Aveling W, et al.: Coeliac plexus block for pain in pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1983, 70:730–732.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Madsen P, Hansen E: Coeliac plexus block versus pancreaticogastrostomy for pain in chronic pancreatitis. A controlled randomized trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 1985, 20:1217–1220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Basinski A, Stefaniak T, Vingerhoets A, et al.: Effect of NCPB and VSPL on pain and quality of life in chronic pancreatitis patients. World J Gastroenterol 2005, 11:5010–5014.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Garcea G, Thomasset S, Berry DP, et al.: Percutaneous splanchnic nerve radiofrequency ablation for chronic abdominal pain. ANZ J Surg 2005, 75:640–644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Plancarte R, de Leon-Casasola OA, El-Helaly M, et al.: Neurolytic superior hypogastric plexus block for chronic pelvic pain associated with cancer. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1997, 22:562–568.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gamal G, Helaly M, Labib YM: Superior hypogastric block: transdiscal versus classic posterior approach in pelvic cancer pain. Clin J Pain 2006, 22:544–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bosscher H: Blockade of the superior hypogastric plexus block for visceral pelvic pain. Pain Pract 2001, 1:162–170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Reig E, Abejón D, del Pozo C, et al.: Thermocoagulation of the ganglion impar or ganglion of Walther: description of a modified approach. Preliminary results in chronic, nononcological pain. Pain Pract 2005, 5:103–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. de Oliveira R, dos Reis MP, Prado WA: The effects of early or late neurolytic sympathetic plexus block on the management of abdominal or pelvic cancer pain. Pain 2004, 110:400–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hooten WM, Martin DP, Huntoon MA: Radiofrequency neurotomy for low back pain: evidence-based procedural guidelines. Pain Med 2005, 6:129–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. van Wijk RMAW, Geurts JWM, Wynne HJ, et al.: Radiofrequency denervation of lumbar facet joints in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, sham lesion-controlled trial. Clin J Pain 2005, 21:335–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Boswell MV, Colson JD, Sehgal N, et al.: A systematic review of therapeutic facet joint interventions in chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2007, 10:229–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gofeld M, Jitendra J, Faclier G: Radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar zygapophysial joints: 10-year prospective clinical audit. Pain Physician 2007, 10:291–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanford University School of Medicine, 780 Welch Road, Suite 280D, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA

    Tracy P. Jackson

Authors
  1. Tracy P. Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raymond Gaeta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy P. Jackson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, T.P., Gaeta, R. Neurolytic blocks revisited. Current Science Inc 12, 7–13 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-008-0003-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-008-0003-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation