Stress fractures: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors
- 933 Downloads
A stress fracture represents the inability of the skeleton to withstand repetitive bouts of mechanical loading, which results in structural fatigue and resultant signs and symptoms of localized pain and tenderness. To prevent stress fractures, an appreciation of their risk factors is required. These are typically grouped into extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors. Extrinsic risk factors for stress fractures are those in the environment or external to the individual, including the type of activity and factors involving training, equipment, and the environment. Intrinsic risk factors for stress fractures refer to characteristics within the individual, including skeletal, muscle, joint, and biomechanical factors, as well as physical fitness and gender. This article discusses these extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors, as well as the pathophysiology and epidemiology of stress fractures.
KeywordsStress Fracture Overuse Injury Military Recruit Bone Strain Bone Loading
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Recommended Reading
- 8.Goldberg B, Pecora C: Stress fractures: a risk of increased training in freshmen. Phys Sportsmed 1994, 22:68–78.Google Scholar
- 21.Warden SJ, Hurst JA, Sanders MS, et al.: Bone adaptation to a mechanical loading program significantly increases skeletal fatigue resistance. J Bone Miner Res 2005, 20:809–816. Animal study investigating the influence of bone mass and size on stress fracture risk. It found that a small (less than twofold) change in the structural properties of a bone increased its fatigue resistance more than 100-fold, indicating that a moderate exercise program that induces bone adaptation may be an effective strategy for preventing stress fractures.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Milner CE, Ferber R, Pollard CD, et al.: Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38:323–328. Study retrospectively investigating biomechanical factors potentially associated with tibial stress fractures. It demonstrated that stress fracture risk may be related to loading rates and the magnitude of tibial shock; the latter could categorize individuals according to stress fracture history with 70% accuracy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Giladi M, Milgrom C, Stein M, et al.: The low arch, a protective factor in stress fractures: a prospective study of 295 military recruits. Orthop Rev 1985, 14:709–712.Google Scholar
- 47.Redman LM, Loucks AB: Menstrual disorders in athletes. Sports Med 2005, 35:747–755. An excellent review of the incidence, mechanisms, and clinical consequences of menstrual disorders in female athletes. Concludes that athletic women may acquire their menstrual disorders by failing to increase dietary intake in compensation for exercise energy expenditure.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Ihle R, Loucks AB: Dose-response relationships between energy availability and bone turnover in young exercising women. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19:1231–1240. Study investigating the dose-response relationship between energy availability and selected markers of bone turnover in female military recruits. Bone formation markers decreased and bone resorption markers increased in those who had restricted energy availability, suggesting that nutritional status may contribute to the higher incidence of stress fractures in female military recruits.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar