COVID-19 and Cancer: a Comprehensive Review


Purpose of Review

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged to be the biggest global health threat worldwide, which has now infected over 1.7 million people and claimed more than 100,000 lives around the world. Under these unprecedented circumstances, there are no well-established guidelines for cancer patients.

Recent Findings

The risk for serious disease and death in COVID-19 cases increases with advancing age and presence of comorbid health conditions. Since the emergence of the first case in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, tremendous research efforts have been underway to understand the mechanisms of infectivity and transmissibility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), a fatal virus responsible for abysmal survival outcomes. To minimize the mortality rate, it becomes prudent to identify symptoms promptly and employ treatments appropriately. Even though no cure has been established, multiple clinical trials are underway to determine the most optimal strategy. Managing cancer patients under these circumstances is rather challenging, given their vulnerable status and the aggressive nature of their underlying disease.


In this comprehensive review, we discuss the impact of COVID-19 on health and the immune system of those affected, reviewing the latest treatment approaches and ongoing clinical trials. Additionally, we discuss challenges faced while treating cancer patients and propose potential approaches to manage this vulnerable population during this pandemic.


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) marks the emergence of the third large-scale epidemic related to the coronavirus, after SARS-CoV in 2002 and Middle-East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, among a group of individuals presenting with pneumonia of unknown etiology [1, 2]. Based on the sequencing and evolutionary data, bats are the proposed reservoir for the coronavirus [2, 3]. After its initial discovery, the spread of SARS-CoV-2 worldwide was rapid, with over 1.7 million confirmed cases globally and more than 100,000 deaths as of April 2020 [4]. The severity of this disease can range from asymptomatic disease to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring aggressive measures to death [5, 6]. Current management strategies involve supportive treatment and protective measures to prevent further transmission of the virus [7, 8]. Though no potential cure has been reported, several trials are underway to determine the most appropriate treatment regimen.

Providing care to immunocompromised patients and those suffering from cancer, amidst this pandemic, has been extremely challenging. Data from China thus far have shown that cancer patients infected with COVID-19 are at 3.5 times the risk of requiring mechanical ventilation or ICU admission, compared to the general population [9•]. Additionally, the limitation of resources in outpatient settings, including administrative staff and specialists, has hindered the routine care of these patients [10•]. This review aims to evaluate current literature on the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients, and discuss approaches to managing cancer patients in this pandemic.

What Is SARS-CoV-2?

Coronaviruses (CoVs) were first identified by Tyrell and Bynoe in 1966, in patients with viral-like upper respiratory illness [11]. CoVs are enveloped, positive single-stranded RNA viruses that can infect both humans and animals. Their spherical morphology with core shell and glycoprotein projections from their envelope, as seen under an electron microscopy, makes them appear “crown-like,” hence termed coronaviruses [12]. Some human CoVs can cause self-limiting upper respiratory infections in immunocompromised individuals, whereas other CoVs of beta-CoVs subgroup, such as SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), and MERS-CoV, can result in epidemics with increased mortality [13].

COVID-19 and the Immune Response

The fatality rate for infected cancer patients in China is 28.6% [14•], compared to a 2.3% fatality rate for all COVID-19 patients [15]. ACE2 is the common binding site for both the SARS-CoV of the 2002–2003 SARS epidemic and, reportedly, also for the SARS-CoV-2 strain underlying the current COVID-19 epidemic [16].

SARS-CoV-2 interaction with the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) through angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) is a key factor for infectivity [17]. ACE2 physiologically counters RAAS activation and also serves as a receptor for SARS-CoV-2 [16]. ACE2 is expressed broadly in numerous tissues; however, lung alveolar epithelial cells are considered the primary targets [17]. Once CoV-2 gains entry into the target cell, the host response is a major determinant of severity of the ensuing pathogenesis (Fig. 1) [18]. The bronchial mucosa is lined by mucosal associated invariant T (MAIT) cells and γδ T cells [19]. These innate-like lymphocytes respond rapidly to pathogen invasion and trigger a cytokine response essential for microbial killing [19]. The critical role of the host immune system in patients with severe COVID-19 infection is highlighted by the characteristics of patients who have died [15]. Clinical outcomes are dependent upon factors such as age, ACE2 expression, and comorbidities. Thus, cancer patients by virtue of being older (median age of a cancer diagnosis is 66 years in the USA) [20] and having higher ACE2 expression (ACE2 tends to increase with increasing age) [21] and more comorbidities [22] are at a higher risk of adverse outcomes when infected with SARS-CoV-2. Figure 2 highlights the case-fatality rate by age group in the general population diagnosed with COVID-19 in China along with possible roles of mentioned factors.

Fig. 1

Entry mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 into host cell and subsequent inflammatory and immune cascade. SARS-CoV-2 gains entry into host cell when receptor-binding domain (RBD) of viral spike protein binds with host ACE2 receptors. Mucosal associated invariant T (MAIT) cells and γδ T cells respond to invasion releasing inflammatory cytokines. Early responding immune effector cells, including CTL and NK cells, are activated against virus. If persistent cytokine release continues, significant lung damage can occur (“cytokine storm”). Specific cytokine inhibitors, e.g., IL-6 inhibitors, help reduce lung damage. Protracted disease course can result in immune exhaustion (exhausted T cells) and anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors can help reinvigorate immune system. ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; IFN, interferon; IL-6, interleukin-6; NK, natural killer; PD, programmed death-1. * Created with BioRender

Fig. 2

Case-fatality rate by age group in general population diagnosed with COVID-19 in China [15] along with probable roles of factors: age, ACE2 expression, immune profile, and comorbidities. ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme-2; yrs, years

After the initial innate response, a specific adaptive immune response is required to eliminate CoV-2 [23]. However, in cancer patients on active treatment or even during watchful observation, lymphopenia (an independent poor prognostic indicator in COVID-19 patients) [24] is common [25], and hence, the required immune response is impaired. Persistent cytokine release (likely mediated by leukocytes other than T lymphocytes) [23] may then lead to “cytokine storm” and cause significant lung damage. In addition to this damage, subpar specific immune response allows viral propagation, destruction of tissues, and progression to severe stages especially in ACE2-rich tissues, e.g., lung, intestine, and kidneys [23]. Therefore, strategies that augment immune response at this stage, e.g., immunoadjuvant therapies (IFNα or convalescent plasma) [14•, 19], block cytokines (IL-6, IL-1, or tumor necrosis factor alpha, TNFα) or early institution of antiviral agents may prove beneficial.

Less immunocompromised and nonlymphopenic cancer patients may mount an adequate response, with cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells being crucial for the control of viral infection. Persistent adaptive immune activation leading to lymphocyte exhaustion is well described in cases of chronic infections, tumorigenesis [26], and reportedly, even with SARS-CoV-1 infection [27]. Functional exhaustion of CTLs and NK cells is now reported with CoV-2 infection with significantly higher levels of exhaustion markers, e.g., programmed death-1 (PD-1), as compared to healthy controls [27, 28]. Functional exhaustion of CTLs correlates to [29] and likely results in viral disease progression and rapid decompensation [27]. Reports of successful use of anti-PD-1 drugs to reinvigorate exhausted T cells by blocking PD-1 in cases of viral, bacterial, and fungal infections are becoming common [19]. Foreseeably, clinical trials to study the use of anti-PD1 agent against COVID-19 are underway (Table 1).

Table 1 Investigational therapies for COVID-19

Tremendous efforts are underway for vaccine development targeting CoV-2 [74]. However, virus eliminating immune response may be difficult to illicit in immunocompromised cancer patients. Vaccine effectiveness in general tends to be lower in patients with cancer, much lower for those with hematologic malignancies [75]. Utilization of long-term immune memory from convalescent individuals may provide alternate strategies for patients with hematological malignancies.

Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis

The most common clinical symptoms of COVID-19 range from fever, cough, dyspnea, fatigue, and in rare cases diarrhea and vomiting [76]. Based on current evidence, cancer patients also present with similar symptoms, though are at much higher risk of serious outcomes resulting in death when compared to the general population [9•, 10•, 14•]. Emerging data highlighting concerns of coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients is becoming available, but it is too early to infer if these are more or less common in cancer patients [77]. Some of the common laboratory findings seen in COVID-19 patients are cytopenias, specifically lymphocytopenia, along with elevation in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) [14, 76]. COVID-19 patients should additionally be screened for secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) via HScore [78]. This is an often under-recognized hyperinflammatory syndrome characterized by a severe cytokine storm often with multiorgan failure. This is to identify the subgroup of patients who may benefit from immunomodulatory treatment.

Given general upper respiratory infection symptoms, diagnosis of COVID-19 often entails ruling out other common respiratory viral infection (RVI) etiologies. Nasopharyngeal swab is usually a collection method employed to obtain specimen for testing via polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Increasing frequency of false negatives is being reported; as a result, hospitals are either repeating the test or treating patients empirically, if one presents with classical symptoms of fever, fatigue, and dyspnea of unknown etiology [79].

Treatment of SARS-CoV-2

There are no current FDA-approved therapeutic drugs or vaccines for SARS-CoV-2. Most of the treatment options have come from previous experience treating SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Vigorous symptomatic management remains key to treatment. This section focuses on advances in SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic development in the general population. A cancer diagnosis does portend a higher risk of acquiring severe symptoms, and as a result, prompt intervention is recommended. However, COVID-19 treatment for cancer patients is not necessarily different from the general population or other immunocompromised patients.

Antiviral Treatment

Remdesivir is a nucleotide analog that inhibits viral RNA polymerases and has shown activity against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro [61]. In a cohort of 53 patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 who were treated with compassionate-use remdesivir, clinical improvement was seen in 36 (68%) patients [80]. This suggests that remdesivir may have clinical benefit in patients with severe disease, although the lack of a control group precludes definitive conclusions. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is currently underway (NCT04257656).

Lopinavir–ritonavir (Kaletra) is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) medication that has shown inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV in vitro. LOTUS-a RCT in China showed no benefit with lopinavir–ritonavir treatment compared to standard care among 199 patients with severe COVID-19 [81]. Trials with drug combinations to enhance the antiviral effects of this drug are underway (NCT04276688, NCT04252885).

Hydroxychloroquine sulfate and chloroquine phosphate, historically, anti-malaria drugs, have been shown to be safe and efficacious against COVID-19 in clinical trials conducted in China [35, 82] and France [36]. The data from France showed a synergistic effect of azithromycin with hydroxychloroquine [36]. However, evidence of efficacy is limited given there are only few small human trials with methodological limitations [37]. Additionally, there is limited safety data available for the use of these drugs in the context of COVID-19, especially in the setting of liver and renal impairment, which may increase the risk of toxicity from these agents [83]. Therefore, at present time, there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of these drugs outside the context of a clinical trial.


Several studies have indicated a “cytokine storm syndrome” in patients with severe COVID-19, with the release of interleukin IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, and IL-18; TNFα); granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF); IFNγ; and other inflammatory mediators [63]. Immunomodulators decrease the pulmonary inflammatory response, thereby improving the alveolar-capillary gas exchange (which tends be impaired due to cytokine-mediated hyperinflammation), and thus, can improve oxygenation and survival.

Cytokine Inhibitors

IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors may ameliorate severe damage to lung tissue caused by cytokine release in patients with serious COVID-19 infections [64, 84]. One clinical trial using tocilizumab, an IL-6 inhibitor, reported improvement in clinical outcomes in 21 patients with severe COVID-19 [64]. Several interleukin inhibitors are being investigated, including a phase III RCT, COVACTA (NCT04320615), to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 patients, and another double-blind, adaptive phase II/III RCT (NCT04327388) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sarilumab (IL-6 inhibitor) has almost completed accrual.

Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

Acalabrutinib (Calquence) is a next-generation, highly selective Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) used to treat mantle cell lymphoma and CLL, now being tested for use in COVID-19 patients. The Bruton’s tyrosine kinase pathway has a role in the production of inflammatory cytokines [85], and early clinical findings showed that acalabrutinib may ameliorate the severity of respiratory distress caused by COVID-19 infection through inflammation control. The CALAVI trial will be initiated as a randomized global clinical trial to assess the potential of acalabrutinib in the treatment of the cytokine storm associated with severely ill COVID-19 patients [86]. Additionally, other trials are being considered with different BTKi, specifically ibrutinib, to reduce the inflammatory response [87].

Janus Kinase Inhibitors

Baricitinib, fedratinib, and ruxolitinib are selective Janus-associated kinase (JAK)-STAT inhibitors that could potentially have anti-inflammatory effects in COVID-19 patients with elevated cytokine levels [59]. Baricitinib is a JAK inhibitor as well as an AAK1 (AP2-associated protein kinase 1) inhibitor that can interrupt the entry of the virus into cells in addition to an anti-inflammatory effect [88]. Several clinical trials are ongoing to confirm the efficacy of these agents.


GM-CSF is a pro-inflammatory cytokine found to be elevated in the serum of COVID-19 patients. There is evidence that GM-CSF enhances the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in addition to promoting the differentiation of Th1 cells and polarization of macrophages to M1-like phenotype, resulting in pulmonary immunopathology and detrimental clinical manifestations in COVID-19 patients [70]. Therefore, targeting GM-CSF seems to be a promising strategy in ameliorating lung damage while allowing time for the virus to clear.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exert anti-inflammatory effects and promote endogenous repair of alveolar epithelium [54]. A recent pilot study in seven COVID-19 patients who received donor MSC in China showed that the intervention was safe and may improve patient outcomes [55]. The FDA has approved MSC treatments for use in critically ill COVID-19 patients under the expanded access compassionate use.


There is still controversy about the efficacy of glucocorticoids in treating COVID-19-associated pneumonia. The rationale is that steroids prolong the viral shedding time and maintain a systemic anti-inflammatory state that will minimize the precipitation of ARDS, dyspnea, and severe pneumonia. However, steroid therapy did not improve clinical outcomes for patients with SARS or MERS [89, 90]. A small observational study (n = 31) done in Wuhu, China, showed no association between corticosteroids and outcomes in patients with mild disease [91]. Another study conducted in Wuhan, China (n = 201), showed that methylprednisolone decreased the risk of death from COVID-19-associated ARDS (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.20–0.72) [57]. Multiple prospective RCTs to explore the effectiveness and safety of glucocorticoids in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia are ongoing.

Convalescent Plasma

Convalescent plasma originates from patients who have previously recovered from the viral infection and are now able to donate their anti-SARS-CoV-19 immunoglobulin-containing blood. Once transfused into the patient, the antibodies from the convalescent plasma are thought to neutralize the virus and limit its replication. This treatment has been used to treat prior SARS-CoV. An exploratory meta-analysis of 32 studies showed evidence of reduced mortality after receiving various doses of convalescent plasma in patients with severe acute respiratory infections of viral etiology [92]. Recent experience and data from China showed that human convalescent plasma is a potential therapeutic option to lessen the severity and/or shorten the length of illness caused by COVID-19 [93]. The true clinical effect of this intervention is being verified through several ongoing RCTs. In addition, the FDA is supporting a national expanded treatment protocol to provide convalescent plasma to COVID-19 patients across the country, with the help from the Red Cross to identify prospective donors and manage the distribution of these products to hospitals.

Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Inhibitors

ACE2 has been identified as the functional receptor for SARS-CoV invasion into the human body [94]. This led to concerns about the use of RAAS inhibitors in COVID-19 patients; however, published data in humans is inadequate to support or refute this concern [17]. Vaduganathan et al. proposed an alternative hypothesis that ACE2 may be beneficial rather than harmful in patients with lung injury from SARS-CoV [17]. Clinical trials using RAAS modulators including losartan are currently underway (NCT04311177, NCT04312009, NCT04330300).

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be a life-saving intervention for COVID-19 patients with refractory respiratory failure in the setting of ARDS. While this intervention has been used successfully in some patients [43, 95], concerns were raised about the potential harms of ECMO therapy including elevation in IL-6 levels and decrease in the number of functioning lymphocytes [96]. As a result, the immunological status needs to be considered when selecting patients for ECMO, especially in cancer patients who are on treatments that often result in lymphopenia.

Tissue Plasminogen Activator

ARDS with concomitant DIC was observed in 70% of those who die of COVID-19 [97]. There is evidence that fibrin deposition in the pulmonary microvasculature is a contributing factor for ARDS and fibrinolytic therapy was shown to improve survival in ARDS patients. Three case reports of intravenous administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients show an improvement in their PaO2/FiO2 ratio from 38 to 100% [97]. Formal studies are planned to determine the efficacy of this agent [98].

Low Molecular Weight Heparin

Prior evidence has shown that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has anti-inflammatory properties and reduces the biological activity and levels of IL-6 [99]. A retrospective study looked at 449 patients with severe COVID-19, of whom 99 patients received heparin (mainly LMWH). Results show that the heparinized group had lower mortality among patients who had an elevated sepsis-induced coagulopathy score and D-dimer [77]. A smaller retrospective study looked at 42 patients with COVID-19 and analyzed the efficacy of LMWH in slowing their inflammatory response [100]. The 21 patients who received LMWH during hospitalization had significantly lower levels of IL-6, higher lymphocyte levels, and less coagulopathy compared to the 21 patients who did not receive LMWH. No difference was seen in the duration of hospitalization between both groups. This data is promising; however, prospective studies are needed prior to its use in clinical practice.

Traditional Chinese Medicine

Chinese medicine has played a key role in the treatment of several prior epidemic diseases including COVID-19 pandemic [101]. Qingfei paidu decoction (QPD), for example, was used to treat 701 cases with COVID-19 in China. Improvement and cure was seen in 449 cases, and stability of symptoms was seen in 212 cases [101]. QPD is thought to alleviate excessive immune and inflammatory responses by regulating immune-related and cytokine action–related pathways [102]. A RCT to evaluate the effects of traditional Chinese medicine on COVID-19 patients is underway (NCT04251871).

Cancer-Specific Trials

A prospective, randomized multicenter study, IMMUNONCOVID, is currently recruiting patients with advanced or metastatic cancer who have Sars-CoV-2 infection in Europe. The study aims to compare the efficacy of a chloroquine analog (GNS561), an anti-PD-1 (nivolumab), and an IL-6 inhibitor (tocilizumab) versus standard of care in this cohort of patients (NCT04333914). More studies to evaluate the efficacy of such agents in our cancer population are needed.

Approach in Cancer Patients

Cancer patients require timely diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment even during a pandemic. However, it is important to consider that cancer patients are immunocompromised and are at increased risk of COVID-19-related serious events (intensive care admission, requirement for mechanical ventilation, or death) in comparison to the general population [9•, 10•]. Given the current evolving situation, pragmatic approaches are needed to deal with the challenges of treating cancer patients, without jeopardizing their care.

To assist healthcare facilities in these unprecedented times, oncology societies around the world, namely the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), American Society of Clinical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and many more, have developed guidelines to mitigate the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer patients [103,104,105]. The common theme of these proposed guidelines is to categorize patients into high, medium, or low priority based on the Ontario Health Cancer Care Ontario criteria (Table 2) in order to plan their management course accordingly [106]. Figure 3 briefly outlines cancer management in the era of COVID-19 pandemic.

Table 2 Priority levels defined by the Ontario Health Cancer Care Ontario as part of pandemic planning clinical guideline for cancer patients
Fig. 3

Framework for prioritizing clinical management of cancer patients in COVID-19 pandemic. The prioritization-based management is adapted from the Ontario Health Cancer Care Ontario, where the patient with the lowest priority (priority C) could wait for further management until the pandemic resolves, while higher priority (specifically priority A) warrants immediate management as the benefits of the management outweigh the risks from the pandemic. Patients falling in priority B can often be slightly delayed, but usually a thorough discussion among the physician and patient further determines the course. Surg, surgery; Rad onc, radiation oncology; SBO, small bowel obstruction; SVC, superior vena cava syndrome; GI, gastrointestinal; RT, radiation therapy; CRT, chemoradiation therapy; I/O, immunotherapy

In addition to these suggested priority-driven guidelines, hospitals around the world have issued internal guidelines for oncologists, aiming to decrease patient exposure to COVID-19. Given the immunocompromised nature of the patient population, cancer centers have been adhering to strict infection control guidelines, in inpatient and outpatient settings. Outpatient visits, including ambulatory clinics and chemotherapy infusion visits, have been reduced [107]. Utilization of oral therapy regimens is recommended instead of parenteral anticancer therapies, if considered equivalent. This strategy can hence reduce patients’ risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2, without compromising oncological outcome, for instance, the use of capecitabine in place of 5-fluorouracil in patients receiving concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer [108]. Additionally, one must strongly consider delaying anticancer therapy in patients with stable cancer. Zhang et al. studied the outcomes of cancer patients with COVID-19 on active anticancer therapy and reported more than fourfold higher likelihood of experiencing severe events in those who received therapy in the preceding 14 days of COVID-19 diagnosis (HR = 4.079, 95% CI 1.086–15.322, p = 0.037) [14•]. However, for aggressive cancers, it is warranted to have a risk–benefit assessment and proceeding with cancer treatment if benefits outweigh risks. As precisely mentioned by Wang et al., the major risk factor for cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is their inability to receive sufficient medical support [109]. To further minimize patient exposure to COVID-19, clinicians could consider the option of chemotherapy break and the possibility of performing home laboratory draws for toxicity assessment if feasible. To avoid patients’ exposure to pharmaceutical departments, patients could use drive-through pick-up or hospitals could utilize a courier medication delivery service [107, 110].

Surgery is another vital component in cancer management. In the current pandemic, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American College of Surgeons (ACS) have advised rescheduling elective surgeries if possible [111, 112]. Evidence suggests that patients who received surgery and concomitantly contracted COVID-19 were at much higher risk of severe clinical events than those who did not have surgery [9•]. Despite these advisories, it is important for clinicians and patients to have risk assessment discussions prior to making treatment decisions. Part of the discussion should also entail resource availability, as surgeries often require post-operative care in the intensive care unit (ICU). Given the current shortage of ICU beds, it is important to delegate resources efficiently. In instances, specifically early stage cancers where surgery is often the first step in management, patients could be offered neoadjuvant therapy, and surgery could be delayed without compromising patient outcomes [104]. Evidence suggests that 60-day delays in surgical intervention of early stage breast cancer has been documented without worsening oncological outcomes [113].

Unlike medical and surgical management, radiation therapy, which is another essential part of cancer management, has its unique challenges during a pandemic. Given the nature of the treatment, patients have to attend radiation therapy (RT) sessions daily and the interruption of therapy is rather unacceptable [107]. Considering varied clinical scenarios, the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) recently published brief guidelines for radiation oncologists dealing with COVID-19 pandemic. As noted by ASTRO, if considered reasonable, hypofractionated schedules are encouraged [114]. Additionally, in patients with rapidly progressing disease or potentially curable tumors where RT significantly impacts survival, treatment should be prioritized as benefits outweigh risks. On the contrary, patients receiving palliative RT for symptom control or where interrupting the radiation course would not cause potential harm, one should consider delaying the treatment [104, 114].

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are at an increased risk of a variety of infections [107, 115]. Incidence of RVIs is seen in about 8% of allogeneic and 2% of autologous transplant recipients, with majority of patients developing nosocomial RVIs [107]. Additionally, HSCT patients receive therapies which result in prolonged cytopenia, making the transplant patients who contract COVID-19 very vulnerable for severe symptoms [116, 117]. Considering these profound implications, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) recommends evaluating recipients at risk closely, and in appropriate cases, deferring the transplant therapy until asymptomatic (Table 3) [118].

Table 3 EBMT recommendations on managing patients pre- and post-HSCT

Clinical trials are an extremely important part of advancing medicine forward and introducing novel therapies. The Food Drug and Administration (FDA) plays a critical role in conducting these clinical trials, and ensuring participants’ safety is paramount in any scenario. In the midst of the current crisis, the FDA has issued guidance for the institutions to protect trial participants while administering investigational product with an altered monitoring approach [119]. At our institution, clinical trial activity during COVID-19 is tailored to the changing epidemic scenario. All nontherapeutic interventional trials that require in person specimen collection have been suspended until state “stay at home” order is lifted. Therapeutic clinical trials are prioritized by the Clinical Research Services (CRS), with weekly meetings conducted to re-prioritize with the evolving epidemic. The clinical trials that have remained open continue to obtain all tests and data points required for the primary endpoint of the study. Additionally, all correlative studies imbedded in the research plan, except questionnaires, are suspended until the state “stay at home” order is lifted. All the COVID-19-specific research studies have been prioritized and taken precedence in activation and conduct including the correlative endpoints. New studies and proposals continue to be reviewed and processed. Clinical disease teams and the scientific review committees continue to meet virtually and advance the much needed care.


The COVID-19 pandemic is potentially the greatest public health crisis since the influenza pandemic of 1918. This crisis has brought unprecedented challenges in the management of those who are afflicted, by overwhelming healthcare systems and causing great stress to the healthcare workforce. During such crises, generation of timely evidence for treatment options is crucial. The higher risk of COVID-19-related severe disease incurred by patients with cancer prompts the generation of a comprehensive set of pragmatic approaches specifically for cancer patients and an in-depth review of potential treatments options available to patients, including cancer patients.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.

    Bogoch II, Watts A, Thomas-Bachli A, Huber C, Kraemer MUG, Khan K. Pneumonia of unknown aetiology in Wuhan, China: potential for international spread via commercial air travel. J Travel Med. 2020;27.

  2. 2.

    Lu H, Stratton CW, Tang YW. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: the mystery and the miracle. J. Med. Virol. 2020.

  3. 3.

    Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus. J Virol. 2020;94.

  4. 4.

    COVID-19 Coronavirus pandemic. [cited 2020 Apr 11]; available from:

  5. 5.

    Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395:507–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020.

  7. 7.

    Chavez S, Long B, Koyfman A, Liang SY. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a primer for emergency physicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2020.

  8. 8.

    World Health Organization. WHO Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) when COVID-19 disease is suspected. WHO 2020

  9. 9.

    • Liang W, Guan W, Chen R, et al. Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China. Lancet Oncol. 2020; Highlights initial stages of COVID-19 was managed in China, and further management steps were utilized globally.

  10. 10.

    • Ueda M, Martins R, Hendrie PC, et al. Managing cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic: agility and collaboration toward a common goal. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020; Highlights briefly important aspects of cancer care within the United States.

  11. 11.

    Tyrrell DA, Bynoe ML. Cultivation of viruses from a high proportion of patients with colds. Lancet. 1966.

  12. 12.

    Velavan TP, Meyer CG. The COVID-19 epidemic. Tropical Med. Int. Health. 2020.

  13. 13.

    Cascella M, Rajnik M, Cuomo A, Dulebohn SC, Di Napoli R. Features, evaluation and treatment coronavirus (COVID-19). 2020.

  14. 14.

    • Zhang L, Zhu F, Xie L, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19-infected cancer patients: a retrospective case study in three hospitals within Wuhan, China. Ann Oncol. 2020; This was the first study to evaluate cancer patients being at a higher risk of serious illnesses from COVID-19, and rather extra precaution is very much advised for this patient population.

  15. 15.

    Onder G, Rezza G, Brusaferro S. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA2020; available from:

  16. 16.

    Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–280.e8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Michel T, McMurray JJ V, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD. Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; available from:

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pirofski L, Casadevall A. The damage–response framework as a tool for the physician-scientist to understand the pathogenesis of infectious diseases. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(suppl_1):S7–11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hotchkiss RS, Opal SM. Activating immunity to fight a foe - a new path. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1270–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    NCI’s Surveillance and End Results program E. Age and cancer risk. Available from:

  21. 21.

    Yu JC, Khodadadi H, Malik A, Davidson B, Salles ÉSL, Bhatia J, et al. Innate immunity of neonates and infants. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1759 Available from:

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Extermann M. Measuring comorbidity in older cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36(4):453–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Shi Y, Wang Y, Shao C, Huang J, Gan J, Huang X, et al. COVID-19 infection: the perspectives on immune responses. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27:1451–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tan L, Wang Q, Zhang D, et al. Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: a descriptive and predictive study. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):33.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ménétrier-Caux C, Ray-Coquard I, Blay J-Y, Caux C. Lymphopenia in Cancer patients and its effects on response to immunotherapy: an opportunity for combination with cytokines? J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    McLane LM, Abdel-Hakeem MS, Wherry EJ. CD8 T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection and cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 2019;37:457–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zheng M, Gao Y, Wang G, et al. Functional exhaustion of antiviral lymphocytes in COVID-19 patients. Cell Mol Immunol 2020; Available from:

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Diao B, Wang C, Tan Y, et al. Reduction and functional exhaustion of T Cells in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). medRxiv. 2020;2020.02.18.20024364. Available from:

  29. 29.

    Zhang C, Wang X, Li S, et al. NKG2A is a NK cell exhaustion checkpoint for HCV persistence. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wampler Muskardin TL. IV anakinra for macrophage activation syndrome may hold lessons for treatment of cytokine storm in the setting of COVID19. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020; available from:

  31. 31.

    Khamitov RA, Loginova SI, Shchukina VN, Borisevich SV, Maksimov VA, Shuster AM. Antiviral activity of arbidol and its derivatives against the pathogen of severe acute respiratory syndrome in the cell cultures. Vopr Virusol. 2008;53(4):9–13 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Alkharsah KR. VEGF upregulation in viral infections and its possible therapeutic implications. Int J Mol Sci. 2018:19(6) Available from:

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Shirato K, Kawase M, Matsuyama S. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection mediated by the transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2. J Virol. 2013;87(23):12552–61 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tian RR, Zhang MX, Zhang LT, Zhang P, Ma JP, Liu M, et al. CD24 and Fc fusion protein protects SIVmac239-infected Chinese rhesus macaque against progression to AIDS. Antivir Res. 2018;157:9–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gao J, Tian Z, Yang X. Breakthrough: chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci Trends. 2020;14(1):72–3 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gautret P, Lagier J-C, Parola P, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020; available from:

  37. 37.

    Gbinigie K, Frie K. Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review. BJGP Open. 2020; available from:

  38. 38.

    Arulanandam R, Batenchuk C, Varette O, et al. Microtubule disruption synergizes with oncolytic virotherapy by inhibiting interferon translation and potentiating bystander killing. Nat Commun. 2015

  39. 39.

    Roback JD, Guarner J. Convalescent plasma to treat COVID-19: possibilities and challenges. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2020.

  40. 40.

    Harrison C. Coronavirus puts drug repurposing on the fast track. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:379–81.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Triana-Baltzer GB, Babizki M, Chan MCW, et al. DAS181, a sialidase fusion protein, protects human airway epithelium against influenza virus infection: an in vitro pharmacodynamic analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009.

  42. 42.

    Drakesmith H, Prentice A. Viral infection and iron metabolism. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:541–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    MacLaren G, Fisher D, Brodie D. Preparing for the most critically ill patients with COVID-19: the potential role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1245–6 Available from:

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Xia S, Liu M, Wang C, Xu W, Lan Q, Feng S, et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. Cell Res. 2020;30(4):343–55 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lounder DT, Bin Q, De Min C, Jordan MB. Treatment of refractory hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with emapalumab despite severe concurrent infections. Blood Adv. 2019.

  46. 46.

    Chen C, Huang J, Yin P, et al. Favipiravir versus arbidol for COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. medRxiv. 2020;2020.03.17.20037432. Available from:

  47. 47.

    Blanc CA, Rosen H, Lane TE. FTY720 (fingolimod) modulates the severity of viral-induced encephalomyelitis and demyelination. J Neuroinflammation. 2014;11(1):138.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sun S, Jiang Y, Wang R, Liu C, Liu X, Song N, et al. Treatment of paraquat-induced lung injury with an anti-C5a antibody: potential clinical application. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(5):e419–25 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Li G, De Clercq E. Therapeutic options for the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(3):149–50 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jawhara S. Could intravenous immunoglobulin collected from recovered coronavirus patients protect against COVID-19 and strengthen the immune system of new patients? Int J Mol Sci. 2020.

  51. 51.

    Vangelista L, Vento S. The expanding therapeutic perspective of CCR5 blockade. Front Immunol. 2018:8 Available from:

  52. 52.

    Yao TT, Qian JD, Zhu WY, Wang Y, Wang GQ. A systematic review of lopinavir therapy for SARS coronavirus and MERS coronavirus—a possible reference for coronavirus disease-19 treatment option. J Med Virol. 2020;92:556–63.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bian H, Zheng Z-H, Wei D, et al. Meplazumab treats COVID-19 pneumonia: an open-labelled, concurrent controlled add-on clinical trial. medRxiv. 2020;2020.03.21.20040691. Available from:

  54. 54.

    Atluri S, Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA. Expanded umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) as a therapeutic strategy in managing critically ill COVID-19 patients: the case for compassionate use. Pain Physician. 2020;23(2):E71–83 Available from:

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zikuan Leng RZ, Zikuan Leng RZ. Transplantation of ACE2 mesenchymal stem cells improves the outcome of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Aging Dis. 2020;11(2):216–28 Available from:

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Khoury M, Cuenca J, Cruz FF, Figueroa FE, Rocco PRM, Weiss DJ. Current status of cell-based therapies for respiratory virus infections: applicability to COVID-19. Eur Respir J. 2020; available from:

  57. 57.

    Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; available from:

  58. 58.

    Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Arabi YM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Intensive Care Med. 2020; available from:

  59. 59.

    Stebbing J, Phelan A, Griffin I, Tucker C, Oechsle O, Smith D, et al. COVID-19: combining antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatments. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(4):400–2 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Moscona A. Neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(13):1363–73.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J, Xu M, et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020;30(3):269–71 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Kim UJ, Won E-J, Kee S-J, Jung S-I, Jang H-C. Combination therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin and interferon-α for Middle East respiratory syndrome. Antivir Ther. 2016;21(5):455–9 Available from:

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1033–4 Available from:

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Cao X. COVID-19: immunopathology and its implications for therapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020:1–2 Available from:

  65. 65.

    Kindrachuk J, Ork B, Hart BJ, Mazur S, Holbrook MR, Frieman MB, et al. Antiviral potential of ERK/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling modulation for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection as identified by temporal kinome analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:1088–99.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Li Y, Liu X, Guo L, et al. Traditional Chinese herbal medicine for treating novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):75 Available from:

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Russell B, Moss C, George G, et al. Associations between immune-suppressive and stimulating drugs and novel COVID-19-a systematic review of current evidence. Ecancermedicalscience. 2020;14:1022 Available from:

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Chen C, Qi F, Shi K, et al. Thalidomide combined with low-dose glucocorticoid in the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia. 2020; available from:

  69. 69.

    Rudolph AR, Tuthill CW. Treatment or prevention of respiratory viral infections with alpha thymosin peptides. 2010; available from:

  70. 70.

    Zhou Y, Fu B, Zheng X, et al. Aberrant pathogenic GM-CSF+ T cells and inflammatory CD14+CD16+ monocytes in severe pulmonary syndrome patients of a new coronavirus. bioRxiv. 2020;2020.02.12.945576. Available from:

  71. 71.

    Muñoz M, Coveñas R, Kramer M. The involvement of the substance P/neurokinin 1 receptor system in viral infection: focus on the gp120 fusion protein and homologous dipeptide domains. Acta Virol. 2019;63:253–60.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Camarri E, Amerighi A, Bellofiore P, et al. The clinical use of tranexamic acid in acute inflammation of the upper respiratory tract. G Clin Med. 1979;60(12):1010–9 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Carr AC. A new clinical trial to test high-dose vitamin C in patients with COVID-19. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):133 Available from:

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Prompetchara E, Ketloy C, Palaga T. Immune responses in COVID-19 and potential vaccines: lessons learned from SARS and MERS epidemic. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2020;38(1):1–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Blanchette PS, Chung H, Pritchard KI, et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness among patients with cancer: a population-based study using health administrative and laboratory testing data from Ontario, Canada. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(30):2795–804.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wang L, Wang Y, Ye D, Liu Q. A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) based on current evidence. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;105948 Available from:

  77. 77.

    Tang N, Bai H, Chen X, Gong J, Li D, Sun Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost. 2020.

  78. 78.

    Hospital Saint-Antoine Ap-Hp - HScore. [cited 2020 Apr 13]; available from:

  79. 79.

    Loeffelholz MJ, Tang Y-W. Laboratory diagnosis of emerging human coronavirus infections — the state of the art. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:747–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Grein J, Ohmagari N, Shin D, et al. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020. Available from:

  81. 81.

    Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D, et al. A trial of lopinavir–ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020. Available from:

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Chen Z, Hu J, Zhang Z, et al. Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: results of a randomized clinical trial. medRxiv. 2020;2020.03.22.20040758. Available from:

  83. 83.

    Rismanbaf A, Zarei S. Liver and kidney injuries in COVID-19 and their effects on drug therapy; a letter to editor. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020;8(1) Available from:

  84. 84.

    Muskardin TLW. IV anakinra for macrophage activation syndrome may hold lessons for treatment of cytokine storm in the setting of COVID19. ACR Open Rheumatol [Internet] 2020;n/a(n/a). Available from:

  85. 85.

    Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor. [cited 2020 Apr 14]; available from:

  86. 86.

    AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca initiates CALAVI clinical trial with Calquence against COVID-19. [cited 2020 Apr 14]; available from:

  87. 87.

    EXCLUSIVE: AstraZeneca’s Calquence shows early promise For COVID-19 patients. [cited 2020 Apr 14]; available from:

  88. 88.

    Richardson P, Griffin I, Tucker C, Smith D, Oechsle O, Phelan A, et al. Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):e30–1 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Auyeung TW, Lee JSW, Lai WK, et al. The use of corticosteroid as treatment in SARS was associated with adverse outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. J Infect. 2005;51(2):98–102 Available from:

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Hui DS. Systemic corticosteroid therapy may delay viral clearance in patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(6):700–1 Available from:

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Zha L, Li S, Pan L, et al. Corticosteroid treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Med J Aust. 2020;n/a(n/a). Available from:

  92. 92.

    Mair-Jenkins J, Saavedra-Campos M, Baillie JK, Cleary P, Khaw FM, Lim WS, et al. The effectiveness of convalescent plasma and hyperimmune immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe acute respiratory infections of viral etiology: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. J Infect Dis. 2015;211(1):80–90 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Shen C, Wang Z, Zhao F, et al. Treatment of 5 critically ill patients with COVID-19 with convalescent plasma. JAMA. 2020; available from:

  94. 94.

    Cheng H, Wang Y, Wang G-Q. Organ-protective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and its effect on the prognosis of COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2020; available from:

  95. 95.

    Zhan W-Q, Li M-D, Xu M, Lu Y-B. Successful treatment of COVID-19 using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, a case report. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(6):3385–9 Available from:

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Henry BM. COVID-19, ECMO, and lymphopenia: a word of caution. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(4):e24 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Wang J, Hajizadeh N, Moore EE, et al. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) treatment for COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): a case series. J Thromb Haemost JTH. 2020; available from:

  98. 98.

    Moore HB, Barrett CD, Moore EE, et al. Is there a role for tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) as a novel treatment for refractory COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)? J Trauma Acute Care Surg [Internet] 2020; publish Ah. Available from:

  99. 99.

    Qian Y, Xie H, Tian R, Yu K, Wang R. Efficacy of low molecular weight heparin in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving ventilatory support. COPD J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2014;11:171–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Chen Shi, Cong Wang, Hanxiang Wang, Chao Yang, Fei Cai, Fang Zeng, Fang Cheng, Yihui Liu, Taotao Zhou, Bin Deng, Jinping Li. The potential of low molecular weight heparin to mitigate cytokine storm in severe COVID-19 patients: a retrospective clinical study. BMJ Yale. 2020; available from:

  101. 101.

    Ren J-L, Zhang A-H, Wang X-J. Traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19 treatment. Pharmacol Res. 2020;155:104743 Available from:

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    赵静, 田赛赛, 杨健, 刘剑锋, 张卫东. 清肺排毒汤治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎机制的网络药理学探讨. 中草药. 2020;1–7. Available from:

  103. 103.

    NCCN. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resources for the cancer care community. [cited 2020 Apr 9]; available from:

  104. 104.

    ASCO. ASCO coronavirus resources. [cited 2020 Apr 9]; available from:

  105. 105.

    ESMO. ESMO COVID-19 and cancer. [cited 2020 Apr 9]; available from:

  106. 106.

    Ontario Health Cancer Care Ontario. Pandemic planning clinical guideline for patients with cancer. [cited 2020 Apr 9]; available from:

  107. 107.

    Al-Shamsi HO, Alhazzani W, Alhuraiji A, et al. A practical approach to the management of cancer patients during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: an international collaborative group. Oncologist. 2020; available from:

  108. 108.

    Cai ZX, Wen WQ, Min ZJ. Comparison of 5–FU-based and capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017.

  109. 109.

    Wang H, Zhang L. Risk of COVID-19 for patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:e181.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Willan J, King AJ, Hayes S, Collins GP, Peniket A. Care of haematology patients in a COVID-19 epidemic. Br J Haematol. 2020;189:241–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC: COVID-19 [cited 2020 Apr 10]; available from:

  112. 112.

    American College of Surgeons. ACS: COVID-19 and surgery. [cited 2020 Apr 10]; available from:

  113. 113.

    Mansfield SA, Abdel-Rasoul M, Terando AM, Agnese DM. Timing of breast cancer surgery—how much does it matter? Breast J. 2017.

  114. 114.

    American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). COVID-19 recommendations to radiation oncology practices. [cited 2020 Apr 10]; available from:

  115. 115.

    American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT). COVID-19 interim patient care guidelines. [cited 2020 Apr 10]; available from:

  116. 116.

    Öhrmalm L, Wong M, Rotzén-Östlund M, Norbeck O, Broliden K, Tolfvenstam T. Flocked nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate for detection of respiratory tract viruses in immunocompromised adults: a matched comparative study. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10.

  117. 117.

    Whimbey E, Champlin RE, Couch RB, et al. Community respiratory virus infections among hospitalized adult bone marrow transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 1996.

  118. 118.

    European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). COVID-19 and BMT. [cited 2020 Apr 10]; available from:

  119. 119.

    FDA guidance on conduct of clinical trials of medical products during COVID-19 pandemic. The Food Drug & Administration. [cited 2020 Apr 14]; available from:

Download references

Author information




RG, YA, and AS conceived the idea for the article; RG, YA, AS, NR, IP, and MSE performed the literature search and drafted the review; and RG, YA, AS, NR, IP, and MSE critically revised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohit Gosain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Igor Puzanov has received compensation from Amgen for service as a consultant.

Rohit Gosain, Yara Abdou, Abhay Singh, Navpreet Rana, and Marc S. Ernstoff declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gosain, R., Abdou, Y., Singh, A. et al. COVID-19 and Cancer: a Comprehensive Review. Curr Oncol Rep 22, 53 (2020).

Download citation


  • Coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • Pandemic
  • SARS
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • ARDS
  • Pneumonia
  • Cancer
  • Immune response
  • ACE2