Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical Management of Lung Cancer: History, Evolution, and Modern Advances

  • Lung Cancer (H Borghaei, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Oncology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Although surgery for lung cancer was not common before the early twentieth century, it has enjoyed remarkable progress since then both in type of resection and technical approach. This has been coupled with significant technological advances. Here, we will review the history and evolution of this relatively new field of surgery.

Recent Findings

The gold standard of the extent of resection for lung cancer evolved from pneumonectomy to lobectomy to even sublobar resection for select situations. In addition, major advances have occurred in the technical aspect of the surgical procedure. The incisional approach has evolved from rib spreading thoracotomy to thoracoscopic surgery with the latter showing significant improvement in short-term outcomes over open thoracotomy. However, standard video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or VATS is associated with visual and mechanical limitations, including lack of depth perception and rigid straight instruments. This makes it appropriate only for early-stage peripheral and small tumors. Most of the limitations of VATS can be overcome with the more recently introduced robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). RATS utilizes wristed instruments that are introduced in the chest through 8-mm ports and can mimic the movements of the human hand. In addition, magnified, three-dimensional and high definition imaging gives the surgeon an image of the lung unlike any other modality. This has allowed surgeons to perform advanced resections such as pneumonectomy or sleeve resection in a minimally invasive fashion. In addition, RATS has become a platform for the addition of other technical enhancements such as incorporating a near infra-red light source into the camera allowing identification of autoflourescent agents, such as indocyanin green. This has allowed localization of small nodules for resection and identification of tissue planes for sublobar resection. However, new technologies also require investments in time and money.

Summary

Thoracic surgery for lung cancer has evolved to include advanced minimally invasive techniques including video-assisted and robotic-assisted thoracoscopy. RATS in particular may enable surgeons to perform more advanced procedures in a minimally invasive fashion. It is hoped that the higher costs of new surgical technology may be offset by the potential for improved patient outcomes and resultant socioeconomic benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Naef AP. Development of thoracic surgery from 1880 to the present. Rev Med Suisse Romande. 1987 Nov;107(11):949–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guedel A, Waters R. A new intratracheal catheter. Anesth Analg 1928;7:238–9. 1928;7:238–9.

  3. Gale J, Waters R. Closed endobronchial anesthesia in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Surg 1931;1:432–7. 1931;1:432–7.

  4. Graham EA. The first total pneumonectomy. Tex Cancer Bull. 1949;2(1):2–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ochsner A, Debakey M. Primary pulmonary malignancy: treatment by total pneumonectomy; analysis of 79 collected cases and presentation of 7 personal cases. Ochsner J. 1939;1(3):109–25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cahan WG. Radical lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1960;39:555–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shimkin MB, Connelly RR, Marcus SC, Cutler SJ. Pneumonectomy and lobectomy in bronchogenic carcinoma. A comparison of end results of the Overholt and Ochsner clinics. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1962;44:503–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensik RJ, Faber LP, Milloy FJ, Monson DO. Segmental resection for lung cancer. A fifteen-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973;66(4):563–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett WF, Smith RA. Segmental resection for bronchogenic carcinoma: a surgical alternative for the compromised patient. Ann Thorac Surg. 1979;27(2):169–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Errett LE, Wilson J, Chiu RC, Munro DD. Wedge resection as an alternative procedure for peripheral bronchogenic carcinoma in poor-risk patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;90(5):656–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller JI. Hatcher CR,Jr. limited resection of bronchogenic carcinoma in the patient with marked impairment of pulmonary function. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;44(4):340–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Read RC, Yoder G, Schaeffer RC. Survival after conservative resection for T1 N0 M0 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49(3):391,8 discussion 399-400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pastorino U, Valente M, Bedini V, Infante M, Tavecchio L, Ravasi G. Limited resection for stage I lung cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1991;17(1):42–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60(3):615,22; discussion 622-3.

  15. Abbas AE. Ground glass opacity of the lung: the veil that needs lifting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154(6):2100–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Suzuki K, Koike T, Asakawa T, Kusumoto M, Asamura H, Nagai K, et al. A prospective radiological study of thin-section computed tomography to predict pathological noninvasiveness in peripheral clinical IA lung cancer (Japan clinical oncology group 0201). J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(4):751–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cao C, Chandrakumar D, Gupta S, Yan TD, Tian DH. Could less be more?-a systematic review and meta-analysis of sublobar resections versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer according to patient selection. Lung Cancer. 2015;89(2):121–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kodama K, Doi O, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H. Intentional limited resection for selected patients with T1 N0 M0 non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-institution study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114(3):347–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsumura Y, Yano M, Yoshida J, Koike T, Kameyama K, Shimamoto A, et al. Early and late recurrence after intentional limited resection for cT1aN0M0, non-small cell lung cancer: from a multi-institutional, retrospective analysis in Japan. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;23(3):444–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakamura K, Saji H, Nakajima R, Okada M, Asamura H, Shibata T, et al. A phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for small-sized peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40(3):271–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Landreneau RJ, Mack MJ, Hazelrigg SR, Naunheim K, Dowling RD, Ritter P, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain after pulmonary resection by thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107(4):1079,85 discussion 1085-6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jaklitsch MT. DeCamp MM,Jr, Liptay MJ, Harpole DH,Jr, Swanson SJ, Mentzer SJ, et al. video-assisted thoracic surgery in the elderly. A review of 307 cases. Chest. 1996;110(3):751–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Demmy TL, Curtis JJ. Minimally invasive lobectomy directed toward frail and high-risk patients: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(1):194–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, Shimizu K. Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70(5):1644–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(2):421,5 discussion 425-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Amosov NM, Berezovsky KK. Pulmonary resection with mechanical suture. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1961;41:325–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ravitch MM, Steichen FM, Fishbein RH, Knowles PW, Weil P. Clinical experiences with the soviet mechanical bronchus stapler (Ukb-25). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1964;47:446–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Acuff TE, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, Hazelrigg SR. Role of mechanical stapling devices in thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56(3):749–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Abbas AE. Robotic portal lobectomy, surgery through a virtual thoracotomy. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(9):2871–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, Minnich DJ. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(4):740–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S. Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(1):236,42 discussion 242-4.

    Google Scholar 

  32. •• Park BJ, Melfi F, Mussi A, Maisonneuve P, Spaggiari L, Da Silva RK, et al. Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(2):383–9 This is the largest study to date of the long term oncologic effects of robotic surgery for lung cancer. It showed that long-term stage-specific survival for robotic lobectomy is acceptable and consistent with prior results for VATS and thoracotomy.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Louie BE, Farivar AS, Aye RW, Vallieres E. Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(5):1598,604 discussion 1604-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maria Shulman R, El-Sayed Abbas A. The state of the art and future directions of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-017-0626-7. IJTCVS. 2018 January, 2018;34(S1):55.

  35. • Cerfolio R, Louie BE, Farivar AS, Onaitis M, Park BJ. Consensus statement on definitions and nomenclature for robotic thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 23. This paper attempts to standardize the nomenclature used in defining the type of operation performed during robotic lung surgery.

  36. Abbas AE. New nomenclature for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery also gets rid of RATS. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;2.

  37. • Abbas A, Kadakia S, Ambur V, Muro K, Kaiser L. Intraoperative electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopic localization of small, deep, or subsolid pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 7. This paper provides the first description of using near infra red light and autoflourescence for localization of lung nodules during robotic lung surgery.

  38. Shen J. Prof. Abbas E. Abbas: a robotic thoracic practice can provide both clinical and financial benefits for an academic institution. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jun;9(6):E573–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center and Temple University Hospital, 3401 N. Broad St., Suite C-100, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA

    Abbas E. Abbas

Authors
  1. Abbas E. Abbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas E. Abbas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Abbas E. Abbas has received compensation from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. for service as a consultant.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Lung Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbas, A.E. Surgical Management of Lung Cancer: History, Evolution, and Modern Advances. Curr Oncol Rep 20, 98 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-018-0741-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-018-0741-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation