Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of radical hysterectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma of the cervix

  • Published:
Current Oncology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The patient presenting with a bulky stage IB2 cervical cancer is a therapeutic challenge. None of the current surgical or radiation treatment strategies satisfactorily leads to a high rate of disease-free survival and a low risk of treatment-related complications including ovarian failure and psychosexual deficits. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may allow for reductions in tumor bulk, thereby rendering radiation therapy more effective or surgery more feasible. Impressive clinical response rates to cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been achieved with acceptable toxicity. Approximately 20% of patients achieve a complete clinical response, and many also experience a complete pathologic response. There are still too few comparative studies and phase III trials to assess the effectiveness of neoadjudvant chemotherapy and radical surgery relative to standard treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M: Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 2001, 51:15–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roddick JW, Greenelaw RH: Treatment of cervical cancer: a randomized study of operation and radiation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971, 109:754–764.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al.: Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 1997, 350:535–540. This was a large phase III study in early-stage cervical cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to either radical surgery or radiation therapy. Survival rates in the two treatment arms were equivalent.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gauthier P, Gore I, Shingleton HM, et al.: Identification of histopathologic risk groups in stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1985, 66:569–574.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burke TW: Factors affecting recurrence and survival in stage I carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Oncology 1992, 6:111–116.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Comerci G, Bolger BS, Flannelly G, et al.: Prognostic factors in surgically treated stage IB-IIB carcinoma of the cervix with negative lymph nodes. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1998, 8:23–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, et al.: Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999, 340:1154–1161. This randomized controlled trial conducted by the GOG established the superiority of cisplatin chemoradiation versus radiation therapy alone prior to extrafascial hysterectomy for the treatment of stage IB2 cervical cancer.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Feeney DD, Moore DH, Look KY, et al.: The fate of the ovaries after radical hysterectomy and ovarian transposition. Gynecol Oncol 1995, 56:3–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thigpen T, Vance R, Khansur T, Malamud F: The role of ifosfamide and systemic therapy in the management of carcinoma of the cervix. Semin Oncol 1996, 23(suppl 6):56–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brader KR, Morris M, Levenback C, et al.: Chemotherapy for cervical carcinoma: factors determining response and implications for clinical trial design. J Clin Oncol 1998, 16:1879–1884.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Peters WA, Liu PY, Barrett RJ, et al.: Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 2000, 18:1606–1613. Following radical hysterectomy, patients with high risk factors for recurrence (positive lymph nodes, positive surgical margins, and disease extension into the parametrium) were randomly assigned to receive either radiation therapy alone or radiation therapy plus cisplatin/ 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. There was a significant survival advantage for radiation therapy and concomitant chemotherapy.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedlander ML, Atkinson K, Coppleson JVM, et al.: The integration of chemotherapy into the management of locally advanced cervical cancer: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 1984, 19:1–7. This was one of the first nonrandomized studies investigating neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical carcinoma.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Panici PB, Scambia G, Greggi S, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Obstet Gynecol 1988, 74:344–348. This phase II trial demonstrated a 76% response rate with neoadjuvant cisplatin plus bleomycin plus methotrexate chemotherapy.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sardi J, Sananas C, Giaroli A, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Oncol 1990 38:486–493. This was a large (n=151) nonrandomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer. These investigators have published several studies in this area. See also Sardi et al. [35 ].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dottino PR, Plaxe SC, Beddoe AM, et al.: Induction chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1991, 40:7–11. This was one of the first series of neoadjuvant chemotherapy from the United States. The response rate to neoadjuvant vincristine plus cisplatin plus bleomycin plus methotrexate chemotherapy was 100%.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang HC, Lai CH, Chou PC, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, vincristine, and bleomycin and radical surgery in early-stage bulky cervican carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992, 30:281–285. This phase II trial reported a response rate of 85% among 36 patients treated with vincristine plus bleomycin plus cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zanetta G, Landoni F, Colombo A, et al.: Three-year results after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radical surgery, and radiotherapy in locally-advanced cervical carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1993, 82:447–450. This phase II trial reported a response rate of 67% among 24 patients treated with vincristine plus bleomycin plus cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bolis G, van Zainten-Przybysz I, Scarfone G, et al.: Determinants of response to a cisplatin-based regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB-IIB invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1996, 63:62–65. After cisplatin plus ifosfamide/mesna neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 62% of patients with pretreatment positive lymph nodes still had positive lymph nodes at the time of radical surgery.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Minagawa Y, Kigawa J, Irie T, et al.: Radical surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage IIIB cervical cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998, 5:539–543. Neoadjuvant peplomycin plus vincristine plus cisplatin chemotherapy was administered to 26 patients with stage IIIB cervical cancer. Eighteen patients underwent radical surgery, and seven (39%) were found to have lymph node metastasis.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lai CH, Hsueh S, Chang TC, et al.: Prognostic factors in patients with bulky stage IB or IIA cervical carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1997, 64:456–462. Eight patients had pretreatment CT showing enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, scans were negative in five and remained positive in three patients. Among 54 patients who underwent surgery, 10 (18%) had lymph node metastasis (including two of the five patients with negative scans after chemotherapy).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hwang YY, Moon H, Cho SH, et al.: Ten-year survival of patients with locally advanced, stage IB-IIB cervical cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2001, 82:88–93. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 25% of patients proved to have no residual tumor in the cervix, and yet 21% of patients proved to have lymph node metastasis.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Panici PB, Greggi S, Scambia G, et al.: Locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma: is there a place for chemo-surgical treatment? Gynecol Oncol 1996, 61:44–49. This was one of the first studies to use neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma. The overall response rate (79%) compares favorably with the response rates achieved in squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meden H, Meibodi AF, Osmers R, et al.: Wertheim’s hysterectomy after neoadjuvant carboplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with cervical cancer stage IIB and IIIB. Anticancer Res 1998, 18:4575–4580.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Kumagai S, et al.: Combination therapy with irinotecan and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 1999, 81:95–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zanetta G, Fei F, Mangioni C: Chemotherapy with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin for the treatment of squamous cell cervical cancer: the experience of Monza. Semin Oncol 2000, 27(suppl 1):23–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Graniel CL, Reyes M, Chanona G, et al.: Type III radical hysterectomy after induction chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2001, 11:210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Panici PB, Greggi S, Scambia G, et al.: Long-term survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer 1998, 34:341–346. These authors noted that patients with advanced stages, large tumors (>5 cm), nonsquamous tumors, and poor tumor grade were less likely to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Serur E, Mathews RP, Gates J, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1997, 65:348–356. In this nonrandomized comparison, the 5-year survival rate for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 80% versus 69% for patients undergoing primary surgery (P=0.162). The authors acknowledged that this study lacked sufficient power to detect a survival difference of this magnitude.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Scarabelli C, Zarrelli A, Gallo A, Visentin MC: Multimodal treatment with neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy and radical surgery in patients with stage IIIB-IVA cervical cancer. Cancer 1995, 76:1019–1026.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fujiwaki R, Iida K, Ohnishi Y, et al.: Intra-arterial neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and radiotherapy for stage IIB cervical carcinoma. Anticancer Res 1997, 17:3751–3756.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Hasuo Y, et al.: Neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy and/or radiotherapy for locally-advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1998, 69:130–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Muraoka Y, et al.: Radical surgery after neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy in stage IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Int Surg 1999, 84:67–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamakawa Y, Fujimura M, Kidaka T, et al.: Neoadjuvant intraarterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with stage IB2-IIIB cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2000, 77:264–270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Aoki Y, Sato T, Watanabe M, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy using low-dose consecutive intraarterial infusions of cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2001, 81:496–499.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sardi JE, Sananes CE, Giaroli AA, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical carcinoma stage IIB: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1998, 8:441–450. In this four-arm randomized controlled trial, survival differences between neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery plus radiation therapy versus surgery alone, or versus radiation therapy alone, were significant. Furthermore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy appeared to decrease the frequency of poor histopathologic factors: occult parametrial infiltration, vascular space invasion, and positive lymph nodes.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang TC, Lai CH, Hong JH, et al.: Randomized trial of neoadjuvant cisplatin, vincristine, bleomycin, and radical hysterectomy versus radiation therapy for bulky stage IB and IIA cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000, 18:1740–1747. The authors reported results from a phase III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus pelvic radiation therapy. The overall clinical response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (86%) was compared with that in other trials. There were no differences between the two treatment groups in disease-free survival or overall survival.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Eddy GL, Manetta A, Alvarez RD, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with vincristine and cisplatin followed by radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for FIGO stage IB bulky cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 1995, 57:412–416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, D.H. The role of radical hysterectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma of the cervix. Curr Oncol Rep 4, 145–151 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-002-0075-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-002-0075-2

Keywords

Navigation