Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outpatient Approach to Resistant and Refractory Migraine in Children and Adolescents: a Narrative Review

  • Headache (R.B. Halker Singh and J. VanderPluym, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Migraine is one of the top reasons for consulting a pediatric neurologist. Although the majority of children and adolescents who receive evidence-based first-line interventions for migraine will improve substantially, a subset of patients develop resistant or refractory migraine.

Recent Findings

In this review, we summarize the level of evidence for a variety of acute and preventive treatment options to consider in children and adolescents with resistant or refractory migraine. We describe the level of evidence for interventional procedures (onabotulinumtoxinA injections, greater occipital and other nerve blocks), neuromodulation (single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, external trigeminal nerve stimulation, remote electrical neuromodulation, and non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway antagonists (anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants), psychological therapies, and manual therapies (acupuncture, craniosacral therapy, massage and physical therapy, and spinal manipulation).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Curless RG. Diagnostic problems in three pediatric neurology practice plans. Pediatr Neurol. 1998;19(4):272–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abu-Arafeh I, Razak S, Sivaraman B, Graham C. Prevalence of headache and migraine in children and adolescents: a systematic review of population-based studies. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(12):1088–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hershey AD, Powers SW, Lecates S, Kabbouche MA, Maynard MK. PedMIDAS: Development of a questionnaire to assess disability of migraines in children. Neurology. 2001;57:2034–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hershey AD, Powers SW, Vockell A, LeCates S, Segers A, Kabbouche M. Development of a patient-based grading scale for PedMIDAS. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(10):844–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Feigin VL, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abd-Allah F, Abdulle AM, Abera SF, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(11):877–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. •• Powers SW, Coffey CS, Chamberlin LA, Ecklund DJ, Klingner EA, Yankey JW, et al. Trial of amitriptyline, topiramate, and placebo for pediatric migraine. NEJM. 2017;376(2):115. (Seminal pediatric migraine trial that showed no efficacy difference between the two most commonly prescribed preventive medications and placebo••)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. •• Powers SW, Coffey CS, Chamberlin LA, Ecklund DJ, Klingner EA, Yankey JW, et al. Prevalence of headache days and disability 3 years after participation in the Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention Medication Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 10.10:1–14. CHAMP follow-up study that showed that most improvements seen after pill-based treatments are sustained long-term in children and adolescents with migraine

  8. Sacco S, Braschinsky M, Ducros A, Lampl C, Little P, Van Den BAM, et al. European Headache Federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine developed with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance (EMHA). J Headache Pain. 2020;21(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Binder WJ, Brin MF, Blitzer A, Pogoda JM. Botulinum toxin type a (BOTOX) for treatment of migraine. Vol. 48, Disease-a-Month. 2002. p. 323–35.

  10. Aurora SK, Aurora, Sheena K, Paul, Freeman, Marshall C, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled analyses of the 56-week PREEMPT clinical program. Vol. 51, Headache. United States; 2011. p. 1358–73.

  11. Herd CP, Tomlinson CL, Rick C, Scotton WJ, Edwards J, Ives NJ, et al. Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of botulinum toxin for the prevention of migraine. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e027953.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Barad M, Ailani J, Hakim SM, Kissoon NR, Schuster NM. Percutaneous interventional strategies for migraine prevention: a systematic review and practice guideline. Pain Med. 2022;23(1):164–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blumenfeld A, Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, Turkel CC, Binder WJ. Method of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment paradigm based on the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache. 2010;50(9):1406–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcelo R, Freund B. The efficacy of botulinum toxin in pediatric chronic migraine: a literature review. J Child Neurol. 2020;35(12):844–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. • Winner PK, Kabbouche M, Yonker M, Wangsadipura V, Lum A, Brin MF. A randomized trial to evaluate onabotulinumtoxinA for prevention of headaches in adolescents with chronic migraine. Headache. 2020;60(3):564–75. OnabotulinumtoxinA parallel-group randomized controlled trial in children and adolescents

  16. • Shah S, Calderon MD, Crain N, Pham J, Rinehart J. Effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) in pediatric patients experiencing migraines: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study in the pediatric pain population. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(1):41–8. OnabotulinumtoxinA cross-over randomized controlled trial in children and adolescents

  17. Szperka CL, Gelfand AA, Hershey AD. Patterns of use of peripheral nerve blocks and trigger point injections for pediatric headache: results of a survey of the American Headache Society Pediatric and Adolescent Section. Headache. 2016;56(10):1597–607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dubrovsky AS. Nerve blocks in paediatric and adolescent headache disorders. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2017;21(50):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gelfand AA, Reider ACGP. Outcomes of greater occipital nerve injections in pediatric patients with chronic primary headache disorders. Pediatr Neurol. 2014;50(2):135–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lacey D. Efficacy of greater occipital nerve blocks (ONBs) in the treatment of chronic daily headaches (CDH) in adolescent females with fibromyalgia. Headache. 2008;24(3):160–77.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Renaudon-Smith E, Toolis C, Goadsby P, Prabhakar P. Greater occipital nerve injection (GONI) for chronic headache in children. J Headache Pain. 2010;11(S1):1–150.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Puledda F, Goadsby PJ, Prabhakar P. Treatment of disabling headache with greater occipital nerve injections in a large population of childhood and adolescent patients: a service evaluation. J Headache Pain. 2018;19:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Esparham A, Boorigie M, Ablatt S, Connelly M, Bickel J. Improving acute treatment of pediatric primary headache disorders with a novel headache treatment center: retrospective review of preliminary outcomes. J Child Neurol. 2021;36(1):54–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mousa MA, Aria DJ, Mousa AA, Schaefer CM, Temkit MH, Towbin RB. Sphenopalatine ganglion nerve block for the treatment of migraine headaches in the pediatric population. Pain Physician. 2021;24(1):E111–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kouri M, Somaini M, Cárdenas VHG, Niburski K, Vigouroux M, Ingelmo P. Transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block for the preventive treatment of chronic daily headache in adolescents. Children. 2021;8(7):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Barker T. An introduction to the basic principles of magnetic nerve stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;8(1):26–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brighina F, Raieli V, Messina LM, Santangelo G, Puma D, Drago F, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation in pediatric migraine: a perspective from evidence in adult migraine. Front Neurol. 2019;10(APR):1–5.

  28. Beaulieu LD, Schneider C. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation to reduce pain or improve sensorimotor impairments: a literature review on parameters of application and afferents recruitment. Neurophysiol Clinlinique. 2015;45(3):223–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain spinal cord roots and peripheral nerves basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126(6):1071–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Gilbert DL, Garvey MA, Bansal AS, Lipps T, Zhang J, Wassermann EM. Should transcranial magnetic stimulation research in children be considered minimal risk? Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(8):1730–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Krishnan C, Santos L, Peterson MD, Ehinger M. Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents. Brain Stimuls. 2015;8(1):76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zewdie E, Ciechanski P, Kuo HC, Giuffre A, Kahl C, King R, et al. Safety and tolerability of transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation in children: prospective single center evidence from 3.5 million stimulations. Brain Stimul. 2020;13(3):565–75.

  33. • Irwin SL, Qubty W, Allen IE, Patniyot I, Goadsby PJ, Gelfand AA. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for migraine prevention in adolescents: a pilot open-label study. Headache. 2018;58(5):724–31. Transcranial magnetic stimulation open-label pilot study among children and adolescents with migraine

  34. Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Saper JR, Aurora SK, Pearlman SH, et al. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(4):373–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Starling AJ, Tepper SJ, Marmura MJ, Shamim EA, Robbins MS, Hindiyeh N, et al. A multicenter, prospective, single arm, open label, observational study of sTMS for migraine prevention (ESPOUSE Study). Cephalalgia. 2018;38(6):1038–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Schoenen JE, Vandersmissen B, Herroelen L, Vandenheede M, Gerard P, Magis D. Migraine prevention with a supraorbital transcutaneous stimulator: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2013;80:697–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chou DE, Shnayderman Yugrakh M, Winegarner D, Rowe V, Kuruvilla D, Schoenen J. Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): a randomized controlled trial. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(1):3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hokenek NM, Erdogan MO, Hokenek UD, Algin A, Tekyol D, Seyhan AU. Treatment of migraine attacks by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;39:80–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kuruvilla DE, Mann JI, Tepper SJ, Starling AJ, Panza G, Johnson MAL. Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled Trial of e-TNS for the Acute treatment of Migraine (TEAM). Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vikelis M, Dermitzakis EV, Spingos KC, Vasiliadis GG, Vlachos GS, Kararizou E. Clinical experience with transcutaneous supraorbital nerve stimulation in patients with refractory migraine or with migraine and intolerance to topiramate: a prospective exploratory clinical study. BMC Neurol. 2017;17(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jiang L, Yuan D, Li M, Liu C, Liu Q, Zhang Y, et al. Combination of flunarizine and transcutaneous supraorbital neurostimulation improves migraine prophylaxis. Act Neurol Scand. 2019;139(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13050

  42. Magis D, Magis, Delphine, Sava, Simona, d’Elia, et al. Safety and patients’ satisfaction of transcutaneous supraorbital neurostimulation (tSNS) with the Cefaly device in headache treatment: a survey of 2,313 headache sufferers in the general population. Vol. 14, Journal of Headache & Pain. Italy; 2013. p. 95-.

  43. Di Fiore P, Bussone G, Galli A, Didier H, Peccarisi C, D’Amico D, et al. Transcutaneous supraorbital neurostimulation for the prevention of chronic migraine: a prospective, open-label preliminary trial. Neurol Sci. 2017;38:201–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yarnitsky D, Dodick DW, Grosberg BM, Burstein R, Ironi A, Harris D, et al. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) relieves acute migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Headache. 2019;59(8):1240–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. •• Hershey AD, Lin T, Gruper Y, Harris D, Ironi A, Thomas M, et al. Remote electrical neuromodulation for acute treatment of migraine in adolescents. Headache. 2021;61(2):310–7. Remote electrical neuromodulation open-label trial study among children and adolescents with migraine

  46. Yarnitsky D, Volokh L, Ironi A, Weller B, Shor M, Shifrin A, et al. Nonpainful remote electrical stimulation alleviates episodic migraine pain. Neurology. 2017;88(13):1250–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Marmura MJ, Lin T, Harris D, Ironi A, Rosen NL. Incorporating remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) into usual care reduces acute migraine medication use: an open-label extension study. Front Neurol. 2020;11(April):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Buse D, Rabany L, Lin T, Ironi A, Connelly M, Bickel J. Combining guided intervention of education and relaxation (GIER) with remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) in the acute treatment of migraine. Pain Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnac021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vecchio E, Bassez I, Ricci K, Tassorelli C, Liebler E, de Tommaso M. Effect of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation on resting-state electroencephalography and laser-evoked potentials in migraine patients: mechanistic insights. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. • Grazzi L, Egeo G, Liebler E, Padovan A, Barbanti P. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) as symptomatic treatment of migraine in young patients: a preliminary safety study. Neurol Sci. 2017;38(S1):S197–99. Non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation open-label pilot study among children and adolescents with migraine

  51. Tassorelli C, Grazzi L, De Tommaso M, Pierangeli G, Martelletti P, Rainero I, et al. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation as acute therapy for migraine: the randomized PRESTO study. Neurology. 2018;91(4):e364–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Diener HC, Goadsby PJ, Ashina M, Al-Karagholi MAM, Sinclair A, Mitsikostas D, et al. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: the multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled PREMIUM trial. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(12):1475–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Najib U, Smith T, Hindiyeh N, Saper J, Nye B, Ashina S, et al. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for prevention of migraine: the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled PREMIUM II trial. Cephalalgia. 2022;033310242110688.

  54. Lai YH, Huang YC, Huang LT, Chen RM, Chen C. Cervical noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation for migraine and cluster headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuromodulation. 2020;23(6):721–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, DiN Krause. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies - successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(6):338–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Lanteri-Minet M, Osipova V, et al. ARISE: a phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(6):1026–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR. Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(9):1080–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, et al. Effect of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(19):1999–2008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, Ossipov MH, Kim BK, Yang JY. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(8):1442–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallström Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Zhang F, et al. A controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. NEJM. 2017;377(22):2123–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Ferrari MD, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2280–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, et al. Fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. NEJM. 2017;377(22):2113–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018;91(24):E2211–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Dodick DW, Lipton RB, Silberstein S, Goadsby PJ, Biondi D, Hirman J, et al. Eptinezumab for prevention of chronic migraine: a randomized phase 2b clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(9):1075–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ashina M, Saper J, Cady R, Schaeffler BA, Biondi DM, Hirman J, et al. Eptinezumab in episodic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (PROMISE-1). Cephalalgia. 2020;40(3):241–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. •• Greene KA, Gentile CP, Szperka CL, Yonker M, Gelfand AA, Grimes B, et al. Calcitonin gene–related peptide monoclonal antibody use for the preventive treatment of refractory headache disorders in adolescents. Pediatr Neurol. 2021;114:62–7. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody open-label retrospective observational study among adolescents with migraine

  67. Suleman S, Chow C, Rastogi RG. Use of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies in pediatric migraine prevention (4082). Neurology. 2021;96(15 Supplement):4082.

    Google Scholar 

  68. •• Szperka CL, VanderPluym J, Orr SL, Oakley CB, Qubty W, Patniyot I, et al. Recommendations on the use of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in children and adolescents. Headache. 2018;58(10):1658–69. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody expert consensus guidelines on when to use the antibodies off-label in pediatric patients

  69. Dodick D, Lipton R, Ailani J, Lu K, Finnegan M, Trugman J, et al. Ubrogepant for the treatment of migraine. NEJM. 2019;381:2230–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Ailani J, Lu K, Finnegan M, Szegedi A, et al. Effect of ubrogepant vs placebo on pain and the most bothersome associated symptom in the acute treatment of migraine: the ACHIEVE II randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(19):1887–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Gao B, Yang Y, Wang Z, Sun Y, Chen Z, Zhu Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine: evidence from randomized controlled trials. Front Pharmacol. 2020;10:https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01577.

  72. Croop R, Lipton RB, Kudrow D, Stock DA, Kamen L, Conway CM, et al. Oral rimegepant for preventive treatment of migraine: a phase 2/3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10268):51–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Goadsby PJ, Dodick DW, Ailani J, Trugman JM, Finnegan M, Lu K, et al. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of orally administered atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults: a double-blind, randomised phase 2b/3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(9):727–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Knestrick KE, Gibler RC, Reidy BL, Powers SW. Psychological interventions for pediatric headache disorders: a 2021 update on research progress and needs. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022;26(1):85–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. •• Fisher E, Law E, Dudeney J, Palermo T, Stewart G, Eccleston C. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;1–123. Cochrane systematic review on the efficacy of psychological interventions for the management of pediatric chronic pain including migraine

  76. •• Powers SW, Kashikar-Zuck SM, Allen JR, LeCates SL, Slater SK, Zafar M, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy plus amitriptyline for chronic migraine in children and adolescents: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(24):2622–30. Seminal cognitive behavioral therapy trial for adjunctive treatment in children and adolescents with chronic migraine

  77. Vasiliou VS, Karademas EC, Christou Y, Papacostas S, Karekla M. Acceptance and commitment therapy for primary headache sufferers: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy. J Pain. 2021;22(2):143–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Pielech M, Vowles KE, Wicksell R. Acceptance and commitment therapy for pediatric chronic pain: theory and application. Children. 2017;4(2):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Odell S, Logan DE. Pediatric pain management: the multidisciplinary approach. J Pain Res. 2013;6:785–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. • Benore E, Webster EE, Wang L, Banez G. Longitudinal analysis of patient-reported outcomes from an interdisciplinary pediatric pain rehabilitation program for children with chronic migraine and headache. Headache. 2018;58(10):1556–67. Observational study on the efficacy of interdisciplinary intensive pain rehabilitation in children with migraine and other headache disorders

  81. • Shulman J, Conroy C, Cybulski A, Smith KR, Jervis K, Johnson H, et al. Does intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment improve pediatric headache-related disability? Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(2):194–201. Observational study on the efficacy of interdisciplinary intensive pain rehabilitation in children with migraine and other headache disorders

  82. Hechler T, Kanstrup M, Holley AL, Simons LE, Wicksell R, Hirschfeld G, et al. Systematic review on intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment of children with chronic pain. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):115–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Bethell C, Kemper KJ, Gombojav N, Koch TK. Complementary and conventional medicine use among youth with recurrent headaches. Pediatrics. 2013;132(5):e1173–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Dalla Libera D, Colombo B, Pavan G, Comi G. Prescription of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in an Italian cohort of pediatric headache patients. Neurology. 2014;35(S1):145–8.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Lu T, Lu C, Li M, Ke L, Cai H, Yang K. Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses of acupuncture for patients with migraine: a methodological investigation with evidence map. J Integr Med. 2022. 10.10:1–8

  86. Linde K, Allais G, Brinkhaus B, Mehring M, Vertosick E, Vickers A, et al. Acupuncture for the prevention of episodic migraine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;6:CD001218.

  87. Haller H, Lauche R, Sundberg T, Dobos G, Cramer H. Craniosacral therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;21(1):1–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Falsiroli Maistrello L, Rafanelli M, Turolla A. Manual therapy and quality of life in people with headache: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23(10):23–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Jung A, Eschke RC, Gabler T, Pawlowsky V, Luedtke K. Effectiveness of physiotherapeutic treatment interventions on pain intensity, duration, frequency, and quality of life of patients with migraine: a systematic review. Schmerz. 2021. 10.100:1–11

  90. Rist PM, Hernandez A, Bernstein C, Kowalski M, Osypiuk K, Vining R, et al. The impact of spinal manipulation on migraine pain and disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Headache. 2019;59(4):532–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Lawler SP, Cameron LD. A randomized, controlled trial of massage therapy as a treatment for migraine. Ann Behav Med. 2006;32(1):50–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Happe S, Peikert A, Siegert R, Evers S. The efficacy of lymphatic drainage and traditional massage in the prophylaxis of migraine: a randomized, controlled parallel group study. Neurol Sci. 2016;37(10):1627–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Chatchawan U, Eungpinichpong W, Sooktho S, Tiamkao S, Yamauchi J. Effects of Thai traditional massage on pressure pain threshold and headache intensity in patients with chronic tension-type and migraine headaches. J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20(6):486–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. • Gottschling S, Meyer S, Gribova I, Distler L, Berrang J, Gortner L, et al. Laser acupuncture in children with headache: a double-blind, randomized, bicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Pain. 2008;137(2):405–12. Randomized controlled trial on the use of laser acupuncture for children and adolescents with headache disorders

  95. Adams D, Cheng F, Jou H, Aung S, Yasui Y, Vohra S. The safety of pediatric acupuncture: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2011;128:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Todd A, Carroll M, Robinson A, Mitchell E. Adverse events due to chiropractice and other manual therapies for infants and children: a review of the literature. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2015;38(9):699–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Karkhaneh M, Zorzela L, Jou H, Funabashi M, Dryden T, Vohra S. Adverse events associated with paediatric massage therapy: a systematic review. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020;4:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Fisher E, Villanueva G, Henschke N, Nevitt SJ, Zempsky W, Probyn K, et al. Efficacy and safety of pharmacological, physical, and psychological interventions for the management of chronic pain in children: a WHO systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2022;163(1):E1-19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Vohra S, Johnston BC, Cramer K, Humphreys K. Adverse events associated with pediatric spinal manipulation: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2007;119(1):275–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Gladstein J, Szperka C, Gelfand A. Pediatric headache. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA, US: Elsevier; 2021. p. 346.

    Google Scholar 

  101. •• Locher C, Kossowsky J, Koechlin H, Lam TL, Barthel J, Berde CB, et al. Efficacy, safety, and acceptability of pharmacologic treatments for pediatric migraine prophylaxis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(4):341–9. (Network meta-analysis examining the efficacy and safety of pill-based preventive interventions for children and adolescents with episodic migraine)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Hornik C, Gelfand A, Szperka C, Pezzuto T, Utevsky A, Kessel S, et al. Development of a prospective real-world data clinical registry of children and adolescents with migraine. Headache. 2020;60(2):405–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Kommineni M, Finkel AG. Teaching headache in America: survey of neurology chairs and residency directors. Headache. 2005;45(7):862–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Pace A, Orr SL, Rosen NL, Safdieh JE, Bosmenier G, Sprouse-Blum AS. The current state of headache medicine education in the United States and Canada: an observational, survey-based study of neurology clerkship directors and curriculum deans. Headache. 2021;61:854–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Robbins MS, Rosen NL. Headache interest in academic neurology leadership: a cross-sectional study. Headache. 2018;58(1):102–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Gelfand AA, Qubty W, Patniyot I, Grimes B, Pletcher MJ, Goadbsy PJ, et al. Home-based trials in adolescent migraine: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(6):744–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Shapiro RE. What will it take to move the needle for headache disorders? An advocacy perspective Headache. 2020;60(9):2059–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute and the Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary. The Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute and the Department of Pediatrics provided funding for this project but had no role in design or execution of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serena L. Orr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Alison Marshall: none.

Rebecca Lindsay: none.

Michelle A. Clementi: has research funding from the Ludeman Family Center for Women’s Health Research at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and from NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR002535. Contents are the authors’ sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views.

Amy A. Gelfand: in the last 24 months, Dr. Gelfand has received honoraria from UpToDate (for authorship), and stipends from JAMA Neurology for editorial work (last in July 2020) and from the American Headache Society for her role as Editor of Headache. She received grant support from the Duke Clinical Research Institute and the UCSF Resource Allocation Program. Her spouse reports research support (to UCSF) from Genentech for a clinical trial, honoraria for editorial work from Dynamed Plus, and personal compensation for medical-legal consulting.

Serena L. Orr receives royalties from Cambridge University Press. She serves on the editorial boards of Headache and Neurology. She also has research funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Headache

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marshall, A., Lindsay, R., Clementi, M.A. et al. Outpatient Approach to Resistant and Refractory Migraine in Children and Adolescents: a Narrative Review. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 22, 611–624 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-022-01224-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-022-01224-4

Keywords

Navigation