Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Civilian Firearm-Inflicted Brain Injury: Coagulopathy, Vascular Injuries, and Triage

  • Neurotrauma (D. Sandsmark, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Civilian firearm-inflicted penetrating brain injury (PBI) carries high morbidity and mortality. Concurrently, the evidence base guiding management decisions remains limited. Faced with large volume of PBI patients, we have made observations in relation to coagulopathy and cerebrovascular injuries. We here review this literature in addition to the question about early prognostication as it may inform neurosurgical decision-making.

Recent Findings

The triad of coagulopathy, low motor score, and radiographic compression of basal cisterns comprises a phenotype of injury with exceedingly high mortality. PBI leads to high rates of cerebral arterial and venous injuries, and projectile trajectory is emerging as an independent predictor of outcome.

Summary

The combination of coagulopathy with cerebrovascular injury creates a specific endophenotype. The nature and role of coagulopathy remain to be deciphered, and consideration to the use of tranexamic acid should be given. Prospective controlled trials are needed to create clinical evidence free of patient selection bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. •• Deng H, Yue JK, Winkler EA, Dhall SS, Manley GT, Tarapore PE. Adult firearm-related traumatic brain injury in United States trauma centers. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36(2):322–37 Epidemiologic data from the US and the National Trauma Data Bank on firearm inflicted civilian brain injury between the years 2003-2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Skarupa DJ, Khan M, Hsu A, Madbak FG, Ebler DJ, Yorkgitis B, et al. Trends in civilian penetrating brain injury: a review of 26,871 patients. Am J Surg. 2019;218(2):255–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, Corteen EA, Czosnyka M, Timothy J, et al. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(12):1119–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Part 2: Prognosis in penetrating brain injury. J Trauma. 2001 Aug;51(2 Suppl):S44-86. PMID: 11505200.

  5. Loggini A, Vasenina VI, Mansour A, Das P, Horowitz PM, Goldenberg FD, et al. Management of civilians with penetrating brain injury: a systematic review. J Crit Care. 2020;56:159–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Part 1: Guidelines for the management of penetrating brain injury. Introduction and methodology. J Trauma. 2001 Aug;51(2 Suppl):S3-6. PMID: 11505192.

  7. Joseph B, Aziz H, Pandit V, Kulvatunyou N, O'Keeffe T, Wynne J, et al. Improving survival rates after civilian gunshot wounds to the brain. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(1):58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maegele M, Schöchl H, Menovsky T, Maréchal H, Marklund N, Buki A, et al. Coagulopathy and haemorrhagic progression in traumatic brain injury: advances in mechanisms, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(8):630–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher-Sandersjöö A, Thelin EP, Maegele M, Svensson M, Bellander BM. Time Course of Hemostatic Disruptions After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Neurocrit Care. 2021 Apr;34(2):635-656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01037-8. PMID: 32607969; PMCID: PMC8128788.

  10. Böhm JK, Güting H, Thorn S, Schäfer N, Rambach V, Schöchl H, Grottke O, Rossaint R, Stanworth S, Curry N, Lefering R, Maegele M; CENTERTBI Participants and Investigators. Global Characterisation of Coagulopathy in Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury (iTBI): A CENTER-TBI Analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2020 Dec 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01151-7. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33306177.

  11. Mansour A, Loggini A, Goldenberg FD, Kramer C, Naidech AM, Ammar FE, Vasenina V, Castro B, Das P, Horowitz PM, Karrison T, Zakrison T, Hampton D, Rogers SO, Lazaridis C. Coagulopathy as a Surrogate of Severity of Injury in Penetrating Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2021 Jun 1;38(13):1821-1826. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2020.7422. Epub 2021 Jan 20. PMID: 33238820.

  12. Folkerson LE, Sloan D, Davis E, Kitagawa RS, Cotton BA, Holcomb JB, et al. Coagulopathy as a predictor of mortality after penetrating traumatic brain injury. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(1):38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. • Mikati AG, Flahive J, Khan MW, Vedantam A, Gopinath S, Nordness MF, et al. Multicenter validation of the survival after acute civilian penetrating brain injuries (SPIN) score. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(5):E872–9 Validation of the SPIN score for early prediction of outcome in civilian PBI.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. • Lawati KA, Sharif S, Maqbali SA, Rimawi HA, Petrosoniak A, Belley-Cote EP, et al. Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in acute traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(1):14–27 Large systematic review of TXA in TBI including 9 RCTs and 14,747 patients; found no effect of TXA vs. placebo on mortality or functional recovery. However, TXA demonstrated a potential for limiting hematoma expansion on subsequent imaging, and administration was safe.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. CRASH-3 Trial Collaborators. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, disability, vascular occlusive events and other morbidities in patients with acute traumatic brain injury (CRASH-3): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10210):1713–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bossers SM, Loer SA, Bloemers FW, Den Hartog D, Van Lieshout EMM, Hoogerwerf N, et al. Association between prehospital tranexamic acid administration and outcomes of severe traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(3):338–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morte D, Lammers D, Bingham J, Kuckelman J, Eckert M, Martin M. Tranexamic acid administration following head trauma in a combat setting: does tranexamic acid result in improved neurologic outcomes? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87(1):125–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker PF, Bozzay JD, Johnston LR, Elster EA, Rodriguez CJ, Bradley MJ. Outcomes of tranexamic acid administration in military trauma patients with intracranial hemorrhage: a cohort study. BMC Emerg Med. 2020;20(1):39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson TN, Farrell DH, Rowell SE. Fibrinolysis in Traumatic Brain Injury: Diagnosis, Management, and Clinical Considerations. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jul;47(5):527-537. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1722970. Epub 2021 Apr 20. PMID: 33878779.

  20. Bodanapally UK, Saksobhavivat N, Shanmuganathan K, Aarabi B, Roy AK. Arterial injuries after penetrating brain injury in civilians: risk factors on admission head computed tomography. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(1):219–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mansour A, Loggini A, El Ammar F, Ginat D, Awad IA, Lazaridis C, Kramer C, Vasenina V, Polster SP, Huang A, Olivera Perez H, Das P, Horowitz PM, Zakrison T, Hampton D, Rogers SO, Goldenberg FD. Cerebrovascular Complications in Early Survivors of Civilian Penetrating Brain Injury. Neurocrit Care. 2021 Jun;34(3):918-926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01106-y. Epub 2020 Oct 6. PMID: 33025542.

  22. Dawoud FM, Feldman MJ, Yengo-Kahn AM, Roth SG, Wolfson DI, Ahluwalia R, et al. Traumatic cerebrovascular injuries associated with gunshot wounds to the head: a single-institution ten-year experience. World Neurosurg. 2021;146:e1031–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ares WJ, Jankowitz BT, Tonetti DA, Gross BA, Grandhi R. A comparison of digital subtraction angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of penetrating cerebrovascular injury. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;47(5):E16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dagain A, Aoun O, Bordes J, Roqueplo C, Joubert C, Esnault P, et al. Management of war-related ballistic craniocerebral injuries in a French role 3 hospital during the Afghan campaign. World Neurosurg. 2017;102:6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sellier A, Beucler N, Joubert C, Desse N, Dagain A. Letter to the Editor. Ballistic trajectory in civilian penetrating brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2021;5:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roberts SA, Toman E, Belli A, Midwinter MJ. Decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty: experience and outcomes in deployed UK military personnel. Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(5):529–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gressot LV, Chamoun RB, Patel AJ, Valadka AB, Suki D, Robertson CS, et al. Predictors of outcome in civilians with gunshot wounds to the head upon presentation. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(3):645–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yengo-Kahn AM, Patel PD, Kelly PD, Wolfson DI, Dawoud F, Ahluwalia R, et al. The value of simplicity: externally validating the Baylor cranial gunshot wound prognosis score. J Neurosurg. 2021;9:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelly PD, Patel PD, Yengo-Kahn AM, Wolfson DI, Dawoud F, Ahluwalia R, et al. Incorporating conditional survival into prognostication for gunshot wounds to the head. J Neurosurg. 2021;9:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Muehlschlegel S, Ayturk D, Ahlawat A, Izzy S, Scalea TM, Stein DM, et al. Predicting survival after acute civilian penetrating brain injuries: the SPIN score. Neurology. 2016;87(21):2244–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. • Maragkos GA, Papavassiliou E, Stippler M, Filippidis AS. Civilian gunshot wounds to the head: prognostic factors affecting mortality: meta-analysis of 1774 patients. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(22):2605–14 Systematic review and meta-analysis including 1,774 patients across 17 observational studies to identify early prognostic indicators; suggested neurosurgical decision-making algorithm based on GCS, pupillary reactivity and projectile trajectory.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Alexopoulos G, Quadri N, Khan M, Bazai H, Formoso Pico C, et al. Ballistic lobar trajectory outcomes in civilian firearm penetrating brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2020;6:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the neurosciences critical care unit nurses at UCMC for their meticulous expert care of the cohort of patients reported here and to the multiple trainees and consultant physicians involved in their care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Lazaridis.

Ethics declarations

All reported studies with human subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors has conflicts of interest in relation to this manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurotrauma

This manuscript has not been published or submitted for review elsewhere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lazaridis, C., Mansour, A., Alvarado-Dyer, R. et al. Civilian Firearm-Inflicted Brain Injury: Coagulopathy, Vascular Injuries, and Triage. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 21, 47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-021-01131-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-021-01131-0

Keywords

Navigation