Advertisement

Optical Coherence Tomography to Differentiate Papilledema from Pseudopapilledema

  • Gema Rebolleda
  • Aki Kawasaki
  • Victoria de JuanEmail author
  • Noelia Oblanca
  • Francisco Jose Muñoz-Negrete
Neuro-Ophthalmology (A Kawasaki, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Neuro-Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Mild papilledema may be difficult to distinguish by clinical observation from pseudopapilledema. An accurate diagnosis is critical to avoid invasive workup and unwarranted treatment. In this review, we focus on the development and subsequent role of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in detecting and differentiating optic nerve head drusen (ONHD) from papilledema and other causes of acquired swelling of the optic disc.

Recent Findings

Newer OCT technologies which permit deeper penetration to improve detection of ONHD were also reviewed. Enhanced depth imaging (EDI) spectral-domain OCT and swept-source (SS) OCT are currently recognized as the most reliable and sensitive tools to diagnose ONHD.

Summary

OCT devices currently available provide a means to quantify drusen dimensions, to evaluate the integrity of neighboring structures and to monitor axonal and neuronal damage, yielding additional information to better understand the relationship between the morphological features of drusen, and their effects on the structure and function of the optic nerve.

Keywords

Optic disc drusen Enhanced depth imaging Optical coherence tomography Papilledema Pseudo-papilledema 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Gema Rebolleda, Aki Kawasaki, Victoria de Juan, Noelia Oblanca, and Francisco Jose Muñoz Negrete declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Moosajee M, Restori M, Acheson J, Dahlmann-Noor A. The cost-effectiveness of different strategies to evaluate optic disk drusen in children. J AAPOS. 2015;19:392–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kardon R. Optical coherence tomography in papilledema: what am I missing? J Neuroophthalmol. 2014;34(Suppl):S10–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Auw-Haedrich C, Staubach F, Witschel H. Optic disk drusen. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:515–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    • Chang MY, Pineles SL. Optic disk drusen in children. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016;61(6):745–58. A search of literature was conducted focusing on optic nerve drusen and child. Clinical findings, ancillary diagnostic tests, and complications are clearly reviewed and summarized. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiang J, Wong E, Whatham A, Hennessy M, Kalloniatis M, Zangerl B. The usefulness of multimodal imaging for differentiating pseudopapilloedema and true swelling of the optic nerve head: a review and case series. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98(1):12–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tuğcu B, Özdemir H. Imaging methods in the diagnosis of optic disc drusen. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2016;46(5):232–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liebrich R. Contribution to discussion on: Iwanoff A, Ueber neuritis optica. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1868;6:426–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Naumann GO. Optic nerve head drusen associated with abnormally small optic discs. Int Ophthalmol. 1987;11:79–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mullie MA, Sanders MD. Scleral canal size and optic nerve head drusen. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;99:356–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Floyd MS, Katz BJ, Digre KB. Measurement of the scleral canal using optical coherence tomography in patients with optic nerve drusen. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(4):664–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flores-Rodríguez P, Gili P, Martín-Ríos MD, Grifol-Clar E. Comparison of optic area measurement using fundus photography and optical coherence tomography between optic nerve head drusen and control subjects. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33(2):164–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    •• Ghassibi MP, Chien JL, Abumasmah RK, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Park SC. Optic nerve head drusen prevalence and associated factors in clinically normal subjects measured using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(3):320–5. This study emphasizes that EDI OCT can detect a higher prevalence of subclinical drusen than previously reported. A significant association between ONHD and smaller optical nerve head was found. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    •• Malmqvist L, Lindberg AW, Dahl VA, Jørgensen TM, Hamann S. Quantitatively measured anatomic location and volume of optic disc drusen: an enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(5):2491–7. The authors found that larger drusen volume, and not a more superficial location, results in higher degrees of visual field defects. Furthermore GCL thickness correlated better to optic nerve dysfunction than RNFL thickness. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    • Lee KM, Woo SJ, Hwang JM. Morphologic characteristics of optic nerve head drusen on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:1139–47. This large retrospective study shows a classification of optic nerve head drusen based on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography features. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Antcliff RJ, Spalton DJ. Are optic disc drusen inherited? Ophthalmology. 1999;106(7):1278–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    • Lee KM, Woo SJ, Hwang JM. Differentiation of optic nerve head drusen and optic disc edema with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:971–7. This study underlines several markers to distinguish between optic nerve head drusen and optic disc edema by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silverman AL, Tatham AJ, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Assessment of optic nerve head drusen using enhanced depth imaging and swept source optical coherence tomography. J Neuroophthalmol. 2014;34(2):198–205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    •• Traber GL, Weber KP, Sabah M, Keane PA, Plant GT. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of optic nerve head drusen. A comparison of cases with and without visual field loss. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:66–73. Several OCT morphological features of drusen were related to visual field damage. Large and confluent drusen were more commonly found in patients with visual field defects. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lorentzen SE. Drusen of the optic disk. A clinical and genetic study. Acta Ophthalmologica. 1966;(suppl 90):91–180.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee KM, Woo SJ, Hwang JM. Differentiation between optic disc drusen and optic disc oedema using fundus photography. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(4):e329–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Naoum S, Bouacha I, Drumare I, Marks C, Defoort-Delemmes S. Optic disc drusen in children: advantages of various imaging modalities. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016;39(4):341–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pineles SL, Arnold AC. Fluorescein angiographic identification of optic disc drusen with and without optic disc edema. J Neuroophthalmol. 2012;32(1):17–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kurz-Levin MM, Landau K. A comparison of imaging techniques for diagnosing drusen of the optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1045–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gili P, Flores-Rodríguez P, Yangüela J, Herreros Fernández ML. Using autofluorescence to detect optic nerve head drusen in children. J AAPOS. 2013;17:568–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Patel NN S, Neudorfer M, Ben-Haim MS, Leibovitch I, Kesler A. The efficacy of optic nerve ultrasonography for differentiating papilloedema from pseudopapilloedema in eyes with swollen optic discs. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:376–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Malem A, De Salvo G, West S. Use of MultiColor imaging in the assessment of suspected papilledema in 20 consecutive children. J AAPOS. 2016;20(6):532–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wester ST, Fantes FE, Lam BL, Anderson DR, McSoley JJ, Knighton RW. Characteristics of optic nerve head drusen on optical coherence tomography images. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010 Jan-Feb;41(1):83–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Merchant KY, Su D, Park SC, et al. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of optic nerve head drusen. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1409–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Slotnick S, Sherman J. Buried disc drusen have hypo-reflective appearance on SD-OCT. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:704–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sato T, Mrejen S, Spaide RF. Multimodal imaging of optic disc drusen. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(2):275–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(4):496–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ophir A, Karatas M, Ramirez JA, Inzelberg R. OCT and chronic papilledema. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(12):2238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Martinez MR, Ophir A. Optical coherence tomography as an adjunctive tool for diagnosing papilldema in young patients. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2011;48(3):174–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Katz BJ, Pomeranz HD. Visual field defects and retinal nerve fiber layer defects in eyes with buried optic nerve drusen. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(2):248–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Johnson LN, Diehl ML, Hamm CW, Sommerville DN, Petroski GF. Differentiating optic disc edema from optic nerve head drusen on optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:45–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Flores-Rodríguez P, Gili P, Martín-Ríos MD. Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in differentiating optic nerve head drusen and optic disc oedema. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012;32:213–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sarac O, Tasci YY, Gurdal C, Can I. Differentiation of optic disc edema from optic nerve head drusen with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. J Neuroophthalmol. 2012;32:207–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bassi ST, Mohana KP. Optical coherence tomography in papilledema and pseudopapilledema with and without optic nerve head drusen. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(12):1146–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rebolleda G, Diez-Alvarez L, Casado A, Sánchez-Sánchez C, de Dompablo E, González-López JJ, Muñoz-Negrete FJ. OCT: new perspectives in neuro-ophthalmology. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2015;29(1):9–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kulkarni KM, Pasol J, Rosa PR, Lam BL. Differentiating mild papilledema and buried optic nerve head drusen using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(4):959–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fard MA, Fakhree S, Abdi P, Hassanpoor N, Subramanian PS. Quantification of peripapillary total retinal volume in pseudopapilledema and mild papilledema using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(1):136–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Savini G, Bellusci C, Carbonelli M, Zanini M, Carelli V, Sadun AA, et al. Detection and quantification of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in optic disc edema using stratus OCT. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1111–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kupersmith MJ, Sibony P, Mandel G, Durbin M, Kardon RH. Optical coherence tomography of the swollen optic nerve head: deformation of the peripapillary retinal pigment epithelium layer in papilledema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:6558–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gili P, Flores-Rodríguez P, Martin-Ríos MD, Carrasco FC. Anatomical and functional impairment of the nerve fiber layer in patients with optic nerve head drusen. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(10):2421–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Malmqvist L, Wegener M, Sander BA, Hamann S. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness corresponds to drusen. Location and extent of visual field defects in superficial and buried optic disc drusen. J Neuroophthalmol. 2016;36:41–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fledelius HC. Optic disc drusen: longitudinal aspects, with emphasis on visual field constriction and enlarged blind spot: a retrospective hospital-based clinical series. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017;27(3):372–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Noval S, Visa J, Contreras I. Visual field defects due to optic disk drusen in children. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(10):2445–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Purvin V, King R, Kawasaki A, Yee R. Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in eyes with optic disc drusen. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(1):48–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Casado A, Rebolleda G, Guerrero L, Leal M, Contreras I, Oblanca N, Muñoz-Negrete FJ. Measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with optic nerve head drusen. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(10):1653–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete FJ. The role of OCT in the differential diagnosis between buried optic nerve drusen and papilloedema. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2016;91(9):431–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pilat AV, Proudlock FA, Kumar P, Lee H, Papageorgiou E, Gottlob I. Macular morphology in patients with optic nerve head drusen and optic disc edema. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(2):552–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lee KM, Hwang JM, Woo SJ. Hemorrhagic complications of optic nerve head drusen on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2014;34:1142–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Marr B, Reinherz B, Belinsky I, Saffra NA. Pseudouveal melanoma caused by optic disk drusen with juxtapapillary choroidal neovascular membrane. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2016 Spring;10(2):168–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lee KM, Hwang JM, Woo SJ. Optic disc drusen associated with optic nerve tumors. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(4 Suppl 1):S67–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pérez-Sarriegui A, De Juan V, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G. Added value of newer optical coherence tomography technologies in hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis. J Canadian Ophthalmol. Accepted April 2017. http://dx.doi.og/10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.06.016

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017
Corrected publication August/2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gema Rebolleda
    • 1
  • Aki Kawasaki
    • 2
  • Victoria de Juan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Noelia Oblanca
    • 1
  • Francisco Jose Muñoz-Negrete
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS)MadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of OphthalmologyHopital Ophtalmique Jules Gonin, University LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations