Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports

, Volume 1, Issue 6, pp 547–552 | Cite as

Frontal lobe functions

  • Cèline Chayer
  • Morris Freedman

Abstract

The frontal lobes constitute two thirds of the human brain, yet the functions performed by them remained mysterious for a long time. Apart from their well-known involvement in motor function and language, little was previously known about the functions of the frontal lobes. Recent advances have uncovered important roles for the frontal lobes in a multitude of cognitive processes, such as executive function, attention, memory, and language. The importance of the frontal lobes in processes underlying affect, mood, personality, selfawareness, as well as social and moral reasoning, is also a renewed area for research. This article focuses on recent advances in understanding frontal lobe functions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Damasio H, Grabowski T, Frank R, et al.: The return of Phineas Gage: clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science 1994, 264:1102–1105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cummings JL. Frontal-subcortical circuits and human behavior. Arch Neurol 1993, 50:873–880.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ruackert L, Grafman J: Sustained attention deficits in patients with right frontal lesions. Neuropsychologia 1996, 34:953–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen RM, Semple WE, Gross G, et al.: Functional localization of sustained attention: comparison to sensory stimulation in the absence of instruction. Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1988, 1:3–20.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vendrell P, Junque C, Pujol J, et al.: The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33:341–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johannsen P, Jokobsen J, Bruhn P, et al.: Cortical sites of sustained and divided attention in normal elderly humans. Neuroimage 1997, 6:145–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luria AR: The working brain: an introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books; 1973.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dimitrov M, Grafman J, Hollnagel C: The effects of frontal lobe damage on everyday problem solving. Cortex 1996, 32:357–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miotto EC, Morris RG: Virtual planning in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Cortex 1998, 34:639–657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carlin D, Bonerba J, Phipps M, et al.: Planning impairments in frontal lobe dementia and frontal lobe lesion patients. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:655–665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Godefroy O, Rousseaux M: Novel decision making in patients with prefrontal or posterior brain damage. Neurology 1997, 49:695–701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burgess PW, Veitch E, de Lacy Costello A, Shallice T: The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:848–863.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stuss DT, Kaplan EF, Benson DF, et al.: Evidence for the involvement of orbitofrontal cortex in memory functions: an interference effect. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1982, 6:913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lhermitte F: “Utilization behaviour” and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain 1983, 106:237–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sandson J, Albert ML: Perseveration in behavioral neurology. Neurology 1987, 37:1736–1741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milner B: Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Arch Neurol 1963, 9:100–110.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Freedman M: Object alternation and orbitofrontal system dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Cognition 1990, 14:134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Freedman M, Black S, Ebert E, Binns M: Orbitofrontal function, object alternation and perseveration. Cerebral Cortex 1998, 8:18–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shallice T: Specific impairments of planning. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 1982, B298:199–209.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stuss DT, Benson DF: The Frontal Lobes. New York: Raven Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stuss DT, Alexander MP: Executive functions and the frontal lobes: a conceptual view. Psychol Res 2000, 63:289–298. This recent publication reviews the authors’ experience in executive function research, exposes the numerous difficulties and contingencies affecting our understanding of the frontal lobes, and suggests a conceptual framework of frontal functions, as well as future research directions.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duncan J, Owen AM: Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Neurosci 2000, 23:475–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D’Esposito M, Postle BR, Rypma B: Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: evidence from eventrelated fMRI studies. Exp Brain Res 2000, 133:3–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stuss DT, Alexander MP, Palumbo CL, et al.: Organizational strategies of patients with unilateral or bilateral frontal lobe injury in word list learning tasks. Neuropsychology 1994, 8:355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Squire LR: Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychol Rev 1992, 99:195–231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Benson DF, Djenderedjian A, Miller BL, et al.: Neural basis of confabulation. Neurology 1996, 46:1239–1243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lepage M, Ghaffar O, Nyberg L, Tulving E: Prefrontal cortex and episodic memory retrieval mode. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97:506–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tulving E, Kapur S, Craik FI, et al.: Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994, 91:2016–2020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nyberg L, McIntosh AR, Cabeza R, et al.: General and specific brain regions involved in encoding and retrieval of events: what, where, and when. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93:11280–11285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cockburn J: Task interruption in prospective memory: a frontal lobe function? Cortex 1995, 31:87–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Damasio AR, Damasio H: Aphasia and the neural basis of language. In Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology. Edited by Mesulam MM. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:294–315.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Freedman M, Alexander MP, Naeser MA: Anatomic basis of transcortical motor aphasia. Neurology 1984, 34:409–417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ross ED: Affective prosody and the aprosodias. In Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology. Edited by Mesulam MM. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:316–331. The author, a leading researcher in this area, summarizes a series of studies on aprosodia that led to an anatomic classification and logical clinical approach that can be used by physicians at the bedside.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ross ED, Orbelo DM, Burgard M, Hansel S: Functionalanatomic correlates of aprosodic deficits in patients with right brain damage. Neurology 1998, 50(suppl 4):A363.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Alexander MP, Benson DF, Stuss DT: Frontal lobes and language. Brain Language 1989, 37:656–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stuss DT, Gow CA, Hetherington CR: “No longer Gage”: frontal lobe dysfunction and emotional changes. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992, 60:349–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mayberg HS, Liotti M, Brannan SK, et al.: Reciprocal limbiccortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness. Am J Psychiatry 1999, 156:675–682. The authors describe and use a model of limbic-cortical interactions for depression that elegantly leads to hypotheses for the convergence of affective, vegetative, and cognitive symptomatology of depression.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mayberg HS, Brannan SK, Tekell JL, et al.: Regional metabolic effects of fluoxetine in major depression: serial changes and relationship to clinical response. Biol Psychiatry 2000, 48:830–843. This study suggests that pretreatment metabolism of the rostral anterior cingulate could be a marker for prediction of antidepressant treatment response. This could significantly impact the clinical management of depression.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shammi P, Stuss DT: Humour appreciation: a role of the right frontal lobe. Brain 1999, 122:657–666.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR: Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2000, 10:295–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H: Characterization of the decision-making deficit with ventromedal prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain 2000, 123:2189–2202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Anderson SW, Bechara A, Damasio H, et al.: Impairment of social and moral behaviour related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:1032–1037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Picton TW, Stuss DT: Neurobiology of conscious experience. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1994, 4:256–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stone VE, Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT: Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. J Cognition Neurosci 1998, 10:640–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stuss DT, Gallup GG, Alexander MP: The frontal lobes are necessary for theory of mind. Brain 2001, 124:279–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Alexander MP, Stuss DF, Benson DF: Capgras syndrome: a reduplicative phenomenon. Neurology 1979, 29:334–339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wheeler M, Stuss DT, Tulving E: Towards a theory of episodic memory: the frontal lobes and autonoetic conciousness. Psychiatry Bull 1997, 121:331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ettlin TM, Kischka U, Beckson M, et al.: The Frontal Lobe Score: part I: construction of a mental status of frontal systems. Clin Rehabil 2000, 14:260–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wildgruber D, Kischka U, Fassbinder K, Ettlin TM: The Frontal Lobe Score: part II: evaluation of its clinical validity. Clin Rehabil 2000, 14:272–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B: The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology 2000, 55:1621–1626. This brief assessment tool could be very useful for the clinicians as an adjunct to other short tests of cognition used at the bedside.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kertesz A, Davidson W, Fox H: Frontal Behavioral Inventory: diagnostic criteria for frontal lobe dementia. Can J Neurol Sci 1997, 24:29–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kertesz A, Nadkarni N, Davidson W, Thomas AW: The Frontal Behavior Inventory in the differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia. J Int Neuropsy Soc 2000, 6:460–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kertesz A, Clydesdale S: Neuropsychological deficits in vascular dementia vs. Alzheimer’s disease. Frontal lobe deficits prominent in vascular dementia. Arch Neurol 1994, 51:1226–1231.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cèline Chayer
    • 1
  • Morris Freedman
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioural Neurology Program and Rotman Research InstituteBaycrest Centre for Geriatric CareTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations