Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Use of Electronic Health Records to Identify Children with Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension

  • Pediatric Hypertension (B Falkner, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Hypertension Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elevated blood pressures often go unrecognized in pediatric patients, potentially putting children and adolescents at risk for the sequelae of untreated hypertension. This may be partially due to the complexity involved in diagnosing elevated pediatric blood pressures, which demands a high cognitive workload from providers. Tools built into electronic health records have the potential to alleviate this workload, and studies investigating these tools confirm they show promise in improving elevated blood pressure recognition. However, the current tools are not perfect, and determining the optimal design and implementation of future iterations requires further study. The proper integration of patient-generated blood pressure readings, such as those obtained during ambulatory blood pressure monitors, also requires careful consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. • Hansen ML, Gunn PW, Kaelber DC. Underdiagnosis of hypertension in children and adolescents. JAMA. 2007;298(8):874–9. The first study demonstrating the problem of under-recognition of elevated blood pressure in pediatrics.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brady TM, Solomon BS, Neu AM, et al. Patient-, provider-, and clinic-level predictors of unrecognized elevated blood pressure in children. Pediatrics. 2010;125(6):e1286–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shapiro DJ, Hersh AL, Cabana MD, et al. Hypertension screening during ambulatory pediatric visits in the United States, 2000–2009. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):604–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sleeper EJ, Ariza AJ, Binns HJ. Do hospitalized pediatric patients have weight and blood pressure concerns identified? J Pediatr. 2009;154(2):213–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ricke TL, Hendry PL, Kalynych C, et al. Incidence and recognition of elevated triage blood pressure in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27(10):922–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beckett LA, Rosner B, Roche AF, et al. Serial changes in blood pressure from adolescence into adulthood. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135(10):1166–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun SS, Grave GD, Siervogel RM, et al. Systolic blood pressure in childhood predicts hypertension and metabolic syndrome later in life. Pediatrics. 2007;119(2):237–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lauer RM, Clarke WR, Mahoney LT, et al. Childhood predictors for high adult blood pressure: the Muscatine Study. Pediatr Clin N Am. 1993;40(1):23–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bao W, Threefoot SA, Srinivasan SR, et al. Essential hypertension predicted by tracking of elevated blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8(7):657–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Juhola J, Magnussen CG, Viikari JS, et al. Tracking of serum lipid levels, blood pressure, and body mass index from childhood to adulthood: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. J Pediatr. 2011;159(4):584–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18–e209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bello JK, Mohanty N, Bauer V, et al. Pediatric hypertension: provider perspectives. Glob Pediatr Health. 2017;4:2333794X17712637.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Samuels JA, Bell C, Flynn JT. Screening children for high blood pressure: where the US preventive Services Task Force went wrong. J Clin Hypertens. 2013;15(8):526–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. • Cha SD, Chisolm DJ, Mahan JD. Essential pediatric hypertension: defining the educational needs of primary care pediatricians. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:154. Gives provider perspectives on the challenges involved in addressing high blood pressure in children and adolescents

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaheer S, Watson L, Webb NJ. Unmet needs in the measurement of blood pressure in primary care. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(5):463–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gillman MW. Childhood prevention of hypertensive cardiovascular disease. J Pediatr. 2009;155(2):159–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ward RL, Robbins JM, Haden RN, et al. Recognition and management of elevated blood pressure in pediatric patients: challenges and disparities in community health centers. J Community Health. 2016;41(2):258–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parker ED, Sinaiko AR, Daley MF, et al. Factors associated with adherence to blood pressure measurement recommendations at pediatric primary care visits, Minnesota and Colorado, 2007–2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:E118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Blumenthal S, Epps RP, Heavenrich R, et al. Report of the task force on blood pressure control in children. Pediatrics. 1977;59((5 2 suppl):I-II):797–820.

    Google Scholar 

  20. •• Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, et al; Subcommittee on Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017;140(3). The most up-to-date guidelines on the diagnosis and management of pediatric hypertension.

  21. • Hart SG, Staveland EL. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psychol. 1988;52:139–83. Describes the development of a subjective measure of cognitive workload

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lim J, Wu WC, Wang J, et al. Imaging brain fatigue from sustained mental workload: an ASL perfusion study of the time-on-task effect. NeuroImage. 2010;49(4):3426–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gui D, Xu S, Zhu S, et al. Resting spontaneous activity in the default mode network predicts performance decline during prolonged attention workload. NeuroImage. 2015;120:323–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Available at https://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/tlx/. Accessed 20th September 2017.

  25. Ahmed A, Chandra S, Herasevich V, et al. The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(7):1626–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. •• Brady TM, Neu AM, Miller ER 3rd, et al. Real-time electronic medical record alerts increase high blood pressure recognition in children. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015;54(7):667–75. Retrospective cohort study evaluating the effect of an electronic alert on hypertension recognition

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. •• Kharbanda EO, Nordin JD, Sinaiko AR, et al. TeenBP: development and piloting of an EHR-linked clinical decision support system to improve recognition of hypertension in adolescents. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015;3(2):1142. Provides a good summary and implementation of the design of an electronic alert for high blood pressure

    Google Scholar 

  28. •• Twichell SA, Rea CJ, Melvin P, et al. The effect of an electronic health record-based tool on abnormal pediatric blood pressure recognition. Congenit Heart Dis. 2017;12(4):484–90. Evaluates the impact of an optional tool on elevated blood pressure recognition

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Michael G. Semanik

Authors
  1. Michael G. Semanik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael G. Semanik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pediatric Hypertension

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Semanik, M.G. The Use of Electronic Health Records to Identify Children with Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep 19, 98 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-017-0794-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-017-0794-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation