Skip to main content

Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate: What Are the Pitfalls?

Current Hypertension Reports volume 13, pages 116–121 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Because of the high prevalence of chronic kidney disease, estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is necessary to diagnose, stage, and follow the progression of renal impairment, and to adjust the dosage of medications with predominantly renal excretion. The main pitfall of using 24-h urinary creatinine clearance is the inaccuracy of urine collection. Multiple formulas based on serum creatinine have been proposed for the estimation of renal function in daily clinical practice and in large-scale studies. The two most widely used formulas are Cockcroft-Gault (CG) for the estimation of creatinine clearance and MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) for the estimation of GFR. However, the performance of these formulas is satisfactory only in individuals with a GFR level less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the presence of determinants of serum creatinine that are not dependent on GFR, such as gender, age, body weight, or chronic illness, should also be considered. Because of the need for an accurate and reproducible measurement of serum creatinine, uniform creatinine assay calibration is now available. The utility in daily practice of new markers of GFR, such as cystatin C, remains to be demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

Recently published papers of interest have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Stengel B, Billon S, Van Dijk PCW, et al.: Trends in the incidence of renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease in Europe, 1990–1999. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003, 18:1824–1833.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, et al.: Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA 2007, 298:2038–2047.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al.: Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:1296–1305.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heymsfield SB, Arteaga C, McManus C, et al.: Measurement of muscle mass in humans: validity of the 24-hour urinary creatinine method. Am J Clin Nutr 1983, 37:478–494.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitch WE, Walser M, Buffington GA, Lemann J: A simple method of estimating progression of chronic renal failure. Lancet 1976, 2:1326–1328.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Acker BA, Koomen GC, Koopman MG, et al.: Discrepancy between circadian rhythms of inulin and creatinine clearance. J Lab Clin Med 1992, 120:400–410.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Branten AJW, Vervoort G, Wetzels JFM: Serum creatinine is a poor marker of GFR in nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005, 20:707–711.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berlyne GM, Varley H, Nilwarangkur S, Hoerni M: Endogenous-creatinine clearance and glomerular-filtration rate. Lancet 1964, 2:874–876.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrie BJ, Golbetz HV, Michaels AS, Myers BD: Creatinine: an inadequate filtration marker in glomerular diseases. Am J Med 1980, 69:177–182.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Acker BA, Koomen GC, Koopman MG, et al.: Creatinine clearance during cimetidine administration for measurement of glomerular filtration rate. Lancet 1992, 340:1326–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luft FC, Fineberg NS, Sloan RS: Estimating dietary sodium intake in individuals receiving a randomly fluctuating intake. Hypertension 1982, 4:805–808.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH: Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976, 16:31–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al.: A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999, 130:461–470.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Levey AS, Greene T, Kusek JW, Beck GJ: A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine [abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:155A.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rule AD, Gussak HM, Pond GR, et al.: Measured and estimated GFR in healthy potential kidney donors. Am J Kidney Dis 2004, 43:112–119.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Verhave JC, Fesler P, Ribstein J, et al.: Estimation of renal function in subjects with normal serum creatinine levels: influence of age and body mass index. Am J Kidney Dis 2005, 46:233–241.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Myers GL, Miller WG, Coresh J, et al.: Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. Clin Chem 2006, 52:5–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fesler P, Safar ME, du Cailar G, et al.: Pulse pressure is an independent determinant of renal function decline during treatment of essential hypertension. J Hypertens 2007, 25:1915–1920.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rule AD, Larson TS, Bergstralh EJ, et al.: Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141:929–937.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. •• Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al.: A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009, 150:604–612. The new CKD-EPI equation was developed in a set of 8,254 individuals with a wide range of GFR. Because the relationship between GFR and serum creatinine is weaker at lower versus higher creatinine levels, a spline term was included in the equation, reflecting the change in the slope of the linear regression between GFR and the logarithm of serum creatinine.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al.: Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2006, 145:247–254.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmieder RE, Beil AH, Weihprecht H, Messerli FH: How should renal hemodynamic data be indexed in obesity? J Am Soc Nephrol 1995, 5:1709–1713.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Knight EL, Verhave JC, Spiegelman D, et al.: Factors influencing serum cystatin C levels other than renal function and the impact on renal function measurement. Kidney Int 2004, 65:1416–1421.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hojs R, Bevc S, Ekart R, et al.: Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with mild to moderate impairment of kidney function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006, 21:1855–1862.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. White C, Akbari A, Hussain N, et al.: Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005, 16:3763–3770.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zahran A, Qureshi M, Shoker A: Comparison between creatinine and cystatin C-based GFR equations in renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007, 22:2659–2668.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Den Noortgate NJ, Janssens WH, Delanghe JR, et al.: Serum cystatin C concentration compared with other markers of glomerular filtration rate in the old old. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002, 50:1278–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Perkins BA, Nelson RG, Ostrander BEP, et al.: Detection of renal function decline in patients with diabetes and normal or elevated GFR by serial measurements of serum cystatin C concentration: results of a 4-year follow-up study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005, 16:1404–1412.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. • Stevens LA, Coresh J, Schmid CH, et al.: Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2008, 51:395–406. Estimation of GFR based on both serum creatinine and cystatin C seems to be superior to formulas based on serum creatinine alone, at least in patients with chronic kidney disease.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Conflicts of Interest: P. Fesler: none. A. Mimran: Board membership, Sankyo; Consulting fees, Servier.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital Lapeyronie, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5, France

    Pierre Fesler & Albert Mimran

Authors
  1. Pierre Fesler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Albert Mimran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Fesler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fesler, P., Mimran, A. Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate: What Are the Pitfalls?. Curr Hypertens Rep 13, 116–121 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-010-0176-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-010-0176-5

Keywords

  • GFR
  • Kidney disease
  • Creatinine clearance
  • Serum creatinine
  • Markers
  • Cystatin C
  • Proteinuria