Advertisement

Current HIV/AIDS Reports

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 336–349 | Cite as

eHealth to Enhance Treatment Adherence Among Youth Living with HIV

  • Marta I. Mulawa
  • Sara LeGrand
  • Lisa B. Hightow-WeidmanEmail author
HIV and Technology (J Simoni and K Horvath, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on HIV and Technology

Abstract

Purpose of review

Multiple reviews have examined eHealth/mHealth interventions to address treatment adherence, including those focusing on youth living with HIV (YLWH). This review synthesizes results of prior reviews and recent studies (last 5 years) to provide a path forward for future research, acknowledging both lessons learned and gaps to be addressed.

Recent findings

Recent studies provide further evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of technology-based HIV interventions. Formative research of more comprehensive smartphone applications and pilot studies of computer-delivered interventions provide additional guidance on YLWH’s preferences for intervention components and show promising preliminary efficacy for impacting treatment adherence.

Summary

Expanding access to technology among YLWH, in the United States (US) and globally, supports the continued focus on eHealth/mHealth interventions as a means to reduce disparities in clinical outcomes. Future research should lend greater focus to implementation and scale-up of interventions through the use of adaptive treatment strategies that include costing analyses, measuring and maximizing engagement, fostering information sharing between researchers, and building upon sustainable platforms.

Keywords

eHealth mHealth Youth Adolescents SMS Technology HIV treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Kate Muessig for her review of this paper.

Funding Information

This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health grant (U19HD089881; MPI: Hightow-Weidman/Sullivan).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance data- US and 6 dependent areas 2015. 2017.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zanoni BC, Mayer KH. The adolescent and young adult HIV cascade of care in the United States: exaggerated health disparities. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2014;28(3):128–35.  https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2013.0345.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferrand RA, Briggs D, Ferguson J, Penazzato M, Armstrong A, MacPherson P, et al. Viral suppression in adolescents on antiretroviral treatment: review of the literature and critical appraisal of methodological challenges. Tropical Med Int Health. 2016;21(3):325–33.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zanoni BC, Archary M, Buchan S, Katz IT, Haberer JE. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the adolescent HIV continuum of care in South Africa: the cresting wave. BMJ Global Health. 2016;1(3):e000004.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    • Kim SH, Gerver SM, Fidler S, Ward H. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in adolescents living with HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS (London, England) 2014;28(13):1945–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0000000000000316. This article includes a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies reporting adherence to ART for adolescents and young adults (ages 12-24 years) living with HIV. The authors identified 50 eligible articles reporting data from 53 countries.
  6. 6.
    MacDonell K, Naar-King S, Huszti H, Belzer M. Barriers to medication adherence in behaviorally and perinatally infected youth living with HIV. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(1):86–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0364-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Houston E, Fominaya AW. Antiretroviral therapy adherence in a sample of men with low socioeconomic status: the role of task-specific treatment self-efficacy. Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(8):896–905.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2014.986137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shacham E, Estlund AL, Tanner AE, Presti R. Challenges to HIV management among youth engaged in HIV care. AIDS Care. 2017;29(2):189–96.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1204422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuhns LM, Hotton AL, Garofalo R, Muldoon AL, Jaffe K, Bouris A, et al. An index of multiple psychosocial, Syndemic conditions is associated with antiretroviral medication adherence among HIV-positive youth. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2016;30(4):185–92.  https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2015.0328.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gross IM, Hosek S, Richards MH, Fernandez MI. Predictors and profiles of antiretroviral therapy adherence among African American adolescents and young adult males living with HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2016;30(7):324–38.  https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2015.0351.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rudy BJ, Murphy DA, Harris DR, Muenz L, Ellen J. Patient-related risks for nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected youth in the United States: a study of prevalence and interactions. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2009;23(3):185–94.  https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2008.0162.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rudy BJ, Murphy DA, Harris DR, Muenz L, Ellen J. Prevalence and interactions of patient-related risks for nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy among perinatally infected youth in the United States. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2010;24(2):97–104.  https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2009.0198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Macdonell KE, Naar-King S, Murphy DA, Parsons JT, Harper GW. Predictors of medication adherence in high risk youth of color living with HIV. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010;35(6):593–601.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp080.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murphy DA, Marelich WD, Hoffman D, Steers WN. Predictors of antiretroviral adherence. AIDS Care. 2004;16(4):471–84.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120410001683402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bogart LM, Landrine H, Galvan FH, Wagner GJ, Klein DJ. Perceived discrimination and physical health among HIV-positive black and Latino men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(4):1431–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0397-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: the winding road from late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    DeLaMora P, Aledort N, Stavola J. Caring for adolescents with HIV. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2006;3(2):74–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ybarra ML, Bull SS. Current trends in internet- and cell phone-based HIV prevention and intervention programs. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007;4(4):201–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    • Muessig KE, LeGrand S, Horvath KJ, Bauermeister JA, Hightow-Weidman LB. Recent mobile health interventions to support medication adherence among HIV-positive MSM. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2017;12(5):432–41.  https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0000000000000401. This study describes recent mobile health (mHealth) interventions (January 2016–13 May 2017) supporting antiretroviral therapy (ART) medication adherence among HIV-positive MSM. Conclusions from seven publications [text messaging (4), smartphone apps (2), social media (1)] were that mHealth interventions to support ART adherence among MSM show acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hightow-Weidman LB, Muessig KE, Bauermeister J, Zhang C, LeGrand S. Youth, technology, and HIV: recent advances and future directions. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12(4):500–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-015-0280-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Claborn KR, Fernandez A, Wray T, Ramsey S. Computer-based HIV adherence promotion interventions: a systematic review: translation behavioral medicine. Transl Behav Med. 2015;5(3):294–306.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0317-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    •• Navarra AD, Gwadz MV, Whittemore R, Bakken SR, Cleland CM, Burleson W, et al. Health technology-enabled interventions for adherence support and retention in care among US HIV-infected adolescents and young adults: an integrative review. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(11):3154–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1867-6. This integrative review describes current US trends for health technology-enabled adherence interventions among behaviorally HIV-infected youth (ages 13–29 years), and provides data on the feasibility and efficacy of the nine identified interventions. Findings demonstrate the feasibility of computer-based interventions, and initial efficacy of SMS texting for adherence support among HIV-infected youth. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lenhart A, Pew Research Center. Teen, social media and technology overview. 2015.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pew Research Center Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. 2016.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pew Research Center. Emerging nations embrace internet, mobile Technology 2014.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pew Research Center. Mobile Fact Sheet. 2017. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/. Accessed 26 Jan 2018.
  27. 27.
    Horvath T, Azman H, Kennedy GE, Rutherford GW. Mobile phone text messaging for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. The Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012(3):CD009756. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009756.
  28. 28.
    Mayer JE, Fontelo P. Meta-analysis on the effect of text message reminders for HIV-related compliance. AIDS Care. 2017;29(4):409–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1214674.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    • Badawy SM, Barrera L, Sinno MG, Kaviany S, O'Dwyer LC, Kuhns LM. Text Messaging and Mobile Phone Apps as Interventions to Improve Adherence in Adolescents With Chronic Health Conditions: A Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2017;5(5):e66.  https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7798. This systematic review evaluated evidence for the efficacy of text messaging and mobile phone apps as interventions to promote medication adherence among adolescents with chronic health conditions (CHCs). Of 15 publications, [text messaging (n=12) and mobile phone apps (n=3)], the authors found promising feasibility and acceptability and modest efficacy for the use of text messaging and mobile phone app interventions to improve medication adherence among adolescents with CHCs. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Badawy SM, Kuhns LM. Economic evaluation of text-messaging and smartphone-based interventions to improve medication adherence in adolescents with chronic health conditions: a systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2016;4(4):e121.  https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6425.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Anand T, Nitpolprasert C, Kerr SJ, Muessig KE, Promthong S, Chomchey N, et al. A qualitative study of Thai HIV-positive young men who have sex with men and transgender women demonstrates the need for eHealth interventions to optimize the HIV care continuum. AIDS Care. 2017;29(7):870–5.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2017.1286288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holloway IW, Winder TJ, Lea CH, III, Tan D, Boyd D, Novak D. Technology use and preferences for mobile phone-based HIV prevention and treatment among black young men who have sex with men: exploratory research. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2017;5(4):e46. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6436.
  33. 33.
    LeGrand S, Muessig KE, McNulty T, Soni K, Knudtson K, Lemann A, et al. Epic allies: development of a gaming app to improve antiretroviral therapy adherence among young HIV-positive men who have sex with men. JMIR Serious games. 2016;4(1):e6.  https://doi.org/10.2196/games.5687.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Outlaw AY, Naar-King S, Tanney M, Belzer ME, Aagenes A, Parsons JT, et al. The initial feasibility of a computer-based motivational intervention for adherence for youth newly recommended to start antiretroviral treatment. AIDS Care. 2014;26(1):130–5.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2013.813624.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rana Y, Haberer J, Huang H, Kambugu A, Mukasa B, Thirumurthy H, et al. Short message service (SMS)-based intervention to improve treatment adherence among HIV-positive youth in Uganda: focus group findings. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0125187.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Saberi P, Yuan P, John M, Sheon N, Johnson MO. A pilot study to engage and counsel HIV-positive African American youth via telehealth technology. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2013;27(9):529–32.  https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2013.0185.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saberi P, Siedle-Khan R, Sheon N, Lightfoot M. The use of mobile health applications among youth and young adults living with HIV: focus group findings. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2016;30(6):254–60.  https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2016.0044.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dowshen N, Kuhns LM, Gray C, Lee S, Garofalo R. Feasibility of interactive text message response (ITR) as a novel, real-time measure of adherence to antiretroviral therapy for HIV+ youth. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2237–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0464-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dowshen N, Kuhns LM, Johnson A, Holoyda BJ, Garofalo R. Improving adherence to antiretroviral therapy for youth living with HIV/AIDS: a pilot study using personalized, interactive, daily text message reminders. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(2):e51.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Garofalo R, Kuhns LM, Hotton A, Johnson A, Muldoon A, Rice D. A randomized controlled trial of personalized text message reminders to promote medication adherence among HIV-positive adolescents and young adults. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(5):1049–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1192-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Linnemayr S, Huang H, Luoto J, Kambugu A, Thirumurthy H, Haberer JE, et al. Text messaging for improving antiretroviral therapy adherence: no effects after 1 year in a randomized controlled trial among adolescents and young adults. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(12):1944–50.  https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2017.304089.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Menza TW, Choi SK, LeGrand S, Muessig K, Hightow-Weidman L. Correlates of self-reported viral suppression among HIV-positive, young, black men who have sex with men participating in a randomized controlled trial of an internet-based HIV prevention intervention. Sex Transm Dis. 2018;2017  https://doi.org/10.1097/olq.0000000000000705.
  43. 43.
    Hightow-Weidman L, LeGrand S, Simmons R, Egger J, Choi SK, Muessig K. healthMpowerment: effects of a mobile phone-optimized, internet-based intervention on condomless anal intercourse among young black men who have sex with men and transgender women. Abstract# WEPEC1001, 2017 International AIDS society conference. Paris, France, July 23-26, 2017.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hightow-Weidman LB, Muessig KE, Pike EC, LeGrand S, Baltierra N, Rucker AJ, et al. HealthMpowerment.org: building community through a mobile-optimized, online health promotion intervention. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(4):493–9.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198114562043.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Naar-King S, Outlaw AY, Sarr M, Parsons JT, Belzer M, Macdonell K, et al. Motivational enhancement system for adherence (MESA): pilot randomized trial of a brief computer-delivered prevention intervention for youth initiating antiretroviral treatment. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013;38(6):638–48.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jss132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stankievich E, Malanca A, Foradori I, Ivalo S, Losso M. Utility of mobile communication devices as a tool to improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected children and young adults in Argentina. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1097/inf.0000000000001807.
  47. 47.
    Inwani I, Chhun N, Agot K, Cleland CM, Buttolph J, Thirumurthy H, et al. High-yield HIV testing, facilitated linkage to care, and prevention for female youth in Kenya (GIRLS study): implementation science protocol for a priority population. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(12):e179.  https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mavhu W, Willis N, Mufuka J, Mangenah C, Mvududu K, Bernays S, et al. Evaluating a multi-component, community-based program to improve adherence and retention in care among adolescents living with HIV in Zimbabwe: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):478.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2198-7. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tanner AE, Mann L, Song E, Alonzo J, Schafer K, Arellano E, et al. weCARE: a social media-based intervention designed to increase HIV care linkage, retention, and health outcomes for racially and ethnically diverse young MSM. AIDS Educ Prev. 2016;28(3):216–30.  https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2016.28.3.216. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Definition of Youth. Fact sheet. 2016. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/youth/fact-sheets/youth-definition.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
  51. 51.
    Gaysynsky A, Romansky-Poulin K, Arpadi S. “my YAP family”: analysis of a Facebook Group for young adults living with HIV. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(6):947–62.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0887-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Eysenbach G. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e126.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1923.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Saberi P, Johnson MO. Correlation of internet use for health care engagement purposes and HIV clinical outcomes among HIV-positive individuals using online social media. J Health Commun. 2015;20(9):1026–32.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018617.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Crutzen R, Roosjen JL, Poelman J. Using Google analytics as a process evaluation method for internet-delivered interventions: an example on sexual health. Health Promot Int. 2013;28(1):36–42.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/das008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Van Gemert-Pijnen EWCJ, Kelders MS, Bohlmeijer TE. Understanding the usage of content in a mental health intervention for depression: an analysis of log data. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(1):e27.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2991.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kelders MS, Bohlmeijer TE, Van Gemert-Pijnen EWCJ. Participants, usage, and use patterns of a web-based intervention for the prevention of depression within a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e172.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Graham LM, Strawderman SM, Demment M, Olson MC. Does usage of an eHealth intervention reduce the risk of excessive gestational weight gain? Secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e6.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6644.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Baltierra NB, Muessig KE, Pike EC, LeGrand S, Bull SS, Hightow-Weidman LB. More than just tracking time: complex measures of user engagement with an internet-based health promotion intervention. J Biomed Inform. 2016;59:299–307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.12.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    •• Bauermeister JA, Golinkoff JM, Muessig KE, Horvath KJ, Hightow-Weidman LB. Addressing engagement in technology-based behavioural HIV interventions through paradata metrics. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2017;12(5):442–6.  https://doi.org/10.1097/coh.0000000000000396. The goal of this review was to examine how often researchers report participants’ online engagement using paradata (i.e. intervention usage metrics) when describing the outcomes of online behavioural HIV prevention and care interventions. The authors provide insights on the utility of paradata collection and analysis for future technology-based trials. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cherenack EM, Wilson PA, Kreuzman AM, Price GN. The feasibility and acceptability of using technology-based daily diaries with HIV-infected young men who have sex with men: a comparison of internet and voice modalities. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(8):1744–53.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1302-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Spruijt-Metz D, Nilsen W. Dynamic models of behavior for just-in-time adaptive interventions. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2014;13(3):13–7.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2014.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Almirall D, Nahum-Shani I, Sherwood NE, Murphy SA. Introduction to SMART designs for the development of adaptive interventions: with application to weight loss research. Transl Behav Med. 2014;4(3):260–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0265-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Collins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher V. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(5 Suppl):S112–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.022. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Murphy SA, Lynch KG, Oslin D, McKay JR, TenHave T. Developing adaptive treatment strategies in substance abuse research. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88(Suppl 2):S24–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.008. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Patton GC, Viner R. Pubertal transitions in health. Lancet (London, England). 2007;369(9567):1130–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60366-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    World Health Organization. Health for the world’s adolescents: a second chance in the second decade. 2014.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Larson R, Richards MH. Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: changing developmental contexts. Child Dev. 1991;62(2):284–300.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    World Health Organization. HIV and adolescents: guidance for HIV testing and counselling and care for adolescents living with HIV. Geneva: WHO; 2013.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Agwu AL, Fairlie L. Antiretroviral treatment, management challenges and outcomes in perinatally HIV-infected adolescents. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16:18579.  https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.16.1.18579.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Koenig LJ, Nesheim S, Abramowitz S. Adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV: emerging behavioral and health needs for long-term survivors. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23(5):321–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834a581b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lowenthal ED, Bakeera-Kitaka S, Marukutira T, Chapman J, Goldrath K, Ferrand RA. Perinatally acquired HIV infection in adolescents from sub-Saharan Africa: a review of emerging challenges. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(7):627–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70363-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    World Health Organization. Why focus on adolescents (10–19 years)? http://apps.who.int/adolescent/second-decade/section/section_2/level2_3.php. Accessed 2 Febr 2018.
  73. 73.
    Pew Research Center. Parents, teens and digital monitoring. 2016.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT). U01MD011274 (PI: Bauermeister): Reducing HIV Vulnerability through a Multilevel Life Skills Intervention for Adolescent Men (2016–2021). https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=9322370&icde=37901692&ddparam=&ddvalue=&ddsub=&cr=2&csb=default&cs=ASC&pball. Accessed 4 Febr 2018.
  75. 75.
    National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT). U01MD011279 (PI: Schnall): A Pragmatic Clinical Trial of MyPEEPS Mobile to Improve HIV Prevention Behaviors in Diverse Adolescent MSM (2016–2021). https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=9321397&icde=37901692. Accessed 4 Febr 2018.
  76. 76.
    National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT). U01MD011281 (PI: Mustankski): A Pragmatic Trial of an Adaptive eHealth HIV Prevention Program for Diverse Adolescent MSM (2016–2020). https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=9562779&icde=37901728&ddparam=&ddvalue=&ddsub=&cr=7&csb=default&cs=ASC&pball. Accessed 4 Febr 2018.
  77. 77.
    Hightow-Weidman L, Knudtson K, Muessig K, Srivatsa M, Lawrence E, LeGrand S et al. AllyQuest: engaging HIV+ young MSM in care and improving adherence through a social networking and gamified smartphone application (App). Abstract# TUPED1273, 2017 International AIDS Society Conference. Paris, France, July 23–26, 2017.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Scott H, Vittinghoff E, Irvin R, Liu A, Fields S, Magnus M et al. Sex pro: a personalized HIV risk assessment tool for men who have sex with men. Abstract #1017, 2015 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Seattle, Washington, February 23–26, 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta I. Mulawa
    • 1
  • Sara LeGrand
    • 2
  • Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Duke Global Health InstituteDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Center for Health Policy and Inequalities, Duke Global Health InstituteDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Department of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations