Skip to main content

Improving the self-report of HIV antiretroviral medication adherence: Is the glass half full or half empty?

Current HIV/AIDS Reports volume 6, Article number: 177 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Self-reports are the most widely used method for measuring antiretroviral adherence. The association between self-reports and viral loads has been repeatedly demonstrated, but this association does not address how well self-reports measure actual medication-taking behaviors. Understanding adherence self-reports requires studying the science of memory and the reporting of behaviors. In the first section of this review, we discuss research in cognitive psychology that pertains to adherence self-reports, focusing primarily on studies that examine cognitive processes respondents use to answer survey questions. In the second section, we review recent articles examining the relationship between self-reports and objective measures of adherence, highlighting the strength of associations and key methodologic issues. We conclude with key questions for future research and methodologic recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Gordis L: Conceptual and methodologic problems in measuring patient compliance. In Compliance in Health Care. Edited by Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979:23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rand CS, Weeks K: Measuring adherence with medication regimens in clinical care and research. In The Handbook of Health Behavior Change, edn 2. Edited by Shumaker SA, Schron EB, Ockene JK, McBee WL. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.; 1998:114–132.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rand CS: “I took the medicine like you told me, Doctor”: Self-reports of adherence with medical regimens. In The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice, edn 1. Edited by Stone AA, Turkkan JS, Bachrach CA, et al.: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 2000:257–276.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lu M, Safren SA, Skolnik PR, et al.: Optimal recall period and response task for self-reported HIV medication adherence. AIDS Behav 2007, 12:86–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deeks SG: Treatment of antiretroviral-drug-resistant HIV-1 infection. Lancet 2003, 362:2002–2011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rhee MS, Greenblatt DJ: Pharmacologic consideration for the use of antiretroviral agents in the elderly. J Clin Pharmacol 2008, 48:1212–1225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson SM, Penzak SR, Pau A: Drug interactions in the management of HIV infection: an update. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2007, 8:2947–2963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K: The Psychology of Survey Response, edn 8. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwartz N: Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 2000.

  11. Blair E, Burton S: Cognitive processes used by survey respondents to answer behavioral frequency questions. J Consum Res 1987, 14:280–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burton S, Blair E: Task conditions, response formulation processes, and response accuracy for behavioral frequency questions in surveys. Public Opin Q 1991, 55:50–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Menon G: The effects of accessibility of information in memory on judgments of behavioral frequencies. J Consum Res 1993, 20:431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith AF, Jobe JB, Mingay DJ: Retrieval from memory of dietary information. Appl Cogn Psychol 1991, 5:269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Myers LB, Midence K: Concepts and issues in adherence. In Adherence to Treatment in Medical Conditions, edn 1. Edited by Myers LB, Midence K. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1998:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Belli RF: Inaccuracies in self-reported medication adherence: findings and psychological processes. In Methodological Issues in the Study of Adherence. Edited by Dunbar-Jacob J, Erlen J, Schlenk E, Stilley C. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press; 2005:35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson MK, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay DS: Source monitoring. Psychol Bull 1993, 114:3–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Belli RF, Traugott MW, Young M, McGonagle KA: Reducing vote overreporting in surveys: social desirability, memory failure, and source monitoring. Public Opin Q 1999, 63:90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Simoni JM, Kurth AE, Pearson CR, et al.: Self-report measures of antiretroviral therapy adherence: a review with recommendations for HIV research and clinical management. AIDS Behav 2006, 10:227–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nieuwkerk PT, Oort FJ: Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection and virologic treatment response: a meta-analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005, 38:445–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fletcher CV, Testa MA, Brundage RC, et al.: Four measures of antiretroviral medication adherence and virologic response in AIDS Clinical Trials Group study 359. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005, 40:301–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Halkitis PN, Kutnick AH, Slater S: The social realities of adherence to protease inhibitor regimens: substance use, health care and psychological states. J Health Psychol 2005, 10:545–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Muyingo SK, Walker AS, Reid A, et al.: Patterns of individual and population-level adherence to antiretroviral therapy and risk factors for poor adherence in the first year of the DART trial in Uganda and Zimbabwe. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008, 48:468–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Holzemer WL, Bakken S, Portillo CJ, et al.: Testing a nursetailored HIV medication adherence intervention. Nurs Res 2006, 55:189–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Munoz-Moreno JA, Fumaz CR, Ferrer MJ, et al.: Assessing self-reported adherence to HIV therapy by questionnaire: the SERAD (Self-Reported Adherence) Study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2007, 23:1166–1175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu H, Miller LG, Hays RD, et al.: A practical method to calibrate self-reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2006, 43(Suppl 1):S104–S112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pearson CR, Simoni JM, Hoff P, et al.: Assessing antiretroviral adherence via electronic drug monitoring and self-report: an examination of key methodological issues. AIDS Behav 2007, 11:161–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Deschamps AE, De Geest S, Vandamme AM, et al.: Diagnostic value of different adherence measures using electronic monitoring and virologic failure as reference standards. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2008, 22:735–743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kerr T, Hogg RS, Yip B, et al.: Validity of self-reported adherence among injection drug users. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care 2008, 7:157–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Joslyn S, Loftus E, McNoughton A, Powers J: Memory for memory. Mem Cognit 2001, 29:789–797.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schaeffer NC: Asking questions about threatening topics: a selective overview. In The Science of Self-Report. Edited by Stone AA, Turkkan JS, Bachrach CA, et al.: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 2000:105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sobell MB, Sobell LC, Klajner F, et al.: The reliability of a timeline method for assessing normal drinker college students’ recent drinking history: utility for alcohol research. Addict Behav 1986, 11:149–161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1:307–310.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Anscombe FJ: Graph in statistical analysis. Am Stat 1973, 27:17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Park LC, Lipman RS: A comparison of patient dosage deviation reports with pill counts. Psychopharmacologia 1964, 6:299–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gordis L, Markowitz M, Lilienfeld AM: The inaccuracy in using interviews to estimate patient reliability in taking medications at home. Med Care 1969, 7:49–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL, et al.: Can simple clinical measurements detect patient noncompliance? Hypertension 1980, 2:757–764.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gilbert JR, Evans CE, Haynes RB, Tugwell P: Predicting compliance with a regimen of digoxin therapy in family practice. Can Med Assoc J 1980, 123:119–122.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Inui TS, Carter WB, Pecoraro RE: Screening for noncompliance among patients with hypertension: is self-report the best available measure? Med Care 1981, 19:1061–1064.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Stewart M: The validity of an interview to assess a patient’s drug taking. Am J Prev Med 1987, 3:95–100.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Waterhouse DM, Calzone KA, Mele C, Brenner DE: Adherence to oral tamoxifen: a comparison of patient self-report, pill counts, and microelectronic monitoring. J Clin Oncol 1993, 11:1189–1197.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rand CS, Wise RA, Nides M, et al.: Metered-dose inhaler adherence in a clinical trial. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992, 146:1559–1564.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Burney KD, Krishnan K, Ruffin MT, et al.: Adherence to single daily dose of aspirin in a chemoprevention trial. An evaluation of self-report and microelectronic monitoring. Arch Fam Med 1996, 5:297–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Spector SL, Kinsman R, Mawhinney H, et al.: Compliance of patients with asthma with an experimental aerosolized medication: implications for controlled clinical trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986, 77:65–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yeung M, O’Connor SA, Parry DT, Cochrane GM: Compliance with prescribed drug therapy in asthma. Respir Med 1994, 88:31–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, #345, Boston, MA, 02111, USA

    Ira B. Wilson

Authors
  1. Ira B. Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda E. Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karina M. Berg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ira B. Wilson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, I.B., Carter, A.E. & Berg, K.M. Improving the self-report of HIV antiretroviral medication adherence: Is the glass half full or half empty?. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 6, 177 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-009-0024-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-009-0024-x

Keywords

  • Medication Adherence
  • Recall Period
  • Pill Count
  • Source Monitoring
  • Electronic Drug Monitoring