Skip to main content
Log in

Can we identify liver fibrosis in HCV-infected patients without a liver biopsy?

  • Published:
Current Hepatitis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most relevant consequence of persistent infection with the hepatitis C virus is liver fibrosis, which will evolve into cirrhosis in a significant proportion of patients. Evaluation of liver damage is commonly assessed by a liver biopsy. However, there is an increasing interest to use noninvasive methods for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis. There have been several approaches aimed at identifying liver fibrosis. The simplest ones are based on routine laboratory tests and a few well-known markers of collagen production or degradation. Different combinations of these markers allow us to correctly identify a remarkable proportion of patients at both spectrums of the disease (mild and severe fibrosis). With a better knowledge on the pathophysiology of liver fibrosis and, therefore, with the incorporation of more specific markers involved in the different steps of the fibrogenic process, accurate noninvasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis will be available in the next few years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Schuppan D, Krebs A, Bauer M, et al.: Hepatitis C and liver fibrosis. Cell Death Differ 2003, 10(suppl 1):S59-S67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Poynard T, Ratziu V, Benhamou Y, et al.: Natural history of HCV infection. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2000, 14:211–228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Perrillo RP: The role of liver biopsy in hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997, 26(3 suppl 1):57S-61S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saadeh S, Cammell G, Carey WD, et al.: The role of liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2001, 33:196–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. EASL International Consensus Conference on hepatitis C 1999. Paris, 26-27 February 1999. Consensus statement [no authors listed]. J Hepatol 1999, 31(suppl 1):3–8.

  6. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Management of hepatitis C: June 10–12, 2002 [no authors listed]. Hepatology 2002, 36(suppl 1):S3–S20.

  7. Pradat P, Alberti A, Poynard T, et al.: Predictive value of ALT levels for histologic findings in chronic hepatitis C: a European collaborative study. Hepatology 2002, 36:973–977.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marcellin P, Asselah T, Boyer N: Fibrosis and disease progression in hepatitis C. Hepatology 2002, 36:S47-S56. A careful review of longitudinal and cross-sectional studies analyzing fibrosis progression based on data provided by liver biopsy. Variables potentially associated with fibrosis progression are discussed.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Forns X, Ampurdanes S, Sanchez-Tapias JM, et al.: Long-term follow-up of chronic hepatitis C in patients diagnosed at a tertiary-care center. J Hepatol 2001, 35:265–271.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yano M, Kumada H, Kage M, et al.: The long-term pathological evolution of chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 1996, 23:1334–1340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Seeff LB: Natural history of chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2002, 36:S35-S46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P: Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The OBSVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR, and DOSVIRC groups. Lancet 1997, 349:825–832.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, et al.: Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001, 358:958–965.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fried MW, Shiffman M, Reddy KR, et al.: Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:975–982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinrichsen H, Benhamou Y, Reiser M, et al.: First report on the antiviral efficacy of BILN 2061, a novel oral HCV serine protease inhibitor, in patients with chronic hepatitis C, genotype 1 [abstract]. Hepatology 2002, 36:145A.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cadranel JF, Rufat P, Degos F: Practices of liver biopsy in France: results of a prospective nationwide survey. For the Group of Epidemiology of the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF). Hepatology 2000, 32:477–481.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fontana RJ, Lok AS: Noninvasive monitoring of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2002, 36:S57-S64. Provides an updated review of the current status of noninvasive monitoring of liver damage in patients with chronic hepatitis C. A proposed strategy for initial noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis is included.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghany MG, Kleiner DE, Alter HJ, et al.: Progression of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2003, 124:97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shiratori Y, Imazeki F, Moriyama M, et al.: Histologic improvement of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C who have sustained response to interferon therapy. Ann Intern Med 2000, 132:517–524. Assessed the changes in hepatic fibrosis after interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. A large cohort of 593 patients (487 interferon treated) had paired liver biopsies. Virologic response was associated with regression of fibrosis.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Poynard T, McHutchison J, Manns M, et al.: Impact of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin on liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2002, 122:1303–1313. Using pooled individual data from 3010 naive patients with pretreatment and post-treatment liver biopsies, the authors conclude that baseline fibrosis stage, age, sustained virologic response, body mass index, minimal baseline activity, and low viral load are associated with the absence of significant fibrosis after therapy.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Guechot J, Laudat A, Loria A, et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of hyaluronan and type III procollagen amino-terminal peptide serum assays as markers of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis C evaluated by ROC curve analysis. Clin Chem 1996, 42:558–563.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Oberti F, Valsesia E, Pilette C, et al.: Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1997, 113:1609–1616.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bonacini M, Hadi G, Govindarajan S, et al.: Utility of a discriminant score for diagnosing advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Am J Gastroenterol 1997, 92:1302–1304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Poynard T, Bedossa P: Age and platelet count: a simple index for predicting the presence of histological lesions in patients with antibodies to hepatitis C virus. METAVIR and CLINIVIR Cooperative Study Groups. J Viral Hepat 1997, 4:199–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McHutchison JG, Blatt LM, de Medina M, et al.: Measurement of serum hyaluronic acid in patients with chronic hepatitis C and its relationship to liver histology. Consensus Interferon Study Group. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000, 15:945–951.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Imbert-Bismut F, Ratziu V, Pieroni L, et al.: Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a prospective study. Lancet 2001, 357:1069–1075. Evaluates the accuracy of an index aimed at identifying both patients with and without significant fibrosis. The model incorporates routine laboratory tests and some more sophisticated biochemical markers. Prevalence of significant fibrosis in the cohort used to estimated the model was high (40%).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Patel K, Gordon SC, Smith K, et al.: A non-invasive panel of serum markers can reliably differentiate hepatitis C patients with minimal fibrosis from those with fibrosis stages F2-F4 [abstract]. Hepatology 2002, 36:355A.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Forns X, Ampurdanes S, Llovet JM, et al.: Identification of chronic hepatitis C patients without hepatic fibrosis by a simple predictive model. Hepatology 2002, 36:986–992. Evaluates the accuracy of a simple model to predict the absence of significant fibrosis using routine laboratory tests. The authors emphasize the possible application of this model in community-based cohorts, where absent or minimal fibrosis is extremely frequent at the time of diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Adinolfi LE, Giordano MG, Andreana A, et al.: Hepatic fibrosis plays a central role in the pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Br J Haematol 2001, 113:590–595.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fabris C, Federico E, Soardo G, et al.: Blood lipids of patients with chronic hepatitis: differences related to viral etiology. Clin Chim Acta 1997, 261:159–165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Giannini E, Ceppa P, Botta F, et al.: Steatosis and bile duct damage in chronic hepatitis C: distribution and relationships in a group of Northern Italian patients. Liver 1999, 19:432–437.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Scheuer PJ, Davies SE, Dhillon AP: Histopathological aspects of viral hepatitis. J Viral Hepat 1996, 3:277–283.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Thabut D, Simon M, Myers RP, et al.: Noninvasive prediction of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003, 37:1220–1221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Patel K, Muir AJ, McHutchinson JG: Noninvasive prediction of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003, 37:1222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Serfaty L, Andreani T, Giral P, et al.: Hepatitis C virus induced hypobetalipoproteinemia: a possible mechanism for steatosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol 2001, 34:428–434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rossi E, Adams L, Prins A, et al.: Validation of the FibroTest biochemical markers score in assessing liver fibrosis in hepatitis C patients. Clin Chem 2003, 49:450–454.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Friedman S: Liver fibrosis-from bench to bedside. J Hepatol 2003, 38:S38-S53. Provides a complete review of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of liver fibrogenesis, analyzing possible new markers to monitor liver fibrosis and describing the basis for potential antifibrotic therapies.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Patel K, Lajoie A, Heaton S, et al.: Clinical use of hyaluronic acid as a predictor of fibrosis change in hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003, 18:253–257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Johansen JS, Christoffersen P, Moller S, et al.: Serum YKL-40 is increased in patients with hepatic fibrosis. J Hepatol 2000, 32:911–920.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Aube C, Oberti F, Korali N, et al.: Ultrasonographic diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis. J Hepatol 1999, 30:472–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Colli A, Fraquelli M, Andreoletti M, et al.: Severe liver fibrosis or cirrhosis: accuracy of US for detection: analysis of 300 cases. Radiology 2003, 227:89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mathiesen UL, Franzen LE, Aselius H, et al.: Increased liver echogenicity at ultrasound examination reflects degree of steatosis but not of fibrosis in asymptomatic patients with mild/moderate abnormalities of liver transaminases. Dig Liver Dis 2002, 34:516–522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hirata M, Akbar SM, Horiike N, Onji M: Non-invasive diagnosis of the degree of hepatic fibrosis using ultrasonography in patients with chronic liver disease due to hepatitis C virus. Eur J Clin Invest 2001, 31:528–535.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Albrecht T, Blomley M, Cosgrove D, et al.: Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic cirrhosis by transit-time analysis of an ultrasound contrast agent. Lancet 1999, 353:1579–1583.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Materne R, Annet L, Dechambre S, et al.: Dynamic computed tomography with low- and high-molecular-mass contrast agents to assess microvascular permeability modifications in a model of liver fibrosis. Clin Sci (Lond) 2002, 103:213–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Taura T, Nakamura K, Takashima S, et al.: Heterogeneity of hepatic parenchymal enhancement on computed tomography during arterial portography: quantitative analysis of correlation with severity of hepatic fibrosis. Hepatol Res 2001, 20:182–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lucidarme O, Baleston F, Cadi M, et al.: Non-invasive detection of liver fibrosis: is superparamagnetic iron oxide particleenhanced MR imaging a contributive technique? Eur Radiol 2003, 13:467–474.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Barbaro B, Manfredi R, Bombardieri G, et al.: Correlation of MRI liver volume and Doppler sonographic portal hemodynamics with histologic findings in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Clin Ultrasound 2000, 28:461–468.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Afdhal N: Diagnosing fibrosis in hepatitis C: is the pendulum swinging from biopsy to blood tests? Hepatology 2003, 37:972–974. A concise editorial critically reviewing the most recent publications on noninvasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forns, X., Bataller, R. Can we identify liver fibrosis in HCV-infected patients without a liver biopsy?. Curr hepatitis rep 2, 145–151 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-003-0016-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-003-0016-z

Keywords

Navigation