Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Frontline Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL): Targeted Therapy vs. Chemoimmunotherapy

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemias (N Jain, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The treatment options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) have expanded significantly in the last few years, including the use of new classes of oral small molecular inhibitors targeting the B cell receptor signaling pathway or the apoptosis machinery. Targeted therapy with or without immunotherapy has quickly emerged as a new standard for frontline treatment of CLL/SLL, though the previous standard chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) remains a treatment option. In this review, we present data from key clinical trials to evaluate the benefits and risks associated with different frontline treatment approaches.

Recent Findings

We reviewed recently published and presented clinical trials on frontline CLL/SLL treatment, with particular focus on the comparison of CIT vs. targeted therapies, including inhibitors of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) or of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2. Various BTK inhibitors as continuous treatment with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have compared favorably to the conventional CITs in previously untreated CLL/SLL patients of various ages and comorbidities. Fixed duration treatment with the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax combined with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies also showed superiority in clinical outcomes compared to CIT. Subgroup analysis interestingly showed that IgHV-mutated CLL/SLL might still derive similar benefits from CIT. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating combined targeted therapies of venetoclax plus a BTK inhibitor to try to further improve the efficacy while limiting the duration of treatment.

Summary

Targeted therapies are becoming the new standard of care for frontline treatment of CLL/SLL although conventional CIT remains an option group of fit patients with low risk features. Novel strategies are being studied using targeted therapy combinations to optimize the depth of response in a time-limited fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Burger JA. Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:460–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. International CLL-IPI working group. An international prognostic index for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL-IPI): a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:779–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer K, Bahlo J, Fink AM, Goede V, Herling CD, Cramer P, et al. Long-term remissions after FCR chemoimmunotherapy in previously untreated patients with CLL: updated results of the CLL8 trial. Blood. 2016;127:208–15.

  4. Hallek M, Fischer K, Fingerle-Rowson G, Fink AM, Busch R, Mayer J, et al. Addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1164–74.

  5. Eichhorst B, Fink AM, Bahlo J, Busch R, Kovacs G, Maurer C, et al. First-line chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine and rituximab versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL10): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:928–42.

  6. Goede V, Fischer K, Busch R, Engelke A, Eichhorst B, Wendtner CM, et al. Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1101–10.

  7. Advani RH, Buggy JJ, Sharman JP, Smith SM, Boyd TE, Grant B, et al. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (PCI-32765) has significant activity in patients with relapsed/refractory B cell malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(1):88–94.

  8. O'Brien S, Furman RR, Coutre SE, Sharman JP, Burger JA, Blum KA, et al. Ibrutinib as initial therapy for elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma: an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b/2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:48–58.

  9. • Byrd JC, et al. Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:32–42. This is the first reported study of ibrutinib in CLL.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Byrd JC, Brown JR, O'Brien S, Barrientos JC, Kay NE, Reddy NM, et al. Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in previously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:213–23.

  11. Burger JA, Tedeschi A, Barr PM, Robak T, Owen C, Ghia P, et al. Ibrutinib as initial therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2425–37.

  12. •• Burger JA, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study. Leukemia. 2020;34:787–98. The RESONATE-2 study demonstrated the efficacy of ibrutinib for frontline therapy in CLL, including in patients with high-risk disease. The comparison was with chemotherapy (chlorambucil).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. •• Moreno C, et al. Ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab in first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (iLLUMINATE): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:43–56. The iLLUMINATE trial compared targeted therapy plus immunotherapy to chemoimmunotherapy, and led to the approval of ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab for frontline treatment in CLL.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. •• Woyach JA, et al. Ibrutinib regimens versus chemoimmunotherapy in older patients with untreated CLL. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2517–28. The Alliance 041202 study compared ibrutinib monotherapy, ibrutinib plus rituximab, or BR in older patients (age 65 and above) with previously untreated CLL.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. •• Shanafelt TD, et al. Ibrutinib–rituximab or chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:432–43. The ECOG 1912 study compared ibrutinib plus rituximab with FCR in patients aged 70 or younger with previously untreated CLL.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Byrd JC, Harrington B, O’Brien S, Jones JA, Schuh A, Devereux S, et al. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:323–32.

  17. Ghia P, Pluta A, Wach M, Lysak D, Kozak T, Simkovic M, et al. ASCEND: phase III, randomized trial of acalabrutinib versus idelalisib plus rituximab or bendamustine plus rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:2849–61.

  18. •• Sharman JP, et al. Acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzumab for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ELEVATE-TN): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2020;395:1278–91. The ELEVATE-TN trial (along with the ASCEND trial) led to the approval of acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab for first-line treatment of CLL.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tam CS, Trotman J, Opat S, Burger JA, Cull G, Gottlieb D, et al. Phase 1 study of the selective BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib in B cell malignancies and safety and efficacy evaluation in CLL. Blood. 2019;134:851–9.

  20. Tam CS, Robak T, Ghia P, Kahl BS, Walker P, Janowski W, et al. Efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) with del(17p): initial results from arm C of the Sequoia (BGB-3111-304) trial. Blood. 2019;134:499–9.

  21. Tam CS et al. Zanubrutinib monotherapy for patients with treatment naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia and 17p deletion. Haematologica Online ahead of print, 2020.

  22. Soumerai JD, et al. Initial results of a multicenter, investigator initiated study of MRD driven time limited therapy with zanubrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl):8006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tam CS, Opat S, D'Sa S, Jurczak W, Lee HP, Cull G, et al. A randomized phase 3 trial of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia: the ASPEN study. Blood. 2020;136:2038–50.

  24. Sedlarikova L, Petrackova A, Papajik T, Turcsanyi P, Kriegova E. Resistance-associated mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with novel agents. Front Oncol. 2020;10:894.

  25. Mato AR, Shah NN, Jurczak W, Cheah CY, Pagel JM, Woyach JA, et al. Pirtobrutinib in relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies (BRUIN): a phase 1/2 study. Lancet. 2021;397:892–901.

  26. Eli Lilly and company, Loxo Oncology at Lilly Announces Updated Data from the PHase 1/2 BRUIN Clinical Trial for LOXO-305 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma at the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting (https://investor.lilly.com/news-releases/news-release-details/loxo-oncology-lilly-announces-updated-data-phase-12-bruin-0, 2020).

  27. Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, Kahl BS, Puvvada SD, Gerecitano JF, et al. Targeting BCL2 with venetoclax in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:311–22.

  28. Stilgenbauer S, Eichhorst B, Schetelig J, Coutre S, Seymour JF, Munir T, et al. Venetoclax in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with 17p deletion: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:768–78.

  29. • Seymour JF, et al. Venetoclax plus rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:230–40. This phase 1b study of venetoclax-rituximab in relapsed CLL demonstrated high rate of response with undetectable MRD and the durability of response off treatment, supporting the concept of venetoclax-based time-limited therapy in CLL.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. •• Seymour JF, et al. Venetoclax-Rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1107–20. The MURANO study compared venetoclax-rituximab (VenR) vs. bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in relapsed CLL. The 24 months fixed-duration therapy of VenR led to significantly prolonged PFS. This study lead to the FDA approval of VenR in relapsed CLL.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kater AP, et al. Fixed duration of venetoclax-rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia eradicates minimal residual disease and prolongs survival: post-treatment follow-up of the MURANO phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;37:269–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kater A, Kipps BET, Hillmen P, D'Rozario J, Owen C, Assouline S, Lamanna N, Robak T, de la Serna J, Jaeger U, Cartron G, Montillo M, Mellink C, Chyla B, Wilson C, Wu J, Jiang Y, Lefebure M, Boyer M, Seymour J. Five-year analysis of Murano study demonstrates enduring undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) in a subset of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL) patients (Pts) following fixed-duration venetoclax-rituximab (VenR) therapy (Tx) in 62nd ASH annual meeting and exposition. (ASH, 2020).

  33. Al-Sawaf O, et al. Venetoclax plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL14): follow-up results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1188–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. •• Fischer K, et al. Venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med. 380, 2019:2225–36. The CLL14 study showed an improvement in PFS and increase in undetectable-MRD in patients treated with 12 months fixed-duration therapy of venetoclax-obinutuzumab compared with chlorambucil-obinutuzumab in previously untreated CLL. This study led to the FDA approval of venetoclax-obinutuzumab as a frontline treatment for CLL.

  35. Al-Sawaf O, Zhang C, Robrecht S, Wilson C, Tandon TCM, Fink A-M, et al. Clonal dynamics after venetoclax-obinutuzumab therapy: novel insights from the randomized, phase 3 CLL14 trial in 62nd ASH annual meeting and exposition. ASH; 2020.

  36. Gopal AK, Kahl BS, de Vos S, Wagner-Johnston ND, Schuster SJ, Jurczak WJ, et al. PI3Kδ inhibition by idelalisib in patients with relapsed indolent lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1008–18.

  37. • Furman RR, et al. Idelalisib and rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:997–1007. This phase 3 study showed superiority of idelalisib plus rituximab over placebo plus rituximab, leading to the the FDA approval of idelalisib plus rituximab in relapsed CLL after at least 2 prior therapies.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sharman JP, Coutre SE, Furman RR, Cheson BD, Pagel JM, Hillmen P, et al. Final results of a randomized, phase III study of rituximab with or without idelalisib followed by open-label idelalisib in patients with relapsed chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1391–402.

  39. Flinn IW, Hillmen P, Montillo M, Nagy Z, Illés Á, Etienne G, et al. The phase 3 DUO trial: duvelisib vs ofatumumab in relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL. Blood. 2018;132:2446–55.

  40. Gribben J et al. Umbralisib plus ublituximab (U2) is superior to obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (O + Chl) in patients with treatment naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): results from the phase 3 unity-CLL study. 62nd ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition. ASH; 2020.

  41. Wang YLL, Franzen C, Wang S, Venkataraman G, Li L, Niu N, et al. Ibrutinib and venetoclax Target Distinct Subpopulation of CLL Cells: Rationale for Drug Combination and Implication of Minimal Residual Disease Eradication. Blood. 2019;134:475.

  42. • Jain N, et al. Ibrutinib and venetoclax for first-line treatment of CLL. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2095–103. This trial combined two targeted agents for a limited-time therapy in CLL, and paved the way for further combinations of targeted agents.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wierda WG, Siddiqi T, Flinn I, Badoux XC, Kipps TJ, Allan JN, et al. Phase 2 CAPTIVATE results of ibrutinib (ibr) plus venetoclax (ven) in first-line chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:7502–2.

  44. Wierda WG, Tam CS, Allan JN, Siddiqi TJKT, Opat S, Tedeschi A, et al. 62nd ASH annual meeting and exposition. ASH; 2020.

  45. Huber H, et al. CLL2-GIVe, a prospective, open-label, multicentre phase-II trial of obinutuzumab (GA101, G), ibrutinib (I), plus venetoclax (VE) in untreated patients with CLL with 17P deletion/TP53 mutation. EHA25 Virtual; 2020.

  46. Rogers K, et al. Three-year follow-up from a phase 2 study of combination obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In: 62nd ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition: ASH; 2020.

  47. Davids M, et al. Updated safety and efficacy results from a phase 2 study acalabrutinib, venetoclax and obinutuzumab (AVO) for frontline treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In: 62nd ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition: ASH; 2020.

  48. Chanan-Khan A, Cramer P, Demirkan F, Fraser G, Silva RS, Grosicki S, et al. Ibrutinib combined with bendamustine and rituximab compared with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (HELIOS): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:200–11.

  49. Fraser G, Cramer P, Demirkan F, Silva RS, Grosicki S, Pristupa A, et al. Updated results from the phase 3 HELIOS study of ibrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Leukemia. 2019;33:969–80.

  50. • Davids M, et al. Ibrutinib plus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab as initial treatment for younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematology. 2019;6:419–28. This is a single-arm trial using ibrutinib in combination with chemoimmunotherapy (FCR) for younger pateints with CLL (for up to 6 cycles), and allowing for an MRD-driven strategy of treatment discontinuation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. •• Jain N, et al. Ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (iFCG) for first-line treatment of IGHV-mutated CLL and without del (17p)/mutated TP53. Blood. 2019;134:357–7. This is another single-arm, MRD-driven study using ibrutinib in combination with chemoimmunotherapy (FCG) for younger patients, but with exclusion of high-risk patients, and chemotherapy administration for only 3 cycles.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 E Superior St, Lurie 3-103, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA

    Sara Small & Shuo Ma

Authors
  1. Sara Small
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuo Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuo Ma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

SS has a family member employed by Abbvie. SM received research funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Juno, Pharmacyclics, and TG Therapeutics; advisory honorarium from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech, Pharmacyclics, and Verastem; and speaker honorarium from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, and Pharmacyclics.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemias

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Small, S., Ma, S. Frontline Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL): Targeted Therapy vs. Chemoimmunotherapy. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 16, 325–335 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-021-00637-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-021-00637-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation