Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lessons Learned Treating Patients with Multiple Myeloma in Resource-Constrained Settings

  • Multiple Myeloma (P Kapoor, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Purpose of Review

Based on personal experiences, recommendations for physicians treating patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are proposed.

Recommendations

(1) Implement strategies to keep the patient in the best possible condition for the longest time, in addition to focusing on ways to avoid financial toxicity; (2) if lenalidomide is unavailable, start treatment with thalidomide and dexamethasone, include, if possible, bortezomib; (3) conduct an outpatient-based autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in all eligible patients; (4) use thalidomide as post-ASCT maintenance treatment if lenalidomide is unavailable for the standard risk patients; (5) monitor monoclonal proteins with serum protein electrophoresis and free light chain measurements; (6) employ novel drugs in cases of relapsed or refractory disease; and (7) do not forget supportive therapy.

Summary

The therapeutic recommendations to treat patients with MM are somewhat different for physicians working in LMICs, compared with those treating patients in high-income countries. These are relevant since more than 50% of the inhabitants of the world live in LMICs, thus indicating that the vast majority of patients with MM are being treated in resource-constrained settings. As time goes by, physicians may acquire the ability to analyze and express their feelings and experiences about topics in the practice of medicine in which they could have learned lessons (1). Since 1980, we have been treating patients with multiple myeloma (MM); to date, we have been personally involved in the study and treatment of more than 300 patients with this disease (2). Having gained experience dealing with MM patients in underprivileged circumstances, such as those prevailing in our country: México, having explored different ideas, treatments, and methods, and being aware of the financial implications which may impact our selection of therapeutic strategies and recommendations, we felt that it was appropriate to share in this article some of these ideas with practitioners around the world who are involved in the treatment of patients with MM in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance importance

  1. Ramsenthaler C, Kane P, Gao W, Siegert RJ, Edmonds PM, Schey SA, et al. Prevalence of symptoms in patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Haematol. 2016;97:416–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Acquah ME, Hsing AW, McGuire V, Wang S, Birmann B, Dei-Adomakoh Y. Presentation and survival of multiple myeloma patients in Ghana: a review of 169 cases. Ghana Med J. 2019;53:52–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee N, Moon S, Lee J, Park H, et al. Discrepancies between the percentage of plasma cells in bone marrow aspiration and BM biopsy: impact on the revised IMWG diagnostic criteria of multiple. Blood Cancer J. 2017;7:530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rajkumar SV, Kumar S. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:101–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diamond BT, Rustad E, Maclachlan K, Thoren K, Ho C, Roshal M, et al. Defining the undetectable: The current landscape of minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma and goals for future clarity. Blood Rev. 2020;100732.

  6. Lambert L, Ourednicek P, Meckova Z, Gavelli G, Strau J. Whole-body low-dose computed tomography in multiple myeloma staging: superior diagnostic performance in the detection of bone lesions, vertebral compression. Oncol Lett. 2017;13:2490–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jamet B, Bailly C, Carlier T, Michaud A-V, Touzeau C, Moreau P, et al. FDG PET in multiple myeloma. In: Molecular imaging in multiple myeloma. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;8:421–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greipp PR, Miguel JS, Durie BGM, Crowley JJ, Barlogie B, Bladé J, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3412–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Amato RJ, Loughnan MS, Flynn E, Folkman J. Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;26(91):4082–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddlemon P, et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 1999;18:1565–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dimopoulos MA, Anagnostopoulos A, Weber D. Treatment of plasma cell dyscrasias with thalidomide and its derivatives. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4444–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, Irwin D, Stadtmauer EA, Facon T, et al. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2005;16:2487–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hideshima T, Richardson P, Chauhan D, Palombella VJ, Elliott PJ, Adams J, et al. The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibits growth, induces apoptosis, and overcomes drug resistance in human multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3071–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang M, Giralt S, Delasalle K, Handy B, Alexanian R. Bortezomib in combination with thalidomide-dexamethasone for previously untreated multiple myeloma. Hematology. 2007;12:235–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. • Murrieta-Álvarez I, Steensma DP, Olivares-Gazca JC, Olivares-Gazca M, León-Peña A, Cantero-Fortiz Y, et al. Treatment of persons with multiple myeloma in underprivileged circumstances: real-world data from a single institution. Acta Haematol. 2020;11:1–7 Single center long term analysis of the treatment of patients with myeloma employing a simplified and affordable approach.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mohan M, Matin A, Davies FE. Update on the optimal use of bortezomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Cancer Manag Res. 2012;9:51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jagannath S, Barlogie B, Berenson JR, Siegel DS, Irwin D, Richardson PG, et al. Updated survival analyses after prolonged follow-up of the phase 2, multicenter CREST study of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2008;143:537–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Niu C, Jin H, Li M, Zhu S, Zhou L, Jin F, et al. Low-dose bortezomib increases the expression of NKG2D and DNAM-1 ligands and enhances induced NK and γδ T cell-mediated lysis in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. 2017;7:530.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee SM, Backenroth D, Cheung YKK, Hershman DL, Vulih D, Anderson B, et al. Case example of dose optimization using data from bortezomib dose-finding clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1395–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vanderloo JP, Pomplun ML, Kolesar JM. Stability of unused reconstituted bortezomib in original manufacturer vials. J Oncol Pharm. 2011;17:400–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vela-Ojeda J, Gómez-Almaguer D, Espinoza-Zamora R, Ramírez-Alvarado AG, Villalobos A, Herrera-Rojas MA et al. Prescription patterns of daratumumab in patients with MM in underprivileged circumstances: a multicenter experience in Mexico Arch Med Res 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2021.02.008.

  22. • López-Otero A, Ruiz-Delgado G, Rujiz-Argüelles A. A simplified method for stem cell autografting in multiple myeloma: a single institution experience. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;44:715–9 Description of the method and results of a simplified approach to autograft myeloma patients on an outpatient basis.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruiz-Argüelles GJ. Whither the bone marrow transplant? Hematology. 2010;15:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vela-Ojeda J, García-Ruiz-Esparza MA, Padilla-González Y, GómezAlmaguer D, Gutiérrez-Aguirre CH, Gómez-Rangel D, et al. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma using oral versus I.V. melphalan. Ann Hematol. 2007;86:277–82.

  25. León-González M, León-Peña AA, Vallejo-VIllalobos MF, Núñez-Cortés AK, Ruiz-Argüelles A, Ruiz-Argüelles GJ. Mexican biosimilar filgrastim for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and transplantation. Rev Investig Clin. 2016;68(4):181–3.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gómez-De León A, Bugarin-Estrada E, Colunga-Pedraza PR, et al. Efficacy of three filgrastim-intended copies for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in healthy adult and pediatric donors in México. J Clin Apher. 2019;34(5):537–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gutiérrez-Aguirre CH, Alvarado-Navarro DM, Palomares-Leal A, Mejía-Jaramillo G, Salazar-Riojas R, León AGD, et al. Reduced-dose plerixafor as a mobilization strategy in autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: a proof of concept study. Transfusion. 2019;59(12):3721–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. • Ruiz-Argüelles GJ. Lessons learned starting a bone marrow transplantation programme in a resource-constrained setting. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:509–10 A summary of over 25 years of experience conducting both allo and autografts in underprivileged circumstances.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McCarthy PL, Holstein SA, Petrucci MT, Richardson PG, Hulin C, Tosi P, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(29):3279–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tarín-Arzaga L, Arredondo-Campos D, Martínez-Pacheco V, MartínezGonzález O, Ramírez-López A, Gómez-De León A, et al. Impact of the affordability of novel agents in patients with multiple myeloma: real-world data of current clinical practice in México. Cancer. 2018;124:1946–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Peña C, Riva E, Schutz N, Tarín-Arzaga L, Martínez-Cordero H, Bove V, et al. Different outcomes for transplant eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients in Latin America according to the public versus private management: A GELAMM study. Leukemia Lymph. 2020;61:3112–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Palumbo A, Hajek R, Delforge M, Kropff M, Petrucci MT, Catalano J, et al. Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1759–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruiz-Argüelles GJ. Factors involved in the selection of treatment in patients with hematological malignancies. Acta Haematol. 2019;141(1):54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Peña C, Ortiz M, Voisin J, Peralta A, Balboa V, Delgado F. Sensibilidad diagnóstica de electroforesis de proteínas y cadenas livianas libres séricas en gammapatías monoclonales. Rev Med Chil. 2018;146:64–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sekine L, Ziegelmann PK, Manica D, Fonte Pithan C, Sosnoski M, Morais VD, et al. Frontline treatment for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma: a 6474 patients network metaanalysis. Hematol Oncol. 2019;37(1):62–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Leebeek FW. Update of thrombosis in multiple myeloma. Thromb Res. 2016;140(Suppl 1):S76–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pour L, Adam Z, Buresova L, Krejci M, Krivanova A, Sandecka V, et al. Varicella-zoster virus prophylaxis with low-dose acyclovir in patients with multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2009;9:151–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Talamo G, Dimaio C, Abbi KK, et al. Current role of radiation therapy for multiple myeloma. Front Oncol. 2015;5:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Himelstein AL, Foster JC, Khatcheressian JL, Roberts JD, Seisler DK, Novotny PJ, et al. Effect of longer-interval vs standard dosing of zoledronic acid on skeletal events in patients with bone metastases: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2017;317:48–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gimsing P, Carlson K, Turesson I, Fayers P, Waage A, Vangsted A, et al. Effect of pamidronate 30 mg versus 90 mg on physical function in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Nordic Myeloma Study Group): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Oct;11(10):973–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gerecke C, Fuhrmann S, Strifler S, Schmidt-Hieber M, Einsele H, Knop S. Diagnostik und therapie des multiplen myeloms. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113:470–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors appreciate from Sergio LOZANO-RODRIGUEZ MCP, MWC, the language review of this paper

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillermo J. Ruiz-Argüelles.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Multiple Myeloma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruiz-Argüelles, G.J., Gómez-Almaguer, D. Lessons Learned Treating Patients with Multiple Myeloma in Resource-Constrained Settings. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 16, 40–44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-021-00616-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-021-00616-6

Keywords

Navigation