Abstract
Purpose of Review
Our aim was to assess the degree of acceptance of the European Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) on heart failure (HF) among Spanish physicians according to sex. This was a cross-sectional study, employing Google Forms, conducted by a group of HF experts from the Region of Madrid (Spain), between November 2021 and February 2022, among specialists and residents of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, and Primary Care from Spain.
Recent Findings
A total of 387 physicians—173 women (44.7%)—from 128 different centers completed the survey. Compared to men, women were significantly younger (38.2 ± 9.1 years vs. 40.6 ± 11.2 years; p = 0.024) and had fewer years of clinical practice (12.1 ± 8.1 years vs. 14.5 ± 10.7 years; p = 0.014). Briefly, women and men had a positive opinion of the guidelines and thought that implementing quadruple therapy is feasible in less than 8 weeks. Women followed more frequently than men the new paradigm of “4 pillars at lowest doses” and considered more frequently the establishment of quadruple therapy before implanting a cardiac device. Although they agreed about “low blood pressure” as the major limitation for achieving quadruple therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, there were discrepancies on the second most frequent barrier, and women were more proactive when initiating SGLT2 inhibitors.
Summary
In a large survey including nearly 400 doctors from all over Spain to provide real-world opinion on 2021 ESC HF Guidelines and experience with SGLT2 inhibitors, women follow more frequently the new paradigm of “4 pillars at lowest doses”, consider more frequently the establishment of quadruple therapy before implanting a cardiac device, and were more proactive when initiating SGLT2 inhibitors. Further studies confirming an association of sex with a better compliance of HF guidelines are needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data can be available by request.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Sicras-Mainar A, Sicras-Navarro A, Palacios B, Varela L, Delgado JF. Epidemiología y tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardiaca en España: estudio PATHWAYS-HF. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022;75(1):31–8.
McDonald M, Virani S, Chan M, Ducharme A, Ezekowitz JA, Giannetti N, Heckman GA, Howlett JG, Koshman SL, Lepage S, Mielniczuk L, Moe GW, O’Meara E, Swiggum E, Toma M, Zieroth S, Anderson K, Bray SA, Clarke B, Cohen-Solal A, D’Astous M, Davis M, De S, Grant ADM, Grzeslo A, Heshka J, Keen S, Kouz S, Lee D, Masoudi FA, et al. CCS/CHFS Heart Failure Guidelines update: defining a new pharmacologic standard of care for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37:531–46.
McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Piepoli MF, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Skibelund AK, ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3599–726.
Tsutsui H, Ide T, Ito H, Kihara Y, Kinugawa K, Kinugawa S, Makaya M, Murohara T, Node K, Saito Y, Sakata Y, Shimizu W, Yamamoto K, Bando Y, Iwasaki YK, Kinugasa Y, Mizote I, Nakagawa H, Oishi S, Okada A, Tanaka A, Akasaka T, Ono M, Kimura T, Kosaka S, Kosuge M, Momomura SI. JCS/JHFS 2021 Guideline focused update on diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2021;27:1404–44.
Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun J-J, Colvin MM, Deswal A, Drazner MH, Dunlay SM, Evers LR, Fang JC, Fedson SE, Fonarow GC, Hayek SS, Hernandez AF, Khazanie P, Kittleson MM, Lee CS, Link MS, Milano CA, Nnacheta LC, Sandhu AT, Stevenson LW, Vardeny O, Vest AR, Yancy CW, Writing committee members. 2022 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America Guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary. J Card Fail. 2022;28:810–30.
• Álvarez-García J, Cristo Ropero MJ, Iniesta Manjavacas ÁM, Díez-Villanueva P, Esteban-Fernández A, Juan Bagudá J de, Rivas-Lasarte M, TaiboUrquía M, Górriz-Magaña J, Cobo Marcos M, Goirigolzarri-Artaza J, Iglesias del Valle D, Bover Freire R, Beltrán Herrera C, Villa A, Campuzano Ruiz R, Martínez-Sellés M. Opinión sobre la guía ESC 2021 sobre insuficiencia cardiaca. Una encuesta a 387 médicos. REC CardioClinics. 2022; In press. This work assesses the degree of acceptance of the European clinical practice guidelines on HF among Spanish physicians. Although the new HF guidelines have been well received, the need to develop clinical protocols to facilitate its implementation is detected. SGLT2i are managed on an outpatient basis in patients with HF and reduced LVEF, but there are clinical scenarios where their use can be increased.
• Fauvel C, Bonnet G, Mullens W, Giraldo CIS, Mežnar AZ, Barasa A, Tokmakova M, Shchendrygina A, Costa FM, Mapelli M, Zemrak F, Tops LF, Jakus N, Sultan A, Bahouth F, Hadjseyd C, Salvat M, Anselmino M, Messroghli D, Weberndörfer V, Giverts I, Bochaton T, Berthelot E, Legallois D, Beauvais F, Bauer F, Lamblin N, Damy T, Girerd N, Sebbag L, et al. Sequencing and titratingapproach of therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction following the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines: an international cardiology survey. Eur J Heart Fail 2022; In press. This is a web-based survey designed by a group of international HF specialists and posted by email and through various social networks to a broad community of cardiologists worldwide 1 year after the publication of the latest European HF Guidelines. They observe that the “historical approach” to HFrEF therapies remains the preferred sequencing approach. However, accelerated introduction and uptitration are also major treatment goals.
Swaraj S, Kozor R, Arnott C, Di Bartolo BA, Figtree GA. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction-does sex matter? Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2021;18:345–52.
Lala A, Tayal U, Hamo CE, Youmans Q, Al-Khatib SM, Bozkurt B, Davis MB, Januzzi J, Mentz R, Sauer A, Walsh MN, Yancy C, Gulati M. Sex differences in heart failure. J Card Fail. 2022;28:477–98.
Sanromán Guerrero MA, Antoñana Ugalde S, Hernández Sánchez E, Prado Díaz S del, Jiménez-Blanco Bravo M, Cordero Pereda D, Zamorano Gómez JL, Álvarez-García J. Role of sex on the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9. In press.
Álvarez-García J. Sacubitril/valsartan adherence… because the best is sometimes difficult to replace the good. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022;24:1516–8.
Komajda M, Cowie MR, Tavazzi L, Ponikowski P, Anker SD, Filippatos GS. Physicians’ guideline adherence is associated with better prognosis in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the QUALIFY international registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:1414–23.
Greene SJ, Tan X, Yeh YC, Bernauer M, Zaidi O, Yang M, Butler J. Factors associated with non-use and sub-target dosing of medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Heart Fail Rev. 2022;27:741–53.
McKinlay JB, Link CL, Freund KM, Marceau LD, O’Donnell AB, Lutfey KL. Sources of variation in physician adherence with clinical guidelines: results from a factorial experiment. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:289–96.
• Marx G, Koens S, Knesebeck O Von Dem, Scherer M. Age and gender differences in diagnostic decision-making of early heart failure: results of a mixed-methods interview-study using video vignettes. BMJ Open 2022;12. The aim of this work is to analyze differences in general practitioners’ (GPs) HF diagnosis and diagnostic certainty by patient age and gender and to identify reasons for possible differences. The study showed differences by patients’ gender and age in frequency and certainty of HF diagnosis. In order to avoid that GPs overlook or misinterpret early signs of HF, it is important to critically reflect diagnostic decisions and possible social influences.
Packer M, McMurray JJV. Rapid evidence-based sequencing of foundational drugs for heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;23:882–94.
Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Pocock SJ, Carson P, Januzzi J, Verma S, Tsutsui H, Brueckmann M, Jamal W, Kimura K, Schnee J, Zeller C, Cotton D, Bocchi E, Böhm M, Choi D-J, Chopra V, Chuquiure E, Giannetti N, Janssens S, Zhang J, Gonzalez Juanatey JR, Kaul S, Brunner-La Rocca H-P, Merkely B, Nicholls SJ, Perrone S, Pina I, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1413–24.
McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, Ponikowski P, Sabatine MS, Anand IS, Bělohlávek J, Böhm M, Chiang C-E, Chopra VK, de Boer RA, Desai AS, Diez M, Drozdz J, Dukát A, Ge J, Howlett JG, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Ljungman CEA, Merkely B, Nicolau JC, O’Meara E, Petrie MC, Vinh PN, Schou M, Tereshchenko S, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1995–2008.
Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Brueckmann M, Ofstad AP, Pfarr E, Jamal W, Packer M. SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet. 2020;396:819–29.
Butt JH, Docherty KF, Petrie MC, Schou M, Kosiborod MN, O’Meara E, Katova T, Ljungman CEA, Diez M, Ogunniyi MO, Langkilde AM, Sjöstrand M, Lindholm D, Bengtsson O, Martinez FA, Ponikowski P, Sabatine MS, Solomon SD, Jhund PS, McMurray JJV, Køber L. Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in men and women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a prespecified analysis of the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:678–89.
Vardeny O, Vaduganathan M. Practical guide to prescribing sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for cardiologists. JACC Hear Fail. 2019;7:169–72.
Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2002;288:756–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The survey was individual, voluntary, and anonymous; without collecting identifiable data, an Ethics Committee approval review was not required.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All reported studies with human subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The editors would like to thank Dr. Albert Ariza for taking the time to review this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Álvarez-García, J., Cristo Ropero, M.J., Iniesta Manjavacas, Á.M. et al. Do Women Physicians Accept and Follow Heart Failure Guidelines More Than Men?. Curr Heart Fail Rep 20, 151–156 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-023-00597-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-023-00597-y