Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous Ventricular Restoration with a Partitioning Device for Ischemic Heart Failure Treatment

  • Nonpharmacologic Therapy: Surgery, Ventricular Assist Devices, Biventricular Pacing, and Exercise (A Hasan, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Heart Failure Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of the review

Percutaneous ventricular restoration with a ventricular partitioning device (VPD) is a novel minimally invasive procedure designed to restore the left ventricular (LV) shape by isolating the infarcted and aneurysmal LV apex from remainder of the cavity in heart failure patients with severely reduced LV ejection fraction. In this review, we perform an in-depth analysis of the design and purpose of the VPD and review the available clinical data, with special attention to hemodynamics, outcomes, and complications.

Recent findings

PARACHUTE trials have shown >90% procedural success rate of VPD implant. Heart failure patients had improvement in hemodynamics (reduction in LV volumes and increase in LV ejection fraction) and functional status (6-min walking distance and quality of life scores) after the VPD implant. Optimal implant position is necessary to obtain a good clinical outcome.

Summary

Percutaneous VPD implantation has thus far been a safe intervention capable of improving surrogate markers of heart failure but there is still a need to develop more durable devices with a long-lasting hemodynamics effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. • Writing Group M, Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):e38–360. This report from American Heart Association has the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and other cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. •• Oliveira GH, Al-Kindi SG, Bezerra HG, Costa MA. Left ventricular restoration devices. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014;7(3):282–91. This review has a nice summary of surgical and minimally invasive methods of left ventricular restoration.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Konstam MA, Kramer DG, Patel AR, Maron MS, Udelson JE. Left ventricular remodeling in heart failure: current concepts in clinical significance and assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(1):98–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rouleau JL, de Champlain J, Klein M, Bichet D, Moye L, Packer M, et al. Activation of neurohumoral systems in postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(2):390–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Experimental observations and clinical implications. Circulation. 1990;81(4):1161–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McKay RG, Pfeffer MA, Pasternak RC, Markis JE, Come PC, Nakao S, et al. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: a corollary to infarct expansion. Circulation. 1986;74(4):693–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chareonthaitawee P, Christian TF, Hirose K, Gibbons RJ, Rumberger JA. Relation of initial infarct size to extent of left ventricular remodeling in the year after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25(3):567–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burton AC. The importance of the shape and size of the heart. Am Heart J. 1957;54(6):801–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sutton MG, Sharpe N. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: pathophysiology and therapy. Circulation. 2000;101(25):2981–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Remme WJ. Therapeutic strategies and neurohormonal control in heart failure. Eur Heart J. 1994;15 Suppl D:129–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Francis GS. Neurohormonal control of heart failure. Cleve Clin J Med. 2011;78 Suppl 1:S75–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pouleur HG, Konstam MA, Udelson JE, Rousseau MF. Changes in ventricular volume, wall thickness and wall stress during progression of left ventricular dysfunction. The SOLVD Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(4 Suppl A):43A–8A.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenberg B, Quinones MA, Koilpillai C, Limacher M, Shindler D, Benedict C, et al. Effects of long-term enalapril therapy on cardiac structure and function in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Results of the SOLVD echocardiography substudy. Circulation. 1995;91(10):2573–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Konstam MA, Patten RD, Thomas I, Ramahi T, La Bresh K, Goldman S, et al. Effects of losartan and captopril on left ventricular volumes in elderly patients with heart failure: results of the ELITE ventricular function substudy. Am Heart J. 2000;139(6):1081–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Senior R, Basu S, Kinsey C, Schaeffer S, Lahiri A. Carvedilol prevents remodeling in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1999;137(4 Pt 1):646–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Colucci WS, Packer M, Bristow MR, Gilbert EM, Cohn JN, Fowler MB, et al. Carvedilol inhibits clinical progression in patients with mild symptoms of heart failure. US Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. Circulation. 1996;94(11):2800–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lechat P, Escolano S, Golmard JL, Lardoux H, Witchitz S, Henneman JA, et al. Prognostic value of bisoprolol-induced hemodynamic effects in heart failure during the Cardiac Insufficiency BIsoprolol Study (CIBIS). Circulation. 1997;96(7):2197–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Groenning BA, Nilsson JC, Sondergaard L, Fritz-Hansen T, Larsson HB, Hildebrandt PR. Antiremodeling effects on the left ventricle during beta-blockade with metoprolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(7):2072–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Opie LH, Commerford PJ, Gersh BJ, Pfeffer MA. Controversies in ventricular remodelling. Lancet. 2006;367(9507):356–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Donato M, Sabatier M, Toso A, Barletta G, Baroni M, Dor V, et al. Regional myocardial performance of non-ischaemic zones remote from anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm. Effects of aneurysmectomy. Eur Heart J. 1995;16(9):1285–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mirsky I. Left ventricular stresses in the intact human heart. Biophys J. 1969;9(2):189–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen WY, Wu FY, Shih CC, Lai ST, Hsu CP. Left ventricular aneurysm repair: a comparison of linear versus patch remodeling. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009;72(8):414–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prucz RB, Weiss ES, Patel ND, Nwakanma LU, Baumgartner WA, Conte JV. Coronary artery bypass grafting with or without surgical ventricular restoration: a comparison. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(3):806–14. discussion -14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beck CS. Operation for aneurysm of the heart. Ann Surg. 1944;120(1):34–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Murray G. The pathophysiology of the cause of death from coronary thrombosis. Ann Surg. 1947;126(4):523–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Likoff W, Bailey CP. Ventriculoplasty: excision of myocardial aneurysm; report of a successful case. J Am Med Assoc. 1955;158(11):915–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cooley DA, Collins HA, Morris Jr GC, Chapman DW. Ventricular aneurysm after myocardial infarction; surgical excision with use of temporary cardiopulmonary bypass. J Am Med Assoc. 1958;167(5):557–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jatene AD. Left ventricular aneurysmectomy. Resection or reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;89(3):321–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dor V, Saab M, Coste P, Kornaszewska M, Montiglio F. Left ventricular aneurysm: a new surgical approach. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;37(1):11–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Di Donato M, Barletta G, Maioli M, Fantini F, Coste P, Sabatier M, et al. Early hemodynamic results of left ventricular reconstructive surgery for anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69(9):886–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mann DL, Acker MA, Jessup M, Sabbah HN, Starling RC, Kubo SH, et al. Clinical evaluation of the CorCap Cardiac Support Device in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(4):1226–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Costanzo MR, Ivanhoe RJ, Kao A, Anand IS, Bank A, Boehmer J, et al. Prospective evaluation of elastic restraint to lessen the effects of heart failure (PEERLESS-HF) trial. J Card Fail. 2012;18(6):446–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Grossi EA, Patel N, Woo YJ, Goldberg JD, Schwartz CF, Subramanian V, et al. Outcomes of the RESTOR-MV Trial (Randomized Evaluation of a Surgical Treatment for Off-Pump Repair of the Mitral Valve). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(24):1984–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Velazquez EJ, Lee KL, Deja MA, Jain A, Sopko G, Marchenko A, et al. Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(17):1607–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Shroyer AL, Collins JF, Grover FL. Evaluating clinical applicability: the STICH trial’s findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(6):508–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. • Ige M, Al-Kindi SG, Attizzani G, Costa M, Oliveira GH. Percutaneous left ventricular restoration. Heart Fail Clin. 2015;11(2):261–73. This review summarizes the methods of ventricular restoration and various PARACHUTE trial results.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Skowasch M, Robertson GC, Wunderlich N, Nikolic S, Khairkhahan A, Sievert H. Percutaneous ventricular restoration in a chronic heart failure patient. EuroIntervention. 2006;2(1):128–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. • Costa MA, Pencina M, Nikolic S, Engels T, Templin B, Abraham WT. The PARACHUTE IV trial design and rationale: percutaneous ventricular restoration using the Parachute device in patients with ischemic heart failure and dilated left ventricles. Am Heart J. 2013;165(4):531–6. This paper reviews the design of PARACHUTE IV trial.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nikolic SD, Khairkhahan A, Ryu M, Champsaur G, Breznock E, Dae M. Percutaneous implantation of an intraventricular device for the treatment of heart failure: experimental results and proof of concept. J Card Fail. 2009;15(9):790–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Otasevic P, Sagic D, Antonic Z, Nikolic SD, Khairakhan A, Radovancevic B, et al. First-in-man implantation of left ventricular partitioning device in a patient with chronic heart failure: twelve-month follow-up. J Card Fail. 2007;13(7):517–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sharkey H, Nikolic S, Khairkhahan A, Dae M. Left ventricular apex occluder. Description of a ventricular partitioning device. EuroIntervention. 2006;2(1):125–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mazzaferri Jr EL, Gradinac S, Sagic D, Otasevic P, Hasan AK, Goff TL, et al. Percutaneous left ventricular partitioning in patients with chronic heart failure and a prior anterior myocardial infarction: results of the PercutAneous Ventricular RestorAtion in Chronic Heart failUre PaTiEnts Trial. Am Heart J. 2012;163(5):812–20. e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Costa MA, Mazzaferri Jr EL, Sievert H, Abraham WT. Percutaneous ventricular restoration using the Parachute device in patients with ischemic heart failure: three-year outcomes of the PARACHUTE first-in-human study. Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7(5):752–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Thomas M, Nienaber CA, Ince H, Erglis A, Vukcevic V, Schafer U, et al. Percutaneous ventricular restoration (PVR) therapy using the Parachute device in 100 subjects with ischaemic dilated heart failure: one-year primary endpoint results of PARACHUTE III, a European trial. EuroIntervention. 2015;11(6):710–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. • Yang YJ, Huo Y, Xu YW, Wang JA, Han YL, Ge JB, et al. Percutaneous ventricular restoration therapy using the Parachute device in Chinese patients with ischemic heart failure: three-month primary end-point results of PARACHUTE China study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016;129(17):2058–62. PARACHUTE China trial results.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sagic D, Otasevic P, Sievert H, Elsasser A, Mitrovic V, Gradinac S. Percutaneous implantation of the left ventricular partitioning device for chronic heart failure: a pilot study with 1-year follow-up. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12(6):600–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Silva G, Melica B, Pires de Morais G, Sousa O, Bettencourt N, Ribeiro J, et al. Percutaneous implantation of a ventricular partitioning device for treatment of ischemic heart failure: initial experience of a center. Rev Port Cardiol. 2012;31(12):795–801.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. • Schmidt T, Frerker C, Thielsen T, Dotz I, Wohlmuth P, Kuck KH, et al. New evidence for favourable effects on haemodynamics and ventricular performance after Parachute((R)) implantation in humans. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(10):1112–9. This study highlights the acute hemodynamic effects of percutaneous ventricular partitioning device implantation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Schäfer U. Percutaneous ventricular restoration (PVR) therapy using the Parachute® device in patients with ischemic dilated heart failure: PARACHUTE III, European post market trial, 2 year results. Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT). 2015

  50. Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E, Blackstone EH, Cutlip DE, Kappetein AP, et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research Consortium. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(2):205–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Adamson P, Thomas M, Costa M, Nienaber C, Ince H, Erglis A, et al. Pooled analysis of percutaneous ventricular restoration (PVR) therapy using the PARACHUTE® device in patients with ischemic dilated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63 (12_S).

  52. Chen J, Normand SL, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. National and regional trends in heart failure hospitalization and mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-2008. JAMA. 2011;306(15):1669–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Bozdag-Turan I, Bermaoui B, Turan RG, Kische S, Paranskaya L, Kloker K, et al. Parachute implant: CT morphological criteria of our center to identify the suitable patient. Cardiovasc Ther. 2014;32(1):26–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bozdag-Turan I, Bermaoui B, Paranskaya L, GokmenTuran R, D’Ancona G, Kische S, et al. Challenges in patient selection for the Parachute device implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(5):E718–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. • Alaiti MA, Fares A, Erglis A, Nshisso L, Shaikh K, DeCicco AE, et al. Evaluating the quality of implantation of percutaneous ventricular restoration device (Parachute®) by cardiac computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 doi: 10.1002/ccd.26644. This study demonstrates the importance of optimal positioning of the ventricular partitioning device implant to achieve good treatment outcomes.

  56. Tam CC, Fares A, Alaiti A, Shaikh K, Ince H, Erglis A, et al. Cardiac computed tomography assessment of the near term impact of percutaneous ventricular restoration therapy (Parachute((R)) ) on mitral valve geometry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88(2):E45–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhou D, Pan W, Guan L, Pan C, Ge J. Transcatheter closure of a post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture using a Parachute device. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(2):369–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Abu Saleh WK, Al Jabbari O, Bruckner BA, Suarez EE, Estep JD, Loebe M. Left ventricular assist device implantation after intracardiac Parachute device removal. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(2):720–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ravi Y, Bansal S, Rosas PC, Mazzaferri Jr EL, Sai-Sudhakar CB. Surgical considerations for the explantation of the Parachute left ventricular partitioning device and the implantation of the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2016;29(2):176–7.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lauschke J, Schneider R, Bansch D. Ventricular tachycardia ablation in a patient with a Parachute device: a decent word of warning. Europace. 2014;16(2):207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ladich E, Otsuka F, Virmani R. A pathologic study of explanted Parachute devices from seven heart failure patients following percutaneous ventricular restoration. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(4):619–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guilherme H. Oliveira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Bishnu P. Dhakal and Guilherme H. Oliveira declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Nonpharmacologic Therapy: Surgery, Ventricular Assist Devices, Biventricular Pacing, and Exercise

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

ᅟ(DOCX 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhakal, B.P., Oliveira, G.H. Percutaneous Ventricular Restoration with a Partitioning Device for Ischemic Heart Failure Treatment. Curr Heart Fail Rep 14, 87–99 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-017-0326-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-017-0326-z

Keywords

Navigation