Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vasopressin Receptor Antagonists: From Pivotal Trials to Current Practice

  • Pharmacologic Therapy (WHW Tang, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Heart Failure Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heart failure is a growing health and economic problem in America, and outcomes continue to remain dismal, particularly for those presenting with acute heart failure syndrome (AHFS). In theory, arginine vasopressin antagonists (VRAs) could be useful in both acute and chronic heart failure, depending on which vasopressin receptor is targeted. Most studies of VRAs in heart failure have focused on V2 receptor antagonism, and to a lesser extent on combined V1a/V2 antagonism, due to the availability of appropriate agents and the unmet need of improving outcomes in AHFS. These agents are particularly attractive as adjunctive or alterative agents in AHFS because of their ability to produce a substantial diuresis without some of the drawbacks intrinsic to loop diuretics. While VRAs have been shown to ameliorate signs and symptoms of congestion when added to standard care, the largest trial of these agents showed no improvement in long-term morbidity, mortality, or hospitalization rates when added to standard care. This article reviews the mechanism of action of VRAs, the relevant clinical trials data, and current recommendations for clinical use, and suggests future directions for study of these agents in patients with heart failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2013 Update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:e6–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pang PS, Komajda M, Gheorghiade M. The current and future management of acute heart failure syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:784–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gheorghiade M, Abraham WT, Albert NM, et al. OPTIMIZE-HF Investigators and Coordinators. Systolic blood pressure at admission, clinical characteristics, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. JAMA. 2006;296:2217–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gheorghiade M, Braunwald E. Reconsidering the role for digoxin in the management of acute heart failure syndromes. JAMA. 2009;302(19):2146–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bankir L. Antidiuretic action of vasopressin: quantitative aspects and interaction between V1a and V2 receptor-mediated effects. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;51:372–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldsmith SR. Baroreflex control of vasopressin secretion in normal humans. In: Cowley AW, Liard J-F, Ausiello DA, editors. Vasopressin: Cellular and Integrative Functions. New York: Raven Press; 1988. p. 389–97.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldsmith SR, Gheorghiade M. Vasopressin antagonism in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(10):1785–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Francis GS, Benedict C, Johnstone DE, et al. Comparison of neuroendocrine activation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure. A substudy of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Circulation. 1990;82:1724–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jard S. Mechanisms of action of vasopressin and vasopressin antagonists. Kidney Int Suppl. 1988;26:S38–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu YJ, Gopalakrishnan V. Vasopressin increases cytosolic free [Ca2+] in the neonatal rat cardiomyocyte. Evidence for V1 subtype receptors. Circ Res. 1991;69:239–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura Y, Haneda T, Osaki J, et al. Hypertrophic growth of cultured neonatal rat heart cells mediated by vasopressin V(1A) receptor. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;391:39–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Penit J, Faure M, Jard S. Vasopressin and angiotensin II receptors in rat aortic smooth muscle cells in culture. Am J Physiol. 1983;244:E72–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. • Li X, Chan TO, Myers V, et al. Controlled and cardiac-restricted overexpression of the arginine vasopressin V1A receptor causes reversible left ventricular dysfunction through Galphaq-mediated cell signaling. Circulation. 2011;124(5):572–81. In this elegant study, Li et al. demonstrate that over-expression of V1a receptor signaling is capable of producing the dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype in genetically altered mice. Further, the phenotype is 'rescued' by co-expression of an inhibitory gene for G (sub-alpha q) signaling. These experiments unequivocally establish that excessive arginine vasopressin secretion can cause or exacerbate dilated cardiomyopathy and that the mechanism relates to intra-cellular signaling pathways common to other elements of the neurohormonal axis such as angiotensin II. These experiments provide strong support for developing V1a antagonists as a possible therapeutic avenue in patients with heart failure..

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nielsen S, Chou CL, Marples D, et al. Vasopressin increases water permeability of kidney collecting duct by inducing translocation of aquaporin-CD water channels to plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:1013–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldsmith SR, Brandimarte F, Gheorghiade M. Congestion as a therapeutic target in acute heart failure syndromes. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;52(5):383–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Felker GM, O'Connor CM, Braunwald E. Heart Failure Clinical Research Network Investigators. Loop diuretics in acute decompensated heart failure: necessary? Evil? A necessary evil? Circ Heart Fail. 2009;2(1):56–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McCurley JM, Hanlon SU, Wei SK, et al. Furosemide and the progression of left ventricular dysfunction in experimental heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(6):1301–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Costello-Boerrigter LC, Smith WB, Boerrigter G, et al. Vasopressin-2-receptor antagonism augments water excretion without changes in renal hemodynamics or sodium and potassium excretion in human heart failure. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290(2):F273–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gheorghiade M, Rossi JS, Cotts W, et al. Characterization and prognostic value of persistent hyponatremia in patients with severe heart failure in the ESCAPE Trial. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1998–2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gheorghiade M, Abraham WT, Albert NM, et al. Relationship between admission serum sodium concentration and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure: an analysis from the OPTIMIZE-HF registry. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:980–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rossi J, Bayram M, Udelson JE, et al. Improvement in hyponatremia during hospitalization for worsening heart failure is associated with improved outcomes: insights from the Acute and Chronic Therapeutic Impact of a Vasopressin Antagonist in Chronic Heart Failure (ACTIV in CHF) trial. Acute Card Care. 2007;9:82–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klein L, O’Connor CM, Leimberger JD, et al. Lower serum sodium is associated with increased short-term mortality in hospitalized patients with worsening heart failure: results from the Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Chronic Heart Failure (OPTIME-CHF) study. Circulation. 2005;111:2454–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Francis GS, Siegel RM, Goldsmith SR, et al. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103(1):1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. • Goldsmith SR. Hyponatremia and outcomes in patients with heart failure. Heart. 2012;98(24):1761–2. In this editorial, Goldsmith summarizes the available data concerning the relationship between outcomes and hyponatremia in clinical heart failure. The potential mechanisms of the relationship are explored, as are the implications for therapy and the need for additional study..

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldsmith SR. Hyponatremia in heart failure: time for a trial. J Card Fail. 2013;19(6):398–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Decaux G, Soupart A, Vassart G. Non-peptide arginine vasopressin antagonists: The vaptans. Lancet. 2008;371:1624–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shoaf SE, Bramer SL, Bricmont P, Zimmer CA. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interaction between Tolvaptan, a Non-Peptide AVP Antagonist, and Furosemide or Hydrochlorothiazide. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007;50(2):213–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schrier RW, Gross P, Gheorghiade M, et al. SALT Investigators. Tolvaptan, a selective oral vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, for hyponatremia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(20):2099–112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gheorghiade M, Gattis WA, O’Connor CM, et al. Effects of tolvaptan, a vasopressin antagonist, in patients hospitalized with worsening heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1963–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Creager MA, Faxon DP, Cutler SS, et al. Contribution of vasopressin to vasoconstriction in patients with congestive heart failure: comparison with the renin-angiotensin system and the sympathetic nervous system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:758–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldsmith SR, Francis GS, Cowley Jr AW, et al. Hemodynamic effects of infused arginine vasopressin in congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8:779–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Udelson JE, Smith WB, Hendrix GH, et al. Acute hemodynamic effects of conivaptan, a dual V(1A) and V(2) vasopressin receptor antagonist, in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation. 2001;104(20):2417–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldsmith SR, Elkayam U, Haught WH, et al. Efficacy and safety of the vasopressin V1A/V2-receptor antagonist conivaptan in acute decompensated heart failure: a dose-ranging pilot study. J Card Fail. 2008;14:641–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Udelson JE, Orlandi C, Ouyang J, et al. Acute hemodynamic effects of tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor blocker, in patients with symptomatic heart failure and systolic dysfunction: an international, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1540–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Udelson JE, McGrew FA, Flores E, et al. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effect of oral tolvaptan on left ventricular dilation and function in patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2151–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gheorghiade M, Orlandi C, Burnett JC, et al. Rationale and design of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of vasopressin antagonism in heart failure: outcome study with tolvaptan (EVEREST). J Card Fail. 2005;11:260–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gheorghiade M, Konstam MA, Burnett Jr JC, et al. Short-term clinical effects of tolvaptan, an oral vasopressin antagonist, in patients hospitalized for heart failure: the EVEREST Clinical Status Trials. JAMA. 2007;297:1332–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Konstam MA, Gheorghiade M, Burnett Jr JC, et al. Effects of oral tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: the EVEREST outcome trial. JAMA. 2007;297:1319–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. • Lanfear DE, Sabbah HN, Goldsmith SR, et al. EVEREST trial investigators. Association of arginine vasopressin levels with outcomes and the effect of V2 blockade in patients hospitalized for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: insights from the EVEREST trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(1):47–52. In this retrospective analysis of data from the EVEREST trial, Lanfear et al. report on the relationship between increased vasopressin levels and outcomes, as well as response to therapy in patients treated with either placebo or tolvaptan. The data show, for the first time in a large series of patients with clinical heart failure on appropriate background therapy, that elevated plasma AVP levels are associated with worse outcomes. However, while AVP levels were higher in patients treated with tolvaptan, the outcomes were not worse in this group..

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Matsue Y, Suzuki M, Seya M, et al. Tolvaptan reduces the risk of worsening renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in high-risk population. J Cardiol. 2013;61(2):169–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. • Hauptman PJ, Burnett J, Gheorghiade M, et al. Everest Investigators. Clinical course of patients with hyponatremia and decompensated systolic heart failure and the effect of vasopressin receptor antagonism with tolvaptan. J Card Fail. 2013;19(6):390–7. In this retrospective analysis of the EVEREST trial, Hauptman et al. describe the clinical course of hyponatremic patients and their response to tolvaptan therapy vs. placebo as compared to normonatremic patients. Although the relevance of the information is limited by relatively few patients and a small number of events, the analysis suggests that hyponatremic patients in general have worse outcomes, may have a somewhat better clinical response regarding dyspnea when treated with tolvaptan, and, in the cohort with serum sodium below 13 0meq/liter, better cardiovascular outcomes when treated with tolvaptan. This analysis provides support for the usefulness of performing a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of tolvaptan therapy in hyponatremic heart failure patients..

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Udelson JE, Bilsker M, Hauptman PJ, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tolvaptan monotherapy compared to furosemide and the combination of tolvaptan and furosemide in patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction. J Card Fail. 2011;17(12):973–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Goldsmith SR, Gilbertson DT, Mackedanz SA, Swan SK. Renal effects of conivaptan, furosemide, and the combination in patients with chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2011;17(12):982–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Ankur Kalra declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Valmiki Maharaj declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Steven R. Goldsmith has received research support and consulting and speaking fees from Astellas and Otsuka.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven R Goldsmith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalra, A., Maharaj, V. & Goldsmith, S.R. Vasopressin Receptor Antagonists: From Pivotal Trials to Current Practice. Curr Heart Fail Rep 11, 10–18 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-013-0175-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-013-0175-3

Keywords

Navigation