Abstract
The objective of this research was to develop a shorter version of the Attitudes Towards Police Legitimacy Scale (APLS) using Rasch analysis. Two studies are conducted here to reduce the 34-item APLS to the 11-item APLS Short Form (APLS-SF). It was hypothesized that the APLS-SF would also predict right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance, support for police in a hypothetical donation task, and justification of an officer involved shooting. In study 1 (N = 300) and study 2 (N = 600), participants were sampled from Prolific Academic. The APLS-SF fit the Rasch model and predicted each variable as hypothesized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available on: https://osf.io/jf2qn/.
References
Altemeyer B (2004) The other “authoritarian personality.” In: Jost JT, Sidanius J (eds) Political psychology: key readings. Psychology Press, pp 85–107
Andrich D (1978) A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 43(4):561–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293814
Anselmi P, Colledani D, Robusto E (2019) A comparison of classical and modern measures of internal consistency. Front Psych 10:2714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02714
April K, Cole LM, Goldstein NES (2022) Let’s “talk” about the police: the role of race and police legitimacy attitudes in the legal socialization of youth. Curr Psych: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02709-8
Bailes LP, Nandakumar R (2020) Get the most from your survey: an application of Rasch analysis for education leaders. Int J Leadersh 16(2). https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2020v16n2a857
Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107(2):238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Bond TG, Yan Z, Heene M (2021) Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (4th ed.). Routledge
Boone WJ, Staver JR, Yale MS (2014) Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer
Bottoms A, Tankebe J (2012) Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. J Crim Law Criminol 102:119–170. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23145787
Cao L, Frank J, Cullen FT (1996) Race, community context, and confidence in the police. Am J Police 15(1):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/07358549610116536
Cao L, Graham A (2019) The measurement of legitimacy: a rush to judgment? Asian J Crimino 14:291–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-019-09297-w
Cao L, Wu Y (2019) Confidence in the police by race: taking stock and charting new directions. Police Pract Res 20(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2017.1396460
Chang H (2004) Inventing temperature. Oxford University
Culhane SE, Bohman JH, Schweitzer K (2016) Public perceptions of the justifiability of police shootings: the role of body cameras in a pre- and post- Ferguson experiment. Police Q 19(3):251–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611116651403
Ewanation L, Bennell C, Blaskovits B, Baldwin S (2019) Validating the police legitimacy scale with a Canadian sample. Can J Criminol Crim Justice 61(4):1–23. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2018-0036
Green DA, Evans AM (2021) Undue police violence toward African Americans: an analysis of professional counselors’ training and perceptions. J Couns Dev 99(4):363–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12389
Hart CO, Mueller CE, Royal KD, Jones MH (2013) Achievement goal validation among African American high school students: CFA and Rasch results. J Psychoeduc Assess 31(3):284–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912466726
Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jackson J, Bradford B (2019) Blurring the distinction between empirical and normative legitimacy? A methodological commentary on ‘Police legitimacy and citizen cooperation in China.’ Asian J Criminol 14(4):265–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-019-09289-w
Jackson J, Milani J, Bradford B (2018) Empirical legitimacy and normative compliance with the law. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1914-1
Kenny DA, Kaniskan B, McCoach DB (2015) The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociol Method Res 44(3):486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236
Kline T (2005) Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage
Korva N, Bennell C, Lalumière M, Karimullah M (2022) What do you see? Understanding perceptions of police use of force videos as a function of the camera perspective. Behav Sci Law 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2578
Lai K, Green SB (2016) The problem with having two watches: assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivar Behav Res 51(2/3):220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306
Linacre JM (1997) KR-20 or Rasch reliability: which tells the “truth”? Rasch Measurement Transactions 11(3):580–581
Linacre JM (2022a) Winsteps. Rasch measurement computer program (Version 5.2.3). Portland, Oregon: Winsteps.com
Linacre JM (2022b) Winsteps. Rasch measurement computer program (Version 5.2.4). Portland, Oregon: Winsteps.com
Linacre JM (2022c) Winsteps. Rasch measurement computer program User's Guide. Version 5.2.3. Portland, Oregon: Winsteps.com
Linacre M, Wright B (1993) Constructing linear measures from counts of qualitative observations. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Bibliometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics, Berlin, Germany
Luce RD, Krantz DH, Suppes P, Tversky A (1990) Foundations of measurement, Vol 3: representation, axiomatization, and invariance. Academic Press
Luce RD, Tukey JW (1964) Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type fundamental measurement. J Math Psychol 1(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-X
Marcus B, Bosnjak M, Lindner S, Pilischenko S, Schütz A (2007) Compensating for low topic interest and long surveys: a field experiment on nonresponse in web surveys. Soc Sci Comput Rev 25(3):372–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307297606
Michell J (1990) An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Routledge
Michell J (2014) The Rasch paradox, conjoint measurement, and psychometrics: response to Humphry and Sijtsma. Theory Psychol 24(1):111–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354313517524
Papachristos AV, Meares TL, Fagan J (2012) Why do criminals obey the law? The influence of legitimacy and social networks on active gun offenders. J Crim Law Criminol 102(2):397–440. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5667&context=fss_papers
Paternoster R, Brame R, Bachman R, Sherman LW (1997) Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law Soc Rev 31(1), 163–204. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3054098
Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the Turk: alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J Exp Soc Psychol 70:153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
Pomerantz AL, Bell K, Green K, Foster S, Carvallo M, Schow P (2021) “Badge of honor”: honor ideology, police legitimacy, and perceptions of police violence. J Police Crim 36(3):473–489 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09433-2
Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth LM, Malle BF (1994) Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol 67(4):741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
Provenza K (2021) Gatekeepers of accountability: Grand juror decision making in police use of force cases at the intersection of race and mental illness [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wyoming]. Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses Global
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Reisig MD, Bratton J, Gertz MG (2007) The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Crim Justice Behav 34(8):1005–1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807301275
Reynolds JJ, Estrada-Reynolds V, Nunez N (2018) Development and validation of the Attitudes Towards Police Legitimacy Scale. Law Hum Behav 42(2):119–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000281
Rosseel Y (2012) Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Sherry D (2011) Thermoscopes, thermometers, and the foundations of measurement. Stud Hist Philos Sci A 42(4):509–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.07.001
Shi D, Lee T, Maydeu-Olivares A (2019) Understanding the model size effect on SEM fit indices. Educ Psychol Measur 79(2):310–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418783530
Sturges HA, Flick C, Provenza K, Nunez N (2022) Civil juror compensation and judgments of police use of force at the intersection of race and mental illness. Behav Sci Law 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2561
Sun IY, Li L, Wu Y, Hu R (2018) Police legitimacy and citizen cooperation in China: Testing an alternative model. Asian J Crim 13:275–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-018-9270-4
Sun IY, Wu Y, Hu R, Farmer AK (2017) Procedural justice, legitimacy, and public cooperation with police: does Western wisdom hold in China? J Res Crime Delinq 54(4):454–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242781663870
Tankebe J (2013) Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology 51(1):103–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x
Tankebe J, Reisig MD, Wang X (2016) A multidimensional model of police legitimacy: a cross-cultural assessment. Law Hum Behav 40(1):11–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000153
Trinkner R (2019) Clarifying the contours of the police legitimacy measurement debate: a response to Cao and Graham. Asian J Crim 14(4):309–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-019-09300-4
Tyler TR (1990) Why people obey the law. Yale University Press
Tyler TR (2006) Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annu Rev Psychol 57:375–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
Tyler TR (2009) Legitimacy and criminal justice: the benefits of self-regulation. Ohio State J Crim Law 7:307–359
Tyler TR, Fagan J (2008) Legitimacy and cooperation: why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State J Crim Law 6:231–275. Retrieved from https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/1811/73064/OSJCL_V6N1_231.pdf
Tyler TR, Jackson J (2014) Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychol Public Policy Law 20(1):78–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034514
West C, Baker A, Ehrich JF, Woodcock S, Bokosmaty S, Howard SJ et al (2018) Teacher disposition scale (TDS): construction and psychometric validation. J Furth High Educ 44(2):185–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1527022
Wright BD, Masters GN (1982) Rating scale analysis. MESA press
Yan Z (2020) Developing a short form of the self-assessment practices scale: psychometric evidence. Front Edu 4:153. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00153
Zakrisson I (2005) Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality Individ Differ 39(5):863–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.026
Funding
This work was supported by internal funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Reynolds, J.J. Development of the Attitudes Towards Police Legitimacy Scale Short Form: A Rasch Analysis. J Police Crim Psych 38, 702–715 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-023-09597-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-023-09597-z