Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Guns, Gloves, and Tasers: Perceptions of Police Officers and Their Use of Weapon as a Function of Race and Gender

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present studies was to examine how officer characteristics influenced mock jurors’ judgments in a police use of force case. In study 1 (N = 356), we examined officer race, suspect race, and weapon type (gun vs. taser vs. assault gloves), and in study 2 (N = 352) we examined officer gender, weapon type, and whether the officer was on or off duty. In both studies, participants read a case summary concerning police use of force where the suspect/victim died from his injuries. In study 1, mock jurors were more likely to vote guilty when the officer was White as well as when a gun was used. The officer was perceived most favorably when he was Black and a taser or assault gloves were used compared to a gun. Mock jurors’ attitudes toward the police also were examined and were found to be related to mock jurors’ guilt ratings and perceptions of the officer. In study 2, mock jurors were more likely to vote guilty for the defendant when the officer was male, off duty, and the weapon used was a gun. Mock jurors also viewed the police officer more negatively when he was off duty as well as when a gun was used. Overall, this study is the first to our knowledge to systematically vary both officer characteristics and suspect/victim characteristics and the results suggest that both have the capacity to influence how use of force cases are perceived by potential jurors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The breakdown of ethnocultural identity is similar to that of the Canadian population. For example, in 2016 22.3% of the Canadian population identified as a visible minority (Statistics Canada, 2016). Individuals who identify as South Asian was the largest visible minority group representing 5.6% of the Canadian population. This was followed by Chinese (4.6% of the population), Black (3.5%), Filipino (2.3%), Arab (1.5%), and Latin American (1.3%) (Statistics Canada, 2016). Indigenous peoples accounted for 4.9% of the Canadian population in 2016 (Statistics Canada, 2017). Approximately 77.7% of the population did not identify as a visible minority in 2016.

  2. The reliability of the scale increased with the removal of one question, “The officer is the only one responsible for the victim’s death”; as such, this question was removed from the composite scale and analyzed on its own (α = 0.76).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Pica.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pica, E., Sheahan, C.L., Pozzulo, J. et al. Guns, Gloves, and Tasers: Perceptions of Police Officers and Their Use of Weapon as a Function of Race and Gender. J Police Crim Psych 35, 348–359 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09365-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09365-3

Keywords

Navigation