Police Expertise and Use of Force: Using a Mixed-Methods Approach to Model Expert and Novice Use-of-Force Decision-Making

Abstract

Improving police use-of-force training is methodologically difficult. By providing a method for identifying the “expert” response to any given scenario, and by triangulating multiple methods, we aim to contribute towards police departments’ capacities to engage in more effective and targeted training. Forty-two police experts and 36 novices watched five scenarios taken from body-worn camera footage. The videos would pause at several points, and respondents gave both close-ended survey answers and open-ended written answers. Using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative regression and natural-language-processing techniques, we triangulated our findings to reach conclusions regarding the differences between experts and novices. Relative to novices, expert police officers were more likely to report the importance of force mitigation opportunities to any given scenario in close-ended questions, and were more likely to use words associated with verbal de-escalation; novices were more likely to use words associated with physical control. The materials can be accessed at https://osf.io/wujkz/.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Alpert GP & Rojek J (2011) Frontline police officer assessments of risks and decision making during encounters with offenders (briefing paper no. 5). Nathan, Australia: ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security

  2. Alpert GP, Smith WC (1994) How reasonable is the reasonable man: police and excessive force. J Crim Law Criminol 85:481–501. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arellano M (1987) Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 49:431–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1987.mp49004006.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basit T (2003) Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educ Res 45:143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188032000133548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bittner E (1990) Aspects of police work. Northeastern University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bolger PC (2015) Just following orders: a meta-analysis of the correlates of American police officer use of force decisions. Am J Crim Justice 40:466–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9278-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boulton L, Cole J (2016) Adaptive flexibility: examining the role of expertise in the decision making of authorized firearms officers during armed confrontation. J Cogn Eng Decis Making 10:291–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343416646684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Graham V. Connor (1989) 490 U.S. 386

  9. Crandall BW, Klein GA, Hoffman RR (2006) Working minds: a practitioner’s guide to cognitive task analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engel R, McManus H, & Herold T (2019). The deafening demand for de-escalation training: a systematic review and call for evidence in police use of force reform. Unpublished manuscript. https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/IACP_UC_De-escalation%20Systematic%20Review.pdf. Accessed December 4 2019

  11. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 100:363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans JS (2008) Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59:255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Geller WA, Toch H (eds) (1995) And justice for all: understanding and controlling police abuse of force. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greco S, Masciari E, Pontieri L (2001) Combining inductive and deductive tools in data analysis. AI Commun 14:69–82

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harris KR, Eccles DW, Freeman C, Ward P (2017) ‘Gun! Gun! Gun!’: An exploration of law enforcement officers’ decision-making and coping under stress during actual events. Ergonomics 60:1112–1122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1260165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hine, K. A., Porter, L. E., Westera, N. J., Alpert, G. P., & Allen, A. (2018). What were they thinking? Factors influencing police recruits’ decisions about force Polic Soc Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2018.1432612

  17. Hoffman RR (1987) The problem of extracting the knowledge of experts from the perspective of experimental psychology. AI Mag 8(2):53–67. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v8i2.583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffman RR (1989) A survey of methods for eliciting the knowledge of experts. ACM SIGART Bull 108:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/63266.63269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffman RR, McNeese MD (2009) A history for macrocognition. J Cogn Eng Decis Making 3:97–110. https://doi.org/10.1518/155534309x441835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoffman RR, Militello L (2008) Perspectives on cognitive task analysis: historical origins and modern communities of practice. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson RR, Stone BT, Miranda CM, Vila B, Lois J, James SM et al (2014) Identifying psychophysiological indices of expert versus novice performance in deadly force judgment and decision making. Front Hum Neurosci 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00512

  22. Kaptein R, Hiemstra D, Kamps J (2010) How different are language models and word clouds? In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Retrieval, vol 32, pp 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_48

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klein GA (2017) Sources of power: How people make decisions, 20th edn. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  24. Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.). (1993). Decision making in action: models and methods. Westport: Ablex Publishing

  25. Klein GA, Ross KG, Moon BM, Klein DE, Hoffman RR, Hollnagel E (2003) Macrocognition. IEEE Intell Syst 18(3):81–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2003.1200735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Klein GA, Phillips JK, Rall EL, Peluso DA (2007) A data-frame theory of sensemaking. In: Hoffman RR (ed) Expertise out of context: proceeding of the sixth international conference on naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, pp 113–155

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klein G, Klein HA, Lande B, Borders J, Whitacre JC (2015) Police and military as good strangers. J Occup Organ Psychol 88:231–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Klein G, Shneiderman B, Hoffman RR, Ford KM (2017) Why expertise matters: a response to the challenges. IEEE Intell Syst 32(6):67–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2017.4531230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Klham CF, Tillyer R (2015) Rethinking the measurement of officer experience and its role in traffic stop searches. Police Q 18(4):343–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611115585315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Klockars CB (1995) A theory of excessive force and its control. In: Geller WA, Toch H (eds) Police violence: understanding and controlling police abuse of force. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  31. Manning CD, Schütze H (1999) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mitchell JR, Roach DE, Tyberg JV, Belenkie I, Sheldon RS (2012) Mechanism of loss of consciousness during vascular neck restraint. J Appl Physiol 112:396–402. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00592.2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rolfe J (2005) Decision making of police forward commanders in high-risk situations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  34. Skolnick JH, Fyfe JJ (1993) Above the law: Police and the excessive use of force. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Suss J, Boulton L (2019) Expertise in law enforcement. In: Ward P, Schraagen JM, Gore J, Roth EM (eds) The Oxford handbook of expertise. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 765–791

    Google Scholar 

  36. Suss J, Ward P (2018) Revealing perceptual–cognitive expertise in law enforcement: an iterative approach using verbal-report, temporal-occlusion, and option-generation methods. Cogn Technol Work 20:585–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0493-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Suss J, Belling PK, & Ward P (2014) Use of cognitive task analysis to probe option-generation in law enforcement. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58, 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581058

  38. Taylor TZ, Elison-Bowers P, Werth E, Bell E, Carbajal J, Lamm KB, Velazquez E (2013) A police officer’s tacit knowledge inventory (POTKI): establishing construct validity and exploring applications. Police Pract Res 14:478–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2013.802847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Todak N, James L (2018) A systematic social observation study of police de-escalation tactics. Police Q 21(4):509–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611118784007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vickers JN, Lewinski W (2012) Performing under pressure: gaze control, decision making and shooting performance of elite and rookie police officers. Hum Mov Sci 31:101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2011.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ward P, Suss J, Eccles DW, Williams AM, Harris KR (2011) Skill-based differences in option generation in a complex task: a verbal protocol analysis. Cogn Process 12:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0397-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wolfe SE, Piquero AR (2011) Organizational justice and police misconduct. Crim Justice Behav 38:332–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810397739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Worden RE (1995) The “causes” of police brutality: theory and evidence on police use of force. In: Geller WA, Toch H (eds) And justice for all: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force. Police Executive. Research Forum, Washington, pp 31–60

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zimmerman LA (2006) Law enforcement decision making during critical incidents: a three-pronged approach to understanding and enhancing law enforcement decision processes (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/dissertations/AAI3214014/

  45. Zimmerman LA (2008) Making sense of human behavior: explaining how police officers assess danger during traffic stops. In: Schraagen JM, Militello L, Ormerod T, Lipshitz R (eds) Naturalistic decision making and macrocognition. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp 121–140

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Justice within the Office of Justice Programs (grant number BJA-2016-VI-BX-K005).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Mangels.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Not applicable

Ethical Approval

This research was classified as “exempt” under Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, §46.104, Exempt Research, Category 3(i). Research involved collection of information from adult subjects via written responses/data entry. Subject prospectively agreed to participate in data collection and the information obtained was recorded by investigators in such a manner that the identity of the human subjects cannot readily be ascertained, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects.

Informed Consent

All participants gave informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mangels, L., Suss, J. & Lande, B. Police Expertise and Use of Force: Using a Mixed-Methods Approach to Model Expert and Novice Use-of-Force Decision-Making. J Police Crim Psych 35, 294–303 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09364-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Police
  • Expertise, use of force
  • Body-worn cameras
  • Training
  • Mixed methods
  • Natural language processing