Advertisement

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 48–58 | Cite as

Are Active Shootings Temporally Contagious? An Empirical Assessment

  • Jason KissnerEmail author
Article

Abstract

“Active Shootings,” which include shootings in public, confined areas such as schools, often traumatize communities and attract intense media coverage. Proposed policy responses to the phenomenon, such as concealing information as to casualty counts and even the identities of shooters, often suppose that active shootings are “contagious,” in that previous occurrences can enhance the likelihood of subsequent occurrences. This study marks the first attempt at assessment of the contagiousness of the active shooting phenomenon, and deploys a statistical model—the series hazard model—that is well-suited to the substantive issue of contagion as well as the fine-grained nature of the active shooting data. Results indicate that the hazard of observed active shootings was a function of the number of active shootings that preceded them in the previous two weeks.

Keywords

Active Shootings Active Shooters Contagion Series Hazard Model 

References

  1. Baron JN, Reiss PC (1985) Same time, next year: Aggregate analyses of the mass media and violent behavior. Am Soc Rev 50:347–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkowitz L, Macaulay J (1971) The contagion of criminal violence. Sociometry 34:238–260Google Scholar
  3. Black, J. (1991). The Aesthetics of Murder. A study in romantic literature and contemporary culture. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cantor CH, Sheehan P, Alpers P, Mullen P (1999) Media and Mass Homicides. Arch Sui Res 5:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carcas C, Mouzos J, Grabosky P (2002) The mass murder as quasi-experiment. Hom Stud 6:109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman JS (1964) Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, A. and Smith E.L. (2011). Homicide trends in the United States 1980-2008: Annual Rates for 2009 and 2010. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics Google Scholar
  8. Dietz PE (1986) Mass, Serial, and Sensational Homicides. Bul New York Acad Med 62:477–491Google Scholar
  9. Dugan L (2011) The series hazard model: An alternative to time series for event data. J Quant Crim 27:379–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dugan L (2010) Estimating effects over time for single and multiple units. In: Piquero AR, Weisburd D (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Criminology. Springer Science, New York, pp 741–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dugan L, LaFree G, Piquero AR (2005) Testing a rational choice model of airline hijackings. Criminology 43:1031–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox JA (2009) Mass murder goes to college: An examination of changes on college campuses following Virginia Tech. Am Beh Sci 52:1465–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox JA (2004) Missing data problems in the SHR: Imputing offender and relationship characteristics. Hom Stud 8:214–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox J, DeLateur MJ (2014) Mass shootings in America: Moving beyond Newtown. Hom Stud 18:125–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton LC, Hamilton JD (1983) Dynamics of terrorism. Int Stud Quar 27:39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helfgott, J.B. (2008). Criminal Behavior: Theories, Typologies, and Criminal Justice. Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Holden RT (1986) The contagiousness of aircraft hijacking. Am J Soc 91:874–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holden RT (1987) Time series analysis of a contagious process. J Am Stat Assoc 82:1019–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huff-Corzine, L., McCutcheon, J.C., Corzine, Jarvis, J.P., Tetzlaff-Berniller, M.J., Weller, M. and London, M. (2014). Shooting for accuracy: Comparing data sources on mass murder. Hom. Stud. 18: 105--124.Google Scholar
  20. Kelly, R.W. (2012). Active Shooter: Recommendations and analysis for risk mitigation. New York City Police Department.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly PJ, Lim LY (2000) Survival analysis for recurrent event data: An application to childhood infectious diseases. Stat Med 19:13–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. LaFree G, Dugan L, Korte R (2009) The impact of British counterterrorist strategies on political violence in Northern Ireland: Comparing deterrence and backlash models. Criminology 47:17–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levin J, Madfis E (2009) Mass murder at school and cumulative strain. Am Beh Sci 52:1227–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meloy JR, Hempel AG, Gray BT, Mohandie K, Shiva A, Richards TC (2004) A comparative analysis of North American adolescent and adult mass murderers. Beh Sci and the Law 22:291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Phillips D (1983) The impact of media violence on U.S. homicides. Am Soc Rev 48:560–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Riedel M, Regoeczi WC (2004) Missing data in homicide research. Hom Stud 8:163–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Savage J (2004)  Does viewing violent media really cause criminal violence?  A methodological review. Aggress Violent Behav 10:99–128Google Scholar
  28. Schmidtke A, Schaller S, Miller L (2002) Imation[sic] of amok and amok-suicide. Kritz Dergisi 10:49–60Google Scholar
  29. Schulman, A. N. (2013, November 8). What mass killers want—and how to stop them. 2013. Wall Street Journal The Saturday Essay. Retrieved from http://wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303309504579181702252120052
  30. Stack S (1989) The effect of publicized mass murders and murder-suicides on lethal violence, 1968-1980. Soc Psy Psych Epidem 24:202–208Google Scholar
  31. Surette R (2013) Cause or catalyst: The interaction of real world and media crime models. Am J Crim Justice 38:392–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Surette R (2002) Self-reported copycat crime among a population of serious and violent juvenile offenders. Crime and Del 48:46–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swanson SA, Colman I (2013) Association between exposure to suicide and suicidality outcomes in youth. Can Med Assoc J 185:870–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. United States Department of Homeland Security. (2008). Active shooter: How to respond. http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/active_shooter_booklet.pdf

Copyright information

© Society for Police and criminal Psychology 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CriminologyCalifornia State University, FresnoFresnoUSA

Personalised recommendations