Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Art as a Means to Disrupt Routine Use of Space

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the publicly visible aspects of counter-terrorism activity in pedestrian spaces as mechanisms of disruption. We discuss the objectives of counter-terrorism in terms of disruption of routine for both hostile actors and general users of public spaces, categorising the desired effects as 1) triangulation of attention; 2) creation of unexpected performance; and 3) choreographing of crowd flow. We review the potential effects of these existing forms of disruption used in counter-terrorism. We then present a palette of art, advertising, architecture, and entertainment projects that offer examples of the same disruption effects of triangulation, performance and flow. We conclude by reviewing the existing support for public art in counter-terrorism policy, and build on the argument for art as an important alternative to authority. We suggest that while advocates of authority-based disruption might regard the playfulness of some art as a weakness, the unexpectedness it offers is perhaps a key strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adey P (2004) Surveillance at the airport: surveilling mobility/mobilising surveillance. Environment and Planning A 36(8):1365–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adey P (2008) Airports, mobility and the calculative architecture of affective control. Geoforum 39(1):438–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adriaansens A, Brouwer J (2002) Alien relationships with public space. In: Arjen M, Brouwer J (eds) Transurbanism. Netherlands Architecture Institute [NAi], Rotterdam, pp 139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradau C, Van Munster R (2007) Governing terrorism through risk: Taking precautions, (un)knowing the future. European Journal of International Relations 13(1):89–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson JEG, Hui MKM (1987) A model for crowding in the service experience: empirical findings. In: The services challenge: Integrating for Competitive Advantage. American Marketing Association, Chicago, pp 85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton-Short L (2007) Bollards, bunkers, and barriers: Securing the national mall in Washington, DC. Environment and Planning D 25(3):424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha HK (1998). Anish Kapoor: Making Emptiness. In Bhaba, H.K. and Tazzi, P.L. (eds) Anish Kapoor. Hayward Gallery, London, pp 11–41.

  • Braithwaite, A. (2013). The logic of public fear in terrorism and counterterrorism. Journal of Police & Criminal Psychology, in press.

  • Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1993) Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13(1):3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown BB, Perkins DD, Brown G (2004) Incivilities, place attachment and crime: Block and individual effects. Journal of environmental psychology 24(3):359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullivant, L. (2005). Jason Bruges: Light and Space Explorer. Architectural Design 75(1):79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chebat, J. C., Gélinas-Chebat, C., Vaninski, A., and Filiatrault, P. (1995). The impact of mood on time perception, memorization, and acceptance of waiting. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs 121(4):411–424

  • Clarke, R. V. (1997). Introduction. In Clarke, R.V. (ed) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies 2nd Edition. Harrow and Heston, New York, pp 1–47.

  • City of London Police (2013) Project Griffin Mission. Retrieved from http://www.projectgriffin.org.uk/index.php/mission Accessed 10 Jun 2013.

  • Coaffee J (2010) Protecting vulnerable cities: the UK’s resilience response to defending everyday urban infrastructure. International Affairs 86(4):939–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee J, Moore C, Fletcher D, Bosher L (2008) Resilient design for community safety and terror-resistant cities. Municipal Engineer 161(2):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee J, O’Hare P, Hawkesworth M (2009) The visibility of (in) security: the aesthetics of planning urban defences against terrorism. Security Dialogue 40(4–5):489–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish D (1994) The procedural analysis of offending and its relevance for situational prevention. Crime prevention studies 3:151–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Homeland Security. (2010). “If You See Something, Say Something” Campaign. Retrieved from http://www.dhs.gov/if-you-see-something-say-something-campaign. Accesses 10 Jun 2013.

  • DePaulo BM, Lindsay JJ, Malone BE, Muhlenbruck L, Charlton K, Cooper H (2003) Cues to deception. Psychological bulletin 129(1):74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diller, E., and Scofidio, R. (2000). Brasserie. Retrieved from http://www.dsrny.com/. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.

  • Donath, J. (2008). Technological interventions in everyday interaction. In Act/React catalog. Milwaukee Art Museum, Milwaukee, MN.

  • Edwards, R. (2010, January 15). Heathrow staff given body language training to spot suspected terrorists. Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/6990006/Heathrow-in-security-alert-as-two-men-arrested-on-flight.html. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.

  • Eliasson, O. (2003). The Weather Project. Retrieved from http://www.tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/eliasson/default.htm. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.

  • Eliasson O (2008) San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Exhibition. Leonardo Electronic Almanac 16(1):2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussey P (2007) Observing potentiality in the global city surveillance and counterterrorism in London. International Criminal Justice Review 17(3):171–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, pp. 233–240.

  • Goffman, E. (1966). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. Free Press, New York.

  • Granhag PA, Andersson LO, Strömwall LA, Hartwig M (2004) Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals’ beliefs about deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology 9(1):103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B (2004) Can streets be made safe? Urban Design International 9(1):31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B, Sahbaz O (2009) Crime and urban design: An evidence-based approach. In: Cooper R, Evans G, Boyko C (eds) Designing Sustainable Cities. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 163–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2012). Protecting Crowded Places: Design and Technical Issues. Home Office. Retrieved from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/counter-terrorism/crowded-places/design-tech-issues?view=Binary. (accessed 22/03/13).

  • Hui, M. K., and Bateson, J. E. G. (1991). Perceived control and the effects of crowding and consumer choice on the service experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2:)174–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York.

  • Jason Bruges Architects. (2010). Shortcut. Retrieved from http://www.jasonbruges.com/projects/uk-projects/shortcut. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.

  • Jerram, L. (2008). Play Me, I’m Yours. Retrieved from http://www.lukejerram.com/projects/play_me_im_yours. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.

  • Kapoor, A. (2010). Turning the world upside down. Retrieved from http://www.serpentinegallery.org/2010/03/anish_kapoor.html. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.

  • Levin, T. Y., Frohne, U., Weibel, P., and Karlsruhe, Z. für K. und M. (Eds). (2002). Ctrl [space]: rhetorics of surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. ZKM, Center for Art and Media, Karlsruhe, Germany, and MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Liu M, Granhag PA, Landstroem S, Hjelmsaeter ER, Strömwall L, Vrij A (2010) Can You Remember What Was in Your Pocket When You Were Stung by a Bee?’: Eliciting Cues to Deception by Asking the Unanticipated. Open Criminology Journal 3(1):31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukaitou-Sideris A, Liggett R, Iseki H, Thurlow W (2001) Measuring the effects of built environment on bus stop crime. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28:255–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano-Hemmer, R. (2001). Body Movies. Retrieved from http://www.lozano-hemmer.com/body_movies.php. (accessed 22/03/13).

  • Mehrabian, A., and Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Minton A (2009) Ground Control: Fear and Happiness in the Twenty-First Century City. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • National Counter-terrorism Security Office [NaCTSO]. (2011). Counter-terrorism Protective Security Advice for Stadia and Arenas. Retrieved from https://vsat.nactso.gov.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/AreasOfRisk/Stadia%20and%20Arenas%202011.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.

  • Németh J (2010) Security in public space: an empirical assessment of three US cities. Environment and Planning A 42:2487–2507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman O (1972) Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, C. (2009). Hand from Above. Retrieved from http://www.chrisoshea.org/hand-from-above. (accessed 22/03/13).

  • Piano stairs (2009). DDB Stockholm. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lXh2n0aPyw. (accessed 22/03/13).

  • Puwar, N. (2004). Space invaders: Race, gender and bodies out of place. Berg Publishers, London.

  • Rozin, Daniel. (1999). Wooden Mirror. Retrieved from http://www.smoothware.com/danny/woodenmirror.html. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.

  • Russell, J. S., Bershad, D., Felicella, E., Kelly, M., and Kennedy, E. (2002). Designing for Security: Using Art and Design to Improve Security. Design Trust for Public Space Art Commission of the City of New York. Retrieved from http://www.designtrust.org/publications/publication_97security.html. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.

  • Sester, M. (2003). ACCESS. Retrieved from http://www.accessproject.net/index.html. Accessed 10 Jun 2013.

  • Shaw, P. (1992). Percent for Art: a review. Newcastle: Artic Press/Arts Council of Great Britain, London.

  • Snibbe, S. S., and Raffle, H. S. (2009). Social immersive media: pursuing best practices for multi-user interactive camera/projector exhibits. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM 2009 pp. 1447–1456.

  • Stratfor. (2010). How to Look for Trouble: A Stratfor Guide to Protective Intelligence. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

  • Trafalgar Square green with turf. (2007, May 24). BBC. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6687089.stm. Accessed 22 Mar 20113.

  • Triggs T, McAndrew C (2009) Transforming policy practice in transport: Is there a space for communication design? In: Inclusive Design into Innovation: Transforming Practice in Design, Research and Business. Royal College of Art, London, Presented at the Include 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannini P (2011) Performing elusive mobilities: ritualisation, play, and the drama of scheduled departures. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29:353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij A, Leal S, Granhag PA, Mann S, Fisher RP, Hillman J, Sperry K (2009) Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior 33(2):159–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Project for Public Spaces, New York.

  • Whyte, W. H. (1988). City: Rediscovering the Center. Doubleday, New York.

  • Woolard, C. (2006). Subway Swing. Retrieved from http://carolinewoolard.blogspot.com/2006/10/swing-on-subway.html. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.

  • Worthington, P. (2005). Shadow Monsters. Retrieved from http://www.worthersoriginal.com/viki/. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is conducted as part of the ‘Shades of Grey – Towards a Science of Interventions for Eliciting and Detecting Notable Behaviors’ project (EPSRC reference: EP/H02302X/1). We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for providing thought-provoking and invaluable feedback on earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, K., Dalton, B. & Nikolopoulou, M. Art as a Means to Disrupt Routine Use of Space. J Police Crim Psych 28, 139–149 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-013-9130-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-013-9130-1

Keywords

Navigation