Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 36–43 | Cite as

Children’s Use of a ‘Time Line’ to Indicate When Events Occurred

Article

Abstract

Children who allege abuse are often asked to provide temporal information such as when the events occurred. Yet, young children often have difficulty recalling temporal information due to their limited knowledge of temporal patterns and linguistic capabilities. As time is an abstract concept (we cannot see it), some investigators have begun to use ‘time-lines’ or pictorial representations of time to aid children. Yet, there is no published research testing whether children are able to use time-lines and whether they can provide adequate temporal information using them. We tested whether children could indicate the time-of-day of events using a pictorial time-line and then compared their responses to their parents’. Seven- to 8-year-olds were most consistent with parental estimates while 4-year-olds were least consistent. Responses from the 5- to 6-year-olds depended on the temporal task. Guessing and using general knowledge to estimate the time-of-day were ruled out, and so children were genuinely drawing on episodic memory when making time-line judgments. Thus, there was a developmental progression in children’s use of physical representations to communicate abstract information. These results are promising for the use of the time-line in forensic settings but much more research is needed.

Keywords

Child witnesses Investigative interviewing Forensic investigations Child abuse Temporal recall 

References

  1. Ames LB (1946) The development of the sense of time in the young child. J Genet Psychol 68:97–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer PJ, Burch MM, Scholin SE, Güler OE (2007) Using cue words to investigate the distribution of autobiographical memories in childhood. Psychol Sci 18:910–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer PJ, Mandler JM (1992) Putting the horse before the cart: the use of temporal order in recall of events by one-year-old children. Dev Psychol 28:441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blades M, Cooke Z (1994) Young children’s ability to understand a model as a spatial representation. J Genet Psychol 155:201–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casasanto D, Fotakopoulou O, Boroditsky L (2010) Space and time in the child’s mind: evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal 34:387–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark HH (1973) Space, time, semantics, and the child. In: Moore TE (ed) Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. Academic, Oxford England, p 308Google Scholar
  7. DeLoache JS, Pierroutsakos SL, Uttal DH (2003) The origins of pictorial competence. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 12:114–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fivush R (1984) Children’s long-term memory for a novel event: an exploratory experiment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 30:303–316Google Scholar
  9. Friedman WJ (1987) A follow-up to “Scale effects in memory for the time of events”: the earthquake study. Mem Cognit 15:518–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman WJ (1991) The development of children’s memory for the time of past events. Child Development 62:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman WJ (1992) Children’s time memory: the differentiated past. Cogn Dev 7:171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman WJ (1993) Memory for the time of past events. Psychol Bull 113:44–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedman WJ (2000) The development of children’s knowledge of the times of future events. Child Development 71:913–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman WJ (2003) The development of a differentiated sense of the past and the future. In: Roberts KV (ed) Advances in child development and behavior, vol 31. Academic, San Diego, California, pp 229–269Google Scholar
  15. Friedman WJ, Kemp S (1998) The effects of elapsed time and retrieval on young children’s judgments of the temporal distances of past events. Cogn Dev 13:335–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman WJ, Lyon TD (2005) Development of temporal-reconstructive abilities. Child Development 76:1202–1216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedman WJ, Wilkins AJ (1985) Scale effects in memory for the time of events. Mem Cognit 13:168–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guadagno BL, Powell MB (2009) A qualitative examination of police officers’ questioning of children about repeated events. Police Practice & Research: An International Journal 10:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harner L (1975) Yesterday and tomorrow: development of early understanding of the terms. Dev Psychol 11:864–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lamb ME, Sternberg KJ, Orbach Y, Esplin PW, Stewart H, Mitchell S (2003) Age differences in young children’s responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews. J Consult Clin Psychol 71:926–934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lamb ME, Orbach Y, Hershkowitz I, Esplin PW, Horowitz D (2007) A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: a review of research using the NICHD investigative interview protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect 31:1201–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ling J, Blades M (2000) The effect of a nonverbal aid on preschoolers’ recall for color. J Genet Psychol 16:314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mäntylä T, Carelli MG, Forman H (2007) Time monitoring and executive functioning in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 96:1–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCormack T, Russell J (1997) The development of recency and frequency memory: is there a developmental shift from reliance on trace-strength to episodic recall? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 66:376–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newcombe NS, Lloyd MF, Ratliff KR (2007) Development of episodic and autobiographical memory: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. In: Kail Robert V (ed) Advances in child development and behavior, vol 35. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US, pp 37–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Orbach Y, Lamb ME (2007) Young children’s references to temporal attributes of allegedly experienced events in the course of forensic interviews. Child Development 78:1100–1120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poole DA, Bruck M, Pipe M-E (2011) Forensic interviewing aids: do props help children answer questions about touching? Curr Dir Psychol Sci 20:11–15PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Poole DA, Lamb ME (1998) Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Powell MB, Roberts KP, Guadagno B (2007) Particularisation of child abuse offences: common problems when interviewing child witnesses. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 19:64–74Google Scholar
  30. Roberts KP, Brubacher SP, Price HL, Powell MB (2011) Practice narratives. In: Lamb ME, La Rooy D, Katz C, Malloy L (eds) Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice. Wiley-Blackwell, UK, pp 129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Silverman JL (1997) The development in children of future time perspectives. Dissertation abstracts international: section B. Sci Eng 57(7B):4752Google Scholar
  32. Strange D, Hayne H, Garry M (2008) A photo, a suggestion, a false memory. Appl Cogn Psychol 22:587–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tamis-LeMonda CS, Shannon JD, Cabrera NJ, Lamb ME (2004) Fathers and mothers at play with their 2- and 3-year-olds: contributions to language and cognitive development. Child Development 75:1806–1820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tversky B, Kugelmass S, Winter A (1991) Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cogn Psychol 23:515–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. US vs. Tsinhnahijinnie (1997) 112 F.3d 988 US, Court of Appeals, 9th CircuitGoogle Scholar
  36. Wade KA, Garry M, Read JD, Lindsay DS (2002) A picture is worth a thousand lies: using false photographs to create false childhood memories. Psychon Bull Rev 9:597–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Wilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations