Abstract
It is well documented that candidates in employment situations attempt to present overly positive pictures of themselves that may be inaccurate. Police officer candidacy situations are not an exception. They are more critical to the public welfare, however, because of the sensitive nature of police officers as an interface between government and the community. For this reason, the study of impression management using devices that are employed in police selection is of great importance. This study used 36 college students to whom the MMPI-2 was administered, first under standard conditions (control condition) in which the students responded as they ordinarily would and second, under a set of special instructions (experimental condition) which instructed them to respond as if they were police officer candidates. The two profiles were compared. As hypothesized, the Lie (L) and Correction (K) scales were elevated in the experimental condition. An inspection of the clinical scales revealed that all tended to be lower in the experimental condition than in the control condition, with the exception of Masculinity-Femininity (Mf), Psychopathic Deviate (Pd), Paranoia (Pa), and Hypomania (Ma). Implications of these findings for officer candidate selection are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aamodt MG (2004a) Research in law enforcement selection. Brown Walker Publishing, Boca Raton, FL
Aamodt MG (2004b) Special issue on using the MMPI-2 special scale configurations in law enforcement selection: Introduction and meta-analysis. Applied HRM Research 9:41–52
Austin JS (1992) The detection of fake good and fake bad on the MMPI-2. Educ Psychol Meas 52:669–674
Bagby RM, Rogers R, Buis T (1994) Detecting malingered and defensive responding on the MMPI-2 in a forensic inpatient sample. J Pers Assess 62:191–203
Bagby RM, Nicholson RA, Bacchiochi JR, Ryder AG, Bury AS (2002) The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 and PAI validity scales and indexes to detect coached and uncoached feigning. J Pers Assess 78:69–86
Blanchard DD, McGrath RE, Pogge DL, Khadivi A (2003) A comparison of the PAI and MMPI-2 as predictors of faking bad in college students. J Pers Assess 80:197–205
Boes JO, Chandler CJ, Timm HW (1997) Police integrity: Use of personality measures to identify corruption-prone officers. Defense Personnel Security Research Center, Monterrey, CA
Butcher JN, Graham JR, Ben-Porath YS, Tellegen A, Kaemmer WG, Dahlstrom B (2001) MMPI-2 (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation revised edition. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Detrick P, Chibnall JT, Rosso M (2001) Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in police officer selection: Normative data and relation to the Inwald Personality Inventory. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 32:484–490
Graham J (2006) MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Graham JR, Watts D, Timbrook RE (1991) Detecting the fake-good and fake-bad MMPI-2 profiles. J Pers Assess 57:264–267
Hargrave GE, Hiatt D (1987) Law enforcement selection with the interview, MMPI and CPI: A study of reliability. J Police Sci Adm 15:110–117
Hargrave GE, Hiatt D, Gaffney TW (1988) F+4+9+Cn: An MMPI measure of aggression in law enforcement officers and applicants. J Police Sci Adm 16:268–273
Herndon J (1998) Correlates of MMPI-2 L scale: Elevations in an LEO selection test battery. Paper presented at the 27th annual meeting of the Society of Police and Criminal Psychology, Portland, OR
Lim J, Butcher JN (1996) Detection of faking on the MMPI-2: Differentiation among faking-bad, denial, and claiming extreme virtue. J Pers Assess 67:1–25
Moore D (1999) Gender traits and identities in a “masculine“ organization: The Israeli police force. J Soc Psychol 139(1):49–68
Parker SK, Griffin MA (2002) What is so bad about a little name calling? Negative consequences of gender harassment for overperformance demands and distress. J Occup Health Psychol 7(30):195–210
Remmington PW (1983) Women in the police: Integration or separation? Qual Sociol 6(2):118–135
Sellbom M, Fischler GL, Ben-Porath YS (2007) Identifying MMPI-2 predictors of police officer integrity and misconduct. Crim Justice Behav 34:985–1004
Shusman EJ, Inwald RE, Knatz HF (1987) A cross validation study of police recruit performance as predicted by the IPI and MMPI. J Police Sci Adm 15:162–169
Singer MS, Singer AE (2001) Sex differences in the perception of male and female police officers in New Zealand. J Psychol 119(1):53–57
Weiss WU, Buehler K, Yates D (1995) The Psychopathic Deviate scale of the MMPI in police selection. J Police Crim Psychol 10:57–60
Weiss WU, Serafino G, Serafino A, Willson W, Knoll S (1998) Use of the MMPI-2 to predict the employment continuation and performance ratings of recently hired police officers. J Police Crim Psychol 13:40–44
Weiss WU, Davis R, Rostow C, Kinsman S (2003) The MMPI-2 L Scale as a tool in police selection. J Police Crim Psychol 18(1):57–60
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiss, W.U., Weiss, P.A., Cain, S. et al. Impression Management in Police Officer Candidacy on the MMPI-2. J Police Crim Psych 24, 120–125 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-009-9044-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-009-9044-0